Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 90 - 90
1 Sep 2012
Haverkamp D Somford M Klinkenbijl M Vis Van Der H Albers R
Full Access

Background. A lot of discussion persists whether obesity negatively influences the outcome of hip arthroplasty. Current literature does not answer this question, since manuscripts showing a worse outcome and those showing a similar outcome can both be found. We performed a meta-analysis with the primary research question whether obesity has a negative influence on short and long term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Methods. A search of the literature was performed and studies comparing the outcome of hip arthroplasty in different weight groups were included. Methodology of the included studies was scored according to the Cochrane guidelines. Data extraction and pooling of the data was performed. For continuous data a weighted mean difference and for dichotomous variables a weighted Odds ratio was calculated. Heterogeneity was calculated using I2 statistics. Results. A total of 15 studies were available for data-extraction. Dislocation occurred more often in obese with an Odds ratio of 0.54 (95%CI: 0.38–0.75) (10 studies, n = 8634). Aseptic loosening occured more often in obese with an Odds ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.43–0.96)(6 studies, n = 5137). Infection occured more often in obese with an Odds Ratio of 0.3 (95%CI: 0.19–0.49) (10 studies, n = 7500). Venous thromboembolism occured more often in obese with an Odds Ratio of 0.56 (95%CI: 0.32–0.98) (7 studies, n = 3716). For septic loosening and intraoperative fractures no difference was found, probably due to low power. Subjective outcome measurements did not allow Pooling due to high heterogeneity (I2 = 68%). Conclusions. We conclude that being obese; ergo having a BMI of more than 30 certainly has a negative influence on total hip replacement


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 333 - 333
1 Sep 2012
Essig J Nourissat C Asencio G
Full Access

The use of a total hip arthroplasty with alumina on alumina bearing couple should limit the risk of wear and secondary osteolysis. From June 1999 to December 2002, we have realised a continuous series of 265 ABGII cementless THA with Alumina bearing. The average age was 58 years (22–78 years). The main causes were osteoarthritis (81%) and osteonecrosis (13%). The operation was performed through a posterior standard approach. In all cases, an anatomic cementless ABG II stem and an acetabular cementless ABG II cup were implanted. The bearing couple was always Alumina Biolox Forte with a 28 mm femoral head in 99% of cases. To date, 12 patients died and 17 patients were lost to follow up (6.4%). 224 patients (232 hips) had a regular clinical and radiological follow-up. The mean follow up was 8.5 years (5–11 years). 9 patients were revised for septic loosening (4cases), femoral fracture (4 cases) and inveterate dislocation (1 case). There was no aseptic loosening. The overall survival rate at more than 10 years is 96.6%. We deplore 2 cases of postoperative dislocation. In this series, we did not observe any breakage of ceramic implant. The clinical and functional outcome is good and stable over time with an average PMA score at 17.6 and an average Harris score at 97.3. 16 patients reported at least one or more episode of abnormal noise “Squeaking” type (6%). It is most often a mild noise and it occurs in a static bending position. This noise disappeared with time in 10 cases. It never necessitated a prosthetic revision. The radiological control does not show any wear. There is no evidence of acetabular or femoral osteolysis. The radiological implant fixation according to the Engh and ARA criteria was good and stable in all cases. This series demonstrate that the implantation of an anatomic cementless HA arthroplasty with an alumina bearing in a young and active patient prevents the risk of wear and osteolysis and improves durability over time. The use of a 28 mm head does not increase the risk of instability and we did not observe failure of the ceramic implants


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 291 - 291
1 Sep 2012
Iotov A Ivanov V Tzachev N Baltov A Liliyanov D Kraevsky P Zlatev B Kostov D
Full Access

