The Severity Scoring System (SSS) is a guide to interpreting findings across clinical, functional, and radiological findings, used by qualified, specially trained physiotherapists in the advanced practice role in order to provide consistency in determining the severity of the patient's condition and need for surgical consultation. The system has been utilized for over 14 years as a part of standardized assessment and management care and was incorporated into virtual care in 2020 following the pandemic restrictions. The present study examined the validity of the modified SSS in virtual care. Patients who were referred to the Rapid Access Clinic (RAC), were contacted via phone by two experienced advanced practice practitioners (APPs) from May to July 2020, when in-person care was halted due to the pandemic. The virtual interview included taking history, completing self-reported measures for pain and functional ability and reviewing the radiological reports. A total of 63 patients were interviewed (mean age 68, SD=9), 34 (54%) females. Of 63 patients, 33 (52%) were considered a candidate for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Men and women were comparable in age, P4 and LEFS scores. The TKA candidates had a significantly higher SSS (p<0.0001) and pain scores (p=0.024). The variability of the total SSS score explained by the functional, clinical and radiological components of the tool were 55%, 48% and 4% respectively, highlighting the more important role of patient's clinical history and disability in the total SSS. The virtual SSS is a valid tool in directing patients for surgical management when used by highly trained advanced practice physiotherapists. A large component of the SSS is based on clinical data and patient disability and the APP's skillset rather than severity of pathology found on imaging

Abstract. Objectives. Neonatal motor development transitions from initially spontaneous to later increasingly complex voluntary movements. A delay in transitioning may indicate cerebral palsy (CP). The general movement optimality score (GMOS) evaluates infant movement variety and is used to diagnose CP, but depends on specialized physiotherapists, is time-consuming, and is subject to inter-observer differences. We hypothesised that an objective means of quantifying movements in young infants using motion tracking data may provide a more consistent early diagnosis of CP and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. This study assessed lower limb kinematic and muscle force variances during neonatal infant kicking movements, and determined that movement variances were associated with GMOS scores, and therefore CP. Methods. Electromagnetic motion tracking data (Polhemus) was collected from neonatal infants performing kicking movements (min 50° knee extension-flexion, <2 seconds) in the supine position over 7 minutes. Tracking data from lower limb anatomical landmarks (midfoot inferior, lateral malleolus, lateral knee epicondyle, ASIS, sacrum) were applied to subject-scaled musculoskeletal models (Gait2354_simbody, OpenSim). Inverse kinematics and static optimisation were applied to estimate lower limb kinematics (knee flexion, hip flexion, hip adduction) and muscle forces (quadriceps femoris, biceps femoris) for isolated kicks. Functional principal component analysis (fPCA) was carried out to reduce kicking kinematic and muscle force waveforms to PC scores capturing ‘modes’ of variance. GMOS scores (lower scores = reduced variety of movement) were collected in parallel with motion capture by a trained operator and specialised physiotherapist. Pearson's correlations were performed to assess if the standard deviation (SD) of kinematic and muscle force waveform PC scores, representing the intra-subject variance of movement or muscle activation, were associated with the GMOS scores. Results. The study compared GMOS scores, kinematics, and muscle force variances from a total of 26 infants with a mean corrected gestational age of 39.7 (±3.34) weeks and GMOS scores between 21 and 40. There was a significant association between the SD of the PC scores for knee flexion and the GMOS scores (PC1: R = 0.59, p = 0.002; PC2: R = 0.49, p = 0.011; PC3: R = 0.56, p = 0.003). The three PCs captured variances of the overall flexion magnitude (66% variance explained), early-to-late kick knee extension (20%), and continual to biphasic kicking (6%). For hip flexion, only the SD of PC1 correlated with GMOS scores (PC1: R = 0.52, p = 0.0068), which captured the variance of the overall flexion magnitude (81%). For the biceps femoris, the SD of PC1 and PC3 associated with GMOS scores (PC1: R = 0.50, p = 0.002; PC3: R = 0.45, p = 0.03), which captured the variance of the overall bicep force magnitude (79%) and early-to-late kick bicep activation (8%). Conclusions. Infants with reduced motor development as scored in the GMOS displayed reduced variances of knee and hip flexion and biceps femoris activation across kicking cycles. These findings suggest that combining objectively measured movement variances with existing classification methods could facilitate the development of more consistent and accurate diagnostic tools for early detection of CP. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Hip precautions are currently practiced in three-quarters of trauma hospitals in the UK, despite national recommendations from the ‘Blue Book’ not stating it as a requirement. Valuable therapist time is utilised alongside the need for specialised equipment, which can potentially delay discharge whilst it is being arranged. Objective of this study was to explore the current practice of the use of hip precautions on discharge following hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures. To also explore whether they are necessary and to identify areas for improvement to benefit patient care overall. Online survey distributed to various Trauma and Orthopaedic Departments across the UK. Survey was available over a 4-month period, collecting 55 responses overall. Majority of responses were from trauma and orthopaedic consultants who were aware of the ‘Blue Book’ recommendations. The majority of trusts who responded did not practice hip precautions and did not feel this increased the risk of dislocations on discharge. Recommendations included integration of hip precautions in the post-op advice in coordination with the physiotherapist and information leaflets on discharge regarding hip precautions. Hip precautions were not commonly practiced, for reasons including patient compliance and the inherently stable procedure of a hemiarthroplasty compared to a THR, reducing the need for hip precautions. Hip precautions are not widely regarded as a useful practice for post-hip hemiarthroplasty, viewed as utilising more resources and increasing costs and risk due to increased hospital stay. Thus, this potentially delays discharge overall. A consistent approach should be implemented in treating patients post-hip hemiarthroplasty

The principal of “function priority, early rehabilitation, and return to sports” is now the goal for sports injury rehabilitation. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a rising procedure for early rehabilitation. This paper systematically assessed the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on postoperative ACL reconstruction to provide guidance for physiotherapist and patient when designing a suitable rehabilitation protocol. To evaluate the interventional outcomes of neuromuscular electrical stimulation following ACL reconstruction, we searched PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI to collect all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects with neuromuscular electrical stimulation and without intervention on rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction up to January 30, 2022. Two investigators independently performed literature screening, data extraction, bias assessment of risk, and used RevMan 5.3 software to conduct a meta-analysis. A total of six RCTs were included, and the results showed that the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction significantly improved the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (MD 6.33, 95% CI [-0.43, 12.22]; I2 = 66%; p = 0.040), the Lysholm score (MD 7.94, 95% CI [6.49, 9.39]; I2 = 89%; p < 0.001), and the range of motion (ROM) (MD 9.99, 95% CI [7.97, 12.02]; I2 = 81%; p < 0.001) in the knees when compared to the control group without using neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Existing evidence show that neuromuscular electrical stimulation is beneficial for early rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation is encouraged in the design of rehabilitation protocol. However, due to the limited number of RCT studies and the small sample size, further multi-center RCTs with more participants are needed for a higher-level evidence

Foot pain and related problems are quite common in the community. It is reported that 24% of individuals older than 45 experienced foot pain. Also, it is stated that at least two thirds of individuals experiences moderate physical disability due to foot problems. In the absence of evaluation of risk factors such as limited ankle dorsiflexion in the early period of the diseases (Plantar fasciitis, Achilles Tendinopathy e.g.) and the lack of mobile systems with portable remote access, foot pain becomes refractory/chronic foot pain, secondary pathologies and ends with workload of 1., 2. and 3rd level healthcare services. In the literature, manuel and dijital methods have been used to analyze the ankle range of motion (ROM). These studies are generally based on placing protractors on the image and / or angle detection from inclination measurement by using the gyroscope sensor of the mobile device. Some of these applications are effective and they are designed to be suitable for measuring in a clinical setting by a physician or physiotherapist. To the best of our knowledge, there is no system developed to measure real-time ankle ROM remotely with collaboration of the patients. In this research, we proposed to develop an ankle ROM analyze system with smart phone application that can be used comfortably by subjects. We present a case of a 22-year-old male with a symptomatic pes planus. The mobile application, which was used for data collection, was designed and implemented for Android devices. Initially, before the mobile application home page is opened, a consent page was submitted to the acceptance of individual within the scope of Law (KVKK) data privacy. Then, the participant was asked to state his sociodemographic characteristics [age, gender, height, weight] and dominant side. No history of foot-ankle injury, trauma, and surgery was recorded. Activity pain of the foot was 6 according to visual anolog scale (VAS) in the mobile application. His ankle dorsiflexion was 15 ° by manuel goniometer. Besides, server was responsible for storing the collected data and ROM measurement. ROM was calculated by processing the foot video which was sent through the mobile application. During the processing phase, a segmentation model was used which was trained with image process and deep learning methods. With the developed system, we obtained the manual goniometric measurement result with 2 degrees deviation. As the application is calibrated, it is expected to approach the actual measurement of ROM. We can conclude that mobile app-goniometer result in dorsiflexion measurement is a novel promising evaluation method for ankle ROM. it will be easy and practical to detect and monitor risk factor of the diseases, decrease medical costs, provide health services in rural areas, and contribution to life quality and to reduce the workload on physicians and physiotherapist

