The optimal timing of when to perform manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unclear. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for MUA following primary TKA and whether performing an “early” MUA within 3 months results in a greater improvement in range of motion. Primary TKAs performed between January 2013 and December 2018 at three tertiary New Zealand hospitals were reviewed. International Classification of Diseases discharge coding was used to identify patients who underwent an MUA. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify patient and surgical risk factors for MUA. Pre- and post-MUA knee flexion angles were identified through manual review of operation notes. Multivariate linear regression was performed to compare the mean flexion angles pre- and post-MUA, as well as the mean gain in flexion, between patients undergoing “early” (<3 months) versus “late” MUA (>3 months). 7386 primary TKAs were analyzed in which 131 underwent subsequent MUA (1.8%). Patients aged <65 years were two times more likely to undergo MUA compared to patients aged ≥65 years (2.5% versus 1.3%, adjusted hazard ratio = 2.1, p<0.001). Gender, body mass index, patient comorbidities or a history of cancer were not associated with the risk of MUA. There was no difference in the final post-MUA flexion angle between patients who underwent early versus late MUA (104.7 versus 104.1 degrees, p = 0.819). However, patients who underwent early MUA had poorer pre-MUA flexion (72.3 versus 79.6 degrees, p = 0.012), and subsequently had a greater overall gain in flexion compared to patients who underwent late MUA (mean gain 33.1 versus 24.3 degrees, p<0.001). Younger age was the only patient risk factor for MUA. A greater overall gain in flexion was achieved in patients who underwent early MUA within 3 months

Introduction. The mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design was introduced with the aim of reducing polyethylene wear and component loosening seen in the fixed-bearing (FB) design. A recent joint registry study has revealed increased risk for all-cause revision, but not revision for infection, in MB-TKA. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) to compare all-cause revision rates, and revision rates for aseptic loosening of MB-TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) TKA. Methods. All patients who underwent a primary TKA registered in the NZJR between the 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2021 were identified. Analysis compared MB to FB designs, with sub analysis of implants from a single company. We identified 135,707 primary TKAs, with 104,074 (76.7%) FB-TKAs and 31,633 (23.3%) MB-TKAs recorded. We examined all-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and performed survival analyses. Results. For all-comers, MB-TKA had an all-cause revision rate of 0.43/100-component-years (OCY) compared with 0.42/OCY for FB-TKA (p=0.09). The all-cause revision rate was higher for those age < 65 years (MB TKA 0.60/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.59/OCY) compared to those > 65 years at time of primary TKA (MB-TKA 0.29/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.32/OCY), however there was no statistically significant difference between implant design in either age group (p=0.16 and p=0.64; respectively). Similarly, there was no difference in revision rates for aseptic loosening between implant designs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference in revision-free survival of implants, with both MB-TKA and FB-TKA demonstrating ∼93% revision free survival at 23 years. Conclusions. Both FB- and MB-TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship, with no significant difference in all-cause revision rates or revision for aseptic loosening between implant designs

Approximately 20% of patients feel unsatisfied 12 months after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Current predictive tools for TKA focus on the clinician as the intended user rather than the patient. The aim of this study is to develop a tool that can be used by patients without clinician assistance, to predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). All patients with primary TKAs for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary institutional registry were analysed. The predictive outcome was improvement in Veterans-RAND 12 utility score at 12 months after surgery. Potential predictors included patient demographics, co-morbidities, and patient reported outcome scores at baseline. Logistic regression and three machine learning algorithms were used. Models were evaluated using both discrimination and calibration metrics. Predictive outcomes were categorised into deciles from 1 being the least likely to improve to 10 being the most likely to improve. 3703 eligible patients were included in the analysis. The logistic regression model performed the best in out-of-sample evaluation for both discrimination (AUC = 0.712) and calibration (gradient = 1.176, intercept = -0.116, Brier score = 0.201) metrics. Machine learning algorithms were not superior to logistic regression in any performance metric. Patients in the lowest decile (1) had a 29% probability for improvement and patients in the highest decile (10) had an 86% probability for improvement. Logistic regression outperformed machine learning algorithms in this study. The final model performed well enough with calibration metrics to accurately predict improvement after TKA using deciles. An ongoing randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12622000072718) is evaluating the effect of this tool on patient willingness for surgery. Full results of this trial are expected to be available by April 2023. A free-to-use online version of the tool is available at . smartchoice.org.au.

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. Outcomes following knee arthroplasty are typically defined as implant survivorship at defined timepoints, or revision incidence over time. These estimates are difficult to conceptualise, and lack context for younger patients with more remaining years of life. We therefore aimed to determine a ‘lifetime’ risk of revision as a more useful metric for total (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The New Zealand Joint Registry was used to identify 96,497 primary TKAs and 13,481 primary UKAs performed between 1999 and 2019. Patient mortality and revision incidence were also extracted. Estimates of lifetime risk were calculated using an actuarial lifetable method. The estimates were stratified by age and gender. Reasons for revision were categorised using previously published standardised definitions. The lifetime risk of UKA revision was two-fold higher than TKA across all age groups (range 3.7-40.4% UKA, 1.6-22.4% TKA). Revision risk was higher for males with TKA (range 3.4%-25.2% males, 1.1%-20% females), but higher for females with UKA (range 4.3%-43.4% vs. 2.9%-37.4% for males). Revision due to infections were higher for TKA (1.5% males, 0.7% females) compared with UKA (0.4% males, 0.1% females). The increased risk in younger UKA patients was associated with higher incidence of aseptic loosening (UKA 2%, TKA 1%) and ‘unexplained pain’ (UKA 2%, TKA 0.2%). The risk for UKA was two-fold higher than TKA, and this was partially explained by a higher proportion of revisions due to ‘unexplained pain’. For TKA, males had higher risk of revision, in contrast to UKA where females had higher risk; this gender difference was associated with higher incidence of infections with TKA. Younger age, gender and higher ASA status were also associated with increased lifetime risk of UKA revision. Lifetime risk of revision can provide a meaningful measure of arthroplasty outcomes to aid patient counselling

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item questionnaire used to track knee arthroplasty outcomes. Validation of such patient reported outcome measures is typically anchored to a single question based on patient ‘satisfaction’, however risk of subsequent revision surgery is also an important outcome measure. The OKS can predict subsequent revision risk within two years, however it is not known which item(s) are the strongest predictors. Our aim was to identify which questions were most relevant in the prediction of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision risk. . All primary TKAs (n=27,708) and UKAs (n=8,415) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months, five years or ten years post-surgery were included. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess prediction models at six months, five years and ten years. Q1 ‘overall pain’ was the strongest predictor of revision within two years (TKA: 6 months, odds ratio (OR) 1.37; 5 years, OR 1.80; 10 years, OR 1.43; UKA: 6 months, OR 1.32; 5 years, OR 2.88; 10 years, OR 1.85; all p<0.05). A reduced model with just three questions (Q1, Q6 ‘limping when walking’, Q10 ‘knee giving way’) showed comparable or better diagnostic ability with the full OKS (area under the curve (AUC): TKA: 6 months, 0.77 vs. 0.76; 5 years, 0.78 vs. 0.75; 10 years, 0.76 vs. 0.73; UKA: 6 months, 0.80 vs. 0.78; 5 years: 0.81 vs. 0.77; 10 years, 0.80 vs. 0.77). The three questions on overall knee pain, limping when walking, and knee ‘giving way’ were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision within two years. Attention to the responses for these three key questions during follow-up may allow for prompt identification of patients most at risk of revision

Aim. Strenuous efforts to minimize postoperative infection rates have been made, including the Swedish nation-wide initiative Prosthesis Related Infections Shall be Stopped (PRISS). The aim of this study was to calculate the incidence rate of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) before and after PRISS. Method. All 45,438 primary TKAs registered in the Swedish knee arthroplasty register (SKAR) during 2007–2008 and 2012–2013 were included. Matched data on antibiotic prescriptions were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR). All patients with ≥28 days of continuous antibiotic treatment within 2 years of primary surgery had their medical charts reviewed to identify cases of PJI. Results. 644 PJIs were identified, equaling a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of 1.42% (95% CI: 1.31–1.53). The incidence rate was 1.41% before PRISS and 1.43% after. Diagnosis was made within 30 days of primary TKA in 52%, and within 90 days in 73% of the cases. 603 cases were reoperated. Debridement with exchange of the insert was performed in 32.1% and 62.5% of cases before and after PRISS respectively. Conclusions. No reduction in cumulative PJI incidence was seen after the PRISS initiative

