Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 27
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 49 - 50
1 Dec 2022
Evans JT Whitehouse MR


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 41 - 41
17 Nov 2023
Samir A Abdelghany A Metwally A
Full Access

Abstract. Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of phonophoresis (PH) and conventional therapeutic ultrasound (US) on the functional and pain outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods. We conducted an electronic search through PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus databases. We screened the retrieved articles to include only English full-text randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of phonophoresis versus conventional therapeutic ultrasound on patients with knee osteoarthritis. Two reviewers screened, extracted the data, and independently assessed the quality of the included articles. Results. A total of five randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria out of 267 studies screened. Our results showed no statistically significant differences between the PH and US groups (1), (2), (3),(4), and (5). The PH group demonstrated more significant effects than the UT group in reducing VAS pain scores (P=0.009) and improving WOMAC scores, although this did not reach the level of significance (P=0.143) (5). In the long term, PH therapy was found to be superior to US in improving painless walking duration and distance VAS scores (p=0.034, 0.017) respectively, as well as walking and resting walking VAS scores (p=0.03, 0.007) respectively, which were found to be permanent (3). Conclusions. Both therapies improve pain and function. However, we suggest conducting more high-quality trials with larger sample sizes and do not recommend the use of these therapies in clinical practice due to limitations in gender selection and high risk of bias. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 117 - 117
4 Apr 2023
Du L Yang B Zhong Z Wu K
Full Access

The principal of “function priority, early rehabilitation, and return to sports” is now the goal for sports injury rehabilitation. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a rising procedure for early rehabilitation. This paper systematically assessed the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on postoperative ACL reconstruction to provide guidance for physiotherapist and patient when designing a suitable rehabilitation protocol. To evaluate the interventional outcomes of neuromuscular electrical stimulation following ACL reconstruction, we searched PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI to collect all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects with neuromuscular electrical stimulation and without intervention on rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction up to January 30, 2022. Two investigators independently performed literature screening, data extraction, bias assessment of risk, and used RevMan 5.3 software to conduct a meta-analysis. A total of six RCTs were included, and the results showed that the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction significantly improved the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (MD 6.33, 95% CI [-0.43, 12.22]; I2 = 66%; p = 0.040), the Lysholm score (MD 7.94, 95% CI [6.49, 9.39]; I2 = 89%; p < 0.001), and the range of motion (ROM) (MD 9.99, 95% CI [7.97, 12.02]; I2 = 81%; p < 0.001) in the knees when compared to the control group without using neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Existing evidence show that neuromuscular electrical stimulation is beneficial for early rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation is encouraged in the design of rehabilitation protocol. However, due to the limited number of RCT studies and the small sample size, further multi-center RCTs with more participants are needed for a higher-level evidence


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 57 - 57
4 Apr 2023
Tariq M Uddin Q Amin H Ahmed B
Full Access

This study aims to compare the outcomes of Volar locking plating (VLP) versus percutaneous Kirschner wires (K-wire) fixation for surgical management of distal radius fractures. We systematically searched multiple databases, including MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of VLP fixation and K-wire for treatment of distal radius fracture in adults. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications at 1 year follow up were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and results presented as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). 13 RCTs with 1336 participants met the inclusion criteria. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were significantly better for VLP fixation (MD= 2.15; 95% CI, 0.56-3.74; P = 0.01; I2=23%). No significant difference between the two procedures for grip strength measured in kilograms (MD= −3.84; 95% CI,-8.42-0.74; P = 0.10; I2=52%) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores (MD= −0.06; 95% CI,-0.87-0.75; P = 0.89; I2=0%). K-wire treatment yielded significantly improved extension (MD= −4.30; P=0.04) but with no differences in flexion, pronation, supination, and radial deviation (P >0.05). The risk of complications and rate of reoperation were similar for the two procedures (P >0.05). This meta-analysis suggests that VLP fixation improves DASH score at 12 months follow up, however, the difference is small and unlikely to be clinically important. Existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the superiority of either VLP or K-wire treatment in terms of patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 45 - 45
14 Nov 2024
Kjeldsen T Thorgaard Skou S Dalgas U Tønning L Birch S Frydendal T Varnum C Garval M G Ingwersen K Mechlenburg I
Full Access

