Complications such as implant loosening, infection, periprosthetic fracture or instability may lead to revision arthroplasty procedures. There is limited literature comparing single-stage and two-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and cost benefit between single-stage and two-stage revision procedures. Thirty-one revision procedures (mean age 72+/-7, 15 males and 16 females) performed between 2016 and 2021 were included (27 revision RSA, 2 revision TSA, 2 failed ORIFs). Two-stage procedures were carried out 4-6 weeks apart. Single-stage procedures included debridement, implant removal and washout, followed by re-prep, re-drape and reconstruction with new instrumentations. Clinical parameters including length of stay, VAS, patient satisfaction was recorded preoperatively and at mean 12-months follow up. Cost benefit analysis were performed. Seven revisions were two-stage procedures and 24 were single-stage procedures. There were 5 infections in the two-stage group vs 14 in the single-stage group. We noted two cases of unstable RSA and 8 other causes for single-stage revision. Majority of the revisions were complex procedures requiring significant glenoid and/or humeral allografts and tendon transfers to compensate for soft tissue loss. No custom implants were used in our series. Hospital stay was reduced from 41+/-29 days for 2-stage procedures to 16+/-13 days for single-stage (p<0.05). VAS improved from 9+/-1 to 2+/-4 for two-stage procedures and from 5+/-3 to 1+/-2 for single-stages. The average total cost of hospital and patient was reduced by two-thirds. Patient satisfaction in the single-stage group was 43% which was comparable to the two-stage group. All infections were successfully treated with no recurrence of infection in our cohort of 31 patients. There was no instability postoperatively. 3 patients had postoperative neural symptoms which resolved within 6 months. Single-stage procedures for revision shoulder arthroplasty significantly decrease hospital stay, improve patients’ satisfaction, and reduced surgical costs

Aims

To report the rate of early revision (within two years) after shoulder arthroplasty and identify any patient, disease or prosthesis factors that may be associated with these early failures.

The diagnosis of infection following shoulder arthroplasty is notoriously difficult. The prevalence of prosthetic shoulder infection after arthroplasty ranges from 3.9 – 15.4% and the most common infective organism is Cutibacterium acnes. Current preoperative diagnostic tests fail to provide a reliable means of diagnosis including WBC, ESR, CRP and joint aspiration. Fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous synovial biopsy (PSB) has previously been reported in the context of a pilot study and demonstrated promising results. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous synovial biopsy compared with open culture results (gold standard). This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving four sites and 98 patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty. The cohort was 60% female with a mean age was 65 years (range 36-83 years). Enrollment occurred between June 2014 and November 2021. Pre-operative fluoroscopy-guided synovial biopsies were carried out by musculoskeletal radiologists prior to revision surgery. A minimum of five synovial capsular tissue biopsies were obtained from five separate regions in the shoulder. Revision shoulder arthroplasty was performed by fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons. Intraoperative tissue samples were taken from five regions of the joint capsule during revision surgery. Of 98 patients who underwent revision surgery, 71 patients underwent both the synovial biopsy and open biopsy at time of revision surgery. Nineteen percent had positive infection based on PSB, and 22% had confirmed culture positive infections based on intra-operative tissue sampling. The diagnostic accuracy of PSB compared with open biopsy results were as follows: sensitivity 0.37 (95%CI 0.13-0.61), specificity 0.81 (95%CI 0.7-0.91), positive predictive value 0.37 (95%CI 0.13 – 0.61), negative predictive value 0.81 (95%CI 0.70-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 1.98 and negative likelihood ratio 0.77. A patient with a positive pre-operative PSB undergoing revision surgery had an 37% probability of having true positive infection. A patient with a negative pre-operative PSB has an 81% chance of being infection-free. PSB appears to be of value mainly in ruling out the presence of peri-prosthetic infection. However, poor likelihood ratios suggest that other ancillary tests are required in the pre-operative workup of the potentially infected patient

Aim. Diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSI) is difficult as they are mostly caused by low-virulent bacteria and patients do not show typical infection signs, such as elevated blood markers, wound leakage, or red and swollen skin. Ultrasound-guided biopsies for culture may therefore be an alternative for mini-open biopsies as less costly and invasive method. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and reliability of ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and/or synovial markers for preoperative diagnosis of PSI in patients undergoing revision shoulder surgery. Method. A prospective explorative diagnostic cohort study was performed including patients undergoing revision shoulder replacement surgery. A shoulder puncture was taken preoperatively before incision to collect synovial fluid for interleukin-6 (IL-6), calprotectin, WBC, polymorphonuclear cells determination. Prior to revision surgery, six ultrasound-guided synovial tissue biopsies were collected for culture and two additional for PCR analysis. Six routine care tissue biopsies were taken during revision surgery and served as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV; primary outcome measure), and accuracy were calculated for ultrasound-guided biopsies, and synovial markers, and combinations of these. Results. Fifty-five patients were included. In 24 patients, routine tissue cultures were positive for infection. Cultures from ultrasound-guided biopsies diagnosed an infection in 7 of these patients, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 29.2%, 93.5%, 77.8%, 63.0%, and 65.6%, respectively. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in combination with synovial WBC increased the NPV to 76.7% and accuracy to 73.8%. When synovial WBC and calprotectin were combined with ultrasound-guided biopsies, it resulted in a better diagnostic value: sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 80.0%, PPV 69.2%, NPV 80.0%, and accuracy 75.8%. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in combination with calprotectin and ESR yielded a sensitivity of 50.0%, specificity of 93.8%, PPV of 80.0%, NPV of 78.9%, and accuracy of 79.2%. Synovial fluid was obtained in 42 patients. Sensitivities of WBC, PMN, IL-6, and calprotectin were between 25.0% and 35.7%, specificities between 89.5% and 95.0%, PPVs between 60.0% and 83.3%, NPVs between 65.4% and 69.4%, and accuracies between 64.5% and 70.6%. Conclusions. In this prospective study we showed that ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination with PCR and/or synovial markers are not reliable enough to use in clinical practice for the preoperative diagnosis of low grade PSI

Removal of a well-fixed humeral component during revision shoulder arthroplasty presents a challenging problem. If the humeral component cannot be extracted simply from above, an alternate approach must be taken that may include compromising bone architecture to remove the implant. Two potential solutions to this problem that allow removal of the well-fixed prosthesis are making a humeral window or creating a longitudinal split in the humerus. A retrospective review was performed at the Mayo Clinic to determine the complications associated with performing humeral windows and longitudinal splits during the course of revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study included 427 patients from 1994–2010 at Mayo Clinic undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. From this cohort, those who required a humeral window or a longitudinal split to assist removal of a well-fixed humeral component were identified. Twenty-seven patients had a humeral window produced to remove a well-fixed humeral component. Six intra-operative fractures were reported from this group: 5 were in the greater tuberosity and 1 was in the distal humeral shaft. At the latest radiographic follow-up, 24 of 27 windows healed, 2 patients had limited inconclusive radiographic follow-up (1 and 2 months), and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. Twenty-four patients underwent longitudinal osteotomy to extract a well-fixed humeral component. From this group, 1 had intra-operative fracture in the greater tuberosity. At most recent radiographic follow-up, 22 of 24 longitudinal splits healed, 1 had short follow-up (1 ½ months) with demonstrated signs of healing, and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. In both groups, there were no cases of window malunion and no components have developed clinical loosening. Data from this study suggests humeral windows and longitudinal splits can assist with controlled removal of well-fixed humeral components with a high rate of union and a low rate of intra-operative and post-operative sequelae

The number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States continues to rise. Currently, the number of procedures performed per year ranges from 55,000–80,000 and is expected to increase more than 300% in the coming years. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications associated with arthroplasty surgery, leading to poor outcomes, increased cost, and technically difficult revision surgery. The incidence of infection following primary shoulder arthroplasty has been reported between 0.7% and 4%, representing 2.9–4.6% of all complications. Prosthetic shoulder joint infections are unlike prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. Shoulder PJIs are primarily indolent in nature and difficult to diagnose using traditional methods that have been shown to be accurate for periprosthetic infections of the hip and knee. The majority of infected revision shoulder arthroplasties are associated with growth of Propionibacterium acnes (P. Acnes). This slow-growing, anaerobic organism requires longer than normal incubation times for culture (7–21 days), and typically demonstrates a subtle, non-specific clinical presentation that can make the presence of infection difficult to identify. In the reported literature, P. Acnes accounts for about 70% of cases with positive cultures associated with revision for treatment of a painful shoulder arthroplasty and due to the bacteria's slow growing nature and virulence profile, the rate of infection following shoulder arthroplasty may often be underestimated. A more recent and promising tool for evaluation of periprosthetic infection has been analysis of synovial fluid. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been identified as part of the innate response to pathogens, and include pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-microbial peptides, and marker levels have shown promise for improved diagnostic efficacy in hip and knee PJI. Currently, no highly predictive clinical test for diagnosis of PJI in the shoulder exists, however, several of these synovial biomarkers have recently been analyzed for their diagnostic capacity in the setting of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Synovial fluid cytokine analysis shows the potential to improve diagnosis of infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty. This information can help to guide decision-making in the management of PJI of the shoulder, including the decision to perform a single- vs. two-stage revision surgery, and the need for post-operative antibiotics following an unexpected positive culture result after revision surgery. However, there are still challenges to broader use of these synovial biomarkers. Synovial α-defensin (Synovsure, CD Diagnostic) is the only marker currently available as a commercial test, and no point-of-care test is currently available for any of the biomarkers to allow for intraoperative decision-making. While a preoperative synovial aspirate is possible to send for α-defensin analysis currently, with results back in approximately 24 hours, dry fluid aspirations are frequent in the shoulder because of the predominance of indolent pathogens and may limit utility of the test. In summary, indolent infection associated with P. acnes is a common cause for the painful total shoulder arthroplasty. Pre-operative diagnosis of infection is difficult as a result of the poor diagnostic accuracy of traditional methods of testing. Synovial biomarker testing may ultimately improve our ability to more accurately diagnosis and treat prosthetic shoulder joint infections

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in shoulder arthroplasty, due to the indolent nature of the common infecting organisms. Proprionobacterium acnes (P. acnes) is the most common pathogen cultured in revision shoulder arthroplasty. It is a slow growing, anaerobic organism – requires longer incubation period (7–21 days). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (CNSS) is also a common organism responsible for PJI. Established diagnostic tests for hip and knee PJI are often negative in the shoulder despite post-operative growth of intra-operative cultures. Pre-operative synovial aspiration often low volume due to indolent pathogens and successful aspiration is often reported to be 50% or less with Dilisio et al, JBJS 2014: reporting 16.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity. Variable culture length for P. acnes culture protocols are reported from 7–28 days with most groups recommending 14 days. From our research, we demonstrated time to culture growth was significantly shorter in probable true positive culture group (median, 5 vs. 9 days, p=0.002). Frozen section analysis may help intra-operative decision-making (one- vs. two-stage reimplantation) yet the reported sensitivity and specificity in shoulder arthroplasty is far less than in hip and knee arthroplasty. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been identified as part of the innate response to pathogens include pro-inflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides. In a series of prospective studies of revision shoulder arthroplasty, synovial fluid analysis reported by Frangiamore et al, JBJS 2015: IL-6, Frangiamore et al, JSES 2015: α-defensin (Synovasure. TM. ), Frangiamore et al, AAOS 2015: Broader cytokine analysis it was demonstrated that these markers are much more predictive of infection than synovial fluid cultures, frozen section or serum markers

Revision shoulder arthroplasty for failure secondary to soft tissue problems has improved with the availability of the reverse total shoulder system. The initial concept of a platform (convertible) stem was introduced in 2006. Removal of a well-fixed humeral stem can be a significant challenge and may require the surgeon to use osteotomy windows to successfully remove the implant. The increased time in the operating room, potential for complications and the cost of replacing the humeral component are all factors that make platform stem use a important consideration. The first report on total shoulder arthroplasty revision utilizing the platform stem concept confirmed improvements in patient morbidity and decreased costs. However, the overall functional improvement did not reveal a statistically significant improvement in pain relief or range of motion compared to those patients that had the humeral stem revised. Almost all major companies have adopted this concept of a convertible stem system for shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION. Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion of taper interfaces was raised as a concern in total hip arthroplasty (THA) approximately 20 years ago (Gilbert 1993). In total shoulder replacement, however, comparatively little is known about the prevalence of fretting assisted crevice corrosion or the biomechanical and patient factors that influence this phenomenon. Given the comparatively lower loading experienced in the shoulder compared to the hip, we asked: (1) What is the prevalence of fretting assisted corrosion in modular total shoulder replacements, and (2) What patient and implant factors are associated with corrosion?. METHODS. Modular components were collected from 48 revision shoulder arthroplasties as part of a multi-center, IRB approved retrieval program. For anatomic shoulders, this included 40 humeral heads, 32 stems and four taper adapters from seven manufacturers. For reverse shoulders, there were eight complete sets of retrieved components from three manufacturers. The components were predominantly revised for instability, loosening and pain. Anatomical shoulders were implanted for an average of 3.1 years (st dev 3.8; range 0.1–14.5). Reverse shoulders were implanted for an average of 2.2 years (st dev 0.7; range 1.3–3.3). Modular components were disassembled and examined for taper damage. The modular junctions were scored for fretting corrosion using a semi-quantitative four-point scoring system adapted from Goldberg, et al. (Goldberg, 2002, Higgs 2013). The scoring system criteria was adapted from Goldberg and Higgs which is comprised of a one to four grading system (with one indicating little-to-no fretting/corrosion and four indicating extensive fretting/corrosion). The component alloy composition was determined using the manufacturer's laser markings and verified by x-ray fluorescence. Patient age, gender, hand dominance, alloy, flexural rigidity of the trunnion and taper geometry were assessed independently as predictors for fretting corrosion. RESULTS. Moderate to severe fretting corrosion (score > 2) was observed in 23% of the anatomic modular components (Figure 1) and 22% of the reverse shoulder components. An example with severe damage is included in Figure 1. There was no significant relation between corrosion scores and any of the assessed factors. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. It has been suggested that fretting assisted crevice corrosion may be a concern in THA, particularly with large head metal-on-metal articulations. We have identified the presence of moderate to severe corrosion on approximately one quarter of all retrieved shoulder arthroplasties. This is similar to the proportion observed in retrieved modular hips (Goldberg, 2002). While the expected loading of the shoulder is less than that in the hip (Westerhoff, 2009), the offset between the effective center of the prosthetic humeral head and the taper connecter is often larger and the size of the taper is smaller. This can increase the effect of bearing surface loading on the taper. We were unable to detect significant associated biomechanical or patient factors. This was probably due to the limited sample size of our population. At the present time, the clinical effects of taper corrosion in shoulder arthroplasty remain unknown

Objective:. Evaluation of the early results of the implementation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis “Comprehensive Reverse” in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasties. Material and Methods:. September 2010–December 2012, 48 patients (32 women, 16 men) underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using Comprehensive Reverse system. Average age of 69.88. A total of 46 patients were followed. In 22 patients the operation was performed for revision. Patients were pre-and postoperatively evaluated using Oxford, Constant, SF-12 scores, radiographs, pain and range of motion. Mean follow-up 13 months. Results:. In both groups there was an improvement in pain level from 7.9 to 3.2 in the primary replacement group and 7.8 to 5.3 in the revision group. Forward flexion has improved from 60 ° to 107 ° and from 53 ° to 95 ° respectively. Abduction has improved from 52 ° to 90 ° and 42 ° to 77 °, respectively. Significant improvement of Oxford Score from 13.77 to 33.30 in the first group and 12.27 to 21.20 in the second group. Constant score improved from 19.17 to 45.43 and 17.36 to 34.50 in both groups respectively. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between the key variables. Post operative Complications includes separation of baseplate–glenosphere (one patient) required revision, large post operative hematoma in one patient and periprosthetic fracture type C in one case after a fall required revision using Mosaic Modular System. There was one case of superficial infection treated surgically and with antimicrobial treatment. Discussion:. The results of this study show a satisfactory short and acceptable result for the use of reverse shoulder prosthesis “Comprehensive” against primary disease of the shoulder and for revision with better results in the first group. Long-term monitoring is required to better and more complete clinical assessment of the reverse arthroplasty

The aim of the New Zealand National Shoulder Arthroplasty Register is to evaluate the provision of shoulder arthroplasty across the entire country by both recording accurate technical information and measuring the clinical outcomes of all shoulder replacements performed in New Zealand. An initial form is completed at the time of surgery which includes details of the patient, surgical indications, the surgical procedure, the implant and the operating surgeon. Six months following surgery, all registered patients are asked to complete the Oxford Shoulder Score and comment on post-operative complications. Data from 686 consecutive primary and 44 revision shoulder arthroplasties were prospectively collected from January 2000 until December 2003. 82 surgeons performed shoulder arthroplasty during the study period but only 9 performed on average more than 5 per year. Their results at 6 months were statistically superior to those provided by other surgeons. Amongst all diagnoses, osteoarthritis scored significantly better than the rest and for this condition total shoulder replacement scored higher than hemiarthroplasty. 15 different prostheses were used, many of them too infrequently. There was no difference in outcome amongst the 5 most commonly used prostheses. The number of complications reported by patients and the revision rate within the study period was low. No benefit was observed in the use of laminar flow theatre to prevent infection. The combination of technical data about the joint implanted and the individual patient assessment has made the New Zealand Shoulder Arthroplasty Register unique in its own kind. Our findings are in general agreement with the current literature and supports the idea that shoulder arthroplasty is better provided by surgeons with a higher yearly case-load

Introduction:. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has proven to be a useful tool to manage a variety of pathologic conditions. However, inconsistent improvement in motion occurs in patients who have undergone RSA for revision shoulder arthroplasty, proximal humeral fracture sequelae, and treatment of infection. Additional factors that have been suggested to produce poor postoperative range of motion (ROM) may be associated with patient's factors such as poor preoperative range of motion and surgical factors such as inability to lengthen the arm. The purpose of this study was to analyze multiple factors which may be responsible in predicting motion after RSA. It is our hypothesis that intraoperative ROM is most predictive of postoperative ROM. Methods:. Between February 2003 and April 2011 566 patients (225 male and 341 female) treated with a RSA for 1) acute proximal humeral fracture (11), 2) Sequeala of proximal humeral fractures (31), 3) cuff tear arthropathy (278), 4) massive cuff tear without arthritis (78), 5) failed shoulder arthroplasty (168) and 6) infection (29) were evaluated with preoperative range of motion, intraoperative range of motion and range of motion at a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow up. A single observer recorded intraoperative flexion (IFF) in 30° increments. Preoperative and postoperative ROM was recorded by patient video or a previously validated patient performed outcome measure. Preoperative diagnosis was confirmed by radiographic and intraoperative information. 477 patients had preoperative and postoperative radiographs available for analysis of acromial-greater tuberosity distance change (AGT) which was utilized to calculate arm lengthening. A regression analysis was then performed to determine which factors were most influential in predicting postoperative active range of motion. Results:. IFF was the strongest predictor of final postoperative ROM, followed by gender and preoperative ROM. Age, AGT and treatment for the purposes of revision, infection or massive cuff tear were not significant independent predictors of postoperative ROM. Compared to patients with intraoperative forward elevation of ≤60 degrees, patients with intraoperative elevation of 90 degrees gained 16° in postoperative forward elevation (p = 0.029), patients with intraoperative elevation of 120 degrees gained roughly 38° in postoperative forward elevation (p < 0.001) and patients with intraoperative elevation of 150 degrees gained roughly 49 degrees in postoperative forward elevation (p < 0.001). Patients with 120° or more intraoperative elevation were nine times more likely (OR = 9.04, 95%CI: 4.96–16.47) than patients with 90° or less intraoperative elevation to have postoperative forward elevation of 150° or more (top 25% of postoperative results). Conclusions:. Intraoperative forward flexion is strongest predictor postoperative ROM. Surgeons are able to use intraoperative motion as a powerful tool in decision making regarding soft tissue tension in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, therefore by maximizing intraoperative motion, patients have a much greater likelihood of improvement in their final active motion

Background. Periprostetic joint infections (PJI) are often difficult to diagnose, to treat and often leave the patient with severe impaired function. The presence of low virulent bacteria is frequently discovered in apparent aseptic revisions of shoulder arthroplasties and pose a challenge to diagnose preoperatively. Dual Isotope In111 Leucocyte/ Tc99 Bone Marrow SPECT CT scan (L/BMS) is considered the radionuclide gold standard in preoperative diagnosing PJI with reported high specificity and sensitivity in hip and knee arthroplasties. Unfortunately, it is labour-intensive and expensive to perform and documentation using L/BMS on shoulder arthroplasties lack. Aim. To investigate if L/BMS succeeds in detecting shoulder PJI compared to tissue cultures obtained perioperatively. Method. All patients referred to a highly-specialised shoulder department with a painful or stiff shoulder-arthroplasty were included in the cohort. To diagnose infection as a possible cause of arthroplasty failure a L/BMS was planned for all patients. If the arthroplasty was revised, 5 tissue biopsies were obtained from the most infection-suspicious site during revision. Biopsies were cultured in broth and on plates for 14 days due to the high frequency of low virulent infection in shoulder revisions. Infection was defined as growth of the same bacteria in 3 or more of 5 the biopsies. Results. During the observation period 71 patients were referred. Revision surgery was performed in 62% of the patients (44/71) of which 29 also had been examined by L/BMS. A microbiological diagnose was available for all. The most predominant organism isolated was P. Acnes. Two patients both had a positive L/BMS and positive cultures. Negative L/BMS and negative cultures were found in 20 patients. The remaining 7 patients had negative L/BMS, but positive cultures. The two patients with a positive L/BMS both showed overt clinical signs of infection. L/BMS show a sensitivity 0.22 95%CI(0–0.49) and specificity 1.00 95%CI(1.00–1.00) in detecting shoulder PJI. The Positive Predictive Value is 1.00 95%CI(1.00–1.00) and Negative Predictive Value 0.74 95%CI(0.57–0.90). No patients infected with P. Acnes resulted in a positive scintigraphy nor had they preoperative or perioperative signs of infection. Conclusion. Only patients with severe infectious symptoms of shoulder PJI resulted in positive L/BMS. Hence, the scan added nothing to the preoperative clinical diagnose. In111 Leucocyte/ Tc99 Bone Marrow SPECT CT scan cannot be recommended as a standard screening procedure when evaluating failed shoulder arthroplasties for possible infection

Aims

The safe resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery following the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic remains a significant challenge. A number of institutions have developed a COVID-free pathway for elective surgery patients in order to minimize the risk of viral transmission. The aim of this study is to identify the perioperative viral transmission rate in elective orthopaedic patients following the restart of elective surgery.