Aims. 1. To develop a decision aid - Decision Support Package (DSP) - that will provide low back pain (LBP) patients, and their treating physiotherapists with information on the treatment options available to the patients. 2. To develop a training package for physiotherapists on how to use the DSP. 3. To encourage and evaluate the informed shared decision making (ISDM) process between patients and physiotherapists during consultation. Method. We developed a DSP informed by existing research and collaboration with physiotherapists, patients and experts in the field of decision aids and LBP. We did six pieces of exploratory work: literature review; 2009 NICE LBP guidelines review; qualitative screening of transcripts of interviews of LBP patients; focus groups (patients); nominal group (physiotherapists), and Delphi study (experts). We collated these data to develop the DSP. We also developed a training package for physiotherapists. Results. We developed a LBP patient resource for use prior to their first consultation and a training package for physiotherapists. The DSP contained information on acupuncture, structured group exercise, manual therapy and cognitive behavioural approach. LBP patients would expect these treatment options to be offered to them at their initial consultation. The training package for physiotherapists was on DSP use and communication skills during consultation. Conclusion. We have developed an evidence and theory informed Decision Support Package and physiotherapists training. We are currently piloting its use in one NHS Trust prior to running a pilot RCT (N=150) to test is effect on improving patient satisfaction with LBP patients' treatment choices. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. National Institute for Health Research- Research for Patient Benefit (NIHR-RfPB). This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Background. The physiotherapy profession has experienced a paradigm shift in recent years where mounting research evidence, indicating better patient outcomes, has led to an increase in popularity of a biopsychosocial model of care. In turn physiotherapists have begun to address psychosocial ‘obstacles’ to recovery, as means of improving outcomes for patients. To date, research has not examined how this change has affected the perceptions of physiotherapists about delivering care. The aim of this study was to explore these perceptions through exploratory interviews with physiotherapists in the UK. Methods. A qualitative interview study using a purposive sample of physiotherapists (n=12), nested within a larger study, exploring the attitudes and behaviours of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists about managing patients with low back pain. Interview transcripts were coded by the lead researcher and independently validated by a further team member. Transcripts were coded thematically using the constant comparative method to identify similarities and differences between the data and to determine fit and relevance. Results. The findings demonstrate that a combination of traditional physical therapy with a biopsychosocial approach presented significant challenges for professionals during the consultation. Physiotherapists perceived a number of ‘obstacles to recovery’ and responded to these through adoption of ‘health corrective’ strategies and by imposing limits around the management of these concerns with patients. Conclusion. A model of care combining a biopsychosocial approach with traditional physiotherapy can increase pressure on physiotherapists to use consultation strategies which appear to be patient-centred but may fail to shift from a professional-led agenda. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. Arthritis Research UK and the North Staffordshire Primary Care Research Consortium. We confirm that this abstract has not been previously published in whole or part nor has it been presented at a national meeting

The treatment of massive chronic tears is problematic. The re-tear rate following surgery for extensive cuff tears remains high, and there is little consensus regarding optimum treatment. To investigate the outcome of a cohort of patients who had open repair of an extensive cuff tear using the Leeds Kuff patch as an augment. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with a massive cuff tear who had surgery in our regional elective orthopaedic centre over a two year period from January 2015 to Dec 2016. All patients followed identical rehabilitation protocols, supervised by physiotherapists with an interest in the shoulder. Outcomes assessment was undertaken at a minimum of 12 months by a registrar or physiotherapist who was not part of the treating team. Pre-op data collection included; range of motion, pain score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), assessment of muscle atrophy on MRI. Data collection was completed in 15 patients. The mean age was 62 yrs (56 – 75). The mean pre-op OSS was 22, improving to a mean of 43. The range of motion and pain score improved. There were no intra-operative complications. One patient required a second surgery for evacuation of a haematoma at 10 days post op. One patient had an obvious re-tear at 4 months. Open rotator cuff repair with synthetic Kuff patch augmentation for chronic degenerative tears appears worthwhile when assessed at 12 months and they continuous to improve even at 18 months. This treatment method may be a useful option for patients > 70 years old

