Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 125 - 125
1 Apr 2012
Oliver W Khan A Fender D Gibson M
Full Access

Patients with peripheral primary bone tumours are often identified and referred at an early stage to a regional tumour service according to established guidelines. In patients with primary bone tumours of the spine, however, the definitive management or outcome of such patients is being prejudiced by preliminary intervention from non-specialist services prior to their referral. Objective: To audit the standards of management of patients with primary bone tumours of the spine referred to a regional tumour service. Retrospective review of case notes and radiology. Subjects: Patients with primary bone tumour of the spine managed at the Orthopaedic Spine Unit with the Regional Bone Tumour Service in Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust. Referral to tumour service, prior intervention, operative treatment, survival, factors affecting definitive management. 31 of 39 (16 benign, 23 malignant) patients were initially referred from primary care to services other than the regional tumour service, most commonly neurosurgery (11/39) and paediatric oncology (4/39). Seven of 39 of these patients had undergone interventions prior to their referral to the tumour service, which may have negatively impacted their definitive management or curative surgery. These tumours present complex issues regarding their definitive management to optimise outcome. Closer links between departments are required to enable the multidisciplinary management of primary bone tumours of the spine. Prior surgical intervention may compromise cure. Those involved in their management should be encouraged to liaise with their regional bone tumour service to improve outcome


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 67 - 67
1 Jun 2012
Khan AL Oliver WM Fender D Gibson MJ
Full Access

Aim. To identify patterns in referral and the management pathway of patients with primary bone tumours of the spine referred to the Orthopaedic Spine Unit in order to recommend ways to improve the service. Methods and Results. A retrospective notes and imaging review to evaluate the referral pathway undertaken by patients ending up in the orthopaedic spine unit over a 5 year period according to the recommendations for primary bone tumours. Significant events leading to potential improvement in outcomes were assessed. Recommendations for improvements are suggested. None of the 38 patients evaluated were referred within two weeks of presentation, and only 6 were referred directly to the bone tumour service. Almost half (15/32) of the patients who had an indirect referral pathway had a prior intervention. Five of these had non-surgical, while 10 had surgical interventions outside the tumour centre before their referral. Of these, seven had malignant tumours. Conclusion. In order to optimise outcome, patients with potentially malignant primary tumours of the spine should be referred directly to tumour services. Prior procedures should be limited to biopsy procedures and discussed with the tumour service before this is undertaken having appropriate investigation and imaging available. Guidelines for this should be directed at streamlining the referral pathway and encouraging communication between stakeholders. Further research should assess the impact of patient-related delay in presentation contributes to overall delay in referral to tumour service; how early radiological assessment may augment timely referral; and how indirect referral and prior intervention affect patient outcomes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 52 - 52
1 Jun 2012
Mangat N Kotecha A Stirling A
Full Access

Statement of purpose. We review the current state of development of proton therapy and the implications for beam therapy in the management of primary bone tumours. Introduction. The principle of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose, accurately, to the tumour. Conventional photon and proton therapy irradiates adjacent tissue significantly. This is reduced with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). This has been demonstrably effective in treating tumours refractory to chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy such as chrondrosarcomas and chordomas. Case Report. We present a patient with an isolated chondrosarcoma involving the anterior and posterior element of the L3 vertebral body with a significant soft tissue component displacing the IVC. The patient underwent a 2 stage en-bloc excision of the tumour: Stabilization was achieved by posterior L2-4 instrumented fusion with PEEK rods, an anterior PEEK cage and bone graft. Post-operatively the patient underwent 12 weeks of bed rest followed by rehabilitation. Due to pedicle involvement (giving a high risk of contamination) and the narrow clear margin found on histology the patient has been accepted for post-operative IMPT. Discussion. The high risk of contamination and the narrow margins presented an ideal case for post-operative IMPT. However, conventionally the stabilization would have been metallic, distorting the treatment mapping and the delivery of the IMPT, reducing any possible benefit. Thus, we used PEEK as it is proven to maintain its properties when subjected to a wide range of conditions while also being tolerant of, and not interfering with, most forms of radiation including proton therapy, maximising the chance of a positive outcome. One concern is that PEEK is less biomechanically stable then metal, hence the prolonged period of bed rest. Conclusion. This report discusses the current evidence for proton therapy while describing a successful technique for stabilization to facilitate delivery of proton treatment post-operatively


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XX | Pages 16 - 16
1 May 2012
Mangat NS Kotecha A Stirling AJ
Full Access

