Radial head fractures are among the most common fractures around the elbow. Radial head arthroplasty is one of the surgical treatment options after complex radial head fractures. This surgery is usually done under general anaesthesia. However, there is a recent anaesthetic technique - wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) - that has proven useful in different surgical settings, such as in distal radius or olecranon fractures. It allows a good haemostatic control without the use of a tourniquet and allows the patient to actively collaborate during the surgical procedure. Furthermore, there are no side effects or complications caused by the general anaesthesia and there's an earlier patient discharge. The authors present the case of a seventy-six-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department after a fall from standing height with direct trauma to the left elbow. The radiological examination revealed a complete intra-articular comminuted fracture of the radial head (Mason III). Clinical management: The patient was submitted to surgery with radial head arthroplasty, using WALANT. The surgery was successfully completed without pain. There were no intra or immediate post-operative complications and the patient was discharged on the same day. Six weeks after surgery, the patient had almost full range of motion and was very pleased with the functional outcome, with no limitations on her activities of daily living. The use of WALANT has been expanded beyond the hand and wrist surgery. It is a safe and simple option for patients at high risk of general anaesthesia, allowing similar surgical outcomes without the intraoperative and postoperative complications of general anaesthesia and permitting an earlier hospital discharge. Furthermore, it allows the patient to actively collaborate during the surgery, providing the surgeons the opportunity to evaluate active mobility and stability, permitting final corrections before closing the incision

Summary. Increased lateral ulnotrochlear joint space due to improper sizing in radial head arthroplasty may result in medial collateral ligament laxity, leading to increased osteophytes and arthritis. Introduction. Radial head (RH) arthroplasty is a common response to comminuted RH fractures. Typical complications include improper sizing, leading to changes in joint kinematics. Evidence of these changes should be visible through fluoroscopic images of affected joints. The two examined changes in this study are the ulnar deviation from distal radial translation (DRT), and the widening of the lateral ulnotrochlear joint space (LUT). Methods. Eight fresh-frozen cadaver arms were used. Initial images were taken with the native RH intact. The Kocher approach exposed the radiocapitellar (RC) joint capsule, preserving all ligaments. The RH was excised and Integra Katalyst CoCr (Plainsboro, NJ) telescoping, bipolar, RH inserted. Images were taken with implant sizings: −2mm, 0mm, +2mm, and +4mm, (from native) using 1mm washers preventing implant bipolarity. AP fluoroscopic images of the elbow were taken at full extension. Joint spaces were measured using image analysis, normalised using known radio-opaque lengths. Four LUT measurements were made, two medially and two laterally, and normalised by measuring the RH implant diameter. Each set (medial and lateral) were averaged together and the resulting value used for all comparisons. Images of distal ulnar deviation at the wrist were taken with the wrist in supination, the hand rotated medially. Measurements were from the distal medial radial tip to the distal lateral ulnar tip. Images were normalised by placing a scalpel in the same plane as measurement. Results. DRT values were difference paired for each arm using the 0mm values as baselines. One-way ANOVA of the paired values resulted in significant DT with sizing increases (p<0.01). The quotient of DRT and sizing determined comparative impact with the LUT increase. LUT joint gap measurements were percentage paired, with natives as the baseline, and One-way ANOVA used. A significant increase in LUT spacing occurred with increased sizings (p<0.01). Discussion. Increased ulnar deviation can increase loading on the TFCC, leading to possible TFCC tear, increased articular cartilage wear from carpal misalignment, and eventual wrist instability and arthritis. The percentage of the radial lengthening is represented in DRT. Over-sizing results in small percentages of increased radial length at the wrist, therefore deviation at the elbow must take place, either through rotation of the ulna, or translation. Either of these can be seen through LUT measurements. Previous measurements of the LUT space were made by Frank (2009), with similar results. This was being used as a method of improper sizing detection using radiographs. The percentage difference of LUT space for corresponding sizing: there is an increase in LUT space for every sizing; maybe due to loosening of the soft tissue from arthroplasty. Increased LUT space indicates the medial translation of proximal ulna. This can result in Medial Collateral Ligament laxity, leading to increased osteophytes, and arthritis. Use and non-treatment, can create a chronic, painful, disorder

Summary

The significance of matching radius of curvature of the radial head implant and the capitellum in implant selection is evaluated. A mismatch of radius of curvature could lead to point loading, reducing contact area, creating large contact stresses, resulting in arthritis, pain, and other complications.

Summary

Consistent load distributions with over-sizing of radial head implants show minimal variance in interosseus ligament (IOL) and triangular-fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tension, both of which are essential in distribution of load at the elbow.

Introduction:Changes in loading distribution at the elbow have not been studied with radial head (RH) arthroplasty. Difficulty arises concerning distribution variability between loading methods and magnitudes, and with implant oversizing.

Background. Radial head fractures are the commonest fractures involving the elbow. The goals of treatment are to restore stability, preserve motion, and maintain the relative length of the radius. Fortunately, most simple uncomplicated fractures can be treated non-operatively. Choosing between fixation and radial head replacement for comminuted fractures remains difficult. Excision of radial head fractures is not an ideal option in unstable elbow injuries. The purpose of this systematic review was to search for and critically appraise articles directly comparing functional outcomes and complications for fixation (open reduction internal fixation, ORIF) versus arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures (Mason type 3) in adults. Method. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases using specific search terms and limits was conducted. Strict eligibility criteria were applied to stringently screen resultant articles. Three comparative studies were identified and reviewed. Results. Three comparative studies were identified and reviewed: two studies found significantly better Broberg & Morrey functional scores after replacement compared with ORIF in Mason type 3 fractures. The third study found no significant differences in Mayo functional score or range of motion, but did find that grip strength was better after ORIF. Complication rates were too heterogenous for conclusion. Conclusion. Fixation with good reduction may be attempted in unstable Mason type 3 fractures, and arthroplasty may be considered if this is not possible. Further randomised comparative trials are required to clarify the decision-making between fixation and replacement. Functional outcomes and complications were conflicting in the studies included here. Ideally, treatment decision should take into account elbow stability and degree of comminution