Abstract. Background. Whilst the literature abounds with patient reported outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR) there is a paucity of literature covering objective functional outcomes. Awareness of objective functional outcomes following TKR is key to the consent process and relating it to pre-operative function enables a tailored approach to consent. Objectives. Identify trends in a range of functional outcomes prior to and following TKR up to one year post-operatively. Methods. We prospectively gathered data from 82 patients undergoing TKR, examining over 20 functional measures preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Our functional lab incorporated validated assessments and assessments selected by surgeons & physiotherapists seen to be critical to outcomes following TKR, such as: kneeling ability, 6 minute walking distance, time to ascend/descend stairs, quadricep moment strength, single stance difficulty, ability to walk on an uneven surface, “Time to get up and go”, upslope/downslope speed. Results. Our results demonstrated that if a patient was able to kneel preoperatively they had an 82.5% chance of being able to kneel postoperatively; if they could not kneel preoperatively this dropped to only 50% but overall over two-thirds of patients were able to kneel at 1 year postoperatively. Other selected results include: 49% increase in 6-minute walking distance, 45% reduction in time to ascend then descend stairs, over 50% increase in quadriceps moment strength, over 40% increase in both upslope/downslope speed and over 70% reduction in difficulty walking on an uneven surface. Conclusions. With these results we can not only discuss specific functional outcomes following TKR but also relate these to preoperative functional level, enabling a more tailored, detailed and robust consent process. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Following acute ACL rupture patients are routinely referred for rehabilitation but the timing and level of functional recovery related to rehabilitation outcome are poorly defined. The primary aim of this study was to measure functional recovery following acute ACL rupture in the clinical setting using a two dimensional movement analysis system. A longitudinal research design was used; we aimed for three clinical movement analysis sessions over the course of rehabilitation. One hundred and fifteen patients were recruited. Sixty three uninjured matched controls were recorded once performing all the functional activities; walking, jogging, distance hop and run and stop. Participants were filmed in the sagittal plane using a digital camcorder to extract kinematic data. Average recovery over time was modelled using a least squares third order polynomial. The secondary aim was to define the outcome measures and treatment goals used in ACL rehabilitation by specialist knee physiotherapists. A questionnaire was distributed to 300 hospitals across the UK. From the 44 responses insight was obtained about parameters physiotherapists use to plan treatment and evaluate recovery. Repeated movement analysis showed that gait velocity took on average 85 days to recover to within the normal limits of uninjured controls. Jogging velocity took 30 days; Hop distance took 55 days for the non-injured leg and 100 days for the injured leg; Knee range during the landing phase of run and stop took 80 days to recover but demonstrated some deterioration. The questionnaire identified that specialist knee physiotherapists use 60 different outcome measures and 34 rehabilitation treatment goals, which can be sub-divided into patient reported (PR), functional activities (A) and impairments (I). The percentage usage by physiotherapists for each category of outcome measure were 55.8% (A), 62.8% (I) to 67.4% (PR) and for treatment goals 55.8% (PR), 69.8% (A) to 81.4% (I). Hopping is the most frequently evaluated functional activity but there are large differences in its utilisation. The application of functional goals and outcome measures in rehabilitation is not universal with specialist physiotherapists generally adopting an impairment approach. Repeated movement analysis in the clinical setting provided objective data on the recovery of functional activities that progressively challenge knee stability. Gait and hop distance appear to be the most useful variables for tracking performance over time but their predictive value needs to be explored further. Adaptations in the non-injured leg indicate that its use as a control needs to be done with caution. For jogging and run and stop there appears to be a threshold after which patients can perform these activities rather than a gradual recovery. Clinical movement analysis could be used to provide objective feedback on recovery levels and help guide the rehabilitation process. However, currently functional goals and milestones are not always included in the planning and evaluation of rehabilitation. Developing better rehabilitation should involve greater integration of functional activity measures into practice. This would require a shift from an impairment rehabilitation approach to focus on functional goals

Purpose and background. Private musculoskeletal practitioners treat a large section of people with back pain, and could play an important role in returning and maintaining patients to work. We aimed to examine practitioners perception of their role quantitatively. methods and results. A postal questionnaire was sent to 300 chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (n=900). Responses were received from 352 out of 900 (39%). Physiotherapists visited the work place more frequently than either of the other groups, osteopaths were more likely to give out sick leave certificates than chiropractors, who in turn are more likely to give out sick leave certificates than physiotherapists. Physiotherapists had a significantly higher belief in the psychological benefits of work, and in the importance of contacting work than either chiropractors or osteopaths. In addition, physiotherapists held the strongest belief that returning their patients to work was within their remit. There were no differences between the groups in their beliefs that employers could be an obstacle to return to work, that work could be detrimental to recovery, or in their belief that rest from work was necessary for recovery. Almost all practitioners recommended a short break from work sometimes, and more than 10% recommended a break often or always. Conclusion. Overall, practitioners perceived their role in returning patients to work as limited, and believed that direct contact with employers was beyond their remit. Physiotherapists appear to be better placed to liaise with work in terms of both their beliefs and activities. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Background and purpose of the study. Effective communication between healthcare professionals and patients is key to a successful consultation and is reported to affect both adherence to treatment and outcome. Despite this evidence, research on how best to open consultations is limited and the optimal way, unknown. This study seeks the opinions of physiotherapists on how to open a clinical encounter in an adult musculoskeletal outpatient setting – a topic which has relevance to all clinicians aiming to build rapport with their patients. Methods. Forty clinical encounters between physiotherapists in a primary care setting and patients with back pain were observed and audio-recorded. The clinicians' key questions inviting the patient to discuss their back pain were identified, together with a content analysis of the topics discussed prior to the conversation about their back pain. In 2012, a national survey was undertaken, approaching 34,922 physiotherapists from 3 networks on the interactive website hosted by the professional body, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy asking participants to rank the data from clinical practice, to determine the preferred way to open a clinical encounter. Results. Form the 40 recorded consultations eleven opening questions were identified. In these encounters fourteen other topics were discussed before the key opening question about back pain. In the national survey, the top 5 openings were identified. Conclusion. Knowing how clinicians and patients communicate, and specifically, how clinical encounters are opened, is important for teaching and professional development to assist clinicians in optimising their non-specific treatment effects. No Conflict of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Movement dysfunction resulting in a knee valgus position during weight bearing activity is associated with increased risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome especially in young active females. In clinical practice determining the critical knee flexion angle (CKFA) during a single leg squat (SLS) test is used to assess this dysfunction, yet its reliability is unknown. This study aimed to determine rater agreement in determining the presence of knee valgus movement (yes/no) during a SLS test in recreational females (n = 16, age 24.3 ±7.9 yrs, height 165.7±4.8m, mass 62.5±6.4kg) and the intra and inter-rater reliability of measuring CKFA using SiliconCoach™. Three experienced physiotherapists viewed 48 randomised SLS test videos. One physiotherapist repeated the viewing for test-retest analysis. Test-retest agreement for rating SLS test was acceptable (weighted kappa (k) = 0.667). Inter-rater agreement was moderate to substantial (weighted k = 0.284–0.613). Intra-rater reliability of CKFA was acceptable for all three raters (ICC>0.6). Inter-rater absolute reliability was below 5% of the mean CKFA (SEM 4.26 degrees). As previous research reports intra-rater agreement is better than inter-rater agreement when assessing movement dysfunction during functional activity via visual rating. Intra-rater within session and between session reliability for measuring the CKFA using SiliconCoach™ was acceptable and better than inter-rater reliability. Further research is needed to assess the concurrent and construct validity of the protocols used in this study. It is recommended that qualitative research be performed to identify factors that affect physiotherapist's rating of functional activities

