Introduction. Lesser toe proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a common forefoot procedure for correction of claw toe deformities. The most common method of fixation is with k-wires. Although this is a very cost-effective method of fixation, well-known disadvantages include pin site infection, non union, wire migration and the inconvenience to the patients of percutaneous wires for up to six weeks. For these reasons, intramedullary devices for joint fixation without crossing the distal IP joint have been developed. Many different designs are currently available. The Smart Toe prosthesis which has appeared as a type I and II, is one such implant. In two recent studies using type I, the use of this implant is advocated. We wish to present our experience with the use of the Smart Toe II. Methods. In this retrospective study we present a radiological review of 46 consecutive cases in 25 patients who underwent lesser toe interphalangeal arthrodeses using the Smart Toe II implant between July 2010 and November 2014 by the senior author. There were 7 (28%) male and 18 (72%) female patients. Post operative radiographs, taken at a mean follow up of 6 months, were reviewed for non-union, migration and implant failure. Results. There were 9 (20%) implant fractures, 10 (22%) radiological non- unions and 5 (11%) implant migrations. 4 toes (9%) were sufficiently symptomatic to require revision. Conclusion. In contrast to two previous studies, our series showed a high rate of implant fracture and non-union, sometimes leading to the need for revision surgery. We recommend caution in use of the Smart Toe II and welcome further reports of results. If our experience is replicated, we suggest the device's use is withheld pending appropriate studies to identify and address the reasons for implant failure, especially if more of the radiological failures come to require revision

Introduction. The aim of this study is to better understand the anatomy of the forefoot to minimise surgical complications following minimally invasive forefoot surgery. Methods. The study examines the plantar anatomy of the lesser toes in ten cadaver feet. The tendons, nerves and bony anatomy are recorded. Results. The anatomy of the flexor tendons reveals the short flexor tendon bifurcates to allow the long flexor tendon to pass through it reliably at the level of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) in the lesser rays. The division of the intermetatarsal nerves to digital nerves relative to the MTPJ is more variable. This nerve division is more consistently related to the skin of the web between the toes. In the first webspace the division is on average 3cm proximal to the skin at the deepest part of the cleft. In the second, third and fourth webspaces this distance is reduced to 1cm. The level of the deepest part of the webspace to the MTPJ is also variable. Discussion. Surgical release of the flexor tendons is recommended just proximal to the MTPJ for releasing both tendons and distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint for the long flexor tendon. The webspace skin and MTPJ's are easily identifiable landmarks clinically and radiologically. Awareness of the intermetatarsal nerve division will help to reduce nerve injuries with minimally invasive surgery to the plantar forefoot

Hammer toe involves metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) hyperextension and proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) flexion. Surgery commonly involves excision arthroplasty or fusion of the PIPJ with MTPJ soft tissue release if necessary. Previous series record that MTPJ release was carried out “as required” but not how often release is necessary. Myerson and Shereff's (1989) cadaver study found release of the extensors, MTPJ capsule and collateral ligaments necessary for full hammertoe correction. Hossain (2002) found the clinical results of this procedure were no better than simple PIPJ fusion. We release the MTPJ if hyperextension persists after PIPJ correction and release the components sequentially. We studied how often and how extensive a release was required, and how this corelated with pre-operative assessment. We reviewed the records of 164 patients who had hammer toe correction under one consultant surgeon. Patients with complex corrections were excluded. The severity of the pre-operative deformity was classified as type 1 (PIPJ and MTPJ correctable), 2 (PIPJ fixed, MTPJ correctable) or 3 (neither joint correctable). We recorded the extent of release required for each toe. Results. Of 334 type 2 toes in 146 patients, 178 (53.3%) required no MTPJ release, 11 (3.3%) extensor tenotomy only, 15 (4.5%) extensor tenotomy and MTPJ dorsal capsulotomy and 130 (38.9%) extensor tenotomy, capsulotomy and collateral ligament release. Of 31 type 3 toes in 18 patients, one (3.2%) needed no release, 2 (6.5%) tenotomy, one (3.2%) capsulotomy and 27 (87.1%) complete release. Discussion. Nearly 50% of toes needed MTP soft tissue release, partial in 8%. Pre-operative assessment was not very accurate in predicting the need for release. We have not yet correlated need for release with clinical outcome. Conclusion. MTP release is required in many hammertoe corrections. Assessment of toe position after incision of each structure may avoid the need for complete release

Aims

This is the first prospective study to report the pre- and post-operative patient reported outcomes and satisfaction scores following excision of interdigital Morton’s neuroma.

Proximal osteotomies for forefoot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have hitherto not been described. We evaluated combination joint-preserving surgery involving three different proximal osteotomies for such deformities. A total of 30 patients (39 feet) with a mean age of 55.6 years (45 to 67) underwent combined first tarsometatarsal fusion and distal realignment, shortening oblique osteotomies of the bases of the second to fourth metatarsals and a fifth-ray osteotomy.

The mean follow-up was 36 months (24 to 68). The mean foot function index scores for pain, disability and activity subscales were 18, 23, and 16 respectively. The mean Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot score improved significantly from 52.2 (41 to 68) to 89.6 (78 to 97). Post-operatively, 14 patients had forefoot stiffness, but had no disability. Most patients reported highly satisfactory walking ability. Residual deformity and callosities were absent. The mean hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles decreased from 47.0° (20° to 67°) to 9.0° (2° to 23°) and from 14.1° (9° to 20°) to 4.6° (1° to 10°), respectively. Four patients had further surgery including removal of hardware in three and a fifth-ray osteotomy in one.

With good peri-operative medical management of rheumatoid arthritis, surgical repositioning of the metatarsophalangeal joint by metatarsal shortening and consequent relaxing of surrounding soft tissues can be successful. In early to intermediate stages of the disease, it can be performed in preference to joint-sacrificing procedures.