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed secondary to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These poor outcomes may be further complicated by the development of postoperative infection requiring aggressive antibiotic treatment. However, this antibiotic overuse may suppress patients' native bacterial flora, leading to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With the increased demand for primary TKAs and expected rise in revision TKA due to PJI, it is important to identify factors contributing to CDI. Therefore, we aimed to study the: 1) incidence, 2) demographics, length of stay (LOS), and total costs, and 3) risk factors and mortality associated with CDI in revision TKA patients. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all individuals diagnosed with PJI and who underwent revision TKA between 2009 and 2013. Patients who developed CDI during their in-patient hospital stay were identified, yielding 83,806 patients (799 with CDI) with a mean age of 65 (S.D.=11.2). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of CDI. During the study period, the overall incidence of CDI after revision TKA was 1%. These patients were significantly older (mean age 69.05 vs. 65.52 yrs), had greater LOS (median 11 vs. 5 days), had greater costs ($30,612.93 vs. 18,873.75), and had higher in-hospital mortality (3.6 vs. 0.5%, p < 0 .001 for all) compared to those without infection. Patients with CDI were more likely to be treated in urban, not-for-profit, medium or large bed-sized hospitals located in the Northeast or Midwest (p < 0 .05 for all). Patients with underlying depression (OR 4.267, p=0.007) or fluid/electrolyte disorders (OR 3.48, p=0.001) were more likely to develop infection. Although CDI is a rare event following revision TKA, it can have detrimental consequences. Our report demonstrates that CDI is associated with longer LOS, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality. With increased legislative pressure to lower healthcare expenditures, it is crucial to identify means of preventing costly complications

With the introduction of new technology in orthopaedics, surgeons must balance anticipated benefits in patient outcomes with challenges or complications associated with surgical learning curve for the technology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgeon learning curve with a new multi-radius primary TKA system and instruments designed to improve surgical team ease would impact clinical outcomes, surgical time, and complications. From November 2012 to July 2015, 2369 primary TKAs were prospectively enrolled in two multicentre studies across 50 sites in 14 countries with a new knee system (NEW-TKA) evenly balanced across four configurations: cruciate retaining or posterior stabilised with either fixed bearing or rotating platform (CRFB, CRRP, PSFB, PSRP). 2128 knees had a<1 year visit and 1189 had a minimum 1 year visit. These knees were compared to a reference dataset of 843 primary TKAs from three manufacturers in the same four configurations with currently available products (CA-TKA). Demographics for NEW-TKA and CA-TKA were similar and typical for primary TKA. Operative times, clinical outcomes and a series of five patient reported outcomes were compared for NEW-TKA vs. CA-TKA. The first 10 New-TKA subjects for each surgeon were defined as learning curve cases (N=520) and were compared to all later subjects (N=1849). Patient reported outcome measure and clinical outcome analyses were covariate adjusted for patient demographics, pre-op assessment and days post-op. Mean (SD) surgical time for NEW-TKA learning curve cases was 79.1 (24.3) minutes, which reduced thereafter to 73.6 (24.3) (p=0.002). Beyond 10 cases, there was a continued reduction in NEW-TKA surgical time (R-Squared = 0.031). After 10 cases, surgical time was on par with the mean (SD) 71.9 (21.6) for CA-TKA (p=0.078). PROM outcomes of the first 10 learning curve cases for NEW-TKA were not statistically different from later cases at less than 1 year or later when adjusted for relevant covariates including configuration, patient demographics, pre-op functional status, and time post-op (p-values > 0.01). PROM outcomes for NEW-TKA vs. CA-TKA under the same covariate adjustments showed a trend favoring KOOS ADL, Symptoms, and Sport and Recreation subscores at minimum 1 year (p-values < 0.01). The incidence of intraoperative operative site complications was 1.3% for the NEW-TKA learning curve cases which was similar to the 0.6% rate for historical CA-TKA (p=0.231) and the intraoperative complication rate for the NEW-TKA later cases was consistent with learning curve cases (p=0.158). The introduction of new implants into the market place needs to have adequate data to support that they are safe and effective. Except for a minor increase in surgical time during the first 10 patients, this study found that surgeon learning curve with this new primary TKA system does not adversely affect patient short term outcomes and complication rates

Introduction. With the introduction of new technology in orthopaedics, surgeons must balance anticipated benefits in patient outcomes with challenges or complications associated with surgical learning curve for the technology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the surgeon learning curve with a new multi-radius primary TKA system (primary TKA implant and instruments) designed for surgical team ease would impact clinical outcomes, surgical time and complications. Materials & Methods. From November 2012 to July 2015, 2369 primary TKAs were prospectively enrolled in two multicenter studies across 50 sites in 14 countries with a new knee system (ATTUNE®) evenly balanced across four configurations: cruciate retaining or posterior stabilised with either fixed bearing or rotating platform (CRFB, CRRP, PSFB, PSRP). 2261 knees had a <1 year visit and 1628 had a greater than 1 year visit. These knees were compared to a reference dataset of 845 primary TKAs from three manufacturers in the same four configurations with currently available products (CURRENT-TKA). Demographics for ATTUNE and CURRENT-TKA were similar and typical for primary TKA. Operative times, clinical outcomes and a series of five patient reported outcomes were compared for ATTUNE vs. CURRENT-TKA. The first 10 ATTUNE subjects for each surgeon were defined as learning curve cases (N=520) and were compared to all later subjects (N=1849) and also with the CURRENT-TKA cases (N=845). Patient reported outcome measures and clinical outcome analyses were adjusted for covariates including patient demographics, pre-op assessment and days post-op. Results. Mean (SD) surgical time for ATTUNE learning curve cases was 79.3 (24.7) minutes, which reduced thereafter to 73.6 (24.3) (p<0.001). Beyond 10 cases, there was a continued reduction in ATTUNE surgical time (R-Squared = 0.031). After 10 cases, surgical time was on par with the mean (SD) 72.0 (21.7) for CURRENT-TKA (p=0.097). PROM outcomes of the first 10 learning curve cases for ATTUNE were not statistically different from later cases at less than 1 year or later when adjusted for relevant covariates including configuration, patient demographics, pre-op functional status, and time post-op (p-values > 0.01). PROM outcomes for ATTUNE vs. CURRENT-TKA under the same covariate adjustments showed a trend favoring KOOS ADL, Symptoms, and Sport and Recreation subscores at minimum 1 year (p-values < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative operative site (knee) complications was 1.3% (7/520) for the ATTUNE learning curve cases which was similar to both the 0.6% (5/845) rate for historical CURRENT-TKA (p=0.230) and the 0.8% (14/1849) intraoperative complication rate for the ATTUNE later cases (p=0.195). Discussion. The introduction of new implants into the market place needs to have adequate data to support that they are safe and effective. Except for a minor increase in surgical time during the first 10 patients, this study found that surgeon learning curve with the new ATTUNE primary TKA system does not adversely affect patient short term outcomes and complication rates

Background. As life expectancy increases, the number of octogenarians requiring primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Recently, primary TKA has become a common treatment option in octogenarians. However, surgeons are still hesitant about performing revision TKA on octogenarians because of concerning about risk- and cost-benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative complications and mid-term survival in octogenarians following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 231 primary TKAs and 41 revision TKAs performed on octogenarians between 2000 and 2016. The mean age was 81.9 for primary TKA and 82.3 for revision TKA (p=0.310). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was not different, but the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was higher in revision TKA (4.4 vs. 4.8, p=0.003). The mean follow-up period did not differ (3.8 vs. 3.5 years, p=0.451). The WOMAC scores and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative complication and survival rate (end point; death determined by telephone or mail communication with patient or family) were investigated. Results. The postoperative WOMAC and ROM were better in primary TKA (33.1 vs. 47.2, p<0.001; 128.9° vs. 113.6°, p<0.001). The most common postoperative complication was delirium in both groups (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p=0.131). There were no differences in the specific complication rates between the two groups. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87.2% and 62.9%, respectively, in primary TKA and 82.1% and 42.2%, respectively, in revision TKA (p=0.017). Conclusions. Both primary and revision TKAs are viable options for octogenarians when considering the clinical results and mid-term survival. Delirium needs to be managed appropriately as the most common complication in both primary and revision TKAs for octogenarians

Introduction/Aim. Outcomes for guided motion primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients are unknown. Materials and Methods. 1,684 consecutive patients underwent 2,059 primary TKAs with a second-generation guided motion implant (Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis) between 2011–2017 at three European and seven US sites. Results. Of 2,003 (97.3%) TKAs in 1,644 patients with BMI data: average age 64.5 years; 58.4% females; average BMI 32.5 kg/m. 2. ;13.4% had BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. Subjects with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had longest length of hospital stay (LOS) at European sites; LOS similar at US sites. Subjects with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. (P=0.0349) had longest surgery duration. BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had more re-hospitalizations or post-TKA reoperations than BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. (12.7% and 9.2% at five-year post-TKA, P<.0495). 62 TKAs were revised (3.39/100 TKA at five years) with no differences in revision risk between groups. 17 (27.4%) revisions involved femoral or tibial component removal; 45 (72.6%) involved tibial insert or patellar component removal only with revision risk similar between groups. Discussion. Our results corroborate literature-reported revision outcomes of standard TKAs in obese patients. Conclusion. Surgery duration and long-term complication rates are higher in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. , but device revision risk is not elevated

