Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA. Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test. At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures. When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less
Total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly common. A biceps tenodesis or tenotomy has become a routine part of the operation. There are several advantages to a tenodesis or tenotomy. First, the long head of the biceps tendon is routinely pathologic. One study has shown that there are differences in gene expression and mechanical properties in the long head of the biceps tendon in the setting of glenohumeral joint arthritis. Clinically, we often see inflammation, tearing, adhesions, or other pathology. Second, it is largely accepted that the long head of the biceps tendon has minimal function at the shoulder. The biceps muscle primarily functions at the elbow. Therefore, there is little downside to performing a tenodesis if there is a chance of it generating
A majority of patients present with varus alignment and predominantly medial compartment disease. The secret of success in osteoarthritis (OA) treatment is patient selection and patient specific treatment. Different wear patterns have been described and that knowledge should be utilised in modern knee surgery. In case of isolated anteromedial OA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) should be one of the therapeutic options available to the knee surgeon. The discussion not to offer a UKA to patients is based on the fear of the surgeon not being able to identify the right patient and not being able to perform the surgery accurately. The common modes of failure for UKA, which are dislocation or overcorrection leading to disease progression, can be avoided with a fixed bearing implant. Wear can probably be avoided with newer polyethylenes and avoidance of overstuffing in flexion of the knee. Revision for unexplained pain and unknown causes should disappear once surgeons understand persistent
There has been an unprecedented increase in total knee replacement in recent years. The UK national joint registry recorded over 80,000 total knee replacements per year with a generally successful outcome. Improvements in modern knee replacement designs and surgical techniques has resulted in more and more young and active patients having knee replacements. Their more active lifestyles and increased life expectancy is also leading to a rise in revision knee surgery. The most common reason for revision knee replacement is for loosening as a result of wear and/or bone resorption. Revision knee tibial components typically use long stems to increase the stability in the presence of the proximal bone loss associated with implant removal and loosening. The stem design has been cited as a possible cause of the clinically reported pain at the stem end region. The aim of this study was to experimentally validate a finite element (FE) model and the analysis different load conditions and stem orientations in a stemmed tibial component. CT-scans of a composite tibia (Sawbones) were utilized to form a multi-body solid consisting of cortical bone and cancellous bone with an intramedullary canal. A fully cemented tibial component (Stryker) was virtually implanted in the composite tibia with the stem-end centred in the cancellous bone. The tibial compartment loads were distributed with a 60:40 (Medial: Lateral) and 80:20 ratio to simulate a normal and varus type knee. Several stem-end positions were developed with the modification of the tibias proximal resection angle. An experimental study using strain gauges applied to the same composite tibia was used to compare the results with the FE-model. The model was validated with the strain gauged experimental test specimens demonstrating a similar pattern and magnitude of predicted strains. The simulation of different stem-end orientations revealed an increase in strain to the posterior cortex below the stem-end with the stem in direct contact to the posterior cortical bone. A tibial stem fully surrounded by cancellous bone demonstrated a small increase to the proximal strains. The simulation of a varus aligned knee with a 80:20 (Medial: Lateral) load distribution shifted strain overall to the medial side and revealed a large increase of strain to the posterior-medial in the proximity of the stem-end. The intensification of the load on one side of the tibial plateau, associated with a varus aligned knee, developed the largest increase in strain beneath the stem-end region and is possibly a factor in the reported