Introduction. Exercise is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). Interestingly, content and dose of exercise interventions seem to be important for the effect of exercise interventions, but the optimal content and dose is unknown. This warrants randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the optimal exercise program in Hip OA. The aim of this trial was to investigate whether progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) for improving functional performance, hip pain and hip-related quality of life in patients with hip OA. Method. This was a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority trial. 160 participants with clinically diagnosed hip OA were recruited from hospitals and physiotherapy clinics and randomly assigned to twelve weeks of PRT or NEMEX. The PRT intervention consisted of 5 high-intensity resistance training exercises targeting muscles at the hip and knee joints. The NEMEX intervention included 10 exercises and emphasized sensorimotor control and functional stability. The primary outcome was change in the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST). Key secondary outcomes were changes in scores on the pain and hip-related quality of life (QoL) subscales of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Result. The mean changes from baseline to 12-week follow-up in the 30s-CST were 1.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with PRT and 1.5 (CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with NEMEX (difference, 0.0 [CI, 0.8 to 0.8] chair stands). For the HOOS pain subscale, mean changes were 8.6 (CI, 5.3 to 11.8) points with PRT and 9.3 (CI, 5.9 to 12.6) points with NEMEX. For the HOOS QoL subscale, mean changes were 8.0 (CI, 4.3 to 11.7) points with PRT and 5.7 (CI, 1.9 to 9.5) points with NEMEX. Conclusion. In patients with hip OA, PRT is not superior to NEMEX for improving functional performance, hip pain, or hip-related QoL


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 129 - 129
14 Nov 2024
Larsen JB Skou ST Laursen M Bruun NH Bandholm T Arendt-Nielsen L Madeleine P
Full Access

Introduction. There is a lack of evidence-based treatments for patients with chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is well-established that knee extensor and flexor muscle strength are markedly impaired following TKA, but no studies have examined muscle strength and power in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Therefore, the aim was to investigate if neuromuscular exercises and pain neuroscience education (PNE) were superior to PNE alone for improvement of muscle strength and power in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Method. This report presents the exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT03886259). Participants with chronic moderate-to-severe average daily pain intensity and no signs of prosthesis failure at least one year after primary TKA were included. Participants were randomized to receive either supervised neuromuscular exercise and PNE or the same PNE sessions alone. The outcomes were changes from baseline to 12-months for peak leg extension power and maximum muscle strength, measured during maximal voluntary isometric contractions, for the knee extensors and flexors. Result. Sixty-nine participants (age 62.2±7.2, 40 females) were included. No between-group differences were observed for peak leg extension power (difference 13.6 Watts, 95% CI -22.2 to 49.3), maximum knee extensor muscle strength (difference -20.9 Newtons, 95% CI -65.8 to 24.0) or maximum knee flexor muscle strength (difference 8.6 Newtons, 95% CI -11.9 to 29.1). Peak leg extension power (26.3 Watts, 95% CI 4.3 to 48.3) and maximum knee flexor muscle strength (19.7 Newtons, 95% CI 7.6 to 31.9) improved significantly in the neuromuscular exercise and PNE group with no significant improvements observed in the PNE alone group. Conclusion. Neuromuscular exercise and PNE did not improve muscle strength and power compared to PNE alone in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Acknowledgements. This study was funded by the Danish Rheumatism Association, the Svend Andersen Foundation and Lions Club Denmark


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 117 - 117
1 Nov 2021
Longo UG
Full Access

The function of the upper extremity is highly dependent on correlated motion of the shoulder. The shoulder can be affected by several diseases. The most common are: rotator cuff tear (RCT), shoulder instability, shoulder osteoarthritis and fractures. Rotator cuff disease is a common disorder. It has a high prevalence rate, causing high direct and indirect costs. The appropriate treatment for RCT is debated. The American Academy Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines state that surgical repair is an option for patients with chronic, symptomatic full-thickness RCT, but the quality of evidence is unconvincing. Thus, the AAOS recommendations are inconclusive. We are performing a randomized controlled trial to compare surgical and conservative treatment of RCT, in term of functional outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration. Shoulder instability occurs when the head of the upper arm bone is forced out of the shoulder socket. Shoulder instabilities have been classified according to the etiology, the direction of instability, or on combinations thereof. The Thomas and Matsen classification, which is currently the most commonly utilized classification, divides shoulder instability events into the traumatic, unidirectional, Bankart lesion, and surgery (TUBS) and the atraumatic, multidirectional, bilateral, rehabilitation, and capsular shift (AMBRI) categories. The acquired instability overstress surgery (AIOS) category was then added. Surgical procedures for shoulder instability includes arthroscopic capsuloplasty, remplissage, bone block procedure or Latarjet procedure. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) represents a good solution for the management of patients with osteoarthritis or fracture of the proximal humerus, with associated severe osteoporosis and RC dysfunction