Purpose of study. To explore the clinical reasoning strategies used by extended scope physiotherapists (ESPs) when assessing patients with low back pain. Background. Extended scope physiotherapists commonly work in back pain services and their training emphasises the acquisition of clinical skills and possible diagnostic tests (including MRI) to aid clinical reasoning and diagnosis. Whilst there has been some exploration of reasoning strategies of other professional groups (notably medically qualified) to date, the clinical reasoning strategies of ESP clinicians have not been reported. Methods. A qualitative study, with three focus groups, explored clinical reasoning by ESPs and non-ESPs, to compare how these clinicians assess patients' with back pain. This informed a second study, using a ‘think-aloud’ technique with 10 participants from four NHS sites, examining their reasoning strategies, immediately after completing initial consultations. Analysis was informed by a grounded theory approach. Results. Themes identified relating to clinical reasoning were prior thinking, patient interaction, gut-feeling, and formal testing. The differences in practice between ESP and non-ESP appeared to be driven by differences in accountability, safety and external influences. A key difference between the accounts of clinical reasoning provided by ESPs and non-ESPs centred on the role and appropriateness of ‘gut feeling’ in diagnostic decision making. The analysis explores the apparent tension between this instinctive contribution to reasoning and evidence-based practice. The paper explores the legitimacy of gut feeling. Conclusions. Extended scope physiotherapists appear to employ different clinical reasoning strategies to their non-ESP colleagues, highlighting the additional burden of responsibility and tension created by the use of gut feeling. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or in part; nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Background. Recent articles in the medical press highlight the potential dangers of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). CES has the highest rates of litigation due to its long-term neurological impairment, which can lead to devastating outcome on patients. The aim of this study was to assess health care professionals knowledge with regards to the urinary symptoms of CES and the timeframe in which treatment should be offered. Objectives. To assess health care professionals knowledge with regards to urinary symptoms of CES and when treatment should be offered. Design. A 4-part questionnaire established profession and number of cases seen per week. The participant was asked to rank 15 urinary symptoms, 7 of these symptoms were not related to CES. The participants were asked the ideal time to surgical intervention for Complete CES and Incomplete CES. Setting. Primary and Secondary Care. Participants. 60 questionnaires were complete. Participants had to successfully complete the first three parts of the questionnaire (n = 44). Any who failed to complete section four were excluded from analysis from that part only (n = 41). Interventions. Nil. Outcome measures. As design. Results. A total of 44 questionnaires were analysed. Both doctors and physiotherapists ranked the CES symptoms on average significantly higher than then the non-CES symptoms. The physiotherapists rated the CES symptoms significantly higher than the doctors (P = 0.05) and on average rated the non-CES symptoms significantly lower than doctors (P < 0.05). 87.8% thought that complete CES should be treated < 24 hours and 9.76% thought that complete CES should be treated from 24-48 hours. 46.34% thought that CESI should be treated < 24 hours and 43.9% thought that CESI should be treated from 24-48 hours. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that physiotherapists are better than Doctors at identifying the urinary symptoms in CES. The majority of health care professional who took part in this study stated that they would offer surgical intervention for both Complete and Incomplete CES within 24 hours. The gap in knowledge highlights the need for education to all medical professionals in the symptoms of CES and also the timing of treatment

The medical model of history, examination and investigation forms the bedrock of diagnosis and management of all patients. The essence is the recognition of patterns of symptoms and signs. In the modern era there are an increasing number of non-medical resources ranging from web-based information, computer diagnostic aids and non-specialist healthcare professionals to provide a diagnosis and commence management of a wide range of conditions, including knee problems. We analysed the quality and patterns of clinical presentation in order to answer the question how closely clinical symptoms and examination findings correlate to diagnosis based on MRI scan and/or arthroscopic findings. The analysis was a dataset of a consecutive series of patients, aged 18 to 45, with no past history of knee problems or end stage arthritis, presenting to a single specialist triage physiotherapist, working within an integrated knee service, who fully completed a standardised knee assessment proforma of presenting symptoms and signs at a large district general hospital. The study comprises 86 patients and 98 knees. We analysed this data based on diagnostic findings of MRI scan or arthroscopy to provide definitive intra-articular diagnosis. Based on standard textbook descriptions of common presentations, we went on to define the patients' presentation history and examination as typical or atypical, with typical meaning the symptoms and signs correlated with the diagnosis. The null hypothesis is that patients have a high chance of typical presentations for common knee conditions. In the 75% of patients with a significant intra-articular pathology we found the majority had chondral rather than meniscal tears 1.7 to 1. Forty four percent of patients had atypical symptoms and 71% had atypical clinical signs, 30% and only 26% of the cohort had both typical symptoms and signs together, reflecting a surprisingly low positive predictive probability of symptoms and signs in this group of patients, particularly those with chondral lesions which was 44%. In this cohort, 57% of the cohort has 3 or more multiple diagnoses. In the diagnostically normal group, 43% had symptoms and signs typical for a meniscal tear. We conclude that clinical symptoms and signs surprisingly inaccurate in guiding intra-articular pathology within the knee, even in a sub-set considered the easy and accurate to assess. The number of multiple diagnoses and the incidence of false positive results also means that simplistic interpretations of non-definitive diagnoses and linear causation of pain pathways should be treated cautiously

