Background. Readmission following any total joint arthroplasty has become a closely watched metric for many hospitals in the United States because financial penalties imposed by CMS for excessive readmissions occurring within thirty days of discharge has occurred since 2015. The purpose of this study was to identify both preoperative comorbidities associated with and postoperative reasons for readmission within thirty days following primary total joint arthroplasty in the lower extremity. Methods. Retrospective data was collected for patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty (CPT code 27130), total knee arthroplasty (27447), and total ankle arthroplasty (27702) from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013 at our institution. The sample was separated into readmitted and non-readmitted cohorts. Demographic variables, preoperative comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI), operative parameters, readmission rates, and causes of readmission were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results. There were 42 (3.4%), 28 (2.2%), and 1 (0.5%) readmissions within 30 days for THA, TKA, and TAA, respectively. The most common cause of readmission within 30 days following total joint arthroplasty in lower extremity was infection. Trauma was the second most common reason for readmission of a THA while wound dehiscence was the second most common cause for readmission following TKA. With univariate regression, there were multiple associated factors for readmission among total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients including BMI, metabolic equivalent (MET), and CCI. Multivariate regression revealed that hospital length of stay was significantly associated with 30-day readmission after THA and TKA. Conclusion. Patient co-morbidities and pre-operative functional capacity significantly affect 30-day readmission rate following total joint arthroplasty. Adjustments for these parameters should be considered when hospital penalties are calculated with regard to 30-day readmission. Level of Evidence. Level III; Retrospective cohort study

Background. Readmission following any total joint arthroplasty has become a closely watched metric for many hospitals in the United States because financial penalties imposed by CMS for excessive readmissions occurring within thirty days of discharge will be forthcoming in 2015. The purpose of this study was to identify both preoperative comorbidities associated with and postoperative reasons for readmission within thirty days following primary total joint arthroplasty in the lower extremity. Methods. Retrospective data was collected for patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty (CPT code 27130), total knee arthroplasty (27447), and total ankle arthroplasty (27702) from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013 at our institution. The sample was separated into readmitted and non-readmitted cohorts. Demographic variables, preoperative comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI), operative parameters, readmission rates, and causes of readmission were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results. There were 42 (3.4%), 28 (2.2%), and 1 (0.5%) readmissions within 30 days for THA, TKA, and TAA, respectively. The most common cause of readmission within 30 days following total joint arthroplasty in lower extremity was infection. Trauma was the second most common reason for readmission of a THA while wound dehiscence was the second most common cause for readmission following TKA. With univariate regression, there were multiple associated factors for readmission among total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients including BMI, metabolic equivalent (MET), and CCI. Multivariate regression revealed that hospital length of stay was significantly associated with 30-day readmission after THA and TKA. Conclusion. Patient co-morbidities and pre-operative functional capacity significantly affect 30-day readmission rate following total joint arthroplasty. Adjustments for these parameters should be considered when hospital penalties are calculated with regard to 30-day readmission

Aim

Whether laminar airflow (LAF) in the operating room (OR) is effective for decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains a clinically significant yet controversial issue. This study investigated the association between operating room ventilation systems and the risk of PJI in TJA patients.

The brief answer is no….I do not believe that outpatient total joint arthroplasty is the emergent standard of care. However, for some patients and some surgeons I do believe that outpatient total joint arthroplasty can be performed safely and with greater comfort and convenience for the patient. Further, for the surgeon, it can provide greater control over the care environment if performed at an ambulatory surgery center.

Patient selection is paramount in my opinion for safely performing outpatient total joint arthroplasty. While some have attempted to define specific criteria, our own criteria include patients with simple orthopaedic problems who are healthy, trustworthy and have a good support system of family or friends to assist them.

As surgeons we must also be self-aware as the margin for error, particularly at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center, is narrow. Operative times should be reliably brief and blood loss should be minimal to allow for a safe discharge on the same day. Further the incidence of intraoperative complications such as fractures at the time of total hip arthroplasty or ligament injuries during total knee arthroplasty should be low. The surgeon should also be prepared with the equipment to address these common issues, if they do occur.