Statement of purpose. We review the current state of development of proton therapy and the implications for beam therapy in the management of primary bone tumours. Introduction. The principle of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose, accurately, to the tumour. Conventional photon and proton therapy irradiates adjacent tissue significantly. This is reduced with intensity modulation proton therapy (IMPT). This has been demonstrably effective in treating tumours refractory to chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy such as chrondrosarcomas and chordomas. Case Report. We present a patient with an isolated chondrosarcoma involving the anterior and posterior element of the L3 vertebral body with a significant soft tissue component displacing the IVC. The patient underwent a 2 stage en-bloc excision of the tumour: Stabilisation was achieved by posterior L2-4 instrumented fusion with Peek rods and screws, an anterior Peek cage and bone graft. Post-operatively the patient underwent 12 weeks of bed rest followed by rehabilitation. Due to pedicle involvement (giving a high risk of contamination) and the narrow clear margin found on histology the patient has been accepted for post-operative IMPT. Discussion. The high risk of contamination and the narrow margins presented an ideal case for post-operative IMPT. However, conventionally the stabilisation would have been metallic, distorting the treatment mapping and the delivery of the IMPT, reducing any possible benefit. Thus, we used Peek as it is proven to maintain its properties when subjected to a wide range of conditions while also being tolerant of, and not interfering with, most forms of radiation including proton therapy, maximising the chance of a positive outcome. One concern with Peek is that it is less biomechanically stable then metal, hence the prolonged period of bed rest. Conclusion. This report discusses the current evidence for proton therapy while describing a successful technique for stabilisation to facilitate delivery of proton treatment post-operatively. Ethics approval. None Audit/service standard in trust Ethics committee COREC number:. Interest Statement. None Local grant/National grant Commercial/industry support


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 84 - 84
1 Apr 2012
Chan S Choudhury M Grimer R Grainger M Stirling A
Full Access

To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of primary malignant bone tumours. Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies. Management of these lesions is dictated by anatomical considerations and the behaviour of tumours. The three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy. A retrospective review of the surgical management of primary malignant sacral tumours from 2004 - 2009. The study included 46 patients (34 males, 12 females) with an average age of 49 (range 7 – 82). Median duration of symptoms before presentation was 26 months. 10 patients had inoperable tumours at presentation. 6 patients had chemotherapy. 2 patients opted for palliative radiotherapy. 1 patient was unfit for surgery. 25 patients (54%) underwent surgical resection. 8 underwent instrumented stabilisations with fibula strut graft vs. 17 uninstrumented. Colostomy was performed in 10 patients (40%). Mean follow post-operatively was 19.0 months. Wound healing problems were present in 5/25 (20%). There was no difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with and without colostomy. Mechanical failure of stabilisation was noted in 75%. There was one peri-operative death. Local recurrence occurred in 12%(3/25) of operated patients although follow-up period was noted to be short. Mechanical stabilisation for extensive lesions in the sacrum are particularly challenging in tumour surgery. Despite radiological failure in 7/8 instrumented stabilisations, patients were relatively asymptomatic and only 1/8 required revision stabilisation surgery. Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement: None


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 5 | Pages 634 - 636
1 May 2006
Bhadra AK Casey ATH

We have treated 175 patients with a chordoma over a ten-year period. Only two had a family history of the condition and we describe these in this paper. In one patient the tumour was at the craniocervical junction and in the other the lesion affected the sacrum. We have undertaken a literature review of familial chordoma and have identified chromosomal abnormalities associated with the condition.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 7 | Pages 950 - 955
1 Jul 2012
Helenius I Serlo J Pajulo O

We report the results of vertebral column resection (VCR) for paediatric patients with spinal deformity. A total of 49 VCRs in paediatric patients from four university hospitals between 2005 and 2009 with a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively identified. After excluding single hemivertebral resections (n = 25) and VCRs performed for patients with myelomeningocele (n = 6), as well as spondylectomies performed for tumour (n = 4), there were 14 patients who had undergone full VCR at a mean age of 12.3 years (6.5 to 17.9). The aetiology was congenital scoliosis in five, neuromuscular scoliosis in three, congenital kyphosis in two, global kyphosis in two, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in one and secondary scoliosis in one. A total of seven anteroposterior and seven posterolateral approaches were used.

The mean major curve deformity was 86° (67° to 120°) pre-operatively and 37° (17° to 80°) at the two-year follow-up; correction was a mean of 54% (18% to 86%) in the anteroposterior and 60% (41% to 70%) in the posterolateral group at the two-year follow-up (p = 0.53). The mean Scoliosis Research Society-24 total scores were 100 (92 to 108) for the anteroposterior and 102 (95 to 105) for the posterolateral group. There was one paraparesis in the anteroposterior group necessitating urgent re-decompression, with a full recovery.

Patients undergoing VCR are highly satisfied after a successful procedure.