Recently, concerns arose over the medial tibial bone resorption of a novel cobalt-chromium (CoCr) implant. This study aimed to investigate the effects of tibial component material, design, and patient factors on periprosthetic bone resorption and to determine its association with clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 462 primary TKAs using five types of implants were included. To evaluate tibial periprosthetic bone resorption, we assessed radiolucent lines (RLL) and change in bone mineral density at the medial tibial condyle (BMDMT). Factors related to bone resorption were assessed using regression analysis. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated with respect to periprosthetic bone resorption. Compared to titanium (Ti) implants, CoCr implants showed a higher incidence of complete RLL (23.1% vs. 7.9% at two years post-TKA) and a greater degree of BMDMT reduction. However, there was no significant difference between the implants made of the same material. Increased medial tibial bone resorption was associated with male sex, osteoporosis, larger preoperative varus deformity, longer follow-up period, and lower body mass index. The periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with clinical outcomes including changes in range of motion and WOMAC score. Furthermore, no cases warranted additional surgery. Periprosthetic bone resorption was associated with implant material but not with implant design. Moreover, patient factors were related to the medial tibial bone resorption post-TKA. However, the periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with short-term clinical outcomes. We contend that researchers should incorporate integrative considerations when developing and assessing novel implants

INTRODUCTION. Over the past 40 years of knee arthroplasty, significant advances have been made in the design of knee implants, resulting in high patient satisfaction. Patellar tracking has been central to improving the patient experience, with modern designs including an optimized Q-angle, deepened trochlear groove, and thin anterior flange.[1–4] Though many of today's femoral components are specific for the left and right sides, Total Joint Orthopedics’ (TJO) Klassic® Knee System features a universal design to achieve operating room efficiencies while providing all the advancements of a modern knee. The Klassic Femur achieves this through a patented double Q-angle to provide excellent patellar tracking whether implanted in the left or the right knee (Figure 1). The present study examines a prospective cohort of 145 consecutive TKA's performed using a modern universal femur and considers patients’ pre- and post-operative Knee Society Clinical Rating System score (KSS). METHODS AND MATERIALS. 145 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were performed during the study using a measured resection technique with a slope-matching tibial cut for all patients. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was sacrificed to accommodate an ultra-congruent polyethylene insert. The distal femur was cut at five degrees (5°) valgus; the tibia was resected neutral (0°) alignment for valgus legs and in two degrees (2°) of varus for varus alignment. The patella was resurfaced for all patients. Patients were followed annually for up to 46 months and were evaluated using the KSS score on a 200-point scale. RESULTS. The final study group comprised 127 primary TKAs. The average age was 68 years (51–90) with 45 males and 68 females. The average weight was 110kg (range: 75–151kg) for men and 88kg (range: 50–129kg) for women. One patient deceased during the follow-up period, four required manipulation under anesthesia, and two required revision for periprosthetic joint infection. There were no failures due to patellar maltracking. No special soft tissue releases were required in any patient. Average pre-operative knee score was 107, improving to 182 at average follow-up of 41 months (36–46 months). Results are summarized in Table 1. DISCUSSION. The improvement in patient clinical experience demonstrates that a universal femoral design can achieve excellent results if it incorporates modern technologies. A double Q-angle design with a deepened trochlear groove and a thin anterior flange appears to provide excellent patellar tracking for all patients in this cohort. This study is limited to the experience of a single institution. Further study would improve the extensibility of these findings. It does show, however, that a femur using a universal design with modern patellar tracking can improve patient satisfaction with their knee following TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Persistent patellofemoral (PF) pain is a common postoperative complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the USA, patella resurfacing is conducted in more than 80% of primary TKAs [1], and is, therefore, an important factor during surgery. Studies have revealed that the position of the patellar component is still