In our review of the NSQIP data set we matched 1,236 outpatient TJA 1:1 with inpatients based on propensity scores. The risk of 30-day readmissions and complications was no different between groups, although inpatients had a higher rate of VTE and outpatients had a higher risk of re-operation. Risk factors for adverse events included patient age > 85 years old, diabetes and BMI > 35. Likewise in a review of results from my own practice, we have seen no difference in the risk of complications.

As health care providers we must keep the safety of our patients paramount at all times. Further, we must be fiscally responsible to avoid costly complications, reoperations and readmissions. With conservative patient selection and careful surgical technique I believe that outpatient TJA offers an attractive alternative that is safe, cost effective and associated with high satisfaction for both patients and surgeons.

Patients undergoing Joint Arthroplasty received a significant proportion of blood transfusions. In this study, we compared the risk of Deep Infection, and Superficial Infection post operation following Primary Total Hip or Knee replacement in blood-transfused and non-blood-transfused patients.

Cohort of patients who underwent primary total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty from April 2012 to March 2015 in Alberta. Patient characteristics, comorbidity, received blood transfusion were collected from electronic medical records, operating room information systems, discharge abstract database, provincial clinical risk grouper data. Deep Infection and Superficial Infection were captured from Provincial Surgical Site Infection Surveillance data. Deep Infection include deep incisional and organ/space infections. Logistic regression analysis were used to compare Deep Infection and Superficial Infection in blood-transfused and non-blood-transfused cohorts, and risk-adjusted for age, gender, procedure type, and co-morbidities.

Our study cohort contains 27891 patients, with mean of age at admission was 66.3±10.4, 57.5% female, 49.3% had 1 or more comorbidities. 58.8% underwent Knee Replacement. 11.1% received blood transfusion during hospital stay (Total Hip Replacement (THR) =13.1% and Total Knee Replacement (TKR) =9.7%,). 1.1% had Deep Infection (THR=1.4% and TKR=0.9%) and 0.5% had Superficial Infection (THR=0.5% and TKR=0.5%). Blood-transfused patients got 1.7% Deep Infection and 1.0% Superficial infection. Non-blood-transfused patients got 1.0% Deep Infection and 0.5% Superficial infection. Controlling for age, gender, procedure type, and co-morbidities, the odds of Deep Infection were 1.6 times higher for blood-transfused patients than for non-blood-transfused patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.2–2.2], p=0.004). The odds of Superficial Infection were 2.0 times higher for transfused patients (adjusted OR=2.0, 95% CI [1.3–3.0], p=0.002).

Blood transfusion increases Deep Infection and Superficial Infection post-surgery following Primary Total Knee or Hip Replacement. This finding suggests to reduce the unnecessary blood transfusion for patients considering Joint Arthroplasty. Reducing the blood transfusion will save the inpatient cost and decrease the infective complications post-surgery in Hip or Knee Arthroplasty patients.

Introduction

Alternative payment models, such as bundled payments, aim to control rising costs for total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Without risk adjustment for patients who may utilize more resources, concerns exist about patient selection and access to care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with increased resource utilization following TKA and THA.

Aim

Perioperative hyperglycemia has many etiologies including medication, impaired glucose tolerance, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), or stress, the latter of which is common to post-surgical patients. This acute hyperglycemia may impair the ability of the host to combat infection.¹ Our study aims to investigate if post-operative day 1 (POD1) blood glucose level is associated with complications, including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and to determine a threshold for glycemic control that surgeons should strive for during a patient's hospital stay.

Introduction

Peri-operative hyperglycemia has many etiologies, including medication, impaired glucose tolerance, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), or stress, the latter of which is common in post-surgical patients. Our study aims were to investigate if post-operative day 1 (POD1) blood glucose level was associated with post-operative complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and to determine a threshold for glycemic control that surgeons should strive for during a patient's hospital stay.

