Reduction of length of stay (LOS) without compromising quality of care is a trend observed in orthopaedic departments. To achieve this goal the pathway needs to be optimised. This requires team work than can be supported by e-health solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of reduction in LOS on complications and readmissions in one hospital where accelerated discharge was introduced due to the pandemic.

317 patients with primary total hip and total knee replacements treated in the same hospital between October 2018 and February 2021 were included. The patients were divided in two groups: the pre-pandemic group and the pandemic group. The discharge criteria were: patient feels comfortable with going back home, patient has enough support at home, no wound leakage, and independence in activities of daily living. No face-to-face surgeon or nurse follow-up was planned. Patients’ progress was monitored via the mobile application. The patients received information, education materials, postoperative exercises and a coaching via secure chat. The length of stay (LOS) and complications were assessed through questions in the app and patients filled in standard PROMs preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Before the pandemic, 64.8% of the patients spent 3 nights at hospital, whereas during the pandemic, 52.0% spent only 1 night. The median value changed from 3 days to 1 day. The complication rate before the pandemic of 15% dropped to 9 % during the pandemic. The readmission rate remained stable with 4% before the pandemic and 5 % during the pandemic. No difference were observed for PROMS between groups.

The results of this study showed that after a hip and knee surgery, the shortening of the LOS from three to one night resulted in less complications and a stable rate of readmissions. These results are in line with literature data on enhanced recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

The reduction of LOS for elective knee and hip arthroplasty during the pandemic period proved safe. The concept used in this study is transferable to other hospitals, and may have economic implications through reduced hospital costs.

Abstract

Background

Despite an ageing population and a rise in the number of joint replacements being performed, the mean age of patients undergoing surgery remains static. One explanation for this is continued concern over the risks of performing surgery on the very elderly. We aim to investigate the outcome of Total Knee Replacement (TKR) in a nonagenarian population.

This study was conducted to investigate the characteristics, complications, radiologic features and clinical course of patients undergoing reduction of forearm fractures in order to better inform patient prognosis and postoperative management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1079 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327 bed regional medical center. A preoperative radiological assessment and chart review was performed. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comonution, fracture line visibility and angle of angulation were determined by AP and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was derived by: (Displacement of Bone Shafts / Diameter) x 100% = %Fracture Displacement. Angle of angulation and percent fracture displacement were calculated by averaging AP and lateral radiograph measurements. 80 cases, averaging 13.5±8.3 years, were identified as having a complete fracture of the radius and/or ulna with 69 receiving closed reduction and 11 receiving fixation via an intramedullary device or percutaneous pinning. Eight patients (10%) experienced complications with four resulting in a refracture and four resulting in significant loss of reduction (LOR) without refracture. Fractures in the proximal ⅔s of the radius were associated with a significant increase in complications compared to fractures in the distal ⅓ of the radius (31.6% vs 3.4%) (P=.000428). Likewise, a higher percent fracture displacement was associated with a decreased risk of complications (28.7% vs 5.9% displacement)(P=0.0403). No elevated risk of complications was found based on fracture orientation, angulation, fracture line visibility, forearm bone(s) fractured, sex, age or arm affected. Our result highlights radius fracture location and percent fracture displacement as markers with prognostic value following forearm fracture. These measurements are simply calculated via pre-reduction radiographs, providing an efficient method of informing risk of complications following forearm fracture

The multimodal management of canal stenosis is increasing, and inhibitors of central sensitization are playing a crucial role in central sensitization processes. Pregabalin and gabapentin are antiepileptic drugs that reduce presynaptic excitability. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of pregabalin and gabapentin is effective in the symptomatic management of canal stenosis. A literature search was conducted in four databases. The inclusion criteria were studies that compared pregabalin or gabapentin with a control group in lumbar canal stenosis. Randomized clinical trials and a comparative retrospective cohort study were included. The main clinical endpoints were VAS/NRS, ODI, and RDQ (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) at 2, 4, 8 weeks, and 3 months, adverse events, and walking distance were also collected. Data were combined using Review Manager 5.4 software. Six studies and 392 patients were included. The mean age was 60.25. No significant differences were observed in VAS at 2, 4, and 8 weeks: (MD: 0.23; 95% CI: −0.63-1.09), (MD: −0.04; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.57), and (MD: −0.6; 95% CI: −1.22 to 0.02). Significant differences were observed in favor of pregabalin with respect to VAS at three months: (MD: −2.97; 95% CI: −3.43 to −2.51). No significant differences were observed in ODI (MD: −3.47; 95% CI: −7.15 to −0.21). Adverse events were significantly higher in the pregabalin/gabapentin group (OR 5.88, 95%CI 1.28-27.05). Walking distance and RDQ could not be compared, although the results were controversial. Gabapentinoids have not been shown to be superior to other drugs used in the treatment of LSS or to placebo. However, they have shown a higher incidence of adverse effects, improved results in VAS at 3 months, and a slight improvement in ambulation at 4 months in combination with NSAIDs compared to NSAIDs in monotherapy

Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

Abstract. Introduction. Local anaesthetic injections are regularly used for perioperative pain relief for shoulder arthroscopies. In our practice all shoulder arthroscopies were performed under general aneasthesia supplemented by perioperative subacromial local anaesthetic injections or landmark guided axillary nerve together with suprascapular nerve injections. We compared pain relief achieved with these two methods. We hypothesized that the selective nerve blocks would provide better post operative pain relief as described in literature. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on two patient groups with 17 patients each. Group one patients received 20mls 50:50 mixture of 1% lignocaine and 0.5% chirocaine injections before and after start of procedure and group two patients received 20 mls of chirocaine around the axillary and suprascapular nerves. VAS scores were collected at 1 and 4 hours and analgesia taken during the first 24 hours was recorded. Results. No significant difference in pain scores was noted but analgesia requirements in the nerve block group were higher. Conclusion. Landmark guided nerve blocks did not show any advantage over subacromial local anaesthetic in our study. This is in contrast to published literature and we believe subacromial injections are more reliable and reproducible. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Acute syndesmotic ankle injuries continue to impose a diagnostic dilemma and it remains unclear whether weighbearing or external rotation should be exerted rotation during the imaging process. Therefore, we aimed to implement both axial load (weightbearing) and external rotation in the assessment of a clinical cohort of patients with syndesmotic ankle injuries syndesmotic using weightbearing CT imaging. In this retrospective comparative cohort study, patients with an acute syndesmotic ankle injury were analyzed using a WBCT (N= 20; Mean age= 31,64 years; SD= 14,07. Inclusion criteria were an MRI confirmed syndesmotic ankle injury imaged by a bilateral WBCT of the ankle during weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. Exclusion criteria consisted of fracture associated syndesmotic ankle injuries. Three-dimensional (3D) models were generated from the CT slices. Tibiofibular displacement and Talar Rotation was quantified using automated3D measurements (Anterior TibioFibular Distance (ATFD), Alpha Angle, Posterior TibioFibular Distance (PTFD) and Talar Rotation (TR) Angle) in comparison to a cohort of non-injured ankles. Results. The difference in neutral-stressed Alpha° and ATFD showed a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and healthy ankles (P = 0.046 and P = 0.039, respectively) The difference in neutral-stressed PTFD and TR° did not show a significant difference between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and healthy ankles (P = 0.492; P = 0.152, respectively). Conclusion. Application of combined weightbearing-external rotation reveals a dynamic anterior tibiofibular widening in patients with syndesmotic ankle injuries. This study provides the first insights based on 3D measurements to support the potential relevance of applying external rotation during WBCT imaging. However, to what extent certain displacement patterns are associated with syndesmotic instability and thus require operative treatment strategies has yet to be determined in future studies

Applications of weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) imaging in the foot and ankle have emerged over the past decade. However, the potential diagnostic benefits are scattered across the literature, and a concise overview is currently lacking. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review all reported diagnostic applications per anatomical region in the foot and ankle. A systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search terms consisted of “weightbearing/standing CT and ankle, hind-, mid- or forefoot”. English language studies analyzing the diagnostic applications of WBCT were included. Studies were excluded if they simulated weightbearing CT, described normal subjects, included cadaveric samples or samples were case reports. The modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was applied for quality assessment. The added value was defined as the review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the Prospero database (CRD42019106980). A total of 48 studies (prospective N=8, retrospective N=36, cohort study N=1, diagnostic N=2, prognostic comparative study N=1) were found to be eligible for review. The following diagnostic applications were identified per anatomical area in the foot: ankle (osteoarthritis N=5, ligament injury N=6); hindfoot (deformity N=9); midfoot (Lisfranc injury N=2, flatfoot deformity N=13, osteoarthritis N=1); forefoot (hallux valgus N=12). The identified studies contained diagnostic applications that could not be used on plain radiographs. The mean MINORS equaled 10.1 on a total of 16 (range: 8 to 12). Diagnostic applications of weightbearing CT imaging are most frequently studied in hindfoot deformity, but other area's areas are on the rise. Post-processing of images was identified as the main added value compared to WBRX. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution as the average quality score was moderate. Therefore, future prospective studies are warranted to consolidate the role of WBCT in diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms

The treatment of massive chronic tears is problematic. The re-tear rate following surgery for extensive cuff tears remains high, and there is little consensus regarding optimum treatment. To investigate the outcome of a cohort of patients who had open repair of an extensive cuff tear using the Leeds Kuff patch as an augment. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with a massive cuff tear who had surgery in our regional elective orthopaedic centre over a two year period from January 2015 to Dec 2016. All patients followed identical rehabilitation protocols, supervised by physiotherapists with an interest in the shoulder. Outcomes assessment was undertaken at a minimum of 12 months by a registrar or physiotherapist who was not part of the treating team. Pre-op data collection included; range of motion, pain score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), assessment of muscle atrophy on MRI. Data collection was completed in 15 patients. The mean age was 62 yrs (56 – 75). The mean pre-op OSS was 22, improving to a mean of 43. The range of motion and pain score improved. There were no intra-operative complications. One patient required a second surgery for evacuation of a haematoma at 10 days post op. One patient had an obvious re-tear at 4 months. Open rotator cuff repair with synthetic Kuff patch augmentation for chronic degenerative tears appears worthwhile when assessed at 12 months and they continuous to improve even at 18 months. This treatment method may be a useful option for patients > 70 years old

Patients with a hindfoot deformity impose a particular challenge when performing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This could be attributed to the lack of insights concerning the outcome towards the hindfoot alignment. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature to investigate the influence of TKA on hindfoot alignment and vice-versa. In accordance with the Methodological Index For Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched to identify capable studies studying the influence between TKA and hindfoot malalignment. We indentified four prospective cohort studies, seven retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study. All twelve articles addressed the influence of TKA on hindfoot alignment. Seven out of nine studies which noticed an improvement of hindfoot alignment after TKA, found a significant improvement (p<0.05). Aditionally three of these studies reported a significant improvement only in valgus hindfeet (p<0.05). On the topic of hindfoot alignment influencing TKA, we identified two studies. These studies reported an impact of hindfoot alignment on the weightbearing and described that 87% of hindfeet remained in valgus alignment after TKA. Available data suggests that alignment in valgus hindfeet can improve after TKA, though long term results are not present. Contrary to last, improvement of hindfoot alignment is not expected in varus hindfeet. Furthermore hindfoot alignment deformity may cause a reduction of the long term survival of the knee prosthesis and therefore should be taken in to account

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCFH) are the most common type of paediatric elbow fractures. Due to beliefs that non-operatively managed SCFH may displace further from the original position, they are monitored with repeated radiographs and a large number are unnecessarily surgically pinned. Very limited evidence currently exists to support these beliefs. This study aimed to determine the incidence of late “significant” displacement (requiring surgical management) of non-operatively managed paediatric SCFH, and whether they necessitate close radiographic follow-up. Patients aged ≤16, with a SCFH, were included in this retrospective cohort study. All were initially managed non-operatively with at least one follow-up radiograph within six weeks of injury. Data from four consecutive years (2013–2016) was collected using the hospital's radiology database. Two observers independently analysed patient radiographs and classified fractures by the Gartland and AO systems. The incidence of late displacement was determined using follow-up radiographs and clinic notes. Of the 164 patients included in the study, one patient (Gartland Type II, AO Type III) suffered late displacement at two weeks, requiring surgical fixation. One further patient (AO Type II) had a persistent cubitus varus deformity (Baumann's angle 90°), with no long-term functional deficit. Incidence of late displacement was 0.6% (n=1). Our findings suggest that stable Gartland Type I/AO Type I and II fractures do not require repeated radiographic follow-up. However, some Gartland Type II/AO Type III fractures require monitoring. This could considerably reduce the financial costs for the healthcare system, and inconvenience to families, associated with repeated follow-ups

Syndesmotic ankle injuries are present in one fourth of all ankle trauma and may lead to chronic syndesmotic instability as well as posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis. The main challenge remains distinguishing them from other types of ankle trauma. Currently, the patient's injured and non-injured ankles are compared using plain radiographs to determine pathology. However, these try to quantify 3D displacement using 2D measurements techniques and it is unknown to what extent the 3D configuration of the normal ankle syndesmosis is symmetrical. We aimed to assess the 3D symmetry of the normal ankle syndesmosis between the right and left side in a non- and weightbearing CT. In this retrospective comparative cohort study, patients with a bilateral non-weightbearing CT (NWBCT; N=28; Mean age=44, SD=17.4) and weight-bearing CT (WBCT; N=33; Mean age=48 years; SD=16.3) were analyzed. Consecutive patients were included between January 2016 and December 2018 when having a bilateral non-weightbearing or weightbearing CT of the foot and ankle. Exclusion criteria were the presence of hindfoot pathology and age less than 18 years or greather than 75 years. CT images were segmented to obtain 3D models. Computer Aided Design (CAD) operations were used to fit the left ankle on top of the right ankle. The outermost point of the apex of the lateral malleolus (AML), anterior tubercle (ATF) and posterior tubercle (PTF) were computed. The difference in the coordinates attached to these anatomical landmarks of the left distal fibula in the ankle syndesmosis with respect to right were used to quantify symmetry. A Cartesian coordinate system was defined based on the tibia to obtain the direction of differences in all six degrees of freedom. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test to allow comparison between measurements from a NWBCT and WBCT. Reference values were determined for each 3D measurement in a NWBCT and WBCT based on their 2SD. The highest difference in translation could be detected in the anterior-posterior direction (Mean AP. NWBCT. = −0.01mm; 2SD=3.43/Mean AP. WBCT. =−0.1mm; 2SD=2.3) and amongst rotations in the external direction (Mean AP. NWBCT. =−0.3°; 2SD=6.7/Mean AP. WBCT. =-0,2°; 2SD=5.2). None of these differences were statistically significant in the normal ankle syndesmosis when obtained from a NWBCT compared to a WBCT (P>0.05). This study provides references values concerning the 3D symmetry of the normal ankle syndesmosis in weightbearing and non-weightbearing CT-scans. These novel data contribute relevantly to previous 2D radiographic quantifications. In clinical practice they will aid in distinguishing if a patient with a syndesmotic ankle lesion differs from normal variance in syndesmotic ankle symmetry

Introduction. Recurrent patellar dislocation is often reported in bilateral knees in young active individuals. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tear is the attributable cause behind many of them and warrants reconstruction of the ligament to stabilize the patellofemoral joint. Besides, trochleoplasty and Fulkerson's osteotomy are some other procedures that are performed to treat this problem. This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with single-stage bilateral realignment procedures vs staged procedures. Methods. It was a retrospective matched cohort study with prospectively collected data. A total of 36 patients (mean age-26.9 years, range 13 years to 47 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent a surgical correction in both the knees, were divided into two matched groups (age, sex, follow-up, and type of procedure). Among them, 18 patients had surgeries in one knee done at least six months later than the other knee. The remaining 18 patients had surgical interventions for both knees done in a single stage. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner, and subjective knee scores of both groups were compared and analyzed. The rate of complications and return to the theatre were noted in both groups. Results. With a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (2.0 years to 12.3 years), there was a significant improvement in PROMS observed in both the groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be found between the two groups in terms of the Lysholm, Kujala, and subjective knee scores (p> 0.05). The rate of complication and the re-operation rate was comparable in both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion. The outcomes of staged vs simultaneous surgeries for bilateral patellofemoral instability are comparable. Our results indicate that simultaneous bilateral surgical correction is safe. This can potentially be an option to reduce the surgical cost and perioperative morbidity. However, careful selection of cases, choice of the patient, and the scope of rehabilitation facilities are some of the other factors that should be considered

Background. Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial and rotational stability is one of the main concerns. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) has been recommended to enhance rotational stability. Purpose. To assess the effect of ALLR on return to sports. Study Design. Retrospective comparative cohort study;. Level of evidence: III. Methods. A total of 68 patients who underwent ACLR after acute ACL injury between 2015 and 2018 with a follow-up of at least 24 months were enrolled in the study. Patients with isolated ACLR (group ALL(-), n=41) were compared to patients with ACLR+ALLR (group ALL(+), n=27) in regard to subjective knee assessment via Tegner activity scale, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form and Lysholm score. All tests were performed before the surgery, at 6 months and 24 months postoperatively. Results. Mean follow-up was 29.7±2.9 months for group ALL(-) and 31.6±3.0 for ALL(+) (p=0.587). Tegner, ACL-RSI and IKDC scores at last follow-up were significantly better in ALL(+) compared to ALL(-). There were no significant differences in isokinetic extensor strength and single-leg hop test results between the groups. 40 (97.6%) patients in ALL(-) and 27 (100%) in ALL(+) had a grade 2 or 3 pivot shift (p=0.812) preoperatively. Postoperatively, 28 (68.3%) patients in ALL(-) and 25 (92.6%) patients in ALL(+) had a negative pivot shift (p<0.001). 2 (5.9%) patients in ALL(-) and 1 (3.7%) patient in ALL(+) needed ACLR revision due to traumatic re-injury (p=0.165). There was no significant difference in the rate of return to any sports activity (87.8% in ALL(-) vs 88.9% in ALL(+); p=0.532), but ALL(+) showed a higher rate of return to the same level of sports activity (55.6%) than group ALL(-) (31.7%) (p=0.012). Conclusion. ACLR combined with ALLR provided a significantly higher rate of return to the same level sports activity than ACLR alone, probably due to enhanced rotational stability

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta- analysis to investigate the effect of initial varus or valgus displacement of proximal humerus on the outcomes of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing postoperative outcomes associated with initial varus versus initial valgus displacement of proximal humerus fracture. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified two retrospective cohort studies and one retrospective analysis of a prospective database, enrolling a total of 243 patients with proximal humerus fractures. Our analysis showed that initial varus displacement was associated with a higher risk of overall complication (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.12–4.64, P = 0.02), screw penetration (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06–5.02, P = 0.04), varus displacement (RR 4.38, 95% CI 2.22–8.65, P < 0.0001), and reoperation (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.80–5.03, P < 0.0001) compared to valgus displacement. There was no significant difference in avascular necrosis (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62–3.27, P = 0.40), infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46–4.84, P = 0.51), and non-union or malunion (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.37–5.04, P = 0.64). Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that initial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures is associated with higher risk of overall complication, screw penetration, varus displacement, and reoperation compared to initial valgus displacement. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Further high quality studies, that are adequately powered, are required to investigate the outcomes of initial varus and valgus displacement in specific fracture types

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Background. Since 2011, the knee service at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre has been offering a neutralising medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to a group of patients presenting with early medial osteoarthritis of the knee, varus alignment and symptoms for more than 2 years. During development of this practice an association was observed between this phenotype of osteoarthritis and the presence of CAM deformity at the hip. Methods. A retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent HTO since 2011 were identified (n=30). Comparator groups were used in order to establish whether meaningful observations were being made: Control group: The spouses of a high-risk osteoarthritis cohort recruited for a different study at our unit (n=20) Pre-arthroplasty group: Patients who have undergone uni-compartmental arthroplasty (UKA) for antero-medial osteoarthritis (n=20)All patients had standing bilateral full-length radiographs available for analysis using in house developed Matlab-based software for hip measurements and MediCAD for lower limb alignment measurements. Results. A total of 140 limbs from 70 gender-matched subjects were studied. The HTO group had a significantly higher prevalence of CAM lesions defined by an Alpha angle >650. They also had a significantly greater mean alpha angle than both the pre-arthroplasty and control groups [HTO (Avg. 68.3 (±16.1)) vs Pre-arthroplasty (Avg. 59.5 (±15.5)) P=0.01; HTO vs Control (Avg. 58.2 (±13.9)) P=0.007]. Conclusions. The results of this study confirm that our HTO group have a significantly greater prevalence of CAM lesions. A feature not seen in either pre-arthroplasty or control subjects. This group demonstrate independent predictors for progression of OA in both the hip and the knee. To our knowledge this is a novel observation. Level of evidence. Observational cohort study (III)

Background. Over 96% of primary total hip replacements (THR) recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) are performed through a posterior or lateral surgical approach. There is no high quality evidence available to support the use of one approach over the other in primary THR and even less evidence when the outcome of revision THR is considered. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 267 patients who had revision hip replacements between January 2006 and March 2010 for aseptic loosening. They rated their pain from 0–10, and used the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short form-12 (SF-12). Results. We performed 275 revision total hip replacements for aseptic loosening on patients in whom the primary operation details were available. Their mean age was 69 years (SD12) with 43% male and 57% right-sided procedures. 205 patients responded to our questionnaires (209/275 hips, 76%). Unfortunately 19 patients had died, 4 had dementia and 13 declined to participate. We were unable to contact a further 33.Grouping by approach, 20% (43/209) had primary and revision lateral approaches, 20% (43/209) had primary lateral and revision posterior and 60% (123/209) had both primary and revision via posterior approaches. The WOMAC and OHS were significantly better in patients who had a posterior approach for both primary and revision surgery, compared to those that did not (OHS p=0.028, WOMAC p=0.026). We found no significant differences in pain, satisfaction or health-related quality of life between the groups. Conclusions. Registry data may help further explore the relationship between surgical approach and outcome in revision hip surgery. A randomised controlled trial of the posterior versus lateral approach for revision surgery would provide a definitive answer. Level of Evidence. 2b - retrospective cohort study. Disclosures. No financial disclosures or conflicts of interests from any authors