Aims. Implant failure has become more common as the number of primary total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) performed has increased. Although revision arthroplasty has gained attention for functional preservation, the long-term results remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of revision TAA using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in a considerably large cohort; the risk factors for failure were also determined. Methods. This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (117 ankles) who underwent revision TAA for failed primary TAA between July 2000 and March 2010. Survival analysis and risk factor assessment were performed, and clinical performance and patient satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results. The mean duration from initial revision TAA to last follow-up was 15.0 years (SD 3.0; 11.2 to 20.5). The cumulative survival rates of the revised ankles were 81% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74% to 88%), 74% (65% to 82%), and 70% (61% to 79%) at five, ten, and 15 years, respectively. Comorbidities prior to primary TAA, aseptic loosening, instability, or grafting of cysts were found to be the most common risk factors for secondary revision. The median value for preoperative pain, as assessed using the visual analogue scale, declined from 6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5 to 8) to 2 (IQR 0 to 5) (p < 0.001) and the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved from 43 (SD 17) preoperatively to 70 (SD 20) (p < 0.001) at last follow-up. Conclusion. Revision TAA offers acceptable survival rates after 15 years; it therefore offers a valuable option for treatment of implant failure in carefully selected cases. Although patient-reported outcomes improve substantially, the degree of improvement reported following primary TAA is not achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):46–52

Introduction:. NICE guidelines state that every patient should be assessed for their VTE risk on admission to hospital. The aim of this study was to determine whether currently recommended risk assessment tools (Nygaard, Caprini, NICE and Plymouth) can correctly identify the patients at risk. Methods:. In a consecutive series of over 750 trauma patients treated with cast immobilisation 23 were found to have suffered a VTE. Their notes were retrospectively reviewed to discover how many had been assessed for their VTE risk on admission. Additionally, the 4 most current Risk Assessment Tools were used to retrospectively score the patients for their VTE risk to determine whether they would have been identified as at risk of sVTE, had the RAMs been used at the time. We also identified a matched group of patients in the same cohort who had not suffered a VTE and they were also retrospectively risk assessed. Results:. NICE (2010), Caprini (2001) and Nygaard (2009) identified 100% of the 750 patients as at risk of sVTE but had a specificity of 0% as only 23 went on to develop VTE. The Plymouth Score (2010) was more specific and identified 56.3% patients of the 23 confirmed VTEs as ‘at risk’. However it would not have recommended prophylaxis in the remaining 46.7 & that did in fact go on to developed VTE. Conclusion:. The tools used in this study have no clinical utility in this patient group. Detailed evaluation of the different RAMs is required in order to improve their discriminatory power. A reliance on NICE, Caprini and Nygaard tools would have required all 750 patients in this group to have been treated with thromboprophylaxis and therefore lacked sensitivity. However the Plymouth Score would have failed to recommend thromboprophylaxis in half of the patients who eventually developed VTE

Aims

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potential complication of foot and ankle surgery. There is a lack of agreement on contributing risk factors and chemical prophylaxis requirements. The primary outcome of this study was to analyze the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery and Achilles tendon (TA) rupture. Secondary aims were to assess the variation in the provision of chemical prophylaxis and risk factors for VTE.

Nice guidelines recommend VTE prophylaxis to patients in below knee casts following foot and ankle surgery following risk assessment. The guidelines are controversial and BOFAS recommendations reiterate the risk factors but highlight poor evidence to support these guidelines. Implementation has been variable dependent on interpretation. 58 patients who underwent hindfoot procedures and were immobilised in a cast were identified. These patients were under the care of two consultants, one of whom anticoagulates with daily enoxaparin and one who does not, providing a de facto case-control design. The patients were followed up to identify those who subsequently suffered a DVT or PE, and the clinical circumstances. 2 cases of VTE events were noted in 58 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Both were elective cases managed postoperatively in cast and treated with prophylaxic enoxaparin. Both of these presented to hospital with signs of VTE greater than 6 weeks following surgery after cast removal and discontinuation of enoxaparin. No patients were considered high risk according to NICE guidelines. None of the patients who received no thromboprophylaxis had a clinical DVT. Within our study group we found that VTE thromboprophylaxis does not influence clinically evident VTE rates. Patients who developed VTE were not considered high risk by definition of NICE guidelines but only at increased risk due to their immobility. The VTE events were initiated while the patients were receiving thromboprophylaxis. The effectiveness of the guidelines in predicting patients who would benefit from chemoprophylaxis is questionable from this study. NICE guidelines on VTE thromboprophylaxis have been received with some concerns. Although this investigation studied only a relatively small number of patients, it raises issues about the clinical effectiveness of the guidelines in foot and ankle patients