Aims

The purpose of this study was to use pharmacogenetics to determine the frequency of genetic variants in our total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients that could affect postoperative pain medications. Pharmacogenetic testing evaluates patient DNA to determine if a drug is expected to have a normal clinical effect, heightened effect, or no effect at all on the patient. It also predicts whether patients are likely to experience side effects from medicine. We further sought to determine if changing the multimodal programme based on these results would improve pain control or reduce side effects.

Abstract. Introduction. Adverse reactions to pain medication and pain can delay discharge after outpatient knee arthroplasty (TKA). Pharmacogenomics is an emerging tool that might help reduce adverse events by tailoring medication use based on known genetic variations in the CYP genes determining drug metabolism. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether pre-operative pharmacogenomic testing could optimize peri-operative pain management in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This prospective, randomized study was performed in adults undergoing primary TKA. Patients in the experimental group underwent pre-operative pharmacogenomic evaluation and medication adjustments. Medications were not optimized for control patients. The Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) at 24 hours post-op was the primary outcome. Postoperative pain scores (VAS scale), total opioid use, time in recovery, and time to discharge were also compared. Results. 76 patients enrolled. 93% of patients had a poor-intermediate phenotype for at least one of four CYP genes. OBAS did not differ significantly between the two groups (4.2 control vs. 4.7 experimental; 95% CI −1.1 to 2.1) and was below the minimum clinically important difference of 2.0 points. Furthermore, there were no differences in any OBAS subscale including pain, satisfaction, or nausea. There were no differences in time in the recovery area or to discharge from hospital, or narcotic use. Conclusions. Despite many patients having a poor-intermediate phenotype for a CYP gene, pharmacogenomic testing prior to TKA and medication adjustment did not improve anesthesia or pain management outcomes, time to discharge or mean total opioid use after surgery

Great strides have been made in perioperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leading to reduced length of hospital stay, cost reduction, improved patient satisfaction, and more rapid recovery without affecting the rates of readmission after surgery. To assure a happy patient, early recognition of patients at risk for persistent postoperative pain prior to surgery is key. Patients on chronic pain medication should be evaluated by pain management specialists with the intention of reducing overall narcotic requirement prior to TKA. Patients with high anxiety levels, pain catastrophizing, and Kinesphobia are at increased risk for increased pain and poor outcomes and should be referred for cognitive behavioral therapy and coping strategies. Finally, patients with hypersensitivity syndromes localised in the soft tissue around the knee should undergo desensitization protocols prior to TKA. Patient education on the risk of increased postoperative pain is crucial to manage expectations and optimise modifiable risk factors prior to TKA. To assure a happy patient indicated for TKA, a comprehensive pain management strategy divided into pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods should be employed

Pain management following surgery continues to challenge patients, physician-extenders, and surgeons. A recent survey of 300 patients following surgery found that 86% experienced pain following surgery with 75% describing moderate or severe pain. Pain management in 2017 has to better address patient's needs as Pain has become the “5th Vital Sign” and is used in many patient reported outcomes (for better or worse). Multimodal therapy has been defined as “Synchronous administration of ≥ 2 pharmacological agents or approaches, each with a distinct mechanism of action”. Mounting evidence supports the use of a multimodal approach to peri-operative pain management in all surgical subspecialties. A recent systematic review of intravenous ketamine showed a reduction total opioid consumption and an increase in the time to first analgesic dose needed across all studies. Gabapentin and pregabalin have both been shown to dramatically reduce the use of opioid consumption by 30%. We have worked with our anesthesia team and developed a multimodal analgesia program that includes ketorolac 10mg 3 tabs po qd × 3 days, then 10mg 2 tabs po × 2 days; gabapentin 300mg (<65 year old) or 100mg (>65 year old) 3 tabs po × 3 days; oxycodone 5mg po q 4–6 hours prn breakthrough pain and Tylenol 500mg 1–2 tabs po q 6 hours prn

Pain control is critical in the management of TKA patients and is crucial to allow for early ambulation and accelerated physical therapy. Currently data suggests that 19% of patients are not satisfied with their results following TKA, and failure to control pain may result in prolonged hospitalization, worse outcomes, and increased patient dissatisfaction. Studies suggest that local analgesics coupled with both pre- and post-operative multimodal pain management may result in improved pain control and increased patient satisfaction. Minimization of opioid use is helpful in decreasing complications, accelerating physical therapy milestones, minimizing length of stay and increasing discharge to home. Femoral nerve blocks (FNB) can reduce pain scores for up to 48 hours post-operatively, but may delay ambulation and result in an increased rate of falls. Periarticular injection (PAI) with local analgesics can provide significant short term relief comparable to FNB and can also facilitate decreased opioid consumption. One commonly used local anesthetic is bupivacaine, but the average half-life of this drug is only 2.7 hours. An alternative to this for PAI during TKA is liposomal bupivacaine (LB). LB is a multivesicular drug designed for rapid absorption, prolonged release of bupivacaine, and analgesia that is maintained for up to 72 hours with a single injection. LB exhibits a bimodal peak of distribution, one immediate associated with extra-liposomal bupivacaine, and a second 10–36 hours later associated with the release of liposomal encapsulated bupivacaine. The safety profile of LB has been investigated and adverse events are similar to standard bupivacaine and demonstrate acceptable tolerability. Multiple studies have demonstrated efficacy of this drug compared to other pain control modalities. LB is highly technique dependent and only one piece of a multimodal pain management protocol. Our study consisted of 1808 consecutive primary TKA patients from Sept 2013 to Sept 2015. Three patient cohorts were compiled by date, from Sept 2013 to May 2014 was cohort 1, consisting of FNB and PCA. Department wide adoption of LB began in May 2014 and became routinely used in all patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution. Cohort 2 entailed a PCA along with LB injection from May 2014 through Feb 2015. Cohort 3 consisted of LB injection only and was from Feb 2015 through Sept 2015. All patients undergoing TKA were eligible and there were no exclusion criteria as long as the protocols were followed. The standard multi-modal analgesia protocol was provided to all patients in all three cohorts. Prior to entering the operating room, patients received preemptive oral analgesics, consisting of: 200 mg celecoxib, 1000 mg acetaminophen, and 50 mg pregabalin. Intra-operative analgesia was chosen at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and preferentially consisted of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia as an alternate. For all three cohorts, a peri-incisional analgesic cocktail was injected prior to closure consisting of: 40 cc 0.25% Marcaine, 5 cc of (1 mg/cc) morphine, and 1 cc of (30 mg/cc) ketorolac. Cohorts 1 and 2 received PCA post-operatively for pain control post-operatively with prn oral narcotic administration as well. Cohort 3 did not receive a PCA. The cohort treated without FNB and without a PCA using a multimodal pain management protocol including a short acting periarticular injection and a longer acting periarticular injection with LB, had equivalent pain control, less narcotic use, faster achievement of physical therapy milestones, earlier and more frequent discharge home, less complications and a lower cost of the episode of care

Abstract. Background. ‘Free From Pain’ is a drug-free, injection injection-free, lifestyle-based musculoskeletal pain management programme for seniors. The programme empowers Seniors with relevant information and inspirational metaphors whilst providing them with validated exercises. The programme is also available as a published book (ISBN-0995676941). This pilot study aimed to assess the suitability and safety of the programme's exercises and the usefulness of the book before considering a larger study. Methods. Participants used 5-point Likert scales to evaluate the exercises. A rating of three or below on a Likert scale denoted non-agreement to a positive statement regarding the exercises. A rating of four or above denoted agreement. The Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE) was utilised to assess the book. Results. Of 30 participants who attended the programme, 25 completed the questionnaire (19 females and six males), with a mean age of 76 years. All the 25 participants were in agreement that the exercises were suitable, (x? = 4.6) and safe (x? = 4.56). 23 participants would also recommend the programme to family and friends? (x? = 4.48). The USE scale is divided into three, sub-domains: cognition (knowledge obtained); emotional (individual's ability to cope with the illness); and behavioural (ability to self-manage). The mean scores for the book on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sub-domains were 25.48, 24.08 and 24.04, respectively. Conclusion. Results indicate that the ‘Free From Pain’ exercises are suitable and safe. The book provides educational information that empowers participants to better their musculoskeletal health

