Controversy remains as to whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This study compares the outcomes of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. We identified 90 consecutive patients with a mean age of 12.3 years presenting to the study centre with SCFE from a prospective operative database. The patient's notes and radiographs were retrospectively analysed for post-operative complications, re-presentation with a contralateral slip, and the presence of a cam lesion. The mean length of follow-up was 8 years (range 3 to 13). Fifty patients (56%) underwent unilateral fixation and 40 patients underwent bilateral fixation, of which 4 (4%) patients had simultaneous bilateral SCFE and 36 (40%) had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. Twenty-three patients (46%) that underwent unilateral fixation, went onto have contralateral fixation for a further SCFE. Two patients from this group had symptomatic femoracetabular impingement from cam lesions and one patient required a Southwick osteotomy for a severe slip. Five patients (10%) that had unilateral fixation only demonstrated cam lesions on radiographic analysis, being suggestive of an asymptomatic slip. No post-operative complications were observed for the contralateral hip in patients that had prophylactic screw fixation and no cam lesions were identified on radiographic assessment. This study suggests that the contralateral hip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE should be routinely offered prophylactic fixation to avoid a further slip, which may be severe, and the morbidity associated with a secondary cam lesion

The consequences of the complications associated with the management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis are a major source of disability in young adults. Whilst the management of chondrolysis, avascular necrosis or malunion of the femoral neck is usually undertaken by paediatric orthopaedic surgeons the initial management of SUFE in many regions is as part of an adult trauma service. This retrospective audit assessed the outcome of the management of SUFE in one such health region in which treatment occurred at three sites by a number of surgeons of varying experience, during the period July 1994 to June 2004. The aim was to compare our outcomes with those published and to identify whether our service should be altered as a consequence. The case notes and x-rays as recorded in theatre records were retrieved. Of the 64 cases that were treated during this period adequate records for 60 patients were available. Of these 60 patients there were 7 bilateral cases. Fixation in all 67 cases was by a single cannulated screw. In the 53 unilateral cases 17 underwent prophylactic pinning, the remaining 36 remained under observation. Of these nine patients presented with subsequent slips, eight of which were unstable and two had slip angles greater than 60° in which one developed avascular necrosis. Four other cases of avascular necrosis were observed (incidence 6%). Chondrolysis occurred in one patient with persistent pin penetration. In the remaining 73 cannulated screws used for stabilisation and 17 for prophylactic fixation no complications were observed. The complication rates observed in this series are within those accepted in the literature. The high incidence of subsequent slips and the attendant severity of these when compared with the relative safety of contemporary cannulated screw fixation has led us to recommend prophylactic pinning in our region

Aims. The aim of this study was to inform the epidemiology and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Methods. This was an anonymized comprehensive cohort study, with a nested consented cohort, following the the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) framework. A total of 143 of 144 hospitals treating SCFE in Great Britain participated over an 18-month period. Patients were cross-checked against national administrative data and potential missing patients were identified. Clinician-reported outcomes were collected until two years. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected for a subset of participants. Results. A total of 486 children (513 hips) were newly affected, with a median of two patients (interquartile range 0 to 4) per hospital. The annual incidence was 3.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.01 to 3.67) per 100,000 six- to 18-year-olds. Time to diagnosis in stable disease was increased in severe deformity. There was considerable variation in surgical strategy among those unable to walk at diagnosis (66 urgent surgery vs 43 surgery after interval delay), those with severe radiological deformity (34 fixation with deformity correction vs 36 without correction) and those with unaffected opposite hips (120 prophylactic fixation vs 286 no fixation). Independent risk factors for avascular necrosis (AVN) were the inability of the child to walk at presentation to hospital (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 11.4)) and surgical technique of open reduction and internal fixation (aOR 7.5 (95% CI 2.4 to 23.2)). Overall, 33 unaffected untreated opposite hips (11.5%) were treated for SCFE by two-year follow-up. Age was the only independent risk factor for contralateral SCFE, with age under 12.5 years the optimal cut-off to define ‘at risk’. Of hips treated with prophylactic fixation, none had SCFE, though complications included femoral fracture, AVN, and revision surgery. PROMs demonstrated the marked impact on quality of life on the child because of SCFE. Conclusion. The experience of individual hospitals is limited and mechanisms to consolidate learning may enhance care. Diagnostic delays were common and radiological severity worsened with increasing time to diagnosis. There was unexplained variation in treatment, some of which exposes children to significant risks that should be evaluated through randomized controlled trials. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):519–528

