Aims. To determine the value of scoliosis surgery, it is necessary to evaluate outcomes in domains that matter to patients. Since randomized trials on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are scarce, prospective cohort studies with comparable outcome measures are important. To enhance comparison, a core set of patient-related outcome measures is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AIS fusion surgery at two-year follow-up using the core outcomes set. Methods. AIS patients were systematically enrolled in an institutional registry. In all, 144 AIS patients aged ≤ 25 years undergoing primary surgery (median age 15 years (interquartile range 14 to 17) were included. Patient-reported (condition-specific and health-related quality of life (QoL); functional status; back and leg pain intensity) and clinician-reported outcomes (complications, revision surgery) were recorded. Changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed using Friedman’s analysis of variance. Clinical relevancy was determined using minimally important changes (Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r), cut-off values for relevant effect on functioning (pain scores) and a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; Oswestry Disability Index). Results. At baseline, 65 out of 144 patients (45%) reported numerical rating scale (NRS) back pain scores > 5. All PROMs significantly improved at two-year follow-up. Mean improvements in SRS-22r function (+ 1.2 (SD 0.6)), pain (+ 0.6 (SD 0.8)), and self-image (+ 1.1 (SD 0.7)) domain scores, and the SRS-22r total score (+ 0.5 (SD 0.5)), were clinically relevant. At two-year follow-up, 14 out of 144 patients (10%) reported NRS back pain > 5. Surgical site infections did not occur. Only one patient (0.7%) underwent revision surgery. Conclusion. Relevant improvement in functioning, condition-specific and health-related QoL, self-image, and a relevant decrease in pain is shown at two-year follow-up after fusion surgery for AIS, with few adverse events. Contrary to the general perception that AIS is a largely asymptomatic condition, nearly half of patients report significant
Closed suction subfascial drainage is widely used after instrumented posterior spinal fusion in patients with a spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this wound drainage on the outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This was a further analysis of a randomized, multicentre clinical trial reporting on patients after posterior spinal fusion using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. In this study the incidence of deep surgical site infection (SSI) and chronic postoperative pain at two years’ follow-up are reported. We conducted a randomized, multicentre clinical trial on adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 90 consecutive patients were randomized into a ‘drain’ or ‘no drain’ group at the time of wound closure, using the sealed envelope technique (1:1). The primary outcomes in the initial study were the change in the level of haemoglobin in the blood postoperatively and total blood loss. A secondary outcome was the opioid consumption immediately after surgery. The aim of this further study was to report the rate of deep SSI and persistent postoperative pain, at two years' follow-up.Aims
Methods
To report the outcome of spinal deformity correction through anterior spinal fusion in wheelchair-bound patients with myelomeningocele. We reviewed 12 consecutive patients (7M:5F; mean age 12.4 years (9.2 to 16.8)) including demographic details, spinopelvic parameters, surgical correction, and perioperative data. We assessed the impact of surgery on patient outcomes using the Spina Bifida Spine Questionnaire and a qualitative questionnaire.Aims
Methods
Aim:. To present 11 patients with quadriplegia who developed severe lordoscoliosis or hyperlordosis. This is a rare deformity in children with CP, treatment is challenging and there are less than 20 patients ever reported. Method:. All patients underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis at mean age 14.6 years with mean follow-up 3.5 years. We measured all radiographic parameters including coronal and sagittal balance and sacral slope before and after surgery. Results:. Mean preoperative lumbar lordosis was 107°. This corrected to mean 63° at follow-up. Mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 13°. This improved to mean 47° at follow-up. Mean preoperative scoliosis was 80°. This corrected to mean 22o at follow up. Mean preoperative pelvic obliquity was 22°. This corrected to mean 4° at follow-up. Mean preoperative sacral slope was 80o. This corrected to mean 51o at follow-up. Mean preoperative coronal imbalance was 5.2 cm. This corrected to mean 0.6 cm at follow-up. Mean preoperative sagittal imbalance was 8 cm. This corrected to mean 1.6 cm at follow-up. Mean surgical time was 260 minutes. Mean intra-operative blood loss was 0.82 EBV. Mean stay in ICU was 3.6 and in hospital 15.2 days. Complications included 3 patients with severe blood loss (1.3–2 EBV), one patient with chest and one chest and urinary infection, and a patient with superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Increased preoperative lumbar lordosis and sacral slope correlated with surgical and postoperative morbidity. In contrast, there was no correlation between preoperative scoliosis or pelvic obliquity and surgical morbidity. Reduced lumbar lordosis and increased thoracic kyphosis correlated with better global sagittal balance at follow-up. Greater surgical time and blood loss correlated with increased postoperative morbidity. All 11 patients and their parents reported excellent feedback on the outcome of surgery with major improvement in physical appearance, sitting balance and relief of severe
