Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most challenging complications of joint alloplasty and the diagnosis remains difficult. The aim of the study was to investigate the bacterial flora in surgical samples from 22 prosthetic patients using a panel of culture-independent molecular methods including broad range 16S rRNA gene PCR, cloning, sequencing, phylogeny, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Concomitant samples were cultured by standard methods. Molecular methods detected presence of bacteria in samples from 12 of 22 patients. Using clone libraries a total of 40 different bacterial species were identified including known pathogens and species not previously described in association with prosthetic joint infections. The predominant species were Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis; polymicrobial infections were found in 9 patients. Culture-based methods showed bacterial growth in 8 cases with the predominant species being S. epidermidis. Neither anaerobic bacteria (including P. acnes) nor any of the species not previously described in implant infections were isolated. Additionally, 7 of the 8 culture positive cases were monomicrobial. Overall, the results of culture-based and molecular methods showed concordance in 11 cases (hereof 9 negative by both methods) and discrepancy in 6 cases. In the remaining 5 cases, culture-based methods identified only one species or a group of bacteria (e.g., coagulase negative staphylococci or coryneform rods), while culture-independent molecular methods were able to detect several distinct bacterial species including a species within the group identified by culture. A qPCR assay was developed to assess the abundance of Propionibacterium while S. aureus was quantified by a published S. aureus qPCR assay. These quantifications confirmed the findings from the clone library approach and showed the potential of qPCR for fast detection of bacteria in orthopedic samples. Additionally, both single cells and microcolonies were visualized using FISH and confocal scanning laser microscopy. In conclusion, the molecular methods detected a more diverse bacterial flora in prosthetic joint infections than revealed by standard culture-based methods, and polymicrobial infections were more frequently observed. The pathogenesis of these microorganisms and their role in implant-associated infections needs to be determined.
Gram staining is used as an initial indicator of synovial joint infection but has widely varied false negative rates in the literature. Clinical decisions are often made on the basis of gram stain results, such as whether a patient requires urgent surgery, and therefore it is important to understand the tests efficacy. A retrospective review of synovial fluid aspirates in NHS Tayside for the years 2017 and 2018 was performed from the departmental microbiology database. Aspirates of large joints were included (hip, knee, shoulder, wrist, elbow, ankle). Any joints with prosthesis were excluded, including fixation metalwork. Any abscess overlying a joint that was not proven to penetrate the joint was also excluded. Initial gram stain results and formal culture results were reviewed. Final culture results were considered to be the gold standard to compare gram stain results to. 2167 samples were reviewed. Of these 1552 were excluded base on inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 615, 120 (19.5%) were culture positive. There were 33 positive gram stain results, 1 false positive and 32 true positive results. The sensitivity was 26.67% with a specificity of 99.80% (p=0.0001). The negative predictive value is 84.88% (CI 83.44% – 86.21%). These results show that gram stain tests of native joints have a low sensitivity and poor negative predictive value. This is reflected in the current literature with
To validate the Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) as a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hip and knee arthroplasty (THR/TKR) against the UK's gold standard Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS). The MFJS is a new assessment tool devised to provide a greater discriminatory power, particularly in well performing patients. It measures an appealing concept; the ability of a patient to forget about their artificial joint in everyday life. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 400 THR and TKR patients who were 1–2 years post-op. The data collected from the 212 returned questionnaires was analysed in relation to construct and content validity. 77 patients took part in a test-retest repeatability assessment. The MFJS proved to have an increased discriminatory power in high-performing patients in comparison to the OHS and OKS, highlighted by its more normal frequency of distribution and reduced ceiling effects. 30.8% of patients (n=131) achieved excellent OHS/OKS scores of 42–48 this compared to just 7.69% of patients who achieved a proportionately equivalent MFJS score of 87.5–100. The MFJS proved to have an increased test-retest repeatability based upon its intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.97 compared to the Oxford's 0.85. The MFJS provides a more sensitive tool in the assessment of well performing hip and knee arthroplasties in comparison to the OHS/OKS. The MFJS tests the concept of awareness of a
