Aim. In the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), trauma with perigenicular fracture fixation or oncological surgical treatment, soft tissue defects can expose critical structures such as the extensor apparatus, the knee joint, bone or implants. This work compares soft tissue reconstruction (STR) between a classical pedicled gastrocnemius (GC) muscle flap and a pedicled chimeric sural artery perforator (SAP) musculocutaneous GC flap in complex orthoplastic scenarios. Method. A retrospective study was conducted on prospectively maintained databases in three University Hospitals from January 2016 to February 2021 after orthopaedic, traumatological or oncological treatment. All patients with a perigenicular soft tissue defect and implant-associated infection were included undergoing STR either with a pedicled GC flap or with a pedicled chimeric SAP-GC flap. The outcome analysis included successful STR and flap related complications. The surgical timing, preoperative planning and surgical technique are discussed together with the postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Results. 43 patients were included (22 GC muscle flaps, 21 SAP-GC musculocutaneous flaps). The GC and SAP-GC patient group were comparable in terms of age, comorbidities, defect size and follow-up. The incidence of flap related complications was comparable among the two groups. Specifically, in the SAP-GC group 1 wound dehiscence at the recipient site occurred as well as 1 distal muscle flap necrosis, 1 distal skin flap necrosis, 1 donor site infection and 1 donor site wound dehiscence. Furthermore, the donor site was closed in 9 patients while a skin graft was used in 12 patients. A significant difference was recorded with regard to re-raising the flap for further
Introduction. External fixators are common surgical
To examine all open fractures presenting to Bundaberg Base Hospital—from January 2007 to January 2009—by monitoring the clinical course of the patients, with attention to the time intervals between injury, presentation and
A commonly misunderstood principle in medical literature is statistical significance. Often, statistically non-significant or negative results are thought to be evidence for equivalence; mistakenly validating treatment modalities and putting patients at risk. This study examines the prevalence of misinterpretation of negative results of superiority trials in orthopaedic literature and outlines the need for a non-inferiority or equivalence research design. Four orthopaedic journals – Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics A, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery – were hand searched to identify all randomised control trials (RCTs) published within the time periods 2002–2003, 2007–2008 and 2012–2013. The identified RCTs were read and classified by study methodology, results obtained, and interpretation of results. A total of 237 RCTs were identified. When analysing the primary outcomes, 117 (49.4%) studies yielded negative results and 120 (50.8%) yielded positive results. Out of the 237 articles, 231 (97.5%) used superiority methodology and 6 (2.5%) used non-inferiority or equivalence methodology. Of the 231 studies that used superiority methodology, 115 (49.8%) obtained negative results; and 45 (39.1%) of those misinterpreted the negative results for equivalence. While no statistical differences were seen, there was an upward trend in utilising non-inferiority and equivalence methodologies over time. Given the frequency of misinterpreted negative results, there is an evident need for a more appropriate research methodology that shows equivalence of treatment methods. A non-inferiority or equivalence study design can address orthopaedic clinical dilemmas more suitably when trying to show one treatment is no worse or is equal to another
INTRODUCTION. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful
Introduction and aims. Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures has traditionally used plaster of Paris. Recently, synthetic casting materials have been used. There have been no studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials. The aim of this study is to investigate whether one material is superior for paediatric forearm fracture management. Methods. A single-centre prospective randomised trial of patients presenting to the Women's and Children's Hospital with acute fractures of the radius and/or ulna was undertaken. Patients were enrolled into the study on presentation to the Emergency Department and randomised by sealed envelope into either a fiberglass or plaster of Paris group. Patients then proceeded to a standardised method of closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Clinical follow-up occurred at one and six weeks post-immobilisation. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed following cast removal at six weeks. All clinical complications were recorded and cast indexes were calculated. Results. Initially 50 patients were recruited to the study, with equal randomisation. There were no significant differences between the patient demographics of the two groups. The results from this sample indicated an increase in clinical complications involving the plaster of Paris casting group. These complications included soft areas of plaster requiring revision, loss of reduction with some requiring re-manipulation and a high rate of cast spliting due to material swelling. The fractures that loss reduction had increased cast indices. Fibreglass casts were also preferred by patient and their families, with many observational comments regarding the light-weight and durable nature of the material. Conclusions. Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures is a common
COVID-19-related patient care delays have resulted in an unprecedented patient care backlog in the field of orthopaedics. The objective of this study is to examine orthopaedic provider preferences regarding the patient care backlog and financial recovery initiatives in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. An orthopaedic research consortium at a multi-hospital tertiary care academic medical system developed a three-part survey examining provider perspectives on strategies to expand orthopaedic patient care and financial recovery. Section 1 asked for preferences regarding extending clinic hours, section 2 assessed surgeon opinions on expanding surgical opportunities, and section 3 questioned preferred strategies for departmental financial recovery. The survey was sent to the institution’s surgical and nonoperative orthopaedic providers.Aims
Methods
The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has had a significant impact on trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) departments worldwide. To manage the peak of the epidemic, orthopaedic staff were redeployed to frontline medical care; these roles included managing minor injury units, forming a “proning” team, and assisting in the intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, outpatient clinics were restructured to facilitate virtual consultations, elective procedures were cancelled, and inpatient hospital admissions minimized to reduce nosocomial COVID-19 infections. Urgent operations for fractures, infection and tumours went ahead but required strict planning to ensure patient safety. Orthopaedic training has also been significantly impacted during this period. This article discusses the impact of COVID-19 on T&O in the UK and highlights key lessons learned that may help to proactively prepare for the next global pandemic. Cite this article:
This article presents an overview of mycetoma
and offers guidelines for orthopaedic surgeons who may be involved in
the care of patients with this condition. Cite this article: