Aims. Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop deposits in the spine which may lead to vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Our aim was to establish which spinopelvic parameters are associated with the greatest disability in patients with spinal myeloma and VCFs. Patients and Methods. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional review of 148 consecutive patients (87 male, 61 female) with spinal myeloma and analysed correlations between spinopelvic parameters and patient-reported outcome scores. The mean age of the patients was 65.5 years (37 to 91) and the mean number of vertebrae involved was 3.7 (1 to 15). Results. The thoracolumbar region was most commonly affected (109 patients, 73.6%), and was the site of most posterior vertebral wall defects (47 patients, 31.8%). Poorer Oswestry Disability Index scores correlated with an increased sagittal vertical axis (p = 0.006), an increased number of VCFs (p = 0.035) and sternal involvement (p = 0.012). Poorer EuroQol visual analogue scale scores correlated with posterior vertebral wall defects in the thoracolumbar region (p = 0.012). The sagittal vertical axis increased with the number of fractures and kyphosis in the thoracolumbar (p = 0.009) and lumbar (p < 0.001) regions. Conclusions. In MM, patients with VCFs have poorer clinical scores at presentation in the presence of sagittal imbalance. Outcome is particularly affected by multiple fractures in the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions and by failure to prevent kyphosis. Patients with MM should be screened for spinal lesions early. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1234–9

To prospectively determine the relationship between the two most commonly used generic spinal outcome measures, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Outcome measures inform audit and research. Few spine surgical specific outcome measures are in general use. Generic measures are used for a variety of spinal disorders it is not known which is best or exactly how they relate for different conditions. Pre-operatively and two years post surgical results were available in 240 patients. There were 125 males, 115 females. Sub groups numbering 82 discetomy, 78 decompression, 26 revision and 19 fusions were analysed. Average age 55 years (range 23-88). The pre op average ODI was 55% and the LBOS was 29. Correlation was -0.73. The overall post operative score at 2 years was 34% ODI and 37 LBOS, the correlation was better at -0.87. The correlation between the two scores post operatively was very good for Discectomy surgery (-0.916) and fusion surgery (-0.907) but not so close pre operatively with Discectomy (-0.786) and fusion correlation poor at (-0.302). Revision surgery and decompression surgery had similar good correlation post operatively. The correlation of both outcome measures to the Modified Zung depression index was poor. The poor pre operative correlation suggests that thresholds for surgery cannot be compared within registries using different measures. The post operative scores and change in scores correlate better. This is important in comparative studies using different outcomes scores within the same spine registry. No conflict of Interest. Registered database and audit of service standard

Aims

Only a few studies have investigated the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with an idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the overall HRQoL and employment status of patients with an idiopathic scoliosis 40 years after diagnosis, to compare it with that of the normal population, and to identify possible predictors for a better long-term HRQoL.

Aims

Gram-negative infections are associated with comorbid patients, but outcomes are less well understood. This study reviewed diagnosis, management, and treatment for a cohort treated in a tertiary spinal centre.

Purposes and Background. Musculoskeletal disorders are leading causes of work disability. Our purpose was to develop a predictive model in a cohort from 2012 and validate the model in 2016 data. Methods and Results. Prospectively collected data was used to identify inception cohorts in 2012 (n=1652) and 2016 (n=199). Data from back pain claimants receiving treatment in physiotherapy clinics and the Ontario workers' compensation database were linked. Patients were followed for 1 year. Variables from a back pain questionnaire and clinical, demographic and administrative factors were assessed for predictive value. The outcome was cumulative number of calendar days receiving wage-replacement benefits. Cox regression revealed 8 significant predictors of shorter time on benefits in the 2012 cohort: early intervention (HR=1.51), symptom duration < 31 days (HR=0.88), not in construction industry (HR=1.89), high Low Back Outcome Score (HR=1.03), younger age (HR=0.99), higher benefit rate (HR=1.00), intermittent pain (HR=1.15), no sleep disturbance (HR=1.15). The 2012 model c-statistic was 0.73 with a calibration slope of 0.90 (SE=0.19, p=0.61) in the 2016 data, meaning not significantly different. The c-statistic in the 2016 data was 0.69. Median duration on benefits of those with a high risk score was 129 days in 2012 and 45 days in 2016. Conclusion. The 2012 model had a good fit and calibrated well in the 2016 data. Changes in case management by the WSIB might have resulted in significant differences between the 2012 and 2106 cohort. The difference in duration on benefits could affect treatment decision making in future. Conflicts of interest: IWH is funded by the Ministry of Labour in Ontario. Sources of funding: Funding was provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Research