Despite the prophylactic use of antibiotics and hygienic strategies, surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is still a severe and unsolved complication. Since antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) was introduced by Buchholz in the 1970s, the use of ALBC has been increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, the routine use of ALBC during primary TJA remains controversial. Recent clinical studies have found that ALBC is effective in reducing the risk of PJI following primary TJA. Although ALBC having the advantage of reducing the risk of PJI, the main disadvantages are the possible development of toxicity, antibiotic resistance, allergic reaction, and possible reduction of the mechanical properties of bone cement. Nevertheless, a recent published article demonstrated, that the use of high dose dual-antibiotic impregnated cement reduce significantly the rate of surgical site infections compared to standard low dose single ALBC in the setting of a hip fracture treating with hemiarthroplasty. Furthermore, Sanz-Ruiz et al. presented that the use of ALBC in TJA has favorable cost-efficiency profile. In this context, reasons why surgeons should use antibiotic-loaded bone cement during primary TJA are demonstrated.

Despite the demonstrated success in revision total joint arthroplasties, the utilization of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty remains controversial. Multiple studies have demonstrated several risks associated with the routine use of this technique including: allergic reactions, changing the mechanical properties of the cement, emergence of resistant bacterial strains, systemic toxicity, and the added cost. In addition, evidence shows a currently low rate of periprosthetic joint infections in primary total joint arthroplasty (around 1%) and the theoretical benefit of marginally reducing this rate by using antibiotic-cement may not necessarily justify the associated risks and the added cost. Moreover, most of the primary total hip and an increasing number of primary total knee arthroplasties are cementless, which further raises questions about the routine use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty

Aim. Analysis of microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns as well as the clinical outcome of patients who underwent a Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in the early phase following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Method. Of 312 patients treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty between January 2011 and December 2019, 16 (5.1%) patients (9 knee, 7 hip) underwent a DAIR procedure within 6 months following second stage. We retrospectively analyzed the microbiological results as well as changes in the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns between stages of two-stage exchange arthroplasties and DAIR procedures. Patient's re-revision rates after a minimum follow-up of 12 months following DAIR procedure were evaluated. Moreover, differences between knee and hip and between infected primary total joint replacement (TJRs) and infected revision TJRs as well as patient's host factors and microbiological results regarding the outcome of DAIR were analyzed. Results. In 7/16 (43.8%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture positive, in 5/16 (31.2%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture negative and in 4/16 (25%) patients the first stage procedure was culture positive, and the second stage procedure was culture negative. Moreover, 6 (37.5%) out of 16 DAIR procedures showed a positive microbiological result. In 5/7 (71.4%) patients with culture positive second stage procedure a different microorganism compared to first stage procedure was detected. In 6/6 (100%) patients with culture positive DAIR procedure, the isolated microorganisms were not detected during first or second stage procedure. An additional re-revision surgery was necessary in 4/16 (25%) patients after a median time of 31 months (range, 12 to 138 months) at a mean follow up of 63.1 ± 32 months following DAIR procedure. Highest re-revision rates were found in patients with culture positive second stage procedures (3/7 [42.9%]) and patients with culture positive DAIR procedures (2/6 [33.3%]). Conclusions. DAIR procedure seems to be a useful early treatment option following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty. The re-revision rates were independent of different combinations of culture positive and culture negative first and second stage procedures. The high number of changes in the microbiological spectrum needs to be considered in the treatment of PJI