Background. Inpatient physiotherapy is routinely provided after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery to enhance recovery prior to discharge. However, the provision of outpatient physiotherapy is variable in the UK, and the longer-term benefits of outpatient physiotherapy are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group-based outpatient physiotherapy after TKR. Methods. Patients listed for primary TKR were recruited prior to surgery. Patients who decided not to participate were asked about their reasons for non-participation. Patients were randomised to attend a newly developed post-operative physiotherapy class plus usual care or usual care alone. Patients allocated to the intervention group were invited to attend a weekly one-hour physiotherapy class, starting at 6 weeks after surgery and running over 6 consecutive weeks. The group classes were run by two physiotherapists within an outpatient gym, and involved task-orientated and individualised exercises. Classes ran on a rolling system, allowing new patients to join each week. Participants completed an evaluation questionnaire after the final class. Outcomes assessment was by questionnaire prior to surgery and 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Outcomes related to function, pain, balance, self-efficacy, participation, quality of life and resource use. Results. 46/124 patients consented to participate (37% recruitment rate). Frequent reasons for non-participation were related to travelling distance, transportation, and time commitments. 17/23 patients randomised to the intervention group attended the exercise classes. Most (15) patients were very satisfied with the range of exercises on offer. The task-orientated and individual exercises were given average usefulness ratings of 9.6/10 and 9.5/10, respectively. Retention of participants was acceptable; 2 patients were withdrawn from the intervention group and 2 patients from the usual care group. Questionnaire return rates were high in the intervention group (91% at 6 months post-operative) but lower in the usual care group (65% at 6 months post-operative). Conclusion. This study highlights the importance of conducting feasibility work for a RCT. Collecting data on reasons for non-participation provided valuable information on barriers to participation in a trial with this population. The intervention was well attended, and feedback was positive. Questionnaire completion was lower in the usual care group, highlighting the need for additional strategies to improve data collection. Findings from this feasibility study have informed the design of a multi-centre RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a group-based outpatient physiotherapy intervention following TKR

Around 20% of patients who have total knee replacement find that they experience long-term pain afterwards. There is a pressing need for better treatment and management for patients who have this kind of pain but there is little evidence about how to improve care. To address this gap we are developing a complex intervention comprising a clinic to assess potential causes of a patient's long-term pain after knee replacement and onwards referral to appropriate, existing services. The Medical Research Council recommends that development of complex interventions include several stages of development and refinement and involvement of stakeholders. This study comprises the penultimate stage in the comprehensive development of this intervention. Earlier stages included a survey of current practice, focus groups with healthcare professionals, a systematic review of the literature and expert deliberation. Healthcare professionals from diverse clinical backgrounds with experience of caring for patients with long-term pain after knee replacement were sent a study information pack. Professionals who wished to participate were asked to return their signed consent form and completed study questionnaire to the research team. Participants rated the appropriateness of different aspects of the assessment process and care pathway from 1–9 (not appropriate to very appropriate). Data were collated and a document prepared, consisting of anonymised mean appropriateness ratings and summaries of free-text comments. This document was then discussed in 4 facilitated meetings with healthcare professional held at the future trial centres. A summary report and revised care pathway was then prepared and sent to participants for further comments. 28 professionals completed the questionnaire and/or attended a meeting. Participants included surgeons, physiotherapists, nurses, pain specialists and rheumatologists. Mean appropriateness scores ranged from 6.9 to 8.4. Taking a score of 7–9 as agreement, consensus was achieved that the assessment should be performed at 3 months post-operative by an extended scope practitioner/nurse, treatment be guided by a standardised assessment of pain, and treatment individualised. There was also agreement that referrals in the care pathway to surgical review, GP and pain clinics were appropriate. Nurse-led/self-monitoring was rated lower (6.9) because of considerations about the need to ensure that patients receive appropriate support, follow-up and referral to other services. This work demonstrates the research methods that can be used to refine the design of a complex intervention. The process and findings enable refinement of an intervention for patients with long-term pain after knee replacement. The next stage of intervention development will assess the acceptability and reliability of the assessment process, and the usability of the intervention's standard operating procedures. The intervention will then be evaluated by a larger research team in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial, starting in late 2016

