Backgroud: Allogeneic transfusion rates after primary hip and knee arthroplasty are used as quality indicators for hospitals, but hospital comparisons may be hampered by low event rates. Extended hospital stay is often used and may be more suitable as an alternative. This study aims to assess whether transfusion rates and extended hospital stay can be used to reliably rank hospitals. Methods. We used the baseline data from the LISBOA implementation trial, where data on patient characteristics and outcomes were collected in a sample of approximately 100 patients undergoing elective primary total hip or knee arthroplasty for each of the 23 participating hospitals. We calculated the reliability of ranking (Rankability) of transfusion rates and extended hospital stay (> 4 postoperative days), using fixed and random effects logistic regression analysis, by dividing the between-hospital variation to the sum of within and between-hospital variation. Rankability thus shows which part of the hospital differences are true differences and not due to random variation. Results. 1163 total hip and 986 total knee procedures were assessed. After adjustment for patient characteristics the odds ratio (OR) of receiving a transfusion in a hospital after total hip ranged from 0.72 to 1.38 and from 0.30 to 3.30 in total knee. Rankability was 17% for hip and 36% for knee arthroplasty, meaning that only 17% and 36% are true hospital differences. Larger hospital variation was found for extended hospital stay (OR range [0.28–3.51] for hip and [0.10–9.95] for knee arthroplasty), and better rankability. Conclusion. Although allogeneic transfusion rates are useful for monitoring quality within hospitals, they should not be used for ranking hospitals. A large proportion of differences in transfusion rates between hospitals is due to random variation, suggesting that this outcome is not suitable for ranking hospitals contrary to extended hospital stay. Level of evidence. Level 2. Financial disclosure. This study was funded by a grant from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and by a grant from Sanquin Blood Supply. Conflict of interest. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Approval. The Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center decided that ethical approval was not required under Dutch National law for this type of study

In England and Wales in 2012 over 160,000 primary total hip and knee replacements were performed with 57% of hip replacements utilising uncemented prostheses. The main cause of failure, affecting approximately 10% of patients, is aseptic loosening. Previous research has found that functionalising titanium with lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) induces an increase in human osteoblast maturation on the implant surface through co-operation with active metabolites of vitamin D3. This feature, the small size of the LPS molecule and its affinity to readily bind to titanium and hydroxylapatite makes it an especially desirable molecule for bone biomaterials. Nevertheless biomaterials that also demonstrate anti-microbial properties are highly desirable. To test the antimicrobial efficacy of the LPA-functionalised titanium, a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus, obtained from an infected revision surgery, was cultured on the surface of titanium discs functionalised with 0, 0.1. 0.5, 1, 2 and 5μM LPA. Bacterial adhesion was quantified at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours by live/dead counts and biofilm mass quantified by crystal violet staining after 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours culture. To elucidate the mechanisms of action of LPA, proteomic analysis of adhered bacteria was performed using SDS-PAGE and Western blots. 500nM to 1μM LPA were the optimum concentrations to significantly inhibit bacterial adhesion (ANOVA, p<0.001). These concentrations also reduced biofilm mass on the surface of the titanium. Proteomic analysis highlighted an increase in low molecular weight proteins as a result of optimal LPA surface concentrations. Fatty acid chains as found in LPA have previously been associated with causing leakage of low molecular weight proteins through increased cell membrane permeability. LPA coatings have the potential to enhance implant osseointegration whilst simultaneously reducing bacterial attachment. This technology may reduce both septic and aseptic failure of cementless joint prostheses, ultimately prolonging implant longevity and patient quality of life

Background. The Arthroplasty Pain Experience (APEX) studies are two randomised controlled trials in primary total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR) at a large UK orthopaedics centre. APEX investigated the effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration (LAI), administered before wound closure, in addition to standard analgesia, on pain severity at 12 months. This abstract reports results of the within-trial economic evaluations. Methods. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from the health and social care payer perspective in relation to quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Resource use was collected from hospital records and patient-completed postal questionnaires, and valued using unit cost estimates from local NHS Trust and national tariffs. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. Costs and outcomes were compared per trial arm and plotted in cost-effectiveness planes. The economic results were bootstrapped incremental net monetary benefit statistics (INMB) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses explored any methodological uncertainty. Results. In both trials, LAI was cost-saving and more effective than standard care. Using the £20,000 per QALY threshold, in THR, the INMB was £1,125 (95%BCI, £183 to £2,067) and the probability of being cost-effective was over 98%. In TKR, the INMB was £264 (95%BCI, −£710 to £1,238), with only 62% probability of being cost-effective. Considering an NHS perspective only, LAI was no longer dominant in THR, but still highly cost-effective, with an INMB of £961 (95%BCI, £50 to £1,873). Conclusions. Administering LAI is a cost-effective treatment option in THR and TKR surgeries. The evidence is stronger for THR, because of larger QALY gain. In TKR, there is more uncertainty around the economic result, and smaller QALY gains, but results point to LAI being cheaper than standard analgesia, which includes a femoral nerve block. Trial Registration. ISRCTN96095682, 29/04/2010. Funding. NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research RP-PG-0407-10070