Aim. To classify Fracture-related Infection (FRI) allowing comparison of clinical studies and to guide decision-making around the main surgical treatment concepts. Method. An international group of FRI experts met in Lisbon, June 2022 and proposed a new FRI classification. A core group met during the EBJIS Meeting in Graz, 2022 and on-line, to determine the preconditions, purpose, primary factors for inclusion, format and the detailed description of the elements of an FRI Classification. Results. Historically, FRI was classified by time from injury alone (early, delayed or late). Time produces pathophysiological changes which affect the bone, the soft-tissues and the patient general health, over a continuum. No definitive cut-off is therefore possible. Also, in several studies, time was not identified as an independent predictor of outcome. The most important primary factors were characteristics of the fracture (F), relevant systemic co-morbidities of the patient (R) and impairment of the soft-tissue envelope (I). These factors determine FRI severity, choice of treatment method and are predictors of outcome. For the fracture (F), the state of healing, the potential for bone healing and the presence or absence of a bone defect are critical factors. Co-morbidities are listed and the degree of end-organ damage is important (R). The ability to close the wound directly or the need for soft tissue reconstruction determines the impairment of the soft tissue component (I). Hence the FRI Classification was designed. The final proposal of the FRI Classification is presented here. The new classification has five stages; from simple cases of infected healed fractures, in healthy individuals with good soft tissues (Stage 1), through unhealed fractures with variable potential for bone healing (Stages 2, 3 or 4) to Stage 5, with no limb-sparing or reconstructive options. For instance, the need for a free flap (I4), over a well-healed fracture (F1), in a patient with 2 co-morbidities (R2) gives a classification of F1R2I4 for that patient. Conclusions. This novel approach to FRI classification builds on previous work in osteomyelitis, PJI and chronic medical conditions. It focusses attention on the elements of the disease which need treatment. It now requires validation in large patient cohorts. On behalf of the FRI Classification Consensus Group

There is limited literature on the effects of socioeconomic factors on outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In the setting of hip or knee arthroplasty, patients of a lower socioeconomic status demonstrate poorer post-operative satisfaction, longer lengths of stay, and larger functional limitations. It is important to ascertain whether this phenomenon is present in ankle arthritis patients. This is the first study to address the weight of potential socioeconomic factors in affecting various socioeconomic classes, in terms of how they benefit from ankle arthroplasty. This is retrospective cohort study of 447 patients who underwent a TAA. Primary outcomes included pre-operative and final follow-up AAOS pain, AAOS disability, and SF-36 scores. We then used postal codes to determine median household income using Canadian 2015 census data. Incomes were divided into five groups based on equal amounts over the range of incomes. This method has been used to study medical conditions such as COPD and cardiac disease. These income groups were then compared for differences in outcome measures. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test. A total of 447 patients were divided into quintiles by income. From lowest income to highest income, the groups had 54, 207, 86, 64, and 36 patients, respectively. The average time from surgery to final follow up was 85.6 months. Interestingly, we found that patients within the middle household income groups had significantly lower AAOS disability scores compared to the lowest income groups at final follow-up (26.41 vs 35.70, p=0.035). Furthermore, there was a trend towards middle income households and lower post-operative AAOS pain scores compared to the lowest income group (19.57 vs 26.65, p=0.063). There was also a trend toward poorer AAOS disability scores when comparing middle income groups to high income groups post-operatively (26.41 vs 32.27, p=0.058). Pre-operatively, patients within the middle-income group had more pain, compared to the lowest and the highest income groups. No significant differences in SF-36 scores were observed. There were no significant differences seen in middle income groups compared to the highest income group for AAOS pain post-operatively. There were no significant differences found in pre-operative AAOS disability score between income groups. Patients from middle income groups who have undergone TAA demonstrate poorer function and possibly more pain, compared to lower and higher income groups. This suggests that TAA is a viable option for lower socioeconomic groups and should not be a source of discouragement for surgeons. In this circumstance there is no real disparity between the rich and the poor. Further investigation is needed to explore reasons for diminished performance in middle class patients