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 57 - 57
1 Mar 2021
Tennyson M Abdulkarim A Krkovic M
Full Access

Various technical tips have been described on the placement of poller screws during intramedullary nailing however studies reporting outcomes are limited. Overall, there is no consistent conclusion about whether intramedullary nailing alone, or intramedullary nails augmented with poller screws is more advantageous. In a systematic review, we asked: (1) What is the proportion of non-unions with poller screw usage? (2) What is the proportion of malalignment, infection and secondary surgical procedures with poller screws usage?. We conducted a systematic review of multiple databases including Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Seventy-four records were identified, twelve met our inclusion criteria. Twelve studies with a total of 348 participants and 353 fractures were included. Mean follow up time was 21.4 months and mean age of included patients was 40.1 year. Seven studies had heterogenous population of non-unions and/ or malunions in addition to acute fractures. Three studies included only acute fractures and two studies examined non unions only. Four of the twelve studies reported non unions with an overall outcome proportion of 4%. Six studies reported coronal malalignment with an overall outcome proportion of 6%. The secondary surgical procedures rate ranged from 2 – 40% with an overall outcome proportion of 8% and included grafting, revisions and any reported cases of removal of metal work. When compared with existing literature our review suggests intramedullary nailing with poller screws has lower rates of non-unions and coronal malalignment than those reported in the literature for intramedullary nailing alone. Prospective randomized control trial is necessary to fully determine outcome benefits


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Mar 2021
Kumar G Debuka E
Full Access

Increasing incidence of osteoporosis, obesity and an aging population have led to an increase in low energy hip fractures in the elderly. Perceived lower blood loss and lower surgical time, media coverage of minimal invasive surgery and patient expectations unsurprisingly have led to a trend towards intramedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures. This is contrary to the Cochrane review of random controlled trials of intramedullary vs extramedullary implants which continues recommends the use of a sliding hip screw (SHS) over other devices. Furthermore, despite published literature of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of SHS citing benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma, smaller scar, faster recovery, reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia needs; the uptake of these approaches has been poor. We describe a novel technique one which remains minimally invasive, that not only has a simple learning curve but easily reproducible results. All patients who underwent MIS SHS fixation of extracapsular fractures were included in this study. Technique is shown in Figure 1. We collated data on all intertrochanteric hip fractures that were treated by a single surgeon series during period Jan 2014 to July 2015. Data was collected from electronic patient records and radiographs from Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Surgical time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, surgical incision length, post-operative transfusion, Tip Apex Distance (TAD) were analyzed. There were 10 patients in this study. All fractures were Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type A1 or A2. Median surgical time was 36 minutes (25–54). Mean fluoroscopy time was similar to standard incision sliding hip screw fixation. Blood loss estimation with MIS SHS can be undertaken safely and expeditiously for extracapsular hip fractures


Abstract. Objectives. To determine the effects of self-management interventions (SMIs) including an exercise component (EC) on low back pain (LBP) and disability and to determine whether SMIs with tailored exercises (TEs) have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with general exercises (GEs). Methods. An electronic systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in 5 electronic databases. RCTs compared SMIs with an EC to control interventions. Data were extracted at 3 follow-up points (short-term, intermediate and long-term) and meta-analyses were performed. Reviewed RCTs were divided into subgroups based on whether the EC was tailored or generic. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed at the short-term follow-up to assess whether the SMIs with TEs have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with GEs. Results. 12 original RCTs were included in the review (six including SMIs with TEs) and were of moderate quality. The pooled results revealed the effect sizes (ESs) of −0.26,-0.32 and −0.21 for short, intermediate and long-term pain intensity, respectively and −0.26,-0.22 and −0.21 for short, intermediate, and long-term disability, respectively (negative value indicates a mean difference in favour of SMIs) indicating a moderate but significant reduction in pain and disability compared to controls. Subgroup meta-analysis at the short-term follow-up revealed that SMIs with TEs had ES of –0.19(p=0.004) for pain and –0.20(p=0.002) for disability compared to SMIs with GEs demonstrating positive but not significant improvement in pain (ES −0.48, p=0.09) and disability (ES −0.45, p=0.10). Conclusions. There is moderate quality evidence for SMIs with an EC to have moderate but significant positive effect on pain and disability in people with LBP. The subgroup analysis revealed that SMIs with exercises tailored to person's needs are superior in reducing pain and disability. These results indicate the importance of developing TE solutions supporting self-management to improve its effect on pain and disability in LBP patients. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Nov 2018
Barritault D
Full Access