Introduction. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is projected to be the most common elective surgical procedure in the coming decades, however TJA now accounts for the largest expenditure per procedure for Medicare and Medicaid provided interventions. This is coupled with increasing complexity of surgical care and concerns about patient satisfaction. The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) model has been proposed as a method to both improve patient care and reduce costs. The PSH model provides evidence-based protocols and pathways from the time of surgical decision to after postoperative discharge. PSH pathways can further be standardized with integration into electronic medical records (EMRs). The purpose of this study is to see if the implementation of PSH with and without EMR integration effects patient outcomes and cost. Methods. A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent elective primary total joint arthroplasty at our institution from January 1, 2012 to April 1, 2018. Three cohorts were compared. The first cohort included patients before the implementation of the PSH model (January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2014). The second cohort included patients in the PSH model without EMR integration (January 1, 2015 – August 1, 2016). The third cohort included patients in the PSH model with EMR integration (August 1, 2016 - April 1, 2018). The clinical outcome criteria measured were average hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and discharge disposition. Financial data was collected for each cohort and primary measurements included average total cost, diagnostic cost, anesthesia cost, laboratory cost, room and board cost, and physical therapy cost. Results. Overall, 3,384 primary total joint arthroplasty cases were included. Implementation of a PSH without EMR significantly reduced LOS (1.79 vs 3.59, p<0.05), readmission rates (1.9% vs 4.3%, p<0.05), and decreased the rate of skilled nursing facility (SNF) disposition (15.2% vs 31.1%, p<0.05) and increased discharge to home care (84.8% vs 68.9%, p<0.05). EMR integration did not significantly reduce LOS or readmission rates but did further decreased the rate of SNF disposition (10.2% vs 15.2%, p<0.05), while increasing the rate of home care disposition (89.8% vs 84.8%, p<0.05). Per case, implementation of the PSH model without EMR integration decreased diagnostic cost (−$9.37, p<0.05), anesthesia cost (−$71.34, p<0.05), room and board cost (−$285.18, p<0.05) and total overall cost (−$1432.38, p<0.005). Integrating pathways into an EMR led to further cost-reduction in laboratory cost (−$47.04, p<0.05), physical therapy cost (−$57.79, p<0.05), and total overall cost (−$2,837.28, p<0.05). EMR integration did not lead to significant increases in other cost variables. Conclusions. The implementation of a PSH model for total joint arthroplasty, especially with electronic medical record integration, reduces cost, average LOS, 30-day readmissions, and increases discharge to home care

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis remains one of the most important strategies for prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with current guideline recommending a first or second generation cephalosporin. Penicillin (PCN) allergy is often reported by patients, which often results in avoidance of administration of cephalosporins due to fear of cross-reactivity. Alternative medications, such as vancomyin, are often used despite reduced antimicrobial coverage. The purpose of this study was to determine if PCN allergic patients who received vancomycin alone prior to elective primary total joint arthroplasty were at increased risk of developing a subsequent PJI. A retrospective review of 7,602 primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed between 2005 and 2013 in two institutions were identified using a prospective institutional database. Patient reported PCN or cephalosporin allergy was electronically queried from the anesthesia note. Patients who recieved multiple prophylactic antibiotics, or had unavailable perioperative antibiotic information, or those who received medication other than cefazolin and vancomycin were excluded. PJI was determined using a cross-match with an institutional PJI database constructed from International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to evaluate the risk of subsequent PJI. The rate of PJI was 1.4% (32/2296) in patients with a reported PCN allergy that received vancomycin alone versus 1.1% (59/5306) in non-PCN allergic patients that received cefazolin alone. The multivariate analysis, with the given sample size, did not detect a statistically significant increased risk of PJI when vancomycin was administered alone (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% CI 0.6–3.1, p=0.35). While there was no significant differences in the organism profile between PJIs in both groups, the rate of PJI caused by resistant organisms was higher in patients who received vancomycin alone (11.9%, 7/59) compared to those who received cefazolin (3.1%, 1/32). While administration of perioperative prophylactic vancomycin alone during elective primary arthroplasty does not seem to result in a higher rate of subsequent PJI, patients who received vancomycin alone and developed a PJI were more likely to develop an infection with an antibiotic resistant organism. Future studies are needed to determine the most appropriate prophylactic antibiotic for patients who undergo elective arthroplasty and report PCN allergy

Patients who are actively smoking at the time of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at considerably increased risk of perioperative complications. Therefore, strategies to assist patients with smoking cessation before surgery have become routine practice. A secondary benefit is the theoretical catalyst for long-term smoking cessation. However, questions remain as to whether patients actually cease smoking prior to the procedure, and if so, how long this lasts postoperatively. Our high-volume, academic institution documents self-reported smoking status at each clinic visit (at 6-month intervals), as well as at the time of surgery through a total joint registry. As such, all patients who underwent TJA from 2007 to 2018 were identified and grouped as: non-smokers, smokers (regularly smoking cigarettes within 1 year from surgery), and former smokers (those who quit smoking within a year before surgery). Thereafter, smoking status in the postoperative period was assessed, with special attention to the former smokers in order to see who remained smoke-free. From the 28,758 primary TJAs identified, 91.3% (26,244) were non-smokers, 7.3% (2,109) were smokers, and 1.4% (405) had quit smoking before surgery. Among patients who quit smoking before surgery, only 38% were still abstinent at 9 years from surgery. Conversely, 24% of smokers at the time of surgery eventually quit and 3.1% of non-smokers started smoking over the same time period. Despite a concerted effort to help patients stop smoking before TJA, an important proportion (7.3%) are unsuccessful. Among those patients who do manage to stop smoking, only a minority (38%) remain smoke-free after surgery. Compared to current smokers, patients who managed to quit before surgery are more likely to remain smoke-free after surgery. These findings highlight that smoking remains a tremendous challenge in contemporary TJA practices. Additional strategies targeting smoking cessation before after surgery are needed