controversially discussed [2–4]. However, only a limited number of studies address the biomechanical impact of patellar component malalignment on PF dynamics [2]. Hence, the purpose of our present study was to analyze the effect of patellar component positioning on PF dynamics by means of musculoskeletal multibody simulation in which a detailed knee joint model resembled the loading of an unconstrained cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee replacement (TKR) with dome patella button. Material and Methods. Our musculoskeletal multibody model simulation of a dynamic squat motion bases on the SimTK data set (male, 88 years, 66.7 kg) [5] and was implemented in the multibody dynamics software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany). The model served as a reference for our parameter analyses on the impact on the patellar surfacing, as it resembles an unconstrained CR-TKR (P.F.C. Sigma, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) while offering the opportunity for experimental validation on the basis of instrumented implant components [5]. Relevant ligaments and muscle structures were considered within the model. Muscle forces were calculated using a variant of the computed muscle control algorithm. PF and tibiofemoral (TF) joints were modeled with six degrees of freedom by implementing a polygon-contact model, enabling roll-glide kinematics. Relative to the reference model, we analyzed six patellar component alignments: superior-inferior position, mediolateral position, patella spin, patella tilt, flexion-extension and thickness. The effect of each configuration was evaluated by taking the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the PF contact force, patellar shift and patellar tilt with respect to the reference model along knee flexion angle. Results. The analysis showed that the PF contact force was mostly affected by patellar component thickness (RMSE=440 N) as well as superior-inferior (RMSE=199 N), and mediolateral (RMSE=98 N) positioning.. PF kinematics was mostly affected by mediolateral positioning, patellar component thickness, and superior-inferior positioning. Medialization of the patellar component reduced the peak PF contact force and caused a lateral patellar shift. Discussion. Based on our findings, we conclude that malalignment in mediolateral and superior-inferior direction, tilt and thickness of patellar resurfacing are the most important intraoperative parameters to affect PF dynamics. It could be shown that the translational positioning is more critical than rotational positioning regarding PF contact force. Reported findings are in good agreement with previous experimental and clinical studies [2–4]. Our data reveal that patellar component positioning has to be aligned precisely during total knee arthroplasty to prevent postoperative complications. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) helps restore range of motion. This study identifies MUA risk factors to support early interventions to improve functionality. Methods. Data was retrospectively reviewed in 2,925 primary TKAs from October 2013 through December 2015 from 13 orthopedic surgeons using hospital and private practice electronic medical records (EMR). Statistical analysis evaluated MUA and non-MUA groups, comparing demographic, operative, hospital-visit, and clinical factors. T-test, chi-square test, ANOVA and regression analysis were performed. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results. Of 2,925 TKAs, 208 MUAs were performed (7.1%) with no significant differences between groups in sex, BMI, or diabetes status. Mean age of the MUA group was 61.98 years old, and 66.89 years old in the non-MUA group (p<0.005). The ratio of MUA patients with high cholesterol was 3.37% (7/208), and 1.10% (30/2717) in the non-MUA group (p=0.014). The ratio of African-American patients in the MUA group was 6.73% (14/208), and 2.94% (80/2717) in the non- MUA group (p=0.003). Of cases with device data recorded in the EMR (n=1890), MUA incidence in patients receiving a cruciate-retaining (CR) device was 14.58% (50/343), and 9.57% (148/1547) in patients receiving a posterior-stabilized (PS) device (p=0.006). A CR-device patient was 52.35% more likely to undergo MUA than a PS-device patient (95% CI, 1.13–2.05). MUA rate by surgeon training was 6.7% for joint fellowship, 6.8% for general fellowship, and 12.0% for sports medicine fellowship (p=0.015). Further analysis showed that rate of CR-device use was 13.3% for joint-fellowship trained surgeons, 10.2% for general fellowship, and 74.7% for sports medicine fellowship (p<0.001). With the numbers available for this investigation, there were no significant differences found between groups in relation to surgeon, high-volume (>150 TKAs annually) or low-volume surgeons, length of stay, discharge disposition, or smoking status. Conclusion. MUA risk factors include a lower mean age, high cholesterol, African-American, surgeon fellowship training, and receiving a cruciate-retaining device