Aims. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical relevance of increased facet joint distraction as a result of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for trauma. Patients and Methods. A total of 155 patients (130 men, 25 women. Mean age 42.7 years; 16 to 87) who had undergone ACDF between 1 January 2001 and 1 January 2016 were included in the study. Outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Lateral cervical spine radiographs taken in the immediate postoperative period were reviewed to compare the interfacet distance of the operated segment with those of the facet joints above and below. Results. There was a statistically significant relationship between greater facet distraction and increased NDI and VAS pain scores. This was further confirmed by Spearman correlation, which showed evidence of a moderate correlation between both NDI score and facet joint distraction (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.34; p < 0.001) and VAS score and facet distraction (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.52; p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a discernible transition point between outcome scores. Significantly worse outcomes, in terms of both NDI scores (17.8 vs 8.2; p < 0.001) and VAS scores (4.5 vs 1.3; p < 0.001), were seen with facet distraction of 3 mm or more. Patients who went on to have a posterior fusion also had increased NDI and VAS scores, independent of facet distraction. Conclusion. After undergoing ACDF for the treatment of cervical spine injury, patients with facet joint distraction of 3 mm or more have worse NDI and VAS pain scores. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1201–7

Aim:. Vitamin D deficiency is a common problem in the UK. It is more prevalent in patients with orthopaedic conditions. Previous studies in the literature have shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with low patient-related outcome scores. To date, no studies have been performed in spinal patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between vitamin D status and pre-operative outcome scores in patients with AIS. Methods:. AIS patients undergoing scoliosis correction between July 2012 and May 2013 at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital were investigated. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured and SRS-22r questionnaires were completed as part of their pre-admission work up. Results:. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. Of these 11 patients (44%) had inadequate vitamin D levels. There was a significant correlation between the vitamin D level and SRS-22r scores (Spearman's 0.397, p=0.049; Pearson's 0.416, p=0.039). Discussion:. Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with worse pre-operative outcome scores in the AIS population. We are currently recruiting more patients into our study and also plan to look at the post-operative outcome scores to see if this difference is maintained. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Aims

The British Spine Registry (BSR) was introduced in May 2012 to be used as a web-based database for spinal surgeries carried out across the UK. Use of this database has been encouraged but not compulsory, which has led to a variable level of engagement in the UK. In 2019 NHS England and NHS Improvement introduced a new Best Practice Tariff (BPT) to encourage input of spinal surgical data on the BSR. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the spinal BPT on compliance with the recording of surgical data on the BSR.

Aims

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques.

Aims

High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a disabling disorder for which many different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) scores, global balance, and regional spino-pelvic alignment from two to 25 years after surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis using an all-posterior partial reduction, transfixation technique.

Clinical and radiological indicators of outcome in the use of X-Stops were sought by evaluating patient-centred outcomes alongside radiographic scrutiny of changes around implants with correlation to outcome. Prospectively collated outcome scores were correlated to outcome, with retrospective analysis of pre-operative MRI scans and 117 post-operative radiographs. Single surgeon series of 44 patients(52 implants). Clinical - ODI, walking distance, Low Back Outcome Score, MZDI and MSP. Radiographic - lucency(anterior and cranio-caudal to implant), coronal rotation, dorsal migration of implant. Failure defined by persistent symptoms requiring removal+/−decompression. Pre-operative features of success: lower ODI(p<0.05), higher LBOS(p<0.01), higher walking distance(p<0.01), lower MZDI(p<0.01). Marked differences were noted in post-operative scores for the two cohorts. An eight-fold improvement in walking distance in success patients compared to an increase to 1.8 times the baseline in failures. ODI improved ten times more in the success group at 20 cf2(failure). MZDI improvement was greater in the revisions at 2.2 cf 0.9 in successes. Ranking Pearson's coefficient of radiograph measurements in success and failure cohorts, revealed failure associated most to anterior lucency(R=0.93), rotation(R=-0.61), cranio-caudal lucency (R=-0.29) and migration (R=-0.25). Success most associated to rotation (R=-0.22). Failure radiographs revealed greater lucency cranio-caudal and ventral to the implant, more coronal rotation, and pronounced dorsal migration. Clinical features of success are older patients with no co-morbidities, unilateral leg pain and multi-level insertion. Males, those with bilateral leg pain, and scoliosis or spondylolistheses are more likely to fail