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most successful procedures in orthopaedics. Despite the excellent clinical and functional results, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following TJA is a feared complication. For instance, the reported PJI rate after primary total knee arthroplasty is about 0.5–1.9%. In general, prevention of periprosthetic joint and surgical site infections is of utmost importance. This can be reduced by strict antisepsis, adequate sterilization of the surgical instruments and meticulous surgical technique. An indisputable role in prevention of SSI in TJA has been the use of peri-operative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The most common recommended antibiotics for prophylaxis in TJA are cefazolin or cefuroxime. In contrast, routine use of commercial antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in primary total joint arthroplasty is still a concern of open debate. The use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement delivers a high concentration of antibiotics locally and can decrease the infection rate, which is supported by several studies in the literature. In this context, we present the pros of routine use of commercial antibiotic-loaded bone cement

The number of Americans over the age of 80 is increasing at a faster rate than that of the 65–80 population. The cohort age 85–94 years had the fastest rate of growth from 2000–2010. The number of Americans older than 95 years grew at approximately 26% during the same period. This rapid growth has been associated with an increasing incidence of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee in this population. This surge in the growth rate of the elderly population has coincided with an increasing demand for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Surgeons need to be prepared to perform safely and appropriately these procedures in this rapidly growing segment of the population. Surgeons need to be aware of the 1) clinical outcomes that can be expected when total joint procedures are performed in this group of patients; 2) the morbidity and mortality associated with the performance of these procedures; and 3) the relative cost effectiveness of these interventions. Clinical outcomes of TJA in this population are generally good. Pain and satisfaction scores are similar to those of younger patients. Although pre-operative pain and functional impairment scores are higher pre-operatively in elderly patients, these improve significantly following TJA. However, functional outcome scores decline noticeably after 5 years, reflecting the impact of coexistent comorbidities. The continued need for assistive devices is greater in this age group than in younger total joint patients. The risk of falls, a particular issue of concern in this age group, is reduced after total hip and knee surgery. The rate of complications, including mortality, following TJA in this age group is greater than in the 65–79-year-old group. The use of hospitalists to co-manage peri-operative care is particularly important in this age group. The increased rate of complications is associated with longer lengths of stay. However, the length of stay for this age group after primary total joint replacement is decreasing significantly; reflecting the widespread streamlining of peri-operative care that is being incentivised and implemented nationwide. The use of extended care facilities is also greater in this age group. The performance of revision TJA in this age group is particularly challenging. The rates of revision in elderly patients are anticipated to rise significantly in coming years. Although revision TJA is associated with significant pain relief and patient satisfaction, it is accompanied by mortality and complication rates that are substantially greater than those in younger age groups