Matrix therapy is a newly coined name emphasizing the importance of the extracellular matrix in regenerative medicine. Heparan sulfates (HS) are key elements of the extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold which store and protect most growth factors/cytokines controlling the cell migration and differentiation required for healing processes. We have engineered biodegradable nano-polymers (alpha 1–6 polyglucose carboxymethyl sulfate) mimicking (RGTA®) to replace destroyed HS in the damaged ECM scaffolding and to protect cytokines produced by healthy neighbouring cells, thereby restoring the ECM microenvironment and tissue homeostasis and, if needed, provide a homing niche for cell therapy. This matrix therapy approach has considerably improved the quality of healing in various animal models, including muscle and tendon, with reduction or absence of fibrosis resulting in a regeneration process. Over 50 000 patients have been treated in the last years for skin and corneal wounds with dedicated products based on this technology. A randomized controlled trial was performed on 22 racing French Standardbred Trotters (ST) horses to evaluate the efficacy of another polymer, OTR4131 Equitend®, to treat tendinopathies. We evaluated the effect versus placebo on acute superficial digital flexor tendonitis over 4 months by clinical and ultrasonographic measures and their racing performances followed up over the 2 years after treatment. A significant reduction on tendon cross section area was measured in treated animals, racing was 2–3 times more often than placebo, with 3.3 times fewer recurrences and pre-injury performance level was maintained. This study may pave the way for development in humans


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 134 - 134
1 Nov 2018
Murchú SÓ Goel R Sydnor K Rondon A Purtill JJ Austin MS
Full Access

The use of a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Return to function and pain are believed to be affected by the use of a tourniquet. The hypothesis of this study was that use of a tourniquet (T) would delay postoperative functional recovery and increase pain as compared to no tourniquet use (NT). 200 patients were recruited for this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. All surgeries were performed by one of two fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons at our institution. Patients were randomized to either undergo TKA with T or NT and blinded to group allocation. An otherwise standardized perioperative protocol was followed. The primary outcome measures were functional assessment testing using the timed up-and-go (TUG) and stair-climb (SC) tests and visual analog scale pain (VAS-P) scores. Secondary outcome measures included blood loss and range-of-motion (ROM). Patients completed outcomes measures preoperatively, in hospital, and postoperatively at 4–6 weeks and 6–8 months. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and Student's T-test, alpha of p < 0.05, were used to determine significance. No significant differences were seen in postoperative TUG, SC, VAS-P, or ROM at any time point. NT patients were seen to have significantly more calculated blood loss (means: T 1,370.04mL, NT 1,743.85mL; p < 0.001), without a significant increase in transfusion events. Tourniquet use during TKA significantly decreases blood loss and does not adversely affect early postoperative outcomes. Tourniquet use during routine TKA is safe and effective and concerns over deleterious effects on function and pain may not be justified


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Nov 2018
Deering EM Hu S Abdulkarim A
Full Access

Tourniquets have been used for many years during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With a growing demand for TKA in recent years, tourniquet use has been surrounded by ongoing controversy due to many conflicting advantages and disadvantages of tourniquet use. Quantifying the case for or against tourniquet use in TKA, in terms of patient focused outcomes, is a priority. This meta-analysis analysed, the never before assessed, impact of tourniquet use during TKA on post-operative pain. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA reporting guidelines to assess the impact of tourniquet use on patients post-TKA. Post-operative pain was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were post-operative range of motion (ROM) and length of stay (LOS). The initial search yielded 230 studies, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative increase in pain and reduction in ROM when using a tourniquet appeared significantly more likely when compared to no tourniquet use during TKA, yet with no overall difference in post-operative LOS. Subgroup meta-analysis demonstrated a trend that favoured the half-course tourniquet for reduced post-operative pain in patients when compared to full tourniquet use during TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that the after-effects of tourniquet use in TKA patients and its impact on post-operative pain and ROM are indeed significant. We recommend further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on TKA patient outcomes of post-operative pain and ROM. Conflict of interest: The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 49 - 49
1 Apr 2018
Lv ZT Li M Chen AM
Full Access

