In hallux valgus (HV), toe pronation is frequently seen, although there may be some with no pronation. Aims. to evaluate big toe pronation in patients with HV with a clinical and radiographic method. Material and methods. prospective study of 40 patients with HV on the waiting list for surgical treatment. Patients were standing barefoot on a rigid platform. Digital photographs were taken in a frontal plane to obtain the nail-floor angle formed by the secant line of toenail border and a line formed by the platform edge. All patients were evaluated using the AOFAS for HV and lesser toes, if they were affected. Personal and social data were obtained from clinical interviews. Charge radiographs were used to obtain HV, intermetatarsal and PASA angles, first metatarsal rotation as well as sesamoid bones displacement. Exclusion criteria: rheumatoid arthritis and previous intervention on foot or toes. Statistical analysis were performed with a multiple lineal regression. Results. the mean age was 57 years old, they were 31 female and 9 men, with an average AOFAS score of 49, they had a mean of 37° HV angle, 27° nail-floor angle, 20° first metatarsal rotation in about half of patients. We have found a statistical significant relation between HV and nail-floor angles (p<0,001), between sesamoid bones displacement and nail-floor angles (p<0,007), between first metatarsal rotation and HV angle (p<0,001. We found no statistically significant but strong relation between first metatarsal rotation and sesamoid bones displacement. Conclusion. nail-floor angle is strongly related to degree of HV, displacement of sesamoid bones and rotation of the first metatarsal

Non-operative management of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly low demand patients is reported to result in a satisfactory outcome despite routinely producing a nonunion. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is evidence of dynamic movement of the fracture fragment during the elbow arc of movement. Five consecutive patients (≥70 years of age) with a displaced olecranon fracture (Mayo 2A) that were managed with non-operative intervention were recruited. All underwent ultrasound evaluation at six weeks and follow-up questionnaires at six months including the DASH and Oxford Elbow Score (OES). There were three women and two men with a mean age of 79yrs (range 70–88). All injuries were sustained following a fall from standing height. The mean fracture gap in extension was 22.5mm (95% CI 13.0–31.9), midflexion 21.8mm (11.6–32.0) and in deep flexion 21.8mm (10.9–32.8). Although the amount of fracture displacement varied between patients, it remained static in each patient with no significant differences observed throughout the arc of motion (ANOVA p=0.99). The six-month median DASH score was 7.5 (IQR range, 4.2–39.3) and the OES was 44.0 (29.0–47.5). Four out of the five patients were satisfied with their function. Ultrasound evaluation of displaced olecranon fractures following non-operative management suggests the proximal fragment may function as a sesamoid type bone within the triceps sleeve. This could explain how a functional arc of movement with a minimum level of discomfort can usually be expected with non-operative management in select patients

The patella is a complex sesamoid bone within the quadriceps enhancing mechanical advantage of the extensor mechanism. Depending on activity, the patella magnifies either force or displacement; behaving as a lever, by redirecting quadriceps force it also acts as a pulley. Aim. We describe and validate a device for obtaining consistent dynamic weight bearing views of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). Materials and Methods. Weight bearing (WB) axial views of 48 knees (24 patients) were performed using the device. The sulcus angle (SA), congruence angle (CA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), facet angle (FA) and patellofemoral displacement (PD) were measured. These were compared with similar measurements made on prone (PR) and axial (AX) radiographs of same knees. Results. Variance (V=SD2) and Standard error of mean (SEM/95% CI) for all measurements in each of the three views were analysed. For the Sulcus Angle, Congruence angle and LPFA, the WB view had the lowest SEM and the least variance in comparison to PR and AX views (SEM 1.05/V 30.14, SEM 2.52/V 172.39 and SEM 1.34/V 47.61 respectively for the SA, SEM 3.09/V 256, SEM 2.79/V 210.25 and SEM 3.37/V 306.25 respectively for the CA, SEM 0.67/V 11.9, SEM 1.20/V39.06 and SEM 1.03/V 28.83 respectively for the LPFA). SEM and Variance for FA measurements were similar for WB and AX views but superior to PR views (SEM 1.62/V 70.56, SEM 1.6/V 68.9 and SEM 2.3/V 148.84 respectively). Mean PFD was maximum on the WB view compared to the PR and AX views (36.0, −45.62 and 22.23 respectively) with lowest SEM and V (SEM 8.73/V 2052.0, SEM 18.65/V 92959.67 and SEM 9.70/V 2540.16 respectively). Conclusion. The WB view as introduced and reported here has consistently lower Variance, SEM and SD in comparison to Axial and Prone views for all measurements of the PFJ. WB view also gives a more accurate dynamic measure of Patello Femoral displacement. The view is easily obtained and readily reproduced