The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee and total hip replacements in 2016 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early post-operative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, hip or knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in peri-operative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilisation therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. One can think pragmatically to get ahead and stay ahead of 3 predictable physiologic disturbances that adversely impact rapid recovery after knee and hip replacement: fluid/blood loss; pain; and nausea. The modern orthopaedic surgeon and his/her care team needs a simple strategy to pro-actively, not reflexively, manage each of those 3 predictable impediments to early recovery. Those surgical teams that routinely get ahead and stay ahead in each of those areas will routinely witness faster recovery, lower costs and greater patient satisfaction and that is clearly a win for patient and surgeon alike. Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction, decreases hospital stay, and facilitates discharge to home. Today's emphasis is on a multi-modal strategy that minimises the use of opioids. Most protocols use pre-operative medications including an NSAID, acetaminophen, an oral opioid and some include gabapentin. Regional anesthesia is typically preferred over general. Both peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular local anesthetic cocktail injections have proved as effective adjuncts in decreasing early post-operative pain. Post-operative oral medications delivered on a schedule, not just as needed, often include acetaminophen, an NSAID and some included gabapentin. Oral and parenteral opioids are reserved for breakthrough pain

To determine the effect of Dexamethasone on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty in terms of numerical pain rating scale and total opoid consumption. This Randomized Controlled Trail (RCT) was conducted for 02 years (7th September 2015 to 6th September 2017). All patients undergoing primary Unilateral Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for Osteoarthritis knee were included in the study. Patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.6), Hepatic/Renal failure, corticosteroids/ Immunosuppression drug usage in the last 06 months, known psychiatric illnesses were excluded from the study. All patients were operated by consultant Orthopaedic surgeon under Spinal Anaesthesia and tourniquet control using medial para-patellar approach. Patients were randomly divided into 02 groups, A and B. 79 patients were placed in each group. Group A given 0.1mg/kg body weight Dexamethasone Intravenously 15 minutes prior to surgery and another dose 24 hours post-operatively while in group B (control group) no Dexamethasone given. Post-operative pain using the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) and total narcotics consumed converted to morphine dose equivalent noted immediately post-op, 12-, 24- and 48-hours post-operatively. Data analysis done using SPSS version 23. A total of 158 patients were included in the study. Of the total, 98 (62.02%) were females and 60 (37.98%) males. Average BMI of patients 26.94 ±3.14 kg/m2. Patients in group A required less post-operative analgesics (p < 0 .01) and had a better numerical pain rating scale score (p < 0 .01) as compared to group B. Pain scores at 24- and 48-hours post-op were significantly less for Dexamethasone group (p < 0 .01). Use of Dexamethasone per- and post-operatively reduces the pain and amount of analgesics used in patients undergoing TKA. For any reader queries, please contact . drjunaidrmc@gmail.com

In a prospective multicentre study we investigated variations in pain management used by knee arthroplasty surgeons in order to compare the differences in pain levels among patients undergoing total knee replacements (TKR), and to compare the effectiveness of pain management protocols. The protocols, peri-operative levels of pain and patient satisfaction were investigated in 424 patients who underwent TKR in 14 hospitals. The protocols were highly variable and peri-operative pain levels varied substantially, particularly during the first two post-operative days. Differences in levels of pain were greatest during the night after TKR, when visual analogue scores ranged from 16.9 to 94.3 points. Of the methods of managing pain, the combined use of peri-articular infiltration and nerve blocks provided better pain relief than other methods during the first two post-operative days. Patients managed with peri-articular injection plus nerve block, and epidural analgesia were more likely to have higher satisfaction at two weeks after TKR. This study highlights the need to establish a consistent pain management strategy after TKR

