Background. Procedural sedation (PS) requires two suitably qualified clinicians and a dedicated monitored bed space. We present the results of intra-articular haematoma blocks (IAHB), using local anaesthetic, for the manipulation of closed ankle fracture dislocations and compared resource use with PS. Methods. Patients received intra-articular ankle haematoma blocks for displaced ankle fractures requiring manipulation between October 2020 to April 2021. The technique used 10ml of 1% lignocaine injected anteromedially into the tibiotalar joint. Pain scores (VAS), time from first x-ray to reduction, and acceptability of reduction were recorded. A comparison was made by retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone PS for manipulation of an ankle fracture over the six month period March – August 2020. Results. During the periods assessed, 25 patients received an IAHB and 28 received PS for ankle fractures requiring manipulation (mean age 57.8yr vs 55.1yr). Time from first x-ray to manipulation was 65.9 min (IAHB) vs 82.9 min (PS) (p = 0.087). In the IAHB group mean pain scores pre, during and post manipulation were 6.1, 4.7 and 2.0 respectively (‘pre’ to ‘during’ p < 0.05; ‘pre’ to ‘post’ p < 0.01). In the IAHB group, 23 (92%) had a satisfactory reduction without need of PS or general anaesthetic. In the PS group 23 (82%) had a satisfactory reduction. There was no significant difference in the number of unsatisfactory first attempt reductions between the groups. There were no cases of deep infection post operatively in either group. Conclusion. Intra-articular haematoma block of the ankle appears to be an efficacious, safe and inexpensive means of providing analgesia for manipulation of displaced ankle fractures. Advantages of this method include avoiding the risks of procedural sedation, removing the requirement of designated clinical space and need for qualified clinicians to give sedation, and the ability to re-manipulate under the same block

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. Aim. To describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block. Methods. 71 consecutive forefoot procedures (65 patients) were carried out under ankle block. A mixture of 10ml 2% Lidocaine with 10ml 0.5 % Bupivacine was administered to the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, sural and saphenous nerves. Ankle tourniquet was employed in all procedures. Patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremented pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). Results. 61 female and 4 male patients were contacted (age range 33-67y). Procedures included 48 first metatarsal osteotomies, 15 cheilectomies, 2 first MTP joint replacements, and 6 fusions. 17 patients (26 %) reported some discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.2). No patients reported any pain during their operation(s). 14 patients (22%) required supplementation of the block. Average pain score at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 0.66, 2.9, 2.4 and 1.3 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. None complained of nausea or required parentral analgesia. There were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under regional block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. Discussion. There are many advantages in being able to perform these small procedures under regional anaesthesia. Our initial observational study suggests forefoot surgery under ankle block alone may be safe and effective. Anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intra-operative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction

Aims

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice.

Achieving arthrodesis of the ankle can be difficult in the presence of infection, deformity, poor soft tissues and bone loss. We present a series of 48 patients with complex ankle pathology, treated with the Ilizarov technique. Infection was present in 30 patients and 30 had significant deformity before surgery. Outcome was assessed clinically and with patient-reported outcome measures (Modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (MAOFAS) scale and the Short-Form (SF-36)).

Arthrodesis was achieved in 40 patients with the Ilizarov technique alone and in six further patients with additional surgery. Infection was eradicated in all patients at a mean follow-up of 46.6 months (13 to 162). Successful arthrodesis was less likely in those with comorbidities and in tibiocalcaneal fusion compared with tibiotalar fusion.

These patients had poor general health scores compared with the normal population before surgery. The mean MAOFAS score improved significantly from 24.3 (0 to 90) pre-operatively to 56.2 (30 to 90) post-operatively, but there was only a modest improvement in general health; the mean SF-36 improved from 44.8 (19 to 66) to 50.1 (21 to 76). There was a major benefit in terms of pain relief.

Arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is an effective treatment for complex ankle pathology, with good clinical outcomes and eradication of infection. However, even after successful arthrodesis general health scores remain limited.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:371–7.