Background and Purpose:. Modularity of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has many surgical benefits. It also reduces inventory related expenses but increases implant cost. The resulting locking mechanism micromotion that leads to non-articular microwear and has been an accepted consequence of modularity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk of revision (all-cause and aseptic) of a monoblock all-polyethylene tibial component compared to a fixed bearing modular tibial construct with the same articular geometry while adjusting for potential confounders in a community based sample of primary TKAs. In addition, younger and older patient specific risk of revision was evaluated. Method:. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a Total Joint Replacement Registry (TJRR) was conducted. All 27,657 primary TKAs enrolled between 2001 and 2010 performed for any diagnosis with the same implant from a single manufacturer were included in the study. Patient characteristics, as well as surgeon, hospital, procedure, and implant characteristics were compared by the main exposure of interest, i.e. the type of tibial prosthesis (monoblock all-polyethylene vs. metal-backed modular). The main endpoints of the study were all-cause and aseptic revisions only. Descriptive statistics and Cox-regression models were employed. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided. Results:. The cohort consisted of 2,306 (8.3%) monoblock all-polyethylene tibial component TKAs and 25,351 (91.7%) modular metal-backed components. No gender, diagnosis or diabetic status differences were noted between the monoblock and modular cohorts. Patients with monoblock tibias were older (71.8 vs. 68.1 yrs, p < 0.001) and had a lower body mass index (30.1 vs. 31.6 kg/m2, p < 0.001). The median follow up time of the cohort was 2.9 years (interquartile range 1.2–5.1 years), during which 22 (0.95%) monoblock arthroplasties and 550 (2.17%) modular arthroplasties were revised. The all-cause revision rate/100 years of follow-up for monoblock and modular cohorts was 0.30 and 0.65, respectively. Their aseptic revision rate/100 of follow-up was 0.18 and 0.35, respectively. In adjusted overall models, the risk of all-cause revision (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.33–0.78, p = 0.002) and aseptic revision (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.29–1.19, p = 0.139) was lower in the monoblock cohort compared to the modular cohort. In adjusted models of patients 65 years and older, the risk of all-cause revision is 0.59 (95% CI 0.35–0.99, p = 0.045) in the monoblock cohort compared to modular cohort. In adjusted models of patients younger than 65 years old, the risk of all-cause revision (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.10–0.72, p = 0.010) and aseptic revision (HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.65, p = 0.003) were lower in the monoblock compared to the modular cohort. Conclusion:. For our entire cohort of 27,567 primary fixed bearing TKAs, monoblock all-polyethylene tibial components had a 49% lower risk of revision for all-causes and a 41% lower risk of aseptic revision when compared to modular metal-backed tibial constructs. For patients younger than 65 years old, the all-polyethylene component had a 74% lower risk of all-cause revision and a 73% lower risk of aseptic revisions when compared to modular tibial constructs

Background. The knowledge about the common mode of failure and each period in primary and revision TKAs offers useful information to prevent those kinds of failure in each surgery. However, there has been limited report that simultaneously compared the mode of failure between primary and revision TKAs using single prosthesis. We compared the survival rate, mode of failure, and periods of each mode of failure between primary and revision TKAs. Methods. A consecutive cohort of 1606 knees (1174 patients) of primary TKA and 258 knees (224 patients) of revision TKA using P.F.C® prosthesis was retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up periods of primary and revision TKAs were 10.2 and 10.8 years, respectively. We compared the above variables between primary and revision TKAs. Results. The average 5-, 10-, 15-year survivor rate of primary TKA were 99.1% (CI 95%, ±0.3%), 96.7% (CI 95%, ±0.7%), and 85.4% (CI 95%, ±2.0%). They were 97.8% (CI 95%, ±1.0%), 91.4% (CI 95%, ±2.5%), and 80.5% (CI 95%, ±4.5%) in revision TKA. The common mode of failure included polyethylene wear, loosening, and infection in both primary and revision TKAs. The most common mode of failure was polyethylene wear in primary TKAs and infection in revision TKAs. The mean periods of polyethylene wear and loosening were not significantly different between primary and revision TKAs, but the mean period of infection was significantly long in revision TKA (4.8 years vs. 1.2 years, p=0.003). Conclusions. The survival rate decreased with time, especially after 10 years in both primary and revision TKAs. The continuous efforts are required to prevent and detect various modes of failure during the long-term follow-up after primary and revision TKAs. More careful attention is necessary to detect the late infection as a mode of failure after revision TKA. Level of Evidence. Level III, Therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Introduction. Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in end-stage hemophilic arthropathy can reduce the severe joint pain and improve the functional disability, it is technically demanding. In addition, it has generally reported a high rate of complication including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and component loosening up to 20%. Although the Knee Society classification system of TKA complication was introduced, the complications of TKA in hemophilic arthropathy has not stratified using this classification system in previous articles to the best of our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes and complications of TKA in hemophilic arthropathy. Methods. The study retrospectively reviewed 131 consecutive primary TKAs (102 patients) in single institute. The mean patient age was 41.0 years and mean follow-up time was 6.4 years. The clinical and radiographic results were evaluated. The complications were categorized according to the classification system of the Knee Society for TKA complications. Results. The average WOMAC score improved from 66.0 to 24.2. The average flexion contracture significantly decreased from 17.3° to 4.7°, but the average pre and postoperative maximum flexion did not differ (80.9 ° vs. 85.6°). The average mechanical axis was varus 5.2° preoperatively and valgus 0.3° postoperatively. The coronal position of femoral and tibial components and sagittal position of those components were within ±3° in 83.2%, 89.3%, 63.4%, and 73.3%. The complications occurred in 17 knees (13.0%). There were 7 bleeding and hemarthrosis. Five knees were treated with increased amounts of coagulation factor concentrate and two knees were treated with incision and drainage of hematoma. One medial collateral ligament injury of grade 2 required change of postoperative rehabilitation protocol and bracing. Two stiffness of grade 3 required unplanned admission and manipulation under anesthesia. Three deep PJI were treated with 2 stage revision TKA. There were 4 periprosthetic fractures. Three distal femur fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation for 3 knees. One patellar fracture was healed with conservative treatment. Conclusions. The mid-term results of TKA in end-stage hemophilic arthropathy were satisfactory with obtaining pain relief, improving function, and decreasing flexion contracture. Bleeding and PJI continues to be a major concern for TKA in patients with hemophilic arthropathy, and risk of periprosthetic fracture has to be taken into account for patient education and appropriate prevention. Level of evidence. Level IV

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare the mid-term outcomes between rotating platform(RP) and posterior cruciate substitute(PS) bearings in LCS-total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This is a prospective randomized matched-pairs case–control study of patients who underwent primary TKAs with a minimum 2 years follow-up. The inclusion criteria was degenerative arthritis, and exclusion criteria was arthritis other than degeneration, previous operations such as osteotomy, body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m. 2. The matching criteria were set as age, BMI, preoperative ROM, gender, and the Knee Society (KS) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores. After 1:1 matching, 50 cases involved the LCS RP bearing system as group 1 and 50 cases involved LCS PS bearing system group as group 2. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Results. The overall survival was 100% at final follow up. There were no complications between groups, such as infection, dislocation of bearing. The postoperative ROM was 122.3° ± 9.3 in group 1, 121.2° ± 9.7 in group 2. The KSKS scores were 93.5±7.2 in group 1, 92.8±3.6 in group 2 at final follow up. The KSFS scores were 87.5±7.7 in group 1, 86.9±6.8 in group 2 at final follow up. The HSS scores were 93.1±8.8 in group 1, 91.7±6.1 in group 2 at final follow up. There was no statistical difference in Hospital for Special Surgery Scores (HSS), Knee Society Scores (KSS) score evaluations between groups. However, the improvement of KSS and HSS scores was faster in group 1, the final scores were achieved at 3 to 6 months in group 1, at 6 to 1 year in group 2. Moreover, the KSFS scores were improved continuously until 2 years follow up. The postoperative mechanical axis was found as 1.2° ± 1.2 in group 1, 0.9° ± 0.9 in group 2. There were no statistical differences between groups in radiological evaluations including radiolucent lines. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the PS-LCS prosthesis could provide satisfactory performance compared with that of the RP-LCS prosthesis with minimum 2-year follow-up, however, there could be disadvantages in PS-LCS prosthesis due to more bone loss in box cut in femur

Purpose. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the effects of computer navigation on blood conservation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing postoperative blood loss and need for allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing computer navigation and conventional primary TKAs. Methods. Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they compared change in haemoglobin concentration before and after surgery, postoperative blood loss via drainage or calculated total blood loss, and/or allogenic blood transfusion rate following TKA using computer navigation and conventional methods. For all comparisons, odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for binary outcomes, while mean difference and 95 % CI were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results. Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. The change in haemoglobin concentration was 0.39 g/dl lower with computer navigation than with conventional TKA (P = 0.006). Blood loss via drainage was 83.1 ml (P = 0.03) lower and calculated blood loss was 185.4 ml (P = 0.002) lower with computer navigation than with conventional TKA. However, the need for blood transfusion was similar for the two approaches (n.s.). Conclusions. The primary TKA with computer navigation was effective in reducing haemoglobin loss and blood loss, but had no effect on transfusion requirement, compared with conventional primary TKA. These findings suggest the importance of analysing several blood loss parameters, because each may not always accurately reflect true postsurgical bleeding