Aim. To compare spinal outcome measures between patients reviewed for medico-legal compensation claims relating to perceived injury at work to those having sustained serious structural injury in the form of unstable thoraco-lumbar fractures requiring internal fixation. Method. Two consecutive cohorts of 23 patients with healed spinal fractures and 21 patients with a perception of work related soft tissue injury were compared. Patient demographics and a range of outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Low Back Outcome score (LBOS), Modified Somatic Perception (MSP) and Modified Zung Depression (MZD) indices were measured. Results. 23 patients (8F; 15M) with spinal fractures (group 1) of average age 42 years (range 22-66) were followed up for a mean of 41 months (range 14-89, SD 23.3) post trauma and compared to 21 patients (6 females; 15 males) with self reported back pain (group 2) of average age 47 years (range 37-63), mean time since perceived injury of 42 months (range 12-62, SD 14.5). Both groups were comparable in terms of age and sex (P = 0.254 and 0.752 respectively). The average ODI was 28% (SD 18.5) compared to 52% (SD 17.1) in group 1 and 2 respectively (P value: 0.000087); LBOS 40 Vs 20 (P=0.000189); MSP 4 Vs 10 (0.01069); and MZD 20 Vs 36 (P=0.000296). Conclusion. Despite high energy trauma and significant structural damage to the spine, post-traumatic patients had better spinal outcome scores in all measures (ODI, LBO, MSP, MZD). This thereby defies 8 of the 9 Bradford Hill criteria of causation. The reasons for such differences are primarily psychosocial. Addressing obstacles to recovery may improve outcomes. There is no ‘dose-response’ curve to functional outcomes. In fact, uniquely the disability seems greater in the lower energy injury which is unique in trauma care

Purpose and Background:. To identify treatment effect modifiers within the STarT Back Trial which demonstrated prognostic stratified care was effective in comparison to standard care for patients with low back pain. Methods:. Secondary analysis of the STarT Back Trial using 688 patients with available 4-month follow-up data. Disability (baseline and 4 months) was assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) using continuous and dichotomized (>7) outcome scores. Potential treatment effect modifiers were evaluated with group x predictor interaction terms using linear and logistic regression models. Modifiers included: age, gender, education, socio-economic status (SES), employment status, work satisfaction, episode duration, general health (SF-12), number of pain medications, and treatment expectations. Results:. No significant treatment effect modifiers were identified using linear regression, however logistic regression analysis identified SES as a treatment modifier (interaction: OR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.98). Comparing those receiving stratified care versus best current care, the proportion of patients with poor 4 month outcome was similar for lower SES patients (35.4% vs. 37.2%), yet different for high SES patients (19.3% vs. 38.9%). No other treatment effect modifiers were identified; however exploratory analyses indicated trends for worse outcomes with increased age, patients taking ≥3 medications, those with lower education, and those with poor treatment expectations as potential treatment effect modifiers. Conclusion:. SES was identified as a treatment effect modifier in the STarT Back Trial with patients with lower SES not benefiting from stratified care. The explanations for this finding need further exploration

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of pelvic parameters on the tendency of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to develop flatback deformity (thoracic hypokyphosis and lumbar hypolordosis) and its effect on quality-of-life outcomes.

Purpose. To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Methods. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Results. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term. Ethics - none, Interest –none

To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term

Establish the prevalence of B12 deficiency in patients presenting for surgical assessment and to audit subsequent management. Retrospective: The pathology database was interrogated for all B12 and folate requests under the name of a Spine sub-specialty Consultant over a four year period (2005-2008). 38 patients with B12 deficiency were identified. Patient self reported symptoms, drug history, Global outcome score (Much better, better, same, worse) Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI). 458 tests occurred. 38(8.3%) were B12 deficient. Of these, 10 (26%) had received no treatment at review. Average age 63 years. 23 males, 15 females. 6 patients were diabetic. At clinic attendance Mean ODI 46%; VAS(leg) 6.4. A sample from those with a normal B12 had ODI 45%; VAS(leg) of 5.9. Of the three who were “worse”, one had been treated. 7 of the 12 patients who felt the “same” had received injections. 9 were “better” with 5 on supplements. Five were “much better” with all patients on supplements. Less than half(47%) were prescribed analgesia, 11 out of 38 were taking paracetamol, 6 were prescribed NSAIDs, 6 opiates, and 10 were taking neuropathic painkillers. Reversible causes of neuropathic pain can only be identified by testing. A high index of suspicion resulted in positive tests in 8% of the population studied. Administrative obstacles exist to treatment. Those that are treated do better. Sensory symptoms in a spine clinic patient should not be assumed to originate exclusively from the spine. Audit/service standard registered in Trust No conflict of interest

