Introduction. The transition from resident to registrar constitutes a steep learning curve in most medical practitioners’ careers, regardless of speciality. We aimed to determine whether a six-week orthopaedic surgical skills course could increase resident skills and confidence prior to transitioning to orthopaedic registrar within the Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia. Materials. Unaccredited registrars, orthopaedic trainees, and orthopaedic consultants, through a departmental peer reviewed process and survey, developed a six-session course (“Registrar Academy”) that included basic knowledge and essential practical skills training for residents with an interest in becoming orthopaedic registrars. This course was implemented over a 3-month period and assessed. Mixed method quantitative and qualitative evidence was sought via a 14-item and 18-item Likert scale questionnaire coupled with open-ended questions. Ethical approval was granted by our institutions Human Research and Ethics Comittee, reference no.: HREC/16/QGC336. Results/Discussion. Results were qualitatively synthesised using quantitative and qualitative data. Thirteen residents participated in the course. All residents agreed to statements indicating they felt unprepared to work as an orthopaedic registrar and were not confident in performing various core tasks required. After completing the course, residents indicated greater confidence or comfort in all these areas and felt better prepared for the transition to registrar. There was broad approval of the course among participants. Every participant who completed the final questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the course and that it taught usable, reproducible practical skills and increased their orthopaedic knowledge. This group also uniformly agreed or strongly agreed that the course improved their patient care and patient safety. Conclusion. Residents feel unprepared for their transition to orthopaedic registrar and lack confidence in several core competencies. A supplemental “Registrar Academy” within an institution is an effective way to improve knowledge, confidence, and practical skills for residents wishing to transition to a registrar position

Introduction. The stability of the elbow joint following an acute elbow dislocation is dependent on associated injuries. The ability to identify these concomitant injuries correctly directs management and improves the chances of a successful outcome. Interpretation of plain radiographs in the presence of either a dislocation or post-reduction films with plaster in-situ is difficult. This study aimed to assess the ability of orthopaedic registrars to accurately identify associated bony injuries on initial plain radiographs using CT as the gold standard for comparison. Methods. Patients over the age of 16 years undergoing an elbow CT scan within one week of a documented elbow dislocation between 1st June 2010 and 1st June 2014 were included in the study. Three orthopaedic registrars independently reviewed both the initial dislocation and immediate post reduction plain radiographs to identify any associated bony injuries. This radiograph review was repeated by each registrar after two weeks. The incidence of associated injuries as well as the inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated. Results. 28 patients were included in the study. 54% of the patients were female and the mean age was 45 years (range 16 to 90 years). The incidence of a radial head fracture was 54%, coronoid fracture 43% and epicondyle avulsion 18% on CT. The inter-observer reliability was only shown to be fair amongst registrars and the intra-observer variability moderate. Conclusions. Computerised tomography is a useful adjunct in the assessment of associated osseous injuries following an elbow dislocation due to the presence of a high number of injuries. Plain radiographs alone have been shown to have only a fair and moderate inter and intra-observer variability respectively, therefore a low threshold to obtain further 3D imaging should be practised. Level of Evidence. IV