Aim. Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) that requires early and effective therapy. This study aims to investigate the epidemiology, associated risk factors, and outcome of sepsis in the context of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Method. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients treated for PJI from 2017 to 2020. Patients were classified based on the criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society. The presence of sepsis was determined using the SOFA score and SIRS criteria. The cohort with PJI and sepsis (sepsis) was compared to patients with PJI without sepsis (non-sepsis). Risk factors considered were patient characteristics, affected joints, surgical therapy, microbiological findings, preexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, and symptom duration. Outcome parameters were mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results. A total of 109 patients with PJI were identified, of whom 45 patients (41.3%) met the criteria for sepsis. Patients with sepsis had more severe preexisting diseases compared with the non-sepsis cohort (Charlson Comorbidity Index 3.8 vs. 2.8; p≤0.001). An increased odds ratio (OR) for a septic course was found for the comorbidities pneumonia (8.2; p=0.001), myocardial infarction (2.0; p=0.02), atrial fibrillation (3.3; p=0.01), diabetes mellitus (1.2; p=0.04), endocarditis (5.5; p=0.01), and renal disease (2.0; p≤0.001). Infection with Staphylococcus aureus (sepsis 20 vs. non-sepsis 10; p=0.002), Streptococcus dysgalactiae (sepsis 7 vs. non-sepsis 2; p=0.002) and Candida albicans (sepsis 5 vs. non-sepsis 0; p=0.01) were more prevalent in patients with sepsis. In the sepsis cohort, further infectious foci were present in addition to PJI in 57.8% of patients, compared to 18.8% in the non-sepsis cohort. The presence of sepsis was associated with a longer hospital stay (sepsis 68 days vs. non-sepsis 38 days; p=0.001) and longer intensive care unit stay (sepsis 12 days vs. non-sepsis 2 days; p=0.001). In-hospital mortality was ten times higher in the sepsis cohort compared to non-septic patients (sepsis 11/42 vs. non-sepsis 2/64; OR 10.3; p=0.01). Conclusions. In a relevant proportion of patients, PJI can lead to a septic course of disease associated with increased mortality. Particularly in patients with preexisting diseases, increased attention is required, and comprehensive screening for other foci of infection seems mandatory. In addition to highly virulent pathogens such as staphylococci and streptococci, fungal infections should be considered as causative pathogens in septic patients with PJI

Introduction. Open fractures are fortunately rare but pose an even greater challenge due to poor soft tissues, in addition to poor bone quality. Co-morbidities and pre-existing medical conditions, in particular, peripheral vascular diseases make them often unsuitable for free flaps. We present our experience in treating severe open fractures of tibia with Acute Intentional Deformation (AID) to close the soft tissues followed by gradual correction of deformity to achieve anatomical alignment of the tibia and fracture healing with Taylor Spatial Frame. Materials and Methods. We treated 4 geriatric (3 female and 1 male) patients with Gustillo-Anderson III B fractures of the tibia between 2017–18. All were unfit to undergo orthoplastic procedures (free flap or local flaps). The age range is 69 yrs to 92 years. Co-morbidities included severe rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and heart failure. The procedure involved wound debridement, application of two ring Taylor Spatial Frame, acute deformation of the limb on the table to achieve soft-tissue closure/approximation. Regular neurovascular assessments were performed in the immediate post-operative period to monitor for compartment syndrome and nerve compression symptoms. After 7–10 days of latent period, the frame was gradually manipulated, according to a method we had previously published, to achieve anatomical alignment. The frame was removed in clinic after fracture healing. Results. Time in frame ranged from 1.5 months to 7 months. In one patient (92 yr old with an open fracture of the ankle) hindfoot nail was inserted after soft-tissue closure was achieved at 1.5 months, and frame removed. We achieved complete healing of soft tissue wounds without any input from plastic surgeons in all patients. All fractures healed in anatomical alignment. 3 patients had one episode of superficial pin infection each requiring 5 days of oral antibiotics. None of the patients developed a deep infection. Conclusions. Acute intentional deformation (AID) with Taylor Spatial Frame achieves good closure of soft tissues in physiologically compromised geriatric patients who were deemed unfit for plastic surgery. We also achieved fracture healing in all four cases without any major complications

Osteogenic augmentation is required in various orthopaedic conditions. Autograft is the gold standard but has limitations of increased morbidity and limited amount. Bone graft substitutes are costly and limited and don't integrate with host bone. Deep freezed allografts are a viable option, though not widely used in India and there are sparse reports in literature. This paper studies early efficacy of deep freezed bone allografts in treatment of fractures requiring bone graft. This is a prospective descriptive study. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria as per standard guidelines were followed. We have a in-house facility of gamma irradiated deep freezed allografts available in hospital. 20 patients with comminuted fracture, delayed / malunion / nonunion, depressed intra articular fractures were operated during one year and followed up for at least 24 weeks. Sloof's Criteria was used for assessing osteointegration of grafts. Efficacy was authenticated by observing complications like serous discharge from surgical site, infection (superficial/deep), rejection of graft, clinical and radiological integration of graft, maintenance of articular reduction etc. Allografts have not only accepted well but fractures have healed and bone integration is at various stages. Only one patients got infected (5%). The overall success rate in terms of adequate osteointegration is 95 %. 19 out of 20 patients in our study group had either attained or at various stages of osteointegration and healing. We concluded that deep freezed bone allografts is a viable option in patients with fractures requiring bone grafts, thus give satisfactory surgical outcome, with no serious side effects