The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee and total hip replacements in 2016 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early post-operative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, hip or knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in peri-operative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilization therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. One can think pragmatically to get ahead and stay ahead of 3 predictable physiologic disturbances that adversely impact rapid recovery after knee and hip replacement: fluid/blood loss; pain; and nausea. The modern orthopaedic surgeon and his/her care team needs a simple strategy to proactively, not reflexively, manage each of those 3 predictable impediments to early recovery. Those surgical teams that routinely get ahead and stay ahead in each of those areas will routinely witness faster recovery, lower costs and greater patient satisfaction and that is clearly a win for patient and surgeon alike. Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction, decreases hospital stay, and facilitates discharge to home. Today's emphasis is on a multi-modal strategy that minimises the use of opioids. Most protocols use pre-operative medications including an NSAID, acetaminophen, an oral opioid and some include gabapentin. Regional anaesthesia is typically preferred over general. Both peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular local anesthetic cocktail injections have proved as effective adjuncts in decreasing early post-operative pain. Post-operative oral medications delivered on a schedule, not just as needed, often include acetaminophen, an NSAID and some included gabapentin. Oral and parenteral opioids are reserved for breakthrough pain

Perioperative pain involves both neurogenic and inflammatory mediators. The neurogenic component is produced by the intense stimulation of the surgical procedure itself. However, inflammatory mediators resulting from tissue damage and the release of certain cytokines provoke the inflammatory response. Both the neurogenic and inflammatory elements create central nervous system (CNS) excitability. While conventional pain management responds to pain as it occurs, rather than anticipating it, a more appropriate protocol may involve pre-emptive administration of analgesic medication. By beginning this administration prior to surgery and continuing it throughout the rehabilitation process, CNS pharmacological agents are utilised to achieve the following goals: 1.) decrease the neurogenic component at the wound site; 2.) depress afferent pathways; and 3.) decrease central sensitisation in the spinal column. Our experience with such pre-emptive analgesic clinical trials have included implementation of three different protocols in three groups of patients, Groups A-C. In Group A, a continuous epidural for 72-hours was utilised. A short-term epidural for 2–3 hours, followed by the use of scheduled opioid drugs and the use of anti-inflammatory medications, was used in Group B. Finally, Group C included spinal analgesia with shortacting morphine and the continued use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. In all groups, patients were monitored for the return of motor function, respiratory depression, ileus, pain relief, efficacy in analgesia maintenance, and cost. The following trends were observed among the variances: 1.) approximately equal length of stay in all three groups; 2.) decreased motor function in the continuous epidural group (Group A); 3.) increased ileus in the spinal group (Group C); 4.) equal pain relief in all three groups; 5.) high maintenance in the continuous epidural group (Group A); and 6.) decreased cost when continuous epidurals (Group B) were utilised. In conclusion, of the three methodologies implemented, the continuous epidural had a high failure rate (26%). While spinal analgesia is technically easier and less expensive to perform, it has a poorly defined dose response curve and is associated with an increased incidence of ileus. The scheduled opioid medications proved effective. Pre-emptive analgesia not only significantly suppresses pain, it also provides protective sensation. Our recommendation for pre-emptive pain management consists of the use of multi-modal analgesics attacking various sites along the pain pathway, including regional blocks, oral and parental opioids, topical anaesthetics, and ice. However, ongoing study is required to further delineate appropriate protocol, thorough assessment of consequences, and complications associated with all methodologies. Future protocols to be evaluated at this practice include the local injection of bupivacaine hydrochloride prior to wound closure, in addition to assessing the postoperative integration of rofecoxib into the pain management regime