Prophylactic stabilisation with internal fixation of the asymptomatic hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. The incidence of bilaterality varies from 20–80% depending on the length of follow-up. The opposite hip has 2335 times higher incidence of developing a slip in cases of a unilateral slip at presentation and there is no chemical, anatomic or radiological feature which can predict a slip. The arguments regarding prophylactic fixation are based on risks of AVN, chondrolysis, and problems with implant removal and joint penetration. We present a retrospective analysis of sixty-five patients who had prophylactic fixation of the uninvolved hip at the same time as their opposite slipped femoral physis. None had an underlying systemic or endocrine disorder and the average age was 12.5 years (range 11–15 years).A single 7.0 mm cannulated screw was used in all cases. The average time to fusion was 18 months (range 6 to 36 months) and duration of follow up ranged from 3–8 years (mean 4.5 years). None of the patients had implant removal and at latest review did not show any evidence of chondrolysis, avascular necrosis, premature physeal arrest or secondary arthrosis in the prophylactically fixed hip. There were a couple of cases of inadvertent wire penetration into joint, which were recognised and rectified immediately, and a correct length screw inserted. Both these patients had an uneventful post-operative course with no problems of chondrolysis etc at latest follow-up (5 years). One patient (1.5%) developed a superficial wound infection, which cleared up with antibiotics. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the safety of prophylactic fixation using a single cannulated cancellous screw and is recommended for prevention of delayed slip and hence secondary osteoarthrosis

We evaluated the use of unreamed expanding nails in prophylactic stabilization of impending fractures in patients with multiple bone mets.

During 2004–2008 we treated 25 impending fractures due to metastasis (11 male, 14 female patients) with so-called expanding intramedullary nails. All they had multiple bone mets and signs of impending fracture due to extensive osteolysis. We stabilized 6 impending humeral fractures, 15 femoral and 1 tibial with antegrade nailing and 3 pertrochanteric with cephalomedullary nailing. Fluoroscopy was used to check the nail entry-point. No medullary reaming was performed. The nails were not interlocked at the mid-shaft but fixed rather firmly within the medullary cavity after introducing normal saline under pressure that expands its walls. The operation time ranged from 12min (humerus) to 25min (pertrochanteric). No blood transfusion was necessary. On follow-up (8–41 mos) all patients were reviewed. In all cases the risk of impending fracture was remarkably decreased. The patients with humeral fractures regained function quickly. The patiens with lower limb fractures were mobilized immediately post-op and were allowed to walk with TWB.

Surgery of impending fractures of long bones in patients with multiple bone mets is palliative. It aims in safer patient’s mobilization, fracture risk reduction, pain control and function restoration in order to render the patient capable to continue the treatment for the main disease. The expanding nailing is indicated in selected cases as it can be inroduced quickly and effectively with minimal blood loss and morbidity.

Recent reports suggest that long-term alendronate therapy may result in an unusual pattern of femoral subtrochanteric fracture. We aimed to determine if the presence of a specific radiographic feature in patients on alendronate could be used to predict an impending insufficiency fracture and thereby prevent its occurrence through further investigations and prophylactic fixation in high-risk patients. Sixty-two subtrochanteric fractures treated surgically from 2001 to 2007 were reviewed and radiographs of 25 low-energy fractures were independently evaluated. Incidence of alendronate therapy, clinical data, and other investigations like bone mineral density (BMD) scans were recorded. Seventeen fractures (68%) were associated with alendronate therapy. Hypertrophy of the lateral cortex of the femur with splaying of the fracture ends was noted in 70.1% of patients on alendronate; initial radiographs were not available in 17.6% and 11.8% had stress fractures identified by bone scan. None of the fractures in the non-alendronate group had this pattern. The fracture configuration in the alendronate group suggested that an ellipsoid thickening in the lateral cortex had been present prior to fracture. Indeed, 6 patients on alendronate (35.3%) had pre-existing radiographs as early as 3 years prior to fracture and all had this feature. Four of them had bone scans, which confirmed a stress fracture. Hip pain was often associated with this radiographic sign but may not be specific as patients were already on follow-up for other musculoskeletal conditions. BMD scans were not predictive of an impending fracture as they were mostly in the osteopaenic range. Only 50% with proven stress fractures had prophylactic fixation, while the remainder sustained overt fractures. Alendronate-related subtrochanteric fractures are associated with a specific pre-existing radiographic abnormality. We recommend that all patients on long-term alendronate - particularly those with hip pain or a previous subtrochanteric fracture - be routinely followed-up with plain radiographs of the pelvis. If an ellipsoid feature is noted in the subtrochanteric region, further investigations like bone scan or MRI should be sought. Patients with evidence of stress fracture should be strongly considered for prophylactic operative fixation. We believe this is a cost-effective strategy to prevent subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate

Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. . Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1428–34

To identify the incidence of sequential slip of the unaffected hips in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. A retrospective review of all unilateral SCFE treated during 1998 to 2012 was undertaken. The study compares the incidence of sequential slip of the initially unaffected hip in patients managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. The study also reports the incidence avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and metal-work related problem in this group of patients. All patients included in this current work have at least 12 months of follow-up from the index slip. A total of 44 cases had prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip (mean age 12.6 years,) and 36 patients managed with regular observation (mean age 13.4 years). Sequential slip of the unaffected hip was noted in a total of 10 patients (28 %) managed with regular observation and only in 1 patient (2%) managed with prophylactic fixation. A Fishers exact test showed significantly high incidence of sequential slip in unaffected hips when managed by regular observation (p-value-0.002). There is no evidence of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in the unaffected hip in both groups, 3 patients had metalwork related problem and one had superficial wound infection in prophylactic fixation group. Simultaneous prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hips significantly reduces the incidence of sequential slip. This is a relatively safe procedure and should be advocated in all cases of unilateral SCFE to avoid potential complications and preserve function of the unaffected hip

Methods. A retrospective review of 80 patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 1998–2012 was undertaken to determine the outcome of the unaffected hip. All patients were treated with either prophylactic single Richards screw fixation or observation of the uninvolved hip and were followed up for at least 12 months. The unaffected hip of 44 patients (mean age 12.6 years, range 9–17) had simultaneous prophylactic fixation and 36 patients (mean age 13.4 years, range 9–17.4) were managed with observation. Results. Sequential slip of the unaffected hip was noted in 10 patients (28 per cent) in the observation group and only in 1 patient (2 per cent) in the group managed with prophylactic fixation. A Fisher's exact test showed significantly high incidence of sequential slip in unaffected hips when managed with regular observation (p-value 0.002). Only 3 cases had symptomatic hardware on the unaffected side after prophylactic fixation with one requiring revision of the metal work; one had superficial wound infection treated with antibiotics. No cases had AVN or chondrolysis. Conclusion. Simultaneous prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip significantly reduces the incidence of sequential slip in unilateral SCFE with minimal complications. Level of evidence. III

Long femoral nails for neck of femur fractures and prophylactic fixation have a risk of anterior cortex perforation. Previous studies have demonstrated the radius of curvature (ROC) of a femoral nail influencing the finishing point of a nail and the risk of anterior cortex perforation. This study aims to calculate a patients femoral ROC using preoperative XR and CT and therefore nail finishing position. We conducted a retrospective study review of patients with long femoral cephalomedullary nailing for proximal femur fractures (OTA/AO 31(A) and OTA/AO 32) or impending pathological fractures at a level 1 trauma centre between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 with both full length lateral X-ray and CT imaging. Femoral ROC was calculated on both imaging modalities. Outcomes measured including nail finishing position, anterior cortex encroachment and impingement. The mean femoral ROC was 1026mm on CT and 1244mm on XR. CT femoral ROC strongly correlated with nail finishing point with a spearmans coefficient of 0.77. Additionally, femurs with a ROC <1000mm were associated with a higher risk of anterior encroachment (OR 6.12) and femurs with a ROC <900mm were associated with a higher risk of anterior cortex impingement (OR 6.47). To our knowledge this is the first study to compare a measured femoral ROC to nail finishing position. The use of CT to measure femoral ROC and to a lesser extent XR was able to predict both nail finishing position and risk of anterior cortex encroachment. Preoperative XRs and CTs were able to identify patients with a small femoral ROC. This predicted patients at risk of anterior cortex impingement, anterior cortex encroachment and nail finishing position. We may be able to select femoral nails that resemble the native femoral ROC and mitigate the risk of anterior cortex perforation

A painful “dreaded black line” (DBL) has been associated with progression to complete fractures in atypical femur fractures (AFF). Adjacent sclerosis, an unrecognized radiological finding, has been observed in relation to the DBL. We document its incidence, associated features, demographics and clinical progression. We reviewed plain radiographs of 109 incomplete AFFs between November 2006 and June 2021 for the presence of sclerosis adjacent to a DBL. Radiographs were reviewed for location of lesions, and presence of focal endosteal or periosteal thickening. We collected demographical data, type and duration of bisphosphonate therapy, and progression to fracture or need for prophylactic stabilization, with a 100% follow up of 72 months (8 – 184 months). 109 femurs in 86 patients were reviewed. Seventeen sclerotic DBLs were observed in 14 patients (3 bilateral), involving 15.6% of all femora and 29.8% of femora with DBLs. Location was mainly subtrochanteric (41.2%), proximal diaphyseal (35.3%) and mid-diaphyseal (23.5%), and were associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. All patients were female, mostly Chinese (92.9%), with a mean age of 69 years. 12 patients (85.7%) had a history of alendronate therapy, and the remaining 2 patients had zoledronate and denosumab therapy respectively. Mean duration of bisphosphonate therapy was 62 months. 4 femora (23.5%) progressed to complete fractures that were surgically managed, whilst 6 femora (35.3%) required prophylactic fixation. Peri-lesional sclerosis in DBL is a new radiological finding in AFFs, predominantly found in the proximal half of the femur, at times bilateral, and are always associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. As a high proportion of patients required surgical intervention, these lesions could suggest non-union of AFFs, similar to the sclerotic margins commonly seen in fractures with non-union. The recognition of and further research into this new feature could shed more light on the pathophysiological progression of AFFs

Aims. Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide. Methods. All patients with SCFE who underwent fixation using FG SCFE screws after its introduction at our institution, with minimum three years’ follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively as part of ongoing governance. All pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated. The demographics of the patients, the grade of slip, the extent of lengthening of the barrel of the screw and the restoration of Klein’s line were recorded. Subanalysis was performed according to sex and age. Results. A total of 19 hips in 13 patients were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 11.5 years (9 to 13) and the mean follow-up was 63 months (45 to 83). A total of 13 FG SCFE screws were used for the fixation of mild or moderate SCFE, with six contralateral prophylactic fixations. No hip with SCFE showed a further slip after fixation and there were no complications. Lengthening occurred in 15 hips (79%), with a mean lengthening of the barrel of 6.8 mm (2.5 to 13.6) at final follow-up. Remodelling occurred in all hips with lengthening of the barrel. There was statistically more lengthening in patients who were aged < 12 years, regardless of sex (p = 0.002). Conclusion. The FG SCFE screw is effective in preventing further slip in patients with SCFE. Lengthening of the barrel occurred in most hips, and thus allowed remodelling. This was most marked in younger children, regardless of sex. Based on this study, this device should be considered for use in patients with SCFE aged < 12 years instead of standard pinning in situ. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):215–219

Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice. A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side. In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;

Aims. Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending pathological fracture. The purpose of the current retrospective in vivo study was to use CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) to identify a clear quantitative differentiating factor between patients who are at imminent risk of fracturing their femur and those who are not, and to identify the exact location of maximal weakness where the fracture is most likely to occur. Methods. Data were collected on 82 patients with femoral metastatic bone disease, 41 of whom did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A total of 15 had a pathological fracture within six months following the CT scan, and 26 were fracture-free during the five months following the scan. The Mirels score and strain fold ratio (SFR) based on CTFEA was computed for all patients. A SFR value of 1.48 was used as the threshold for a pathological fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values for Mirels score and SFR predictions were computed for nine patients who fractured and 24 who did not, as well as a comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC of the ROC curves). Results. The sensitivity of SFR was 100% compared with 88% for the Mirels score, and the specificity of SFR was 67% compared with 38% for the Mirels score. The AUC was 0.905 for SFR compared with 0.578 for the Mirels score (p = 0.008). Conclusion. All the patients who sustained a pathological fracture of the femur had an SFR of > 1.48. CTFEA was far better at predicting the risk of fracture and its location accurately compared with the Mirels score. CTFEA is quick and automated and can be incorporated into the protocol of CT scanners. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):638–645

Between July 1994 and June 2004, 60 patients with 76 slipped upper femoral epiphyses were managed within the adult trauma service of three hospitals. Treatment was by a single cannulated screw. Of these cases, 53 were unilateral, in 17 of which uncomplicated prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was performed. Of the other 36 cases, nine presented with a subsequent slip despite ongoing out-patient care. The subsequent slip was unpredictable in timing and unrelated to the age at the initial slip. It was more often unstable and in one case avascular necrosis developed. The overall rate of avascular necrosis, although in accordance with the literature, was 60% in acute unstable slips with a slip angle greater than 40°. In our experience, prophylactic fixation was safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip

Purpose. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in children 9–15 years old. The epidemiology for SCFE in the total population of Sweden has not yet been described. Methods. In a prospective cohort study, we analysed pre- and postoperative radiographs and medical records for all children treated for SCFE in Sweden 2007–2013, and noted demographic data, severity of slip, and surgical procedures performed. Results. We identified 379 Swedish children with primary SCFE 2007–2013; 162 girls, median age 12 (7–15) years, and 217 boys, median age 13 (4–17) years. The cumulative incidence was 45.8/100 000 for girls and 58.2/100 000 for boys. As an initial symptom, 66% of the children had hip/groin pain and 12% knee pain. At first presentation, 7% of the children had bilateral SCFE. Prophylactic fixation was performed in 43% . Of the remaining children, 21% later developed a contralateral slip. Fixation with implants permitting further growth of the femoral neck was used in 90% of the children. Femoral neck osteotomy was performed for 11 hips. Of 34 treating hospitals, only three treated > 3 children with SCFE annually. Conclusions. The cumulative incidence 2007–2013 in the total population in Sweden showed a mild increase for girls. The male-to-female ratio was lower than previously described for Sweden. Prophylactic fixation was performed in 43% of the children. Fixation with an implant that allows further growth was used for 90% of the children. Most hospitals in Sweden treat < 2 children annually

In the majority of patients with slipped upper femoral epiphysis only one hip is involved at primary diagnosis. However, the contralateral hip often becomes involved over time. There are no reliable factors predicting a contralateral slip. Whether or not the contralateral hip should undergo prophylactic fixation is a matter of controversy. We present a number of essential points that have to be considered both when choosing to fix the contralateral hip prophylactically as well as when refraining from surgery and instead following the patients with repeat radiographs

There have been recent reports linking alendronate and a specific pattern of subtrochanteric insufficiency fracture. We performed a retrospective review of all subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2007. There were 20 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 12 of whom were on long-term alendronate. Alendronate-associated fractures tend to be bilateral (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.018), have unique radiological features (p < 0.0005), be associated radiologically with a pre-existing ellipsoid thickening of the lateral femoral cortex and are likely to be preceded by prodromal pain. Biomechanical investigations did not suggest overt metabolic bone disease. Only one patient on alendronate had osteoporosis prior to the start of therapy. We used these findings to develop a management protocol to optimise fracture healing. We also advocate careful surveillance in individuals at-risk, and present our experience with screening and prophylactic fixation in selected patients

To assess the referral system, clinical notes and radiographs of patients presenting with metastatic disease of long bones in a regional oncology unit. Thirty questionnaires were sent to oncologists asking about reasons for referral to orthopaedics and use of scoring system to assess risk of pathological fracture. Ninety three percent of oncologists did not use a reliable scoring system to assess risk of pathological fracture. The majority referred in respect to pain on mobilising and the presence of a lytic lesion. Sixty percent felt an improvement in communication between the departments was required. The notes and radiographs were reviewed of thirty-seven patients presenting with femoral metastatic lesions to the oncology department. Sixteen patients had a Mirels score of greater than eight. Four patients were referred for an Orthopaedic opinion. All patients underwent prophylactic fixation. Twelve patients with a score of greater than eight were not referred. Seven of theses patients suffered a pathological fracture within three months. Five patients had a Mirels score of 8. One patient had prophylactic fixation. No fractures occurred. Sixteen patients had a Mirels score of less than 8. None of these patients were referred for an orthopaedic opinion. None of these patients had a pathological fracture within three months. In conclusion, we presently do not offer a multidisciplinary approach to metastatic disease affecting the appendicular skeleton. The majority of patients’ who score eight or above in the Mirels scoring system are at risk of fracture and do require prophylactic surgery. In keeping with the BOA guidelines, “Metastatic Bone Disease: A Guide to Good Practice”, we would recommend that the introduction of a multidisciplinary approach and the use of a recognised scoring system is essential to improve patient care

Aims

The modern prevalence of primary tumours causing metastatic bone disease is ill-defined in the oncological literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the prevalence of primary tumours in the setting of metastatic bone disease, as well as reported rates of pathological fracture, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality for each primary tumour subtype.