Summary. Revision TKA using CCK prosthesis showed comparable outcome to PS prosthesis in clinical and radiological results. Introduction. In revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the goal should be to obtain good motion, function and most importantly stability. The stability depends on remaining soft tissue and implant design. The more the ligaments retain function, the less the implant constraint is needed to achieve stability. With increased constraint, the transfer of joint reaction forces to implant-bone interface may lead to mechanical loosening of the implant. Constrained condylar knee (CCK) prosthesis provides more constraint compared with posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological outcome and survivorship of CCK and PS prosthesis in revision TKA. Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty-one consecutive revision TKAs using CCK (79 knees) and PS (42 knees) were included. The mean follow-up period was 63.2 months for CCK and 64.8 months for PS. The mean age was 69.5 years and 70.6 years in CCK and PS, respectively. Range of motion (ROM), American Knee Society (AKS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, complications and failure rate were assessed. Radiographic measurements included tibiofemoral angle and radiolucent lines. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with an end point of
