Purpose. Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more patient-specific alignment is seen. Robotics is the perfect technology to tailor alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by iKA versus adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods. The authors analysed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic assisted TKA with iKA (n=40) and with aMA (n=40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with 6 variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results. The iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores (p=0.069), with OKS respectively 44.6±3.5 and 42.2±6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better (p=0.012) with iKA (9.2±0.8) compared to aMA (8.5±1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher (p=0.049 and p=0.003, respectively) using iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly (p=0.025) better OKS using iKA (45.4±2.0) compared to aMA (41.4±6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS (β=3.1; p=0.007) and satisfaction (β=0.73; p=0.005) with iKA. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-months follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA

Lateral meniscal failure and secondary valgus with lateral compartment arthrosis is quite common in the developed world. The varus knee is the common phenotype of the ‘jock’ of both genders, while the valgus knee is a common consequence of lateral meniscal tear, skiing or ‘catwalk’ life. Occurring more commonly in ‘flamingo’ phenotypes, lateral meniscal failure can be disabling, entirely preventing high heels being worn for instance. Indications. Lateral UKA is indicated for most valgus knees, and is substantially safer than TKA. ACL integrity is not essential in older people, as the patello-femoral mechanism is in line with the lateral compartment. Severe valgus with substantial bone loss is not a contraindication, if the deformity is simply angular. As long as there is not marked subluxation, fixed flexion deformity invariably corrects after notch osteophyte removal from femur and tibia. Combinations. Lateral UKA can be combined safely with PFJA: performed through a lateral approach, this is a safe and conservative procedure. ACL integrity is not essential – reconstruction can be undertaken simultaneously, if necessary. Combining lateral UKA with medial UKA is only rarely needed, and sometimes needs ACL reconstruction too. Adding a medial UKA in under 5 years usually results from overcorrection of the valgus. Mid Term Results, at a median of 7 years postop: Between 2005 to 2009, 64 knees in 58 patients had a lateral UKA using a device designed for the lateral compartment. This included 41 females and 17 males with a mean age of 71 years at the time of surgery (range 44–92). Thirty-nine patients underwent surgery on the right knee and 6 underwent bilateral procedures, of which four were performed under a single anesthetic. Primary lateral compartment osteoarthritis was the primary diagnosis in 63 cases with secondary osteoarthritis to a lateral tibial plateau fracture the indication in one patient. At 119 months follow up, the predicted cumulative survival was 0.97. With re-operation as an endpoint, 11% of patients within the study had undergone re-operation with a predicted cumulative survival of 0.81 at 119 months. This compares well with historic fixed bearing series. Preoperative OKS scores were available for 50 knees, scores were available for 63 knees at 9–48 months and 52 knees at 61–119 months post index operation. There was a significant improvement in the OKS between the preoperative scores (median 26 range 9–36) and early postoperative time points of 9–48 months, (median 42 range 23–48) (p<0.001). At the later postoperative time point of 61–119 months the score had been maintained (42 range 10–48). Conclusion. Lateral UKA is a small and safe procedure, with clinical outcomes that are equivalent to a medial UKA and are maintained at a median of 7 years postoperatively