INTRODUCTION. Management of neglected residually displaced acetabular fractures is a big challenge. ORIF is often doomed to failure so a primary total hip replacement is usually kept in mind as a method of choice. However THR is a technically difficult and results are quiet unpredictable. OBJECTIVE. To present our experience with THR in maltreated grossly displaced acetabular fractures and to discuss operative technique and prognostic factors in that complicated surgery. MATERIAL. THR was applied in 14 patients (11 males and 3 females, mean age 51 years) with at least three-months old and significantly displaced acetabular fractures. In 12 cases preceding treatment was conservative, and in 2 it was operative. Fracture nonunion was recognized in 5 cases, old hip dislocation in 4 and protusion in 3. Large interfragmentary gaps and local bone defect were detected in almost all cases. METHOD. THR was performed 3–31 months after injury. Extensile iliofemoral or Y-shaped approach with trochanteric osteothomy was used in most cases. Depending of particular situation a variety of techniques were applied to provide adequate bone stock for the cup, such as an approximate ORIF, periacetabular osteotomy, structural or morcelised bone grafting. Reinforcement ring was used in 6 cases. The cup fixation was cemented in 12 procedures and uncemented in 2. Cemented stem was introduced in 10 cases and uncemented in 4. Preoperative selective embolisation of superior gluteal artery was carried out in 1 patient. RESULTS. The operative duration was 3–7 hours and blood loss was 850–2200 ml. The only intraoperative accidentwas jatrogenic lesion of superior gluteal artery required embolisation. The follow up was a 16–94 months. Average postoperative Harris Hip Score was 78, compared with 54 before surgery (P<0.01). There was 2 aceptic and 1 septic loosenings with subsequent revisions (21.4%). In 2 cases sight asymptomatic migration of the cap was noted. DISCUSSION. The most difficult but most important stage of operation is a creating of sufficiently stable bone stock for the acetabular cap, impeded by by fragment displacement, nonunion or prolonged hip dislocation. If nonuion the achievement of bone healing is essential. Any instability should be overcomed by stable osteosynthesis. The gaps should be filled by ORIF or bone grafting. We consider cemented fixation possibly with reinforcement ring as a most secure way to provide strong cup anchorage. Uncemented pess-fit cup may be used in cases with lesser initial displacement. In spite of all late results are considerable worse than in conventional hip replacement. CONCLUSION. THR after neglected acetabular fractures is a challenging and demanding procedure. Successful outcome may be only expected if a solid bone stock is made using various surgical techniques


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 1 | Pages 55 - 63
1 Jan 2020
Hagberg K Ghassemi Jahani S Kulbacka-Ortiz K Thomsen P Malchau H Reinholdt C

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe implant and patient-reported outcome in patients with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) treated with a bone-anchored, transcutaneous prosthesis.

Methods

In this cohort study, all patients with a unilateral TFA treated with the Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) implant system in Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, between January 1999 and December 2017 were included. The cohort comprised 111 patients (78 male (70%)), with a mean age 45 years (17 to 70). The main reason for amputation was trauma in 75 (68%) and tumours in 23 (21%). Patients answered the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) before treatment and at two, five, seven, ten, and 15 years’ follow-up. A prosthetic activity grade was assigned to each patient at each timepoint. All mechanical complications, defined as fracture, bending, or wear to any part of the implant system resulting in removal or change, were recorded.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 4 | Pages 532 - 538
1 Apr 2015
Scott CEH Davidson E MacDonald DJ White TO Keating JF

Radiological evidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after fracture of the tibial plateau is common but end-stage arthritis which requires total knee arthroplasty is much rarer.

The aim of this study was to examine the indications for, and outcomes of, total knee arthroplasty after fracture of the tibial plateau and to compare this with an age and gender-matched cohort of TKAs carried out for primary osteoarthritis.

Between 1997 and 2011, 31 consecutive patients (23 women, eight men) with a mean age of 65 years (40 to 89) underwent TKA at a mean of 24 months (2 to 124) after a fracture of the tibial plateau. Of these, 24 had undergone ORIF and seven had been treated non-operatively. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and > 60 months using the Short Form-12, Oxford Knee Score and a patient satisfaction score.

Patients with instability or nonunion needed total knee arthroplasty earlier (14 and 13.3 months post-injury) than those with intra-articular malunion (50 months, p < 0.001). Primary cruciate-retaining implants were used in 27 (87%) patients. Complication rates were higher in the PTOA cohort and included wound complications (13% vs 1% p = 0.014) and persistent stiffness (10% vs 0%, p = 0.014). Two (6%) PTOA patients required revision total knee arthroplasty at 57 and 114 months. The mean Oxford knee score was worse pre-operatively in the cohort with primary osteoarthritis (18 vs 30, p < 0.001) but there were no significant differences in post-operative Oxford knee score or patient satisfaction (primary osteoarthritis 86%, PTOA 78%, p = 0.437).

Total knee arthroplasty undertaken after fracture of the tibial plateau has a higher rate of complications than that undertaken for primary osteoarthritis, but patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction are comparable.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:532–8.