Introduction. About 2% of primary total joint replacement arthroplasty (TJA) procedures become infected. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is currently one of the main reasons requiring costly TJA revisions, posing a burden on patients, physicians and insurance companies. 1. Currently used drug-eluting polymers such as bone cements offer limited drug release profiles, sometimes unable to completely clear out bacterial microorganisms within the joint space. For this study we determined the safety and efficacy of an antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE articular surface that delivered local antibiotics at optimal concentrations to treat PJI in a rabbit model. Materials and Methods. Skeletally mature adult male New Zealand White rabbits received either two non-antibiotic eluting UHMWPE (CONTROL, n=5) or vancomycin-eluting UHMWPE (TEST, n=5) (3 mm in diameter and 6 mm length) in the patellofemoral groove (Fig. 1). All rabbits received a beaded titanium rod in the tibial canal (4 mm diameter and 12 mm length). Both groups received two doses of 5 × 10. 7. cfu of bioluminescent S. aureus (Xen 29, PerkinElmer 119240) in 50 µL 0.9 % saline in the following sites: (1) distal tibial canal prior to insertion of the rod; (2) articular space after closure of the joint capsule (Fig. 1). None of the animals received any intravenous antibiotics for this study. Bioluminescence signal (photons/second) was measured when the rabbits expired, or at the study endpoint (day 21). The metal rods were stained with BacLight. ®. Bacterial Live-Dead Stain and imaged using two-photon microscopy to detect live bacteria. Hardware, polyethylene implants and joint tissues were sonicated to further quantify live bacteria via plate seeding. Results. All control rabbits expired within 7 days (Fig. 2a). One rabbit in the test group expired at day 7 and another at day 15. All control rabbits had positive bioluminescence (live bacteria), while none of the test rabbits did (Fig 2b). Kidney (creatinine and BUN) and liver functions (ALT and ALP) remained normal for all rabbits. All control rabbits showed positive bacterial culture after sonication, while all test rabbits were negative. Two-photon imaging showed 75±10 % viability for bacteria adhered to the metal rods in the control and no viability in the test group. Discussion. This rabbit model showed that vancomycin eluted from UHMWPE is sufficient to eradicate S. aureus in joint space and in between the bone-implant interface of tibial canal. One limitation of this study is the lack of intravenous antibiotic treatment, which is standard clinical practice. In addition, joint infections are often associated with already formed biofilms, which were not tested in this study. However, safety data (normal kidney and liver functions) and complete eradication of S. aureus is an encouraging finding. Conclusion. Vancomycin-eluting UHMWPE effectively eliminated bacteria in a rabbit model of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection. This material is promising as a replacement liner to treat joint infections in revision surgery. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent contributions of surgeon procedure volume, hospital procedure volume, and standardisation of care on short-term post-operative outcomes and resource utilisation in lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty. Methods. An analysis of 182,146 consecutive patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty was performed with use of data entered into the Perspective database by 3421 physicians from 312 hospitals over a two-year period. Adherence to evidence-based processes of care was defined by administration of appropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, beta blockade, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Patient outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, surgical complications, readmissions, and reoperations within the first 30 days after discharge. Hierarchical models were used to estimate effects of hospital and surgeon procedure volume and standardisation on individual and combined surgical outcomes and length of stay. Results. After adjustment in multivariate models, higher surgeon volume was associated with lower risk of complications, lower rates of readmission and reoperation, shorter length of stay, and higher likelihood of being discharged home. Higher hospital volume was associated with lower risk of mortality and lower risk of readmission and higher likelihood of being discharged home. The impact of process standardisation was substantial; maximising adherence to evidence-based processes of care resulted in improved clinical outcomes and shorter length of hospital stay, independent of hospital or surgeon procedure volume. Conclusion. Although surgeon and hospital procedure volumes are unquestionably correlated with patient outcomes in total joint arthroplasty, process standardisation is also strongly associated with improved quality and efficiency of care. The exact relationship between individual processes of care and patient outcomes has not been established. However, our findings suggest that process standardisation could help providers optimise quality and efficiency in total joint arthroplasty, independent of hospital or surgeon volume

The aim of this study was to re-assess whether the use of a ‘one-knife technique’ can be considered as safe as the alternative practice of using separate skin and inside knives for elective orthopaedic surgery. A total of 609 knife blades from 203 elective orthopaedic operations, with equal numbers of skin, inside and control blades, were cultured using direct and enrichment media. We found 31 skin blades (15.3%), 22 inside blades (10.8%), and 13 control blades (6.4%) gave bacterial growth.

Of the 31 contaminated skin blades only three (9.7%) had growth of the same organism as found on the corresponding inside blade. It is not known whether contamination of deeper layers in the remaining 90% was prevented by changing the knife after the skin incision. The organisms cultured were predominantly coagulase-negative staphylococci and proprionibacterium species; both are known to be the major culprits in peri-prosthetic infection. Our study suggests that the use of separate skin and inside knives should be maintained as good medical practice, since the cost of a single deep infection in human and financial terms can be considerable.