Aim. Assess efficacy of caudal epidural injection with epidurogram with validated outcome measures. Introduction. The administration of local steroids and other drugs into caudal epidural space has been well established procedure in the management of low back pain with or without leg symptoms. Various studies have been done to assess the efficacy of the different routes of administration of epidural injections. However, only a few published prospective studies have been done on performing caudal epidural injections under fluoroscopic guidance with validated outcome measures. Methods. Between 2007 and 2009, a total of 129 patients underwent caudal epidural injections under image intensifier guidance with epidurogram. The study included 69 males and 60 females ranging from 20 to 80 years of age. They were prospectively followed up using validated outcome measures at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results. Out of 129 patients 120 patients were followed at one year. There was statistically significant improvement in mean Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores in these patients which was maintained at the end of one year. Based on LBOS and ODI scores, 76% of patients at 6 weeks, 68% at 3 months, 55% at 6 months and 49% at 1 year had excellent and good results. Patients with less than two levels of degenerative disc disease, with predominant unilateral leg symptoms and with symptomatic duration of less than 6 months had a better outcome of results when compared with patients with predominant back symptoms, multi-level degenerative disc disease, bilateral involvement and history of previous lumbo-sacral spine surgery. Discussion and Conclusion. Our study on caudal epidural injections done under fluoroscopic guidance indicate improved and predictable outcome in addition to the patient satisfaction

Aim. To compare outcomes of revision lumbar discectomy to primary surgery in the same patient cohort. Methods. Prospective outcome data in 36 patients who underwent primary and subsequent revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation between 1995 and 2009. Outcome measures used were Visual Analogue Scores for back (VAB) and leg pain (VAL), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBO). 5 early recurrences within 3 months were excluded. Results. Complete data was available in 31 patients 13F;18M. The average age was 39 years at index and 45 years at revision. Average interval between surgery of 39 months (range 6-122). Mean Pre op ODI 54 and VAL 73 primary procedure, final follow up of primary procedure ODI 33, VAL 43; prior to revision ODI 57, VAL 75; at last FU ODI 32 and VAL 40. There was no statistical difference between outcomes. In the primary discectomy group there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAL, ODI and LBO scores (P<0.05), with no significant improvement in the VAB (P=0.67). In the revision group there was a statistical significant improvement in all the outcomes (P<0.05). Overall, 45% of patients felt their outcome from revision discectomy was better/much better with 54% of patients rating their treatment as either good/excellent. Conclusion. Primary discectomy produced significant improvement in leg pain, ODI and LBO. Revision discectomy did the same, but also a significant improvement in VAB scores. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing the preoperative and postoperative scores for both procedures. Revision discectomy is a procedure which yields clinically significant and patient perceived improvements in spinal outcome measures with an unexplained improvement in VAB scores as compared to the primary procedure. This may challenge the belief of some surgeons in the need for fusion at the time of revision

Introduction. Monitoring of scoliosis is traditionally done with radiographs, which can be associated with an increased risk of cancer secondary to multiple exposures over many years. This study investigated whether the findings from surface topography can be used to monitor scoliosis curves and how much this method affects outcome scores in patients with scoliosis. This study therefore had two subsets: (1) to investigate whether lateral asymmetry (LA) from ISIS2 surface topography can predict radiographic Cobb angle, providing an alternative non-invasive means of monitoring patients with scoliosis (LA and Cobb subset); and (2) to establish the relationships between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by Cobb angle on radiograph and volumetric asymmetry (VA) with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self-image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores (Cobb, VA, and SRS subset). Methods. In the LA and Cobb subset, 72 untreated patients with scoliosis (77 curves) with a Cobb angle of 55° or less were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement taken from a standard radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day. A comparison of Cobb angle and LA was done. In the Cobb, VA, and SRS subset, 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement of radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self-image, and mental health against Cobb angle and VA was undertaken. All statistical analysis was done with software R. Results. In the LA and Cobb subset, for Cobb angle less than 55° on radiograph, ISIS2 was able to predict the Cobb angle within 13°. In the VA, Cobb, and SRS subset, Cobb angle contributed only about 10% to self-image, whereas VA contributed 14%. Cobb angle contributed about 6·2% to mental health, whereas VA contributed 8·6%. Conclusions. Cobb angles display poor reliability, with estimates ranging from 3° to 10°. Even so, the 95% CIs on the prediction of Cobb angle from ISIS2 LA are too wide to use it alone to monitor spinal curvature. Whether or not LA is capable of monitoring change in curvature will be investigated as more longitudinal data are built up. VA correlates better with both mental health and self-image than does Cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither Cobb angle nor VA can be used to predict patient's self-image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters that may affect SRS-22 such as sex, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry, and shoulder asymmetry