Sacral tumours are rare and can present difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenges even at an early diagnosis. Surgical resection margins have a reported prognostic role in local recurrence and improved survival. Successful management is achieved within a specialist multidisciplinary service and involves combination chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. We present our experience of patients with sacral tumours referred to our unit, who underwent total and subtotal sacrectomy procedures. Materials and Methods. Between 1995 and 2010, we identified twenty-six patients who underwent a total or subtotal sacrectomy operation. Patients were referred from around the United Kingdom to our services. We reviewed all case notes, operative records, radiological investigations and histopathology, resection margins, post operative complications, functional outcomes and we recorded long-term survival outcomes. Patients who were discharged to local services for continued follow up or further oncological treatment were identified and information was obtained from their general practitioner or oncologist. We reviewed the literature available on total sacrectomy case series, functional outcomes and soft tissue reconstruction. Results. We reviewed 26 patients, 16 male and 10 female, with a mean age at presentation of 53.4 years (range 11–80 years). Duration of symptoms ranged from 2 weeks to 6 years; lower back pain and sciatica were amongst the most common presenting features. Histological diagnoses included chordoma, Ewing's, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, chondromyxoid fibroma, spindle cell sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, chondrosarcoma. A combined approach was used in two-thirds of patients and most of these patients had a soft tissue reconstruction with pedicled vertical rectus myocutaneous flap. Complications were categorised into major and minor and subdivided into wound, bladder and bowel symptoms. Wound complications and need for further intervention were more common amongst the patient group who did not have simultaneous soft tissue reconstruction at operation. All patients had a degree of bladder dysfunction in the early postoperative period. We present survivorship curves including recurrence and development of metastases. Conclusion. Total sacrectomy procedures carry a high risk of associated morbidity but can improve survival amongst specific groups of patients. They present challenges in diagnosis and management, but must be referred to a specialist service, that will instigate appropriate investigations and treatment regimes within a multidisciplinary setting. The expansion of services from other specialties required for the postoperative and ongoing rehabilitation plays an important role in overall management and appropriate pathways to coordinate these services are necessary

Introduction. Although various reports analyzed “en-bloc” excision of sacral tumors, there are still technical problems to improve protection of nerve roots, preserve surrounding structures and reduce intraoperative bleeding, maintaining the oncologic result. We present a new technique for sacral resection, with short term preliminary results, derived with modification from Osaka technique. Methods. Seven patients were resected for their sacrococcygeal chordoma with the followed described technique. Two patients had previous surgery elsewhere. The sacrum is exposed by a posterior midline incision and complete soft-tissue dissection. Lateral osteotomies were performed through the sacral foramina using a threadwire saw and Kerrison rongeurs, to avoid sacral roots damage. After proximal osteotomy, the sacrum is laterally elevated and mobilized to allow dissection of presacral structures. Mean surgical time was 5 hours (range: 3 to 8). Mean blood loss was 3640 ml. Results. Level of resection was S1 in 2 pts, S2 in 4 pts, S3 in 1. Margins were wide in 6 patients and marginal in one. At a mean follow-up of 2 years, six patients were disease-free, one had a local recurrence. No complications were showed. Conclusion. This technique allows wide margins with roots preservation and reduction of complications and operative time. Indications for posterior approach only can be extended to resection proximal to S3, when there is minimal pelvic invasion and none or partial involvement of sacroiliac joints. However, the long term benefits of this technique need to be evaluated