BACKGROUND. Diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) is impaired in people with chronic pain such as knee osteoarthritis (KOA), which may predict the risk of acute-to-chronic pain transition. Electroacupuncture (EA) is effective in relieving pain in patients with KOA. However, whether EA may inhibit acute-to-chronic pain transition of KOA has not been systematically examined. METHODS. This was a multicenter, three-arm parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial involving a total of 450 patients with KOA. This study was approved by the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials (reference: ChiECRCT-20140035) and registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-ICR-14005411). Patients were divided into three groups based on EA current intensity: strong EA (>2mA), weak EA (<0.5mA) and sham EA (none acupoint). Treatments consisted of five sessions per week, for two weeks. Primary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) and DNIC function. RESULTS. One week of EA had no clinical important improvement in VAS and DNIC function in all three groups (P>0.05). After 2 weeks” treatment, changes from baseline showed that VAS (strong EA: 2.97, SD 0.10, P<0.0001; weak EA: 2.75, SD 0.15, P <0.0001; sham EA: 1.19, SD 0.14, P<0.0001) and DNIC (strong EA: −14.85, SD 0.16, P<0.0001; weak EA: −4.75, SD 0.28, P<0.0001; sham EA: −1.43, SD 0.24, P<0.0001) were significantly improved in all three groups. Compared with sham EA, weak EA (3.8, 95%CI 3.45 to 4.15) and strong EA (13.54, 95%CI 13.23 to 13.85) were better in improving DNIC function. Compared with weak EA, strong EA were better in enhancing DNIC function (9.73, 95%CI 9.44 to 10.02), as well as in reducing VAS. CONCLUSIONS. In conclusion, EA should be administered 2 weeks to exerting significant effect on KOA. Strong EA was better than weak or sham EA in alleviating the intensity of pain and inhibiting the acute-to-chronic pain transition of KOA


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVI | Pages 6 - 6
1 Aug 2012
Alsousou J Handley R Hulley P Thompson M McNally E Harrison P Willett K
Full Access

Purpose. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has been shown to have positive effect in tendon regeneration in in-vitro and limited in-vivo animal studies. We aim to study PRP use in acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) regeneration in a purposely designed clinical trial. Methods. This is a prospective double-arm patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. ATR patients were randomized into PRP treatment or control groups. Non-operatively treated patients received PRP or control injection in clinic. In operatively treated patients, PRP gel was applied in the ruptured gap during percutaneous repair. Standard rehabilitation protocol was used and patients were followed up for 24 weeks. ATR, VISA-A and FAOS scores were used as subjective outcome measures. Functional ultrasound Elastography (FUSE) was performed at each follow-up to assess the mechanical properties of tendons. PRP analysis and tendon needle-biopsy were performed to study the histological differences during healing in both groups. Results. 20 patients were recruited with mean age 37.5±8.8 (8males and 7 females). Rupture location was 4.8±2.1 cm from insertion. PRP platelet count 1044±320 × 1000/μL with average platelet CD62p activation 68.42±4.5%. Mixed linear regression analysis revealed PRP treated tendon achieved better ATR and VISA-A outcome scores (p<0.05). FAOS score analysis showed that PRP group had better pain, ADL and symptoms scores with significant difference apparent from week 3 onwards. Strain mapping using FUSE scan in 4 patients showed bigger harder tendons in PRP group. Analysis of the remaining patients is on the way. To achieve the desired statistical power in pragmatic settings, recruitment will continue in a multi-centre trial. Conclusion. Our preliminary findings show that PRP application in Achilles tendon rupture may lead to faster regeneration and return to function as supported by a combination of objective and subjective outcome measures


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 4 | Pages 44 - 46
1 Aug 2023
Burden EG Whitehouse MR Evans JT


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 49 - 50
1 Oct 2023
Marson BA

This edition of Cochrane Corner looks at some of the work published by the Cochrane Collaboration, covering pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing definitive fixation or joint replacement for hip, pelvic, and long bone fractures; interventions for reducing red blood cell transfusion in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: an overview of systematic reviews; and pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 4 | Pages 43 - 45
2 Aug 2024
Evans JT Evans JP Whitehouse MR


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 3 | Pages 46 - 47
1 Jun 2022
Das A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 6 | Pages 48 - 50
1 Dec 2021
Evans JT French JMR Whitehouse MR