Aim. This study aims to describe our department experience with single stage revision (SSR) for chronic prosthetic-joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2005 and 2014 and to analyze success rates and morbidity results of patients submitted to SSR for infected THA according to pathogen. Method. We retrospectively reviewed our 10 years of results (2005–2014) of patients submitted to SSR of the hip combined with IV and oral antibiotic therapy for treatment of chronic PJI (at least 4 weeks of symptoms), with a minimum follow-up of four years (n=26). Patients were characterized for demographic data, comorbidities, identified germ and antibiotic therapy applied (empiric and/or targeted). Outcomes analyzed were re-intervention rate (infection-related or aseptic), success rate (clinical and laboratory assessment), length of stay, morbidity and mortality outcomes. Results. In this period, 26 single-stage revisions for chronic PJI of the hip were performed. Patients average age was 72 years (range 44–82). Ten patients were women. The average time of follow up was 69 months (range 4 to 12 years). The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (30%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (18%) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (15%). It wasn't possible to identify the germ in 19% of the patients and other 23% were polymicrobial. Targeted antibiotic therapy was administered to 73% of patients and the most used targeted antibiotics were Vancomycin (53%), Linezolid (32%) and Rifampicin (21%). Mean length of stay was 25 days. In the follow-up period, 9 patients (35%) required a re-intervention for infection relapse. Two patients (8%) needed surgery because of persistent instability. During the follow-up period, the infection-free survival was 65% (33% for MRSA; 82% for coagulase-negative Staphylococci) and the surgery-free survival was 62%. Six patients (23%) died during the follow-up, all due to other medical conditions not related to hip infection. Conclusions. Our experience suggests that SSR is associated with good outcomes and low re-intervention rate, except in the case of infection due to MRSA. In this last group, the results were significantly poorer, what leads to suggest that a two-stage revision may be a better option. The potential advantages of a SSR include good rates of infection eradication, a decrease in surgical morbidity and mortality as well as a decrease in healthcare and global economic costs. As such, a one-stage aggressive surgical attitude in addition to targeted antibiotherapy seems to be a suitable solution in selected patients

Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication. . In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted the importance of informing and educating clinicians. Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:434–41

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide and it is largely successful in pain relief and functional recovery. However, when pain persists post-operatively the thorough evaluation must be instituted. Extra-articular causes of knee pain include; hip pathology, lumbar spine degenerative disease or radicular symptoms, focal neuropathy, vascular disease, and chronic regional pain syndrome. Intra-articular causes of knee pain: infection, crepitation/clunk, patella osteonecrosis, patella mal-tracking, soft tissue imbalance, malalignment, arthrofibrosis, component loosening, implant wear, ilio-tibial band irritation, and bursitis. Other causes of pain to rule out are component overhang with soft tissue irritation, recurrent hemarthrosis secondary to synovial impingement or entrapment, non-resurfaced patella, and metal sensitivity. A careful history may reveal previous knee surgeries with delayed healing or prolonged drainage, chronology of sign and symptoms, co-morbid medical conditions, jewel or metal sensitivity. Physical exam should help with specific signs in the operated knee. Targeted local anesthetic blocks are helpful and response to lumbar sympathetic blocks determines presence of CRPS. Lab tests are important: ESR, CRP, WBC, aspiration with manual cell count and diff, leucocyte esterase dipstick, RA titers, metal derm patch testing, nuclear scans, CT best for rotational malalignment, and MARS MRI. More recently patient satisfaction as an outcome measure has shown TKA results not satisfactory in 11- 18% of patients. A discordance of patient vs. surgeon satisfaction exists so the following factors may help improve this: correct patient selection, establishing and correlating surgeon-patient expectations, peri-operative optimization of patient co-morbidities to help avoid preventable complications, use of pre-operative and post-operative pathways. Satisfaction rates can best be improved by addressing the previous points with patients prior to TKA surgery

INTRODUCTION. Gross deformity such as severe flexion contraction or severe varus deformity in both knees is better corrected simultaneously to prevent recurrence of flexion contracture and also to have equal leg length which facilitate proper physiotherapy post operatively. However, there is great reluctance in many institute to perform Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement (SBTKR) fearing higher complication rate. The purpose of this paper is to show that SBTKR is economical, safe and sometimes is necessary in gross deformity such as bilateral flexion contracture. In this paper we will review the most recent literature about SBTKR which support our argument. Also we will review our cases of over 7500 of SBTKR done at our institution. In this study we will focus on the process that we went through at our institution to upgrade our medical care to enable to do this SBTKR safely. We will share also our post-operative protocol and some hint on the administrative level in order to perform SBTKR. METHODS. In the last 20 years we performed over 7500 SBTKR, 15,000 implants. We have established at our institution a pre-operative team where this team included internist, physiotherapist, anesthesiologist and other medical sub specialty as recommended by the internist. The patient was pre-oped carefully and the extent of medical examination was determined by the internist and the anesthesiologist. Each patient care was determined preoperatively and also we have utilized special complexity scale that we have developed at our institution to reflect the complexity of the primary total knee replacement 1–5. The ASA and complexity scale is now routinely printed on our OR schedule. If the patient was cleared, SBTKR were carried on. The surgery is done first for the right side and after cementing the assistant will start the left side while the senior surgeon will clean the knee and then assist in the second knee. We have tried different modalities and the safest, less confusing was to first finish the first knee and after cementing the other limb was started by the assistant. The surgeon had only two assistants and one scrub nurse. Increasing the no. of assistant will make things more confusing. So we strongly recommend having only one senior surgeon. Post-operative care was almost identical to that of a single total knee replacement. We documented the complication rate, blood transfusion and unexpected ICU admission etc. in the SBTKR and we compared it to over 1000 cases of single knee replacement done at our institution by the same surgeon. The knee score was also was documented on both sides. RESULTS. Blood transfusion as much higher in SBTKR and in spite of using many methods to decrease blood loss we continued to have transfusion rate of 52%. We have established a Task Force that usually meets every two weeks in order to improve the medical conditions. Infection rate was the same in the single and SBTKR. Of interest of the fact that the no. of unexpected ICU admission dropped significantly in the second year- which could be related more to the cooperation and collaboration between the medical team. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. SBTKR is safe as single knee replacement. It is needed in gross deformity and in non-ambulating patient. Getting the institution ready for such a procedure has to be organized through special Task Force and requires extensive collaboration among different part of the hospital dept. We strongly recommend doing SBTKR especially in patients who has a gross deformity and in non-ambulating patient

TKA is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide and it is largely successful in pain relief and functional recovery. However, when pain persists post-operatively the thorough evaluation must be instituted. Extra-articular causes of knee pain include; hip pathology, lumbar spine degenerative disease or radicular symptoms, focal neuropathy, vascular disease, and chronic regional pain syndrome. Intra-articular causes of knee pain: infection, crepitation/ clunk, patella osteonecrosis, patella mal-tracking, soft tissue imbalance, malalignment, arthrofibrosis, component loosening, implant wear, ilio-tibial band irritation, and bursitis. Other causes of pain to rule out are component overhang with soft tissue irritation, recurrent hemarthrosis secondary to synovial impingement or entrapment, non-resurfaced patella, and metal sensitivity. A careful history may reveal previous knee surgeries with delayed healing or prolonged drainage, chronology of sign and symptoms, co-morbid medical conditions, jewel or metal sensitivity. Physical exam should help with specific signs in the operated knee. Targeted local anesthetic blocks are helpful and response to lumbar sympathetic blocks determines presence of CRPS. Lab tests are important: ESR, CRP, WBC, aspiration with manual cell count and diff, leukocyte esterase dipstick, RA titers, metal derm patch testing, nuclear scans, CT best for rotational malalignment,, and MARS MRI. More recently patient satisfaction as an outcome measure has shown TKA results not satisfactory in 11 – 18% of patients. A discordance of patient vs. surgeon satisfaction exists so the following factors may help improve this: correct patient selection, establishing and correlating surgeon-patient expectations, peri-operative optimisation of patient comorbidities to help avoid preventable complications, use of pre- and post-operative pathways. Satisfaction rates can best be improved by addressing the previous points with patients prior to TKA surgery

Down syndrome (DS), is a genetic disorder caused by a third copy of the 21st chromosome (Trisomy 21), featuring typical facial characteristics, growth delays and varying degrees of intellectual disability. Some degree of immune deficiency is variably present. Multiple orthopaedic conditions are associated, including stunted growth (90%), ligamentous laxity (90%), low muscle tone (80%), hand and foot deformities (60%), hip instability (30%), and spinal abnormalities including atlanto-axial instability (20%) and scoliosis. Hip disease severity varies and follows a variable time course. Rarely a child presents with DDH, but during the first 2 years the hips are characteristically stable but hypermobile with well-formed acetabulae. Spontaneous subluxation or dislocation after 2 presents with painless clicking, limping or giving way. Acute dislocation is associated with moderate pain, increased limp and reduced activity following minor trauma. Hips are reducible under anesthesia, but recurrence is common. Eventually concentric reduction becomes rarer and radiographic dysplasia develops. Pathology includes: a thin, weak fibrous capsule, moderate to severe femoral neck anteversion and a posterior superior acetabular rim deficiency. A number of femoral and acetabular osteotomies have been reported to treat the dysplasia, with acetabular redirection appearing to be most successful. However, surgery can be associated with a relatively high infection rate (20%). Additionally, symptomatic femoral head avascular necrosis can occur as a result of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Untreated dysplasia patients can walk with a limp and little pain into the early twenties even with fixed dislocation. Pain and decreasing hip function is commonly seen as the patient enters adult life. Occasionally the hip instability begins after skeletal maturity. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the standard treatment when sufficient symptoms have developed. The clinical outcomes of 42 THAs in patients with Down syndrome were all successfully treated with standard components. The use of constrained liners to treat intra-operative instability occurred in eight hips and survival rates were noted between 81% and 100% at a mean follow-up of 105 months (6 – 292 months). A more recent study of 241 patients with Down syndrome and a matched 723-patient cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample compared the incidence of peri-operative medical and surgical complications in those who underwent THA. Compared to matched controls, Down syndrome patients had an increased risk of complications: peri-operative (OR, 4.33; P<.001), medical (UTI & Pneumonia OR, 4.59; P<.001) and surgical (bleeding OR, 3.51; P<.001), Mean LOS was 26% longer (P<.001). While these patients can be challenging to treat, excellent surgical technique and selective use of acetabular constraint can reliably provide patients with excellent pain-relief and improved function. Pre-operative education of all clinical decision makers should also reinforce the increased risk of medical and surgical complications (wound hemorrhage), and lengths of stay compared to the general population

Obesity and the diseases linked to it such as diabetes have been associated with higher complication rates and increased medical costs following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to the rising prevalence of obesity and the adverse impact it has on the development of osteoarthritis, there has been a worldwide surge in the number of obese patients presenting for THA procedures, including those morbidly obese (BMI > 40) and those who are super-obese (BMI > 50). The Reward. When THA is successful (as is true for the majority of morbidly obese patients) the operation is just as dramatically effective as it is for other patients. Excellent pain relief and dramatically improved function is the result, even though obese patients generally achieve a lower overall level of function than non-obese patients. Morbidly obese patients with a successful THA and without early complications are some of the most grateful of patients. This is especially true if they have been denied surgery for prolonged periods due to their weight and have had to bear severe joint changes and symptoms during a long period of time leading up to arthroplasty. The Risks. There is a nonlinear increase in complications, reoperations, and especially infection with increasing BMI that begins between a BMI of 25 to 30, and rises thereafter with a relative inflection point in some incidence curves for complications at around a BMI of 40. This has caused some surgeons to suggest a BMI of 40 as an upper limit for elective hip arthroplasty. Risks continue to rise after a BMI of 40 and when the BMI is over 50, in our series 52% of patients had at least one complication. Of these 24% had at least one major complication and 33% at least one minor complication with some suffering more than one complication overall. These data make it reasonable to ask whether the outcomes in some morbidly obese patients might be improved by weight loss, bariatric surgical intervention and other measures aimed at optimizing the multiple companion comorbidities and medical conditions (such as diabetes) that often accompany excess weight. Unfortunately there has been limited information to date on the best means for optimizing of these patients, and as important the effectiveness of these interventions, so that the timing and performance of the eventual arthroplasty procedures might have the highest possible success rate. The Costs. The adverse impact of obesity on medical resource utilization and costs associated with THA has been well documented, Due to longer initial length of stay, greater resource utilization, higher early complication rates and any readmissions and reoperations the costs for even a single individual patient can climb dramatically. In a review of data on primary THA patients from our institution, even after adjusting for age, sex, type of surgery, and other comorbidities, for every 5 unit increase in BMI beyond 30 kg/m2 there was an associated $500 higher cost of hospitalization and an increase of $900 in 90-day total costs (p=0.0001). The Future. The numbers of morbidly obese patients with severe osteoarthritis presenting for possible THA will only continue to increase in the years ahead. Comprehensive multidisciplinary programs are urgently needed to better manage obese patients with weight reduction options, optimization of medical comorbidities, and treatment of any associated issues, such as protein malnutrition. When end-stage joint changes and symptoms occur we must have such help to maximise the benefit and reduce the complications of hip arthroplasty in this high risk patient population

Background. Instability and dislocation are some of the most important postoperative complications and potential causes of failure that dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (THA) systems continue to address. Studies have shown that increasing the relative head size provides patients implanted with smaller and larger cups increased stability, greater ROM and a lesser incidence of impingement, without compromising clinical results. The purpose of the current study was to review clinical outcomes in three groups of primary THA patients receiving a dual mobility acetabular shell. Methods. In two US based, post-market, multicenter studies, 450 patients received a primary cementless dual mobility THA. Patients were split into three groups based on cup size: ≤ 50mm, 52mm–56mm, and ≥ 58mm. Harris Hip Scores (HHS), Short Form 12 Physical Components (SF12 PCS), Lower Extremity Activity Scores (LEAS), and Euroqol 5D Score (EQ-5Ds) were collected preoperatively and through 2 years postoperative. Results. The current study displays gender differences among the three groups, with 90% female patients in the ≤ 50mm group, 66% male patients in the 52mm–56mm group and 100% males in the largest cup size group. A posterior/posterolateral approach was used in 94% of cases. The mean age range among the 3 groups was 60.5–61.7 and the two most common concurrent medical conditions were cardiovascular and musculoskeletal. There were no differences observed in clinical outcomes among any of the groups, all of which displayed significant increasing trends through 2 years postoperative (Figure 1). The HHS increased significantly from an average preoperative score of 54.5 to 92.9 and 93.7 at 1 and 2 years. Clinically significant improvements were seen at 2 years in SF12 PCS (+16.5) and the LEAS (+2.4) (Figures 1 and 3). The EQ-5D TTO increased from 0.62 preoperative to 0.91 at 2 years postoperative (Figure 2). There have been no failures due to dislocation reported in the current study population. Conclusion. Positive clinical outcomes for primary THA patients receiving a dual mobility system were seen in the current study, supporting their effectiveness. Regardless of the relative head size, all patients showed significant improvements postoperative with continued stability. As the primary risk factors for instability can include gender, age and increased comorbidities, the contemporary dual mobility system used in this study can address each patient's anatomic differences, improving quality of life and reducing the risk for dislocation, as well as the significant cost implications

When is revision surgery contraindicated in the face of a failed total hip? Surgically indicated can be interpreted as a situation where the patient will benefit from a specific intervention, with sufficient likelihood, to warrant the risks of intervention. Contraindication connotes the opposite; the risks, or likelihood of the intervention's failure to achieve the desired results outweigh the expected extent and likelihood of benefit. Contraindicated actually represents the end point of a complex decision making process which must be carried out by the practitioner in conjunction with the patient and may require the full range of the surgeons analytical, technical and communication skills. Most commonly the term means that the surgeon's thinking has led to a belief that the patient will be better off without further surgery. Deciding to forego another revision usually means leaving the patient with a resection arthroplasty. Relative indications for resection, or even avoiding revision of a failed arthroplasty, are most commonly biological. In a healthy host, with a sterile but anatomically deficient bed with adequate soft tissue coverage, mechanical reconstruction capabilities and massive bulk allograft may allow reconstruction of almost any amount of tissue loss. Severe osteomyelitis or soft tissue infection, unmanageable for reasons, including but not limited to: chronic immune-suppression, mixed or resistant organisms or a life threatening sensitivity to antibiotics which may be required to treat the sepsis. More subjective factors, such as adequacy of soft tissue and bone stock, comorbid medical conditions or a patient's desire to avoid additional surgery as well as costs must be considered. This decision may include dozens of other considerations, some of which may be considered pre-operatively and some which may only arise intra-operatively

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Only a few studies have investigated PJI's impact on the most worrisome of all endpoints, mortality. The purpose of this study was to perform a large-scale study to determine the rates of PJI associated in-hospital mortality, and compare it to other surgical procedures. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002 to 2010 to assess the risk of mortality for patients undergoing revision for PJI or aseