Aim. There is a theoretical advantage for immediate postoperative start of rifampicin after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Anti-biofilm treatment may be mostly needed during the first postoperative days in order to prevent new biofilm formation. However, there are concerns with regard to development of rifampicin resistance if rifampicin is started too early. Rifampicin monotherapy will rapidly result in rifampicin resistance, but this may not occur when prescribed as part of combination antimicrobial therapy and after thorough surgical debridement. We hypothesized that in this setting the probability of development of rifampicin resistance is very low. We evaluated the frequency of development of rifampicin resistance in patients with acute staphylococcal PJI who were treated with DAIR followed by immediate postoperative start of rifampicin in combination with a betalactam or glycopeptide. Method. During 2003–2014, all patients with an acute staphylococcal PJI were treated with five days of high-dose rifampicin (600mg bid) in combination with at least 6 weeks of betalactam or glycopeptide antibiotics, both started immediately postoperative after DAIR. Clinical outcome and development of rifampicin resistance in patients who failed were monitored. Susceptibility testing for rifampicin was performed by Vitek 2 (Biomerieux). Until 2014, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for rifampicin resistance were applied (S ≤ 1), from 2014 EUCAST criteria (S ≤ 0.06) were applied. Results. Forty-one patients with acute staphylococcal hip (22) of knee (19) PJI were included. Comorbidities were rheumatoid arthritis (22%), diabetes (10%), a tumor prosthesis due to malignancy (34%) and corticosteroid use (27%). Fifteen patients (37%) developed a failure after DAIR. Eight failures were caused by the same staphylococcal species as the initial PJI (six Staphylococcus aureus, two Coagulase-negative staphylococci). In all failures, rifampicin susceptibility of the isolate had not changed. One patient was started on chronic suppressive treatment (not including rifampicin) and had a prosthetic joint removal 18 months later. In this patient, one out of five positive cultures with S. aureus from the removed prosthesis showed a rifampicin resistant strain. In all failures, mean duration between the initial DAIR and failure was 208 days (range 7–636 days). Conclusions. Immediate postoperative start of high-dose rifampicin in combination with betalactam or glycopeptide did not result in rifampicin resistant staphylococci among patient who had a failure with the same staphylococci. These results strongly indicate that immediate postoperative start of rifampicin is safe. Larger studies are needed to prove the clinical benefit of this strategy

Aim. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis remains a therapeutic challenge, as demonstrated by divergent treatment guidelines. The combination of moxifloxacin and rifampicin may be an attractive treatment option for cases caused by staphylococci; however, previous studies have reported a reduction in plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin when co-administered with rifampicin. The magnitude of this reduction in spinal tissues is not known. We aimed to investigate the interaction of rifampicin on moxifloxacin tissue concentrations in vertebral cancellous bone, intervertebral disc and subcutaneous adipose tissue in steady-state conditions using microdialysis in a porcine model. Method. Twenty female pigs were randomized into two groups of ten pigs: Group A received moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for three days preoperatively. Group B received moxifloxacin 400 mg orally for three days preoperatively combined with rifampicin 450 mg twice daily for seven days preoperatively. Measurements were obtained from plasma, vertebral cancellous bone, intervertebral disc and subcutaneous adipose tissue for 24 h. Microdialysis was applied for sampling in solid tissues. Results. Co-administration of moxifloxacin and rifampicin demonstrated a reduction of free moxifloxacin concentrations in spinal tissues. The peak drug concentration (C. max. ) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC. 0–24. ) in all tissue compartments decreased in the range of 66–79% and 65–76%, respectively. Conclusions. Using microdialysis, we demonstrated a significant reduction of moxifloxacin C. max. and AUC. 0–24. in the spinal tissues when co-administered with rifampicin. Further studies are warranted to understand the clinical implications of this finding for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Aim. Rifampin is considered as the antibiotic corner stone in the treatment of acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, if, when, and how to use rifampin has been questioned. We evaluated the outcome of patients treated with and without rifampin, and analysed the influence of timing, dose and co-antibiotic. Method. Acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement between 1999 and 2017, and a minimal follow-up of 1 year were evaluated. Treatment failure was defined as the need for any further surgical procedure related to infection, PJI-related death, or the need for suppressive antimicrobial treatment. Results. A total of 669 patients were analysed. Treatment failure was 32.2% (131/407) in patients treated with rifampin and 54.2% (142/262) in whom rifampin was withheld (P < 0.001). The most prominent effect of rifampin was observed in knees (treatment failure 28.6% versus 63.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). The use of rifampin was an independent predictor of treatment success in the multi-variate analysis (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.45). In the rifampin group, the use of a co-antibiotic other than a fluoroquinolone (OR 7.73, 95% CI 4.26 – 14.0) and the start of rifampin within 5 days after surgical debridement (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.05 – 3.35) were predictors of treatment failure. Clindamycin demonstrated similar efficacy as co-antibiotic. The dosing of rifampin had no effect on outcome. Conclusions. Our data supports the use of rifampin in acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement, particularly in knees. Immediate start of rifampin after surgical debridement should probably be discouraged

Aim. Bone regeneration following the treatment of Staphylococcal bone infection or osteomyelitis is challenging due to the ability of Staphylococcus aureus to invade and persist within bone cells, which could possibly lead to antimicrobial tolerance and incessant bone destruction. Here, we investigated the influence of Staphylococcal bone infection on osteoblasts metabolism and function, with the underlying goal of determining whether Staphylococcus aureus-infected osteoblasts retain their ability to produce extracellular mineralized organic matrix after antibiotic treatment. Method. Using our in vitro infection model, human osteoblasts-like Saos-2 cells were infected with high-grade Staphylococcus aureus EDCC 5055 strain, and then treated with 8 µg/ml rifampicin and osteogenic stimulators up to 21-days. Results. Immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) imaging demonstrated the presence of intracellular bacteria within the infected osteoblasts as early as 2 hours post-infection. TEM micrographs revealed intact intracellular bacteria with dividing septa indicative of active replication. The infected osteoblasts showed significant amounts of intracellular bacteria colonies and alteration in metabolic activity compared to the uninfected osteoblasts (p≤0.001). Treatment of S. aureus-infected osteoblasts with a single dose of 8 µg/ml rifampicin sufficiently restored the metabolic activity comparative to the uninfected groups. Alizarin red staining and quantification of the rifampicin-treated infected osteoblasts revealed significantly lower amount of mineralized extracellular matrix after 7-days osteogenesis (p<0.05). Interestingly, prolonged osteogenic stimulation and rifampicin-treatment up to 21 days improved the extracellular matrix mineralization level comparable to the rifampicin-treated uninfected group. However, the untreated (native) osteoblasts showed significantly more quantity of mineral deposits (p≤0.001). Ultrastructural analysis of the rifampicin-treated infected osteoblasts at 21-days osteogenesis revealed active osteoblasts and newly differentiated osteocytes, with densely distributed calcium crystal deposits within the extracellular organic matrix. Moreover, residual colony of dead bacteria bodies and empty vacuoles of the fully degraded bacteria embedded within the mineralized extracellular matrix. Gene expression level of prominent bone formation markers, namely RUNX2, COL1A1, ALPL, BMP-2, SPARC, BGLAP, OPG/RANKL showed no significant difference between the infected and uninfected osteoblast at 21-days of osteogenesis. Conclusions. Staphylococcus aureus bone infection can drastically impair osteoblasts metabolism and function. However, treatment with potent intracellular penetrating antibiotics, namely rifampicin restored the metabolic and bone formation activity of surviving osteoblasts. Delay in early osteogenesis caused by the bacterial infection was significantly improved over time after successful intracellular bacteria eradication

Aim. The demonstration of the in vivo bactericidal efficacy of a new bone cement with rifampicin contained in microcapsules and its intra-articular release profile. Method. Fifteen New Zealand White rabbits were employed to reproduce periprosthetic infection by intra-articular inoculation of 10. 5. CFU/mL of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 29213 using as a target implant a 3D printed stainless steel tibial insert. 7 days after inoculation, the first stage of the two stage exchange was carried out and at this time the animals were divided into two study groups: group C (7 rabbits) that received a spacer with gentamicin and group R (8 rabbits) that received a spacer with gentamicin and rifampicin microcapsules. Response to infection was monitored by clinical (weight and temperature), hematological (leukocyte, lymphocyte and platelet counts) and biochemical (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) analyses at the time of inoculation, at the first stage of exchange, 4 days after first stage and weekly until the fourth week when animals were euthanized. Microbiological counts were performed at the first stage of exchange and at the end of the study. Results. 14/15 animals (93.3%) developed a PJI 1 week after the inoculation. A statistically significant elevation of the leukocyte and platelet count and a decrease in the percentage of lymphocytes (p=0.0001) was found and positive microbiological cultures. Four weeks after the placement of the spacer, no bacterial growth was found in the soft tissue or bone samples of the group with rifampicin microcapsules (group R), being these differences statistically significant with p=0.01 and 0.03 respectively. The rifampicin intra-articular release kinetics showed concentrations above the staphylococcal MIC at all time points. Conclusions. The bone cement with microencapsulated rifampicin is effective in the in vivo treatment of prosthetic joint infection due to biofilm-forming S. aureus

Aim. The management of PJIs is slowed down by the presence of bacteria forming biofilms where they may withstand antibiotic therapy. The use of adjuvant strategies, such as hydrolytic enzymes cocktail targeting biofilm matrices and facilitating their dispersion, is a promising option to limit impact of biofilms. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of enzymes cocktail combined with antibiotic dual therapy of rifampicin and vancomycin in a relevant in-vitro model. Method. Mature methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were grown on Ti-6Al-4V coupons by adding 1mL of a 8Log10 ATCC 33591 suspension in TGN (TSB + 1% glucose + 2% NaCl) to 24-wells plates containing the coupons and incubating the plates for 24h at 37°C with a continuous 50rpm agitation. The samples were rinsed and placed in 6 wells plates containing 1ml of the enzymatic cocktail (C.D.D.) solution (tris-buffered (pH 7.0) solution of 400 U/ml of aspecific DNA/RNA endonuclease, 50 U/ml of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase, and 0.06 U/ml of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase). 9ml of TGN or TGN containing antibiotics RIF/VAN (rifampicin 5µg/mL + vancomycin 8µg/mL) at clinically relevant concentrations found locally in bone or joints, was then added and the samples were incubated in identical conditions for 24h. The samples were then recovered and rinsed. CFU counts were obtained by recovering the bacteria with sonication, serial dilutions, and TSA plating. Biomass was determined via crystal violet staining, followed by dye solubilization in acetic acid, and absorbance measurement using a spectrophotometer. Results. Significant reductions in bacterial counts were observed in biofilms exposed to either RIF/VAN or RIF/VAN+CDD, by respectively 2,6 and 3,7Log10 when compared to samples reincubated with TGN alone (p <0.05). Additionally, CFU counts in samples exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD were reduced by 1,1Log10 when compared to those exposed to RIF/VAN (p<0,05). Significant reduction in biomass (-29,8%, p<0.05) was observed for coupons exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD when compared to C.D.D alone (figure 1). Conclusions. The concurrent utilization of enzymes with rifampicin and vancomycin, holds promise as a feasible method to address periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci are the most frequent bacteria responsible for PJI. In patients with acute PJI (i.e. <1 month following the implantation), DAIR with exchange of removal components followed by a combination of antibiotics that includes rifampin (particularly rifampin+fluoroquinolone) are recommended. Unfortunately, some patients could not receive rifampin due to drug-drug interaction or stopped it due to an adverse event. Finally, it was unclear if the dose and the duration of rifampin influenced the prognosis. Method. We performed a retrospective cohort study in 4 hospitals and included patients with staphylococcal acute post-operative (< 1 month) PJI treated with DAIR in 2011–2016 period. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis and Kaplan Meier curves were used to determine the risk factors for treatment failure (persistence of clinical signs, new surgery w/o persistence or superinfection, infection-related death). Results. 79 patients were included (median age: 71 years IQR 53–89]; 55 men [69.6 %]; median ASA score: 2 [IQR 2–3]). Bacterial cultures revealed 65 S. aureus (82.3 %) and 15 coagulase-negative staphylococci (19.0 %) infections, including 14 methicillin-resistant isolates (17.7 %). Among all isolates, only 2 (2.5 %) were resistant to rifampin and 16 (20.3 %) were resistant to fluoroquinolone. The median duration of antimicrobial therapy was 92 days (IQR 31–152). Only 59 patients received rifampin (74.7 %), and 35 (44.3 %) the combination rifampin + fluoroquinolone. Median duration of rifampin was 56.5 days (IQR 15.8–86.0) and median dose 14.6mg/kg/d (IQR 13.0–16.7). Forty patients (50.6 %) received rifampin in the first 2 weeks and 43 patients (54.4 %) received at least 2 weeks of rifampin. Six patients (7.6 %) developed an adverse event leading to rifampin interruption. During a median follow-up of 443 days (IQR 219.5–790.5), 21 patients (26.6 %) experienced a treatment failure including 12 persistence of the initial pathogen (57.1 %) and 9 superinfections (42.9 %). An ASA score >2 (HR 2.8; 95%CI 1.26–6.15), the use of rifampin (HR 0.4; 95% CI 0.17–0.95) and the duration of rifampin treatment (HR 0.83; 95%CI 0.75–0.92 per additional week of treatment) were significant determinants of the outcome (but not methicillin-resistance). Receiving >2 weeks of rifampin prevented the failure, but an introduction during the first 2 weeks did not influence the outcome. Conclusions. In patients with staphylococcal acute PJI, the use of rifampin and its duration strongly influenced the prognosis. As 25% of patients could not receive rifampin, new drugs with anti-biofilm activity are required

Aim. This study investigated if co-administration of rifampicin with moxifloxacin led to a decrease in moxifloxacin concentrations in relevant tissues in a porcine model of implant-associated osteomyelitis caused S. aureus. Pharmacokinetics were measured using microdialysis and treatment effect was measured by quantifying bacterial load from implant and periprosthetic bone following a 1-stage revision and antibiotics. Method. 15 female pigs received a stainless-steel implant in the right proximal tibia and were randomized into two groups. Infection was introduced by inoculating the implant with Staphylococcus aureus as previously described. 1. On day 7 post surgery, all pigs were revised with implant removal, debridement of implant cavity and insertion of a sterile implant. 7 days of treatment was then initiated with either moxifloxacin 400 mg iv q.d. (M) or moxifloxacin and rifampicin 450 mg iv b.i.d. (RM). At day 14, animals were sedated and microdialysis was applied for continuous sampling of moxifloxacin concentrations during 8 h in five compartments: the implant cavity, cancellous bone in both the infected and non-infected proximal tibia, and adjacent subcutaneous tissue on both the infected and non-infected side using a previously described setup. 2. Venous blood samples were collected. Implant and adjacent bone were removed for analysis. Results. Comparable cure rates (sterilization of both implant and bone) were observed with 5/8 pigs in the RM group compared to 3/7 in the M group, p= 0.62 (Fisher's exact test). Due to the small number of samples with growth, median log CFU/ml was 0 for implant and bones in both groups. AUC. 0-last. was significantly smaller in plasma for the RM group, 407; 315 – 499 min µg/mL vs 625; 536 – 724 min µg/mL (mean;95% CI), p= 0.002 (Student's t-test). For the implant cavity, there was a trend toward a lower AUC. 0-last. 425; 327 – 524 min µg/ml vs 297; 205 – 389 min µg/ml in the RM group compared to M, yet this difference was not statistically different, p = 0.06. For the other compartments for other parameters (C. max. and T. max. ) across all compartments, there was no difference. Conclusions. While the AUC. 0-last. was lower in plasma for animals treated with RM, both the concentrations at the site of infection and treatment outcomes were comparable between groups

Aim. The treatment of a chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a combination of the bacteria's identification, a «carcinological» surgery and an appropriate antibiotherapy. In case of gram positive cocci infection, rifampicin is often used. The aim of this study is to determine which factors are responsible for the development of resistance to rifampicine. Method. All patients had a total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty with a chronic infection. They were treated with a two-time surgery. All of them received a bi-antibiotic treatment. In case of gram positive cocci infection, and according to the susceptibility test, they received rifampicin. The 221 patients were operated from July 1997 to November 2013 in 3 university centers (one Belgian and two French) and were retrospectively analysed. The demographical, clinical and bacterial data as well as the antibiotic treatment were collected. The healing was defined as the absence of recurrence during the 2 years following surgery. Results. Among the 221 patients (from 22 to 91 years old, median age: 67), 133 (60%) had a THA infection. 22% of the peroperative samples collected during the first time surgery were sterile. 64% were mono-microbial and 14% were poly-microbial. For 69% of them, gentamycin-impregnated spacers were used and for 26% of them vancomycin and gentamycin-impregnated spacers were used. The median delay for the second time surgery was 52 days (15 to 221 days). The healing was higher for the patients treated by an antibiotic combination with rifampicin than the others (86 vs 72%; p=0.02). In the same way, the healing rate was higher in patients where the delay between the two surgeries was less than one month (91 vs 77%; p=0.09). There were more recurrence in TKA than in THA (30% vs 13%, p=0.006). 12 % of the patients showed a persistence of the germ or the emergence of a new microorganism with a comparable antibiogram. A resistance to rifampicin during the second surgery appears in 9 % of cases. Conclusions. Theses study results suggest the benefit of the use of rifampicin for the treatment of gram positive cocci prosthetic joint infections treated by a two time surgery. In all cases, intravenous antibiotic therapy was maintained until the wound was closed to decrease the emergence of resistance

Aim. Rifampicin as a biofilm-active antibiotic drug has a significant role in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, rifampicin resistance is an increasing threat to PJI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rifampicin resistant staphylococci over time and its association with infection-free survival after PJI in a single centre in Sweden. Methods. We included 238 PJIs in 238 patients who had undergone PJI revision surgery from 2001 to 2020 on whom the causative bacteria were staphylococci, and the agent was tested for rifampicin resistance. Data regarding agents, rifampicin resistance, treatment and outcome was obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox regression model with adjustment for age, sex, localisation (hip or knee) and type of prosthesis (primary or revision) were used to calculate infection-free survival rates and adjusted risk ratios (HRs) of the risk of treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as any reoperation or suppression treatment with antibiotics due to prolonged infection. Results. Among the included 238 PJIs, 40 rifampicin-resistant staphylococci [93% Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS)] and 29 treatment failures were identified. The proportion of rifampicin resistant agents decreased from 25% in 2010–2015 to 12% in 2016–2020. The 2-year infection-free survival rates were 79.0% (95% CI 0.66–0.92) for the rifampicin resistant and 90% (95% CI 0.86–0.94) for the rifampicin sensitive group. Patients with PJI caused by rifampicin resistant bacteria had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure than those caused by sensitive bacteria (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.0–6.2). Conclusions. The incidence of PJI caused by rifampicin resistant staphylococci decreased in Uppsala, Sweden over the past 20 years. PJI caused by rifampicin-resistant staphylococci has a two-fold risk for treatment failure compared to PJI caused by rifampicin-sensitive staphylococci, which stresses the importance of retaining rifampicin resistance low. Additionally, the increased risk of treatment failure when PJI is caused by a rifampicin-resistant bacteria warrants consideration of a more conservative treatment strategy

Background. Treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) usually consists of surgical debridement and prolonged rifampicin combination therapy. Tailored antimicrobial treatment alternatives are needed due to frequent side effects and drug-drug interactions with rifampicin combination therapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of several alternative antibiotic strategies in patients with staphylococcal PJI. Methods. In this prospective, multicenter registry-based study, all consecutive patients with a staphylococcal PJI, treated with DAIR or one-stage revision surgery between January 1. st. , 2015 and November 3. rd. , 2020, were included. Patients were treated according to a predefined protocol for PJI. Antimicrobial treatment strategies differed between centers, which was accepted and used as pseudorandomization. Depending on the hospital patients were admitted to, they were treated with either a long-term rifampicin strategy (consisting of 12 weeks rifampicin combination therapy) ore one of several short-term rifampicin strategies, consisting of only five days of rifampicin combination treatment, started immediately postoperative, followed by clindamycin, flucloxacillin or vancomycin monotherapy. Patients were stratified in different groups, depending on the used antimicrobial strategy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcome between the groups. Results. Two hundred patients were included and, based on the antimicrobial treatment, stratified in one long-term rifampicin group (n=23) or one of the three short-term rifampicin groups: clindamycin (n=56), flucloxacillin (n=47), vancomycin (n=26), other (n=48). Outcome of PJI after DAIR or one-stage exchange was not statistically different between patients treated with long-term rifampicin combination therapy and patients treated with clindamycin or flucloxacillin monotherapy including only five days of rifampicin combination therapy. Moreover, treatment duration was four weeks shorter in the clindamycin-based and flucloxacillin-based groups. Adjusted hazard ratios for failure for patients treated with either flucloxacillin or clindamycin were almost equal to patients treated with long-term rifampicin combination therapy (aHR 1.21, 95%CI 0.34–4.40). Conclusions. A short-term rifampicin strategy with either clindamycin or flucloxacillin and only five days of rifampicin was found to be as effective as traditional long-term rifampicin combination therapy. A randomized controlled trial is needed to further address efficacy and safety of alternative treatment strategies for staphylococcal PJI

Aim. Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed due to toxicity and drug-drug interactions that frequently occur with this strategy. Data from recent clinical studies suggests equipoise for other antimicrobial treatment regimens. The objective of the Rifampicin Combination Therapy versus Targeted Antimicrobial Monotherapy in the Oral Antimicrobial Treatment Phase of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection (RiCOTTA)-trial is to evaluate whether monotherapy with clindamycin is non-inferior to rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in patients with staphylococcal PJI that are treated with DAIR. Method. The RiCOTTA-trial is a multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating clindamycin versus rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in the oral treatment phase in patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR. The trial is performed in 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with staphylococcal knee or hip PJI managed by DAIR. Patients are included one to six days before antibiotic treatment is switched from intravenous to oral therapy. Patients with a contraindication for rifampicin, with a megaprosthesis or who receive intravenous antibiotics for more than three weeks after initial debridement are excluded. Primary outcome is treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment. Success is defined as the absence of: i. Infection related re-surgery, ii. New episode of antibiotic treatment for infection of the index joint after the initial treatment phase of 12 weeks, iii. Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up, iv. Death. The estimated treatment success of rifampicin combination therapy is 85% and the monotherapy strategy is considered not inferior when the difference in treatment success will be less than 10%. Enrolment of 158 patients per group (316 in total) is needed to confirm non-inferiority of monotherapy with a power of 80%. The trial is currently open for enrolment. The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands and registered under EU trial number 2022-501620-26-00 in Clinical Trial Information System. Conclusions. Currently, the RiCOTTTA study is the largest randomised clinical trial that compares targeted oral monotherapy with rifampicin combination treatment for staphylococcal PJI. Noninferiority of monotherapy would result in a change in national PJI guidelines and enable clinicians to use a more patient-tailored approach when considering antibiotics for patients during the oral treatment phase of PJI

Aim. In trauma surgery, the development of biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) is one of the most common complications affecting trauma patients, requiring prolonged hospitalization and the intensive use of antibiotics. Following the attachment of bacteria on the surface of the biomaterial, the biofilm-forming bacteria could initiate a chronic implant-related infection. Despite the use of conventional local and systemic antibiotic therapies, persistent biofilms involve various resistance mechanisms that contribute to therapeutic failures. The development of in vivo chronic BAI models to optimize antibiofilm treatments is a major challenge. Indeed, the biofilm pathogenicity and the host response need to be finely regulated, and compatible with the animal lifestyle. Previously, a Galleria mellonella larvae model for the formation of an early-stage biofilm on the surface of a Kirschner (K)-wire was established. In the present study, two models of mature biofilm using clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains were assessed: one related to contaminated K-wires (in vitro biofilm maturation) and the second to hematogenous infections (in vivo biofilm maturation). Rifampicin was used as a standard drug for antibiofilm treatment. Method. In the first model, biofilms were formed following an incubation period (up to 7 days) in the CDC Biofilm Reactor (CBR, BioSurface Technologies). Then, after implantation of the pre-incubated K-wire in the larvae, rifampicin (80 mg/kg) was injected and the survival of the larvae was monitored. In the second model, biofilm formation was achieved after an incubation period (up to 7 days) inside the larvae and then, after removing the K-wires from the host, in vitro rifampicin susceptibility assays were performed (according to EUCAST). Results. The first model indicate that in vitro biofilm maturation affects the bacterial pathogenicity in the host, depending on the S. aureus strain used. Furthermore, the more the biofilm is matured, the more the rifampicin treatment efficiency is compromised. The second model shows that, despite the fast in vivo biofilm formation in the host, the number of bacteria, either attached to the surface of the K-wire surface or in surrounding tissue of the larvae, was not increased over time. Conclusions. Altogether, these results allow the establishment of biofilm models using G. mellonella larvae in order to understand the impact of biofilm maturation on both the bacterial pathogenicity and the efficiency of antibiofilm treatments

Aim. There is growing evidence that bacteria encountered in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) form surface-attached biofilms on prostheses, as well as biofilm aggregates embedded in synovial fluid and tissues. However, models allowing the investigation of these biofilms and the assessment of their antimicrobial susceptibility in physiologically relevant conditions are currently lacking. To address this, we developed a synthetic synovial fluid (SSF) model and we validated this model in terms of growth, aggregate formation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, using multiple PJI isolates. Methods. 17 PJI isolates were included, belonging to Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci, Cutibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, streptococci, Candida species and Enterobacterales. Growth and aggregate formation in SSF, under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions, were evaluated using light microscopy. The biofilm preventing concentration (BPC) and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of relevant antibiotics (doxycyclin, rifampicin and oxacillin) were determined for the staphylococcal strains (n=8). To this end, a high throughput approach was developed, using a fluorescent viability resazurin staining. BPC and MBIC values were compared to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) obtained with conventional methods. Results. The SSF model allowed all isolates to grow well under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions. When cultured in SSF, all isolates formed biofilm aggregates, varying in size and shape along different species. A susceptibility testing method based on measuring resazurin-derived fluorescence was successfully developed, allowing high throughput determination of the BPC and the MBIC in SSF. For all staphylococci cultured in SSF a reduced susceptibility to the tested antibiotics was observed when compared to susceptibility data obtained in general medium. For rifampicin and doxycyclin the BPC was consistently higher than the MIC (two- to fourfold dilution difference for rifampicin and four- to sixfold dilution difference for doxycyclin). For oxacillin the MIC equaled the BPC for two isolates, while for the other isolates the BPC was higher than the MIC (two- to fourfold dilution difference). Expectedly, the MBIC was higher than the BPC and differences with the MIC were even more pronounced for all antibiotics tested (differences of six- to fourteenfold dilutions were observed). Conclusion. Our data indicate that the in vitro SSF model could provide more insight in how PJI-related pathogens form biofilms in physiologically relevant conditions. The BPC and MBIC were consistently and substantially higher than MIC. This model could be a valuable addition to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility in biofilms in a PJI context. Sources of funding: FWO-Vlaanderen (grant G066523N)

Aim. To describe the management of PJI due to S. aureus in CRIOAcs in 2019 and to particularly focus on the evaluation of the efficacy of DAIR regarding control of infection and risk factors for failure up to 12 months. Method. Thirteen CRIOAcs were selected to participate to the study. Data concerning the management of all the PJI in the year 2019 were retrospectively collected and registered in eCRFs. Inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years old patients with S. aureus ± other bacteria (in per surgical procedure sample); knee or hip PJI and with clinical signs of infection. Patients treated with bacteriophages were excluded. All eligible patients were notified by an information letter. Patients treated by the DAIR procedure were selected, and rate of control of infection (no inflammatory local signs or no new surgical procedure or no S. aureus in case of puncture) was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method and risk factors for failure at 12 months were assessed using Cox regression model. Results. A total of 978 PJI were managed in the 9 CRIOAcs, including 238 hip and knee PJI due to S. aureus and 79 to S. aureus plus another bacteria. Among all of them, 154 were managed with DAIR, and 100 fulfilled inclusion criteria, notifying no opposition to their data collection. The median age was 73.0 years; 57% were male, the median Charlson score was 4.0; 66% had hip PJI. A total of 45 failure were observed during the period studied. At 12 months, the control rate was 58. 7% [36.5–75.4], 49.3% [34.3–62.7] in in early and late PJI respectively according to Tsukuyama classification and 49.6% [30.5–66.1], 54.1% [37.7 – 68.0] in early and delayed/late PJI respectively according to Zimmerli classification, 56.6% [39.5–70.5] in case of mobile part exchange, 53.4% [35.3–68.5] for MRSA PJI and 63.4% [50.5–73. 8] in patients treated with rifampicin. No rifampicin intake was the only significative risk factor for failure in univariate analysis (HR=0.31 (0.17–0.57), p=0.0002), and remained significant after adjustment on Charlson score (aHR=0.34 (0.18–0.64), p=0.0008). Conclusions. The DAIR procedure is frequently performed in patients with acute and late PJI, and is associated with a high rate of failure, especially for patients who cannot receive rifampin. There is a strong rational to assess the use of bacteriophages during the DAIR, as bacteriophages have antibiofilm activity in vitro, and could improve the efficacy of the DAIR to control the disease

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication of total joint arthroplasty that typically requires revision surgery for treatment. Systemic antibiotics are usually held prior to surgery to improve yield of intraoperative cultures. However, recent studies suggest that preoperative aspirations have a high concordance with intraoperative cultures, which may allow surgeons to initiate antibiotic treatment earlier. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Pre-surgical systemic antibiotic therapy on the bacterial burden within the periprosthetic space and systemic immune reaction. Method. PJI was induced with MSSA (Xen36) S. aureus in the right knee of 16-week old, female, C57BL6 mice using a previously validated murine model. Mice were randomized to three groups (n=8, each): control; Vanc, receiving systemic vancomycin (110mg/kg, SQ, twice daily); or VancRif receiving vancomycin same as in Vanc group, plus rifampin (12mg/kg dose, IV, once daily). Following 2 weeks of treatment, mice were euthanized and periprosthetic bone, soft tissue and the implant were harvested. Bacterial burden, colony forming units (CFUs), was quantified in soft tissue, tibial bone, and on the implant. Specifically, tissues were homogenized and serially plated for CFUs, while the implant was sonicated and then plated for CFUs. The host immune response was analysed through weighing inguinal and iliac lymph nodes and through measuring serum amyloid A (SAA). Non-parametric pairwise group comparisons of the three outcome measures were performed using a Mann-Whitney U test. Results. VancRif, the combined treatment significantly reduced bacterial burden in the periprosthetic soft tissue, bone, and implant compared to control (p<0.001) and Vanc alone (p<0.001). While not significant, Vanc alone did reduce bacterial load as compared to control. The ipsilateral weight of the iliac lymph nodes was significantly reduced in Vanc and VancRif mice compared to controls (p<0.001), was well as in VancRif versus Vanc alone (p<0.001). Interestingly, SAA levels did not significantly differ among all groups. During tissue harvesting, minimal purulence was observed in antibiotic treatment groups, unlike controls. Conclusions. Treating active PJI with vancomycin alone decreases periprosthetic bacterial loads and reduces the local immunological response. This effect is significantly enhanced with the combined rifampin use. These findings could suggest that when culture positive PJI is diagnosed, pre-surgical treatment with antibiotics may decrease immunosuppression and soft tissue infiltration, leading to a better chance of infection cure with subsequent surgical debridement. Histological investigations and repeat experiments involving subsequent surgical treatment are underway. Acknowledgements. Funding comes from internal institutional grants

Introduction. A significant burden of disease exists with respect to critical sized bone defects; outcomes are unpredictable and often poor. There is no absolute agreement on what constitutes a “critically-sized” bone defect however it is widely considered as one that would not heal spontaneously despite surgical stabilisation, thus requiring re-operation. The aetiology of such defects is varied. High-energy trauma with soft tissue loss and periosteal stripping, bone infection and tumour resection all require extensive debridement and the critical-sized defects generated require careful consideration and strategic management. Current management practice of these defects lacks consensus. Existing literature tells us that tibial defects 25mm or great have a poor natural history; however, there is no universally agreed management strategy and there remains a significant evidence gap. Drawing its origins from musculoskeletal oncology, the Capanna technique describes a hybrid mode of reconstruction. Mass allograft is combined with a vascularised fibula autograft, allowing the patient to benefit from the favourable characteristics of two popular reconstruction techniques. Allograft confers initial mechanical stability with autograft contributing osteogenic, inductive and conductive capacity to encourage union. Secondarily its inherent vascularity affords the construct the ability to withstand deleterious effects of stressors such as infection that may threaten union. The strengths of this hybrid construct we believe can be used within the context of critical-sized bone defects within tibial trauma to the same success as seen within tumour reconstruction. Methodology. Utilising the Capanna technique in trauma requires modification to the original procedure. In tumour surgery pre-operative cross-sectional imaging is a pre-requisite. This allows surgeons to assess margins, plan resections and order allograft to match the defect. In trauma this is not possible. We therefore propose a two-stage approach to address critical-sized tibial defects in open fractures. After initial debridement, external fixation and soft tissue management via a combined orthoplastics approach, CT imaging is performed to assess the defect geometry, with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer placed at index procedure to maintain soft tissue tension, alignment and deliver local antibiotics. Once comfortable that no further debridement is required and the risk of infection is appropriate then 3D printing technology can be used to mill custom jigs. Appropriate tibial allograft is ordered based on CT measurements. A pedicled fibula graft is raised through a lateral approach. The peroneal vessels are mobilised to the tibioperoneal trunk and passed medially into the bone void. The cadaveric bone is prepared using the custom jig on the back table and posterolateral troughs made to allow insertion of the fibula, permitting some hypertrophic expansion. A separate medial incision allows attachment of the custom jig to host tibia allowing for reciprocal cuts to match the allograft. The fibula is implanted into the allograft, ensuring nil tension on the pedicle and, after docking the graft, the hybrid construct is secured with multi-planar locking plates to provide rotational stability. The medial window allows plate placement safely away from the vascular pedicle. Results. We present a 50-year-old healthy male with a Gustilo & Anderson 3B proximal tibial fracture, open posteromedially with associated shear fragment, treated using the Capanna technique. Presenting following a fall climbing additional injuries included a closed ipsilateral calcaneal and medial malleolar fracture, both treated operatively. Our patient underwent reconstruction of his tibia with the above staged technique. Two debridements were carried out due to a 48-hour delay in presentation due to remote geographical location of recovery. Debridements were carried out in accordance with BOAST guidelines; a spanning knee external fixator applied and a small area of skin loss on the proximal medial calf reconstructed with a split thickness skin graft. A revision cement spacer was inserted into the metaphyseal defect measuring 84mm. At definitive surgery the external fixator was removed and graft fixation was extended to include the intra-articular fragments. No intra-operative complications were encountered during surgeries. The patient returned to theatre on day 13 with a medial sided haematoma. 20ml of haemoserous fluid was evacuated, a DAIR procedure performed and antibiotic-loaded bioceramics applied locally. Samples grew Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic treatment was rationalised to Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD and Rifampicin 450mg BD. The patient has completed a six-week course of Rifampicin and continues on suppressive Co-Trimoxazole monotherapy until planned metalwork removal. There is no evidence of ongoing active infection and radiological evidence of early union. The patient is independently walking four miles to the gym daily and we believe, thus far, despite accepted complications, we have demonstrated a relative early success. Conclusions. A variety of techniques exist for the management of critical-sized bone defects within the tibia. All of these come with a variety of drawbacks and limitations. Whilst acceptance of a limb length discrepancy is one option, intercalary defects of greater than 5 to 7cm typically require reconstruction. In patients in whom fine wire fixators and distraction osteogenesis are deemed inappropriate, or are unwilling to tolerate the frequent re-operations and potential donor site morbidity of the Masqualet technique, the Capanna technique offers a novel solution. Through using tibial allograft to address the size mismatch between vascularised fibula and tibia, the possible complication of fatigue fracture of an isolated fibula autograft is potentially avoidable in patients who have high functional demands. The Capanna technique has demonstrated satisfactory results within tumour reconstruction. Papers report that by combining the structural strength of allograft with the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of a vascularised autograft that limb salvage rates of greater than 80% and union rates of greater than 90% are achievable. If these results can indeed be replicated in the management of critical-sized bone defects in tibial trauma we potentially have a treatment strategy that can excel over the more widely practiced current techniques

Aim. Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) is one of the main pathogens responsible for bone and joint infections especially those involving prosthetic materials (PJI). Although less virulent than S. aureus, S. epidermidis is involved in chronic infections notably due to its ability to form biofilm. Moreover, it is frequently multiresistant to antibiotics. In this context, the development of additional or alternative antibacterial therapies targeting the biofilm is a priority. Method. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the activity of phage lysin exebacase (CF-301) against biofilms formed by 19 S. epidermidis clinical strains responsible for PJI. We determined the remaining viable bacteria inside the biofilm (counting after serial dilution and plating) and the biomass (bacteria and extracellular matrix, using crystal violet staining) after 24h of exposition to exebacase at different concentrations, alone (0.05; 0.5; 5; 50 and 150 mg/L) or in combination (5, 50 and 150 mg/L) with antibiotics commonly used to treat multi-resistant S. epidermidis PJI (rifampin (1 mg/L), vancomycin (10mg/L) and daptomycin (10mg/L)). In this study, synergy was defined as a significantly higher effect of the association in comparison to the sum of the effect of each molecule. Results. Exebacase showed a dose-dependent reduction of biomass, ranging from 11 % at 0.5 mg/L to 66 % at 150 mg/L. Exebacase showed a significant bactericidal activity at 50 and 150 mg/l, with a mean decrease of the inoculum of 0.94 and 1.7 log, respectively. In addition, synergistic effects were observed in association with i) rifampin (1 mg/L) showing a mean decrease up to 84% of the biomass and 3.5 log CFU at 150 mg/L of exebacase, ii) vancomycin (10 mg/L) showing a mean decrease up to 81% of the biomass and 2.82 log CFU at 150 mg/L of exebacase, iii) and daptomycin (10 mg/L) showing a mean decrease up to 85% of the biomass and 3.1 log CFU at 150 mg/L of exebacase. Conclusions. Exebacase showed, in vitro, synergistic activity with antibiotics against S. epidermidis biofilms. It is a promising adjuvant therapy to rifampin, vancomycin and daptomycin in the context of PJI. Further studies are needed, in vitro to understand the mechanism of action on S. epidermidis biofilm and the heterogeneity of strain behaviour and in vivo to confirm the present data

Aim. Here, we are aimed to evaluate bacteriophage (191219) to treat S. aureus implant-associated bone infections by means of testing against S. aureus during its planktonic, biofilm and intracellular growth phases and finally assessing antimicrobial effect on in vivo biofilm formed on metal K-wire in an alternative insect model Galleria mellonella. Method. The bacteriophages (191219) were provided from D&D Pharma GmbH. These bacteriophages were tested against S. aureus EDCC 5055 (MSSA) and S. aureus DSM 21979 (MRSA) strains. To assess the activity of bacteriophages against planktonic growth phase, bacteriophages, and S. aureus EDCC 5055(1×10. 7. CFU/ml) were co-cultured in LB media as multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 for 24 hours at 37. o. C and finally plated out on the LB agar plates to estimate the bacterial growth. The antimicrobial activity of bacteriophages on biofilms in vitro was measured by analysing the incubating the several fold dilutions of bacteriophages in LB media with biofilms formed on 96-well plate. The eradication of biofilm was analysed with crystal violet as well as CFU analysis methods. Later, the effect of bacteriophages on intracellular growth of S. aureus in side osteoblast was tested by treating the S. aureus infected osteoblasts at 2h, 4h and 24h time points of post treatment. In addition, we have analysed synergistic effect with gentamicin and rifampicin antibiotics to clear intracellular S. aureus. Finally, experiments are performed to prove the effect of bacteriophages to clear in vivo biofilm using alternative insect model G. mellonella as well as to detect the presence of bacteriophages inside the osteoblasts through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. Results. Our results demonstrate the in vitro efficacy of bacteriophages against planktonic S. aureus. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments revealed severe infection of bacteria by bacteriophages. Bacteriophages also eradicated in a dose-dependent manner in vitro S. aureus biofilm formation and were active against intracellular S. aureus in an osteoblastic cell line. TEM analysis visualized the effect of the bacteriophages on S. aureus inside the osteoblasts with the destruction of the intracellular bacteria and formation of new bacteriophages. For the Galleria infection model, single administration of phages failed to show improvement in survival rates, but exhibited some synergistic effects with gentamicin or rifampicin, which was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In summary, bacteriophages could be a potential adjuvant treatment strategy for patients with implant-associated biofilm infections. Further preclinical and clinical trials are required to establish adequate treatment protocols

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a much feared complication to arthroplasty with significant patient morbidity. Rifampin is increasingly used in staphylococcal PJIs treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis. The evidence supporting rifampin combination therapy in PJIs is limited due to the lack of controlled studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding rifampin to conventional antimicrobial therapy in early staphylococcal PJIs treated with debridement and retention. Method. In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, 99 patients with PJI after hip and knee arthroplasties were enrolled. All patients underwent a standardized surgical debridement. 65 patients had PJI caused by staphylococci and further included in the study. They were randomly assigned to receive rifampin or not in addition to standard antimicrobial therapy with cloxacillin, or vancomycin in case of methicillin resistance. They received parenteral antibiotics for two weeks, then oral antibiotics for 4 weeks. In case of methicillin resistance, vancomycin was administered i.v. for 6 weeks. The primary end point was no signs of infection after 2 wears follow-up. Results. 48 patients were included in the final analyses. There were no differences in patient characteristics or co-morbidities between the two groups. There was no significant difference in remission rate between the rifampin combination group (17 of 23 (74%)) and the monotherapy group (18 of 25 (72%), relative risk 1,03; 95% confidence interval 0,73 to 1,45, p=0.88). Five patients aborted the rifampin treatment because of adverse effects and continued with monotherapy. All five had complete remission. These patients were not included in the final analysis. Conclusions. Our study has not proven a statistically significant advantage by adding rifampicin to the antibiotic treatment in staphylococcal PJIs. Bigger studies on the subject are needed. Our good success rate raises the question whether the standardized revision surgery is the key to success in these infections rather than rifampin