The regenerative potential of bone is enormous, and it is possible to lengthen limbs by bone distraction. However, there remains a major risk of fracture after lengthening the bone. Previous studies have described how the pixel value ratio may be used for determining the time for frame removal. The aim of this study was to investigate the intrarater and the interrater reliability of pixel value scores from radiographs in tibial lengthening prior to frame removal. Moreover, the study aimed to determine the overall number of X- rays obtained during circular frame treatment. Retrospective study. Patients treated with tibial lengthening by a circular frame at Aalborg University Hospital from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2017 and a minimum of 12 months after frame removal were included. The bone was divided in proximal-, regenerate- and distal bone zone. These 3 zones were in AP x-ray divided in an anterior and posterior zone and in sagittal X-ray medial and lateral zone producing 6 zones in which the pixel value was measured. Pixel value ratio was calculated as: (Proximal pixel value+Distal pixel value)/2/Regenerate pixel value. Interrater correlations were calculated from measurements obtained by an orthopaedic registrar and an orthopaedic specialist. Intrarater correlation was calculated from repeated measurements obtained by an orthopaedic specialist. Mean duration of circular frame treatment was: 6 (+-3) months. Median number of x-ray controls during frame treatment were: 9 (+-4). Out of 90 tibial lengthening it was only possible to measure pixel value in all six areas of interest on 20 lengthening prior to frame removal. Major reasons for inability to obtain measurements were metal hardware crossing the areas of bone interest on x-rays. The mean (95 % confidence intervals) pixel ratios values were: 1) lateral: 0.96 (0.93–1.00); 2) medial: 0.95 (0.92–0.99); 3) anterior: 0.94 (0.90–0.97); 4) posterior: 0.96 (0.93–0.99). The mean (95 % confidence intervals) inter ratter ICC estimates were: 1) lateral: 0.8 (0.5–0.9); 2) medial: 0.8 (0.4–0.9); 3) anterior: 0.4 (−0.5–0.8); 4) posterior: 0.6 (0.1–0.9). The mean (95 % confidence intervals) intra ratter ICC estimates were: 1) lateral: 1.0 (0.9–1.0); 2) medial: 1.0 (1.0–1.0); 3) anterior: 0.9 (0.9–1.0); 4) posterior: 1.0 (1.0–1.0). Out of the 20 lengthening examined one fracture occurred in the bone regenerate after frame removal. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether the pixel value ratio can be used as an indicator for frame removal

Summary Statement. The tensile properties of a number of synthetic fibre constructs and porcine MCLs were experimentally determined and compared to allow the selection of an appropriate synthetic collateral ligament model for use in a kinematic knee simulator. Introduction. As patient expectations regarding functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty rise the need to assess the kinematics of new implants in vitro has increased. This has traditionally been done using cadaveric models, which can demonstrate high physiological relevance but also substantial inter-specimen variability. More recently there has been a shift towards the use of in silico and non-cadaveric methods. Such methods require significant simplifications of the joint and the modelling of soft tissue structures such as the collateral ligaments. Collateral ligaments are often modelled in in silico studies but have not, in the published literature, been modelled in in vitro knee kinematic simulators. Tensile testing of ligament tissue, to provide reference data, and the subsequent analysis of potential synthetic analogues was carried out. The overall aim of the study was to develop a synthetic ligament analogue for use in kinematic knee simulators. Methods. Porcine MCLs were chosen as these are of a similar size and are a readily available alternative to human ligaments. Six porcine knee specimens were sourced and the MCLs dissected by an orthopaedic registrar. Testing was carried out on an Instron MTS fitted with a 5kN load cell. Each specimen was subjected to 5 pre-conditioning loading cycles before cross-sectional and length measurements were made. Each specimen was then cyclically loaded from 0–200N for 30 cycles before being loaded to failure at a rate of 100mm/min. Ten potential synthetic analogues were also assessed using the same procedure: the Lars 80 (Corin Ltd) synthetic ligament reconstruction system and a selection of readily available synthetic constructs. Results. The porcine specimens demonstrated 6% ± 1% strain (mean ± standard error) after 30 cycles of loading, and a tensile stiffness of 100 N/mm ± 8.9 N/mm. The results of the load to failure tests also indicated a substantial toe region and highlighted the substantial variability associated with cadaveric specimens. The Lars system demonstrated a tensile stiffness of nearly 9 times that of the porcine specimens. However, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U analyses indicated that three of the synthetic samples did not have statistically significantly different tensile stiffness values compared to the porcine specimens (p < 0.05). Of these samples, the polyester braided cord demonstrated the longest and most physiologically relevant toe region. All of the polyester load-displacement traces fell within the range demonstrated by the porcine specimens. Discussion/Conclusion. The tensile properties of the porcine specimens analysed were similar to those reported in in the literature for human ligaments1. Porcine MCLs are thus a fair model of human collateral ligaments and were a suitable reference material for the selection of a synthetic analogue. The tensile testing carried out in the present study indicated that commercially available synthetic ligaments are over engineered in terms of strength and inappropriate for use in kinematic analysis. However, a polyester braided cord did demonstrate appropriate basic mechanical properties and would be appropriate as an analogue model on kinematic knee rigs