Technique, inducations, complications and early outcomes with posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy. A. ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY: Tips and Pearls on Avoiding Complications. a. Introduction. i. understanding of the anatomy of the foot and ankle is critical to safe performance of arthroscopic procedures and prevention of complications. ii. understanding of the surface and intra-articular anatomy of the ankle/subtalaar region is essential. iii. topographical anatomy serves as a guide to the successful placement of arthroscopic portals in the ankle. iv. neurovascular and tendinous structures are most at risk. b. Indications for Posterior/Subtalar Arthroscopy. i. Posterior ankle/ST Impingement. ii. OLT Ankle (usually posteromedial). iii. Assist operative reduction of calc or post mal fractures. iv. Arthrodesis ankle/ST or both. c. Portals. i. Know the anatomy, use blunt dissection, minimize re-entry. ii.
Background. Hallux valgus is a complex deformity of the first ray and forefoot, which can be surgically treated by different procedures and osteotomies.
Introduction:. Symptomatic tarsal coalitions failing conservative treatment are traditionally managed by open resection. Arthroscopic excision of calcaneonavicular bars have previously been described as has a technique for excising talocalcaneal bars using an arthroscope to guide an open resection. We describe a purely arthroscopic technique for excising talocalcaneal coalitions. We present a retrospective two-surgeon case series of the first eight patients (nine feet). Methods:. Subtalar arthroscopy is performed from two standard sinus tarsi portals with the patient in a saggy lateral position. Coalitions are resected with a barrel burr after soft tissue clearance with arthroscopic shavers. Early postoperative mobilisation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prevent recurrence of coalition. Outcome measures include restoration of subtalar movements, return to work and sports, visual analogue pain scales and Sports Athlete Foot and Ankle Scores (SAFAS). Follow-up ranges from 1 to 5.5 years. Results:. Pain and SAFAS scores improved in 7 patients. Subtalar movements were improved in all feet and were sustained to final follow-up. All patients achieved early good function and returned to sports and demanding jobs. One patient's pain recurred requiring subsequent fusions. One posterior tibial nerve was damaged. Both of these patients had coalitions extending across more than one quarter of the posterior facet. Conclusion:. Minimal destruction of bone and soft tissues with an arthroscopic technique allows early mobilization and minimizes pain. We acknowledge the risk of neurological damage from both open and arthroscopic excision of tarsal coalitions. Patient selection and
In a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up, patients treated with suture button (SB) for acute syndesmotic injury had better outcomes than patients treated with syndesmotic screw (SS). The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes for these treatment groups after five years. A total of 97 patients with acute syndesmotic injury were randomized to SS or SB. The five-year follow-up rate was 81 patients (84%). The primary outcome was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale. Secondary outcome measures included Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), range of movement, complications, reoperations, and radiological results. CT scans of both ankles were obtained after surgery, and after one, two, and five years.Aims
Methods