Around 1% of the 185,000 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the UK are followed by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Although PJI affects a small percentage of patients, it is one of the most devastating complications associated with this procedure. Treatment usually involves further major surgery which can adversely affect patients' quality of life. Understanding current service provision provides valuable information needed to design and evaluate support interventions for patients. The aim of this survey was to identify usual care pathways and support in UK NHS orthopaedic centres for this population. The 20 highestvolume UK NHS orthopaedic centresfor hip and knee arthroplasty account for 33–50% of all cases treated for prosthetic joint infection. Infection leads at each centre were invited to participate in a survey about usual care provision and support for PJI. Questions exploredfollow up time-points; use of standard outcome measures; multidisciplinary care plans; supportive in-patient care and care after treatment; and onward referrals. Survey responses were recorded on a standardised proforma. Data were entered into Excel for analysis, then reviewed and coded into categories and frequency statistics to describe categorical data. A descriptive summary was developed based on these categories. Eleven of the highestvolume orthopaedic centres completed the survey. Follow-up of patients varied greatly across centres; some centres reviewed patients at weekly or 2 week intervals, while all centres saw patients at 6 weeks. Long-term follow-up varied across centres from 3–4 monthsto 12 monthly. Length of follow-up period varied from until the infection had cleared toindefinitely. Follow-up timepoints were only standardised in 4 out of 11 centres. Only 1 centre had a dedicated infection clinic. Advice on who patients should contact if they had concerns included the consultant, community nurse, extended scope practitioner or the ward, while 3 centres told patients to avoid calling their GP. Only half of the centres routinely used standardised outcome measures with patients with PJI. The majority of centres provided standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy (OT) to in-patients while approximately half also offered social support. Only one centre provided dedicated physiotherapy and OT on a separate infection ward. Three centres provided hospital at home or community services to patients in-between operative stages. Only 3 out of 11 centres stated they had specific multidisciplinary care plans in place for patients. Once discharged most patients were provided with physiotherapy, OT and social services if needed. Common barriersto referral included complexities of referring patients outside the hospital catchment area;lack of availability of community services, and shortage of staff including physiotherapists. Delays in rehab and social services could also be problematic. Findings show wide variation intreatment pathways and support for patients treated for PJI, both as inpatients and in the community. Only one of the 11 centreswho participated had a dedicated infection clinic. Only one centre suggested they individualised their physiotherapy support. A number of barriers exist to referring patients on to other support services after revision surgery

Background-. Health care is best delivered face to face, doctor to patient. However, in some places like Scotland, patients can be in remote areas, far from the nearest health care provider. Medical video conferencing (VC) enables patients and doctors to meet for consultations from wherever they may be without the need for travel, and is already used widely in countries like Australia and Canada. Aim-. To do a pilot study of using the existing VC facility at our hospital for surgical pre-assessment of patients for elective foot/ankle and lower limb arthroplasty surgery. Methods- A prospective pilot study was performed at our hospital after approval from our ethics committee. Patient-records were vetted to include/exclude from the study and cases considered as “straightforward” were included. Two separate rooms with VC facility were set up in the orthopaedic outpatients, one with the patient and a trained physiotherapist, while the surgeon used the second room to discuss patient's complaints, do a physical examination, and discuss surgery where appropriate. Results-. 120 patients were included in the study out of which 82 (68 %) patients were seen exclusively through VC. Out of the 82, there were 42 foot/ankle cases and 40 cases for lower limb arthroplasty (TKR/THR). There were 40 cases where the VC consultation had to be converted into a face-to-face consultation mainly because the surgeon (31/40) was not entirely satisfied with the VC consultation (inadequate information in notes, anxious patient, etc). Conclusion-. We found that the VC consultation worked for a large majority of “straightforward” elective foot/ankle and lower limb arthroplasty conditions. We believe that there is certainly a role for VC consultation, especially for patients in rural/remote areas of Scotland, thus bringing down the cost and inconvenience of patient transport considerably