Introduction. The use of narcotic medications to manage postoperative pain after TJA has been associated with impaired mobility, diminished capacity to engage in rehabilitation, and lower patient satisfaction [1]. In addition, side effects including constipation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention can prolong post-operative hospital stays. Intraarticular administration of local anesthetics such as bupivacaine – part of a multimodal postoperative pain management regimen – reduces pain and lowers patients' length of stay [2]. In addition to its anesthetic activity, bupivacaine also has antibacterial activity, particularly against gram-positive bacteria [3]. We have developed a bupivacaine-eluting ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (Bupi-PE) formulation; we hypothesized that elution of bupivacaine from polyethylene could have both anesthetic and antibacterial effects in vivo. Methods. In Vivo Antibacterial Efficacy. A total of n=10 male Sprague Dawley rats (250 g) were used in this study. Polyethylene (control) or Bupi-PE plugs (2.5 mm diameter × 5 mm length) were implanted subcutaneously in the rat dorsum. After incision site closure, 5 × 10. 7. cfu of bioluminescent S. aureus were injected around the implants. Bioluminescent signal (photos/second) was measured daily. All rats were euthanized after one week. In Vivo Anesthetic Efficacy. A total of n=10 male Sprague Dawley rats (250 g) were used in this study. Polyethylene (control) and Bupi-PE plugs (2.5 mm diameter × 5 mm length) were implanted into rat knees via a lateral transcondylar approach (Figure 1a). Efficacy was determined by performing a walking track analysis using a highly sensitive Tekscan. ®. sensor (VHR, 5101) (Figure 1b). Walking tracks were performed at baseline (pre-surgery) and every 24 hours for two weeks. All rats were euthanized after two weeks. Results. In Vivo Antibacterial Efficacy. One control rat expired at day 3 and another one expired in day 7. None of the Bupi-PE rats expired during the study. Significantly less bacterial load was observed in rats receiving Bupi-PE, starting at 24 hr post implantation, continuing until the end of study (day 7) (Figure 2). In Vivo Anesthetic Efficacy. 24 hr post surgery, rats in the control group loaded their unoperated hindlimb significantly more than their operated hindlimb. Rats with the Bupi-PE implant loaded both their hindlimbs similarly (Figure 1c). Discussion. The antibiotic activity of the Bupi-PE against an acute S. aureus infection in the subcutaneous dorsum determined that bupivacaine elution from UHMWPE effectively eradicated bacteria within the implant perimeter. In the joint, the release of bupivacaine allowed prompt weightbearing and joint mobilization compared to controls. Conclusion. Bupivacaine-eluting UHMWPE effectively reduced bacterial load in murine subcutaneous dorsum and reduced postsurgical pain in a murine intra-articular model. This material can be promising for use as infection prophylaxis and pain management after TJA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Over the past fifteen years, the average length of stay for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gradually decreased from several days to overnight. The most logical and safest next step is outpatient arthroplasty. Through the era of so-called minimally invasive surgery, perhaps the most intriguing advancements are not related to the surgery itself, but instead the areas of rapid recovery techniques and perioperative protocols. Rapid recovery techniques and perioperative protocols have been refined to allow for same-day discharge with improved outcomes. As mentioned, the single most important outcome from the minimally invasive movement has been the multi-modal approach to pain management of patients undergoing arthroplasty. Along with blood loss management, using tranexamic acid and hypotensive anesthetic techniques, this multi-modal program is the most important variable in reducing or avoiding side-effects. In any arthroplasty procedure, side-effects that need to be addressed include the negative effects of narcotics and blood loss. Anesthetic techniques, utilizing local nerve blocks, such as the adductor canal block and sciatic blocks for knee arthroplasty augment intraoperative anesthesia and provide postoperative pain relief and quicker mobilization. Additionally, pericapsular injection with a cocktail of local anesthetic helps significantly with pain relief and recovery reducing the amount of oral narcotic utilised in the early postoperative period. Many have utilised liposomal bupivacaine in these cocktails to successfully increase the period of pain relief. The use of multi-modal perioperative protocols can help avoid narcotics and helps avoid the side-effects of nausea. We also utilise an aggressive prophylactic antiemetic program with dexamethasone, ondansetron and a scopolamine patch. Patients without any significant cardiovascular history are given celecoxib preoperatively, which is continued for approximately two weeks postoperatively. Immediately postoperative, acetaminophen and additional dexamethasone are administered intravenously. The multi-modal protocols to address fear, risk, and side-effects will increase the eligibility for outpatient surgery and decrease the need for overnight hospitalization. By focusing on the patient and avoiding over-treatment, outpatient arthroplasty is quickly becoming the standard of care for total hip replacement in the same way other procedures transitioned from hospital in-patient surgeries to ambulatory procedures

Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. The hallmark of this program is preemptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, IV acetaminophen, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quadriceps function for TKA (adductor canal block) and pericapsular local anesthetics. Over the past two years utilising this type of program over 50% of our joint replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery

Background. Acute pain following total knee replacements (TKRs) is associated with higher peri-operative opiate requirements and their side effects, longer hospital stay and lower patient satisfaction (Petersen 2014). It may also be associated with higher rates of chronic pain at 1 and 5 years (Beswick 2012). We present a novel technique using combination of Local Infiltration Anaesthesia (LIA) with PainKwell infusion system (Bupivacaine 0.5 @ 4mls and 6mls/hr) to improve pain management following TKRs. Methods. Between October 2015 and March 2016. 110 patients undergoing primary TKR were prospectively studied. All patients studied had spinal anaesthesia (SA) with diamorphine. Demographics between the two groups were similar. Group 1. SA plus LIA plus traditional multimodal analgesia. 32 patients. Group 2. SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours rate 4mls. 38 patients. Group 3. SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours rate 6mls. 40 patients. Results. Visual analogue pain scores demonstrated a significant difference at 8hrs, 12hrs, 24hrs and 48hrs between group 1 and 3; p<0.05. There was also a statistical difference in opiate usage at 24 hours between the three groups with group 3 using significantly less opiates compared to group 1. There was least consumption of opiates in group 3 patients across all study periods. Conclusions. This study reported that SA plus LIA and PainKwell system was effective in reducing pain following TKRs. It also demonstrated that the technique of SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours at a rate 6mls/hr reduced opiate usage by 50% and pain by 30% for these patients. Implications. This technique may help improve rehabilitation and shorten hospital stay following total knee arthroplasties

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of post-operative pain management using the intra-operative peri-articular injection(PAI) and/or electromyography (EMG)-guided preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) in total knee arthroplasty(TKA). Materials and Methods. From March 2013 to February 2014, 90 knees which underwent primary TKA by one surgeon were included in our study. The patients were classified into three groups; a single injection FNB with an EMG guide (Group I, 30 knees), intra-operative PAI (Group II, 30 knees) and both FNB and PAI (Group III, 30 knees). Pain at rest and moving was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at postoperative 0, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours. Postoperative range of motion, time to walking, total blood loss, amount of opioid consumption and complications were compared in each group. Results. VAS immediately after surgery was 67.9 in group I, 54.6 in group II and 54.7 in group III. VAS was significantly higher in group I than group II and III (p=0.005), but was not significantly different between group II and III (p>0.05). VAS at postoperative 4 and 8hr showed similar results. VAS at postoperative 24 hr was 49.6 in group I, 56.4 in group II and 46.7 in group III, which was significantly higher in group II than group I and III (p=0.043). After postoperative 48hr, there were no differences in group I, II and III. The total amount of opioid consumption in group III was smaller than that in group I and II (p=0.017). There were no differences in postoperative range of motion, time to walking and total blood loss. There was one case with temporary peroneal nerve palsy in group II and no infection in all cases. Conclusion. PAI was more effective than FNB for early (0∼8hr) postoperative period after TKA. However, PAI showed rebound pain at 24hr after TKA. PAI in combination with FNB could enhance the effect of postoperative pain management from immediate postoperative period to 24hr

Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay in the inpatient hospital environment opening the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is pre-emptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and pericapsular long acting time release local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and IV acetaminophen. Over the past two years utilising this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. We currently utilise a long acting local anesthetic delivery medication consisting of microscopic, spherical, lipid-based particles composed of a honeycomb-like structure of numerous nonconcentric internal aqueous chambers containing encapsulated bupivacaine separated from adjacent chambers by lipid membranes. Bupivacaine is released from the particles with diffusion of the drug over an extended period of time that more closely matches the time course of postsurgical pain following joint replacement surgery. Trials have demonstrated that a single dose administered via deep tissue infiltration is effective at reducing pain up to 72 hours. This has been trialed in TKA as well

Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay and opened the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is preemptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and long acting local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and acetaminophen. Over the past two years utilising this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. We currently utilise a long acting local anesthetic delivery medication consisting of microscopic, spherical, lipid-based particles composed of a honeycomb-like structure of numerous nonconcentric internal aqueous chambers containing encapsulated bupivacaine separated from adjacent chambers by lipid membranes. Bupivacaine is released from the particles with diffusion of the drug over an extended period of time that more closely matches the time course of postsurgical pain following joint replacement surgery. Trials have demonstrated that a single dose administered via deep tissue infiltration is effective at reducing pain up to 72 hours

Background. Chronic pain is a complex condition that demonstrates better outcomes in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, typically delivered to groups of patients by tertiary healthcare teams. An inter-disciplinary pain management course for individual patients was developed to increase the scope of physical therapists working in primary care by integrating osteopathic manual therapy with psychological interventions from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a form of ‘3rd wave’ Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. Method and Results. A single cohort study with pre-course (n=180) and post-course (n=79) self-report measures (44% response rate) evaluated six week interventions which combined individual manual therapy with self-management, delivered by teams of qualified and student osteopaths. Data included: quality of life (European Quality of Life Questionnaire); pain, mood and coping (Bournemouth Questionnaire); psychological flexibility (Revised Acceptance and Action Questionnaire); and mindfulness (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Participants were predominantly female (68%), unemployed (59%), with an average age of 49 and pain duration of more than 12 months (86%). Commonly reported symptoms were low back pain (82%), neck pain (60%) and multiple sites (86%). At six months, there were statistically significant improvements in all four outcome measures (p<0.0005), with promising effect sizes in quality of life and pain coping (r=0.52) which appeared to be mediated by changes in psychological flexibility. Conclusions. This innovative, integrated, patient-centred chronic pain management course demonstrated promising outcomes when delivered by osteopaths with varying experience. Randomised clinical trials are now needed to assess outcomes in comparison with standard care, and optimal ways of training physical therapists to deliver effective psychological interventions. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: A Department of Health ‘Innovation, Excellence and Strategic Development’ (IESD) grant for the Voluntary Sector Investment Programme (AIMS Ref: 2527190; ISRCTN: 04892266). The results of this study are being submitted for publication in the International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine and will be presented at the COME Collaboration Osteopathic Conference in Barcelona on September 30th 2017 and at the Therapy Expo 2017 at the NEC in Birmingham on November 22nd 2017

Background and purpose. The Fear Avoidance Model is used to explain why some patients with acute low back pain develop chronic low back pain (CLBP). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) targeting dysfunctional behavioural cognitions (pain catastrophizing and fear of movement) is recommended. Purpose: to investigate whether a two-week CBT-based pain management program results in improvement in dysfunctional behavioural cognitions and whether these improved cognitions improve functional outcomes. Methods and Results. Cohort study including 524 consecutive CLBP-patients. Main outcome: functioning (ODI). Secondary outcomes: pain severity (NRS), pain catastrophizing (PCS), fear of movement (TSK). Assessments: pre- and post-treatment, 1 and 12-months follow-up (FU). Improvement over time was analysed with repeated measures ANOVA. Path analyses were used to examine the influence of pain catastrophizing and fear of movement on functional disability and pain severity. Multiple imputation was used to complete missing data. Participants with incomplete data (12.8%) did not differ from those with complete data (n= 457). 59% were females, mean age 46 (± 9.5) years, mean CLBP-duration 12 (± 10.8) years. All outcomes significantly improved at post-treatment and a slight significant improvement between post-treatment and 12 months FU was observed. Path analyses showed a direct effect for catastrophizing on post-treatment functioning and an indirect effect for catastrophizing through fear of movement on post-treatment functioning. Comparable results with pain severity as outcome. Conclusion. A two-week pain management program improved dysfunctional behavioral cognitions and functional outcomes in patients with longstanding CLBP up to one year. Targeting both pain catastrophizing and fear of movement during the program resulted in improved outcomes. Conflicts of Interest: JK O'Dowd is director of and shareholder in RealHealth. The authors declare that this abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national or international meeting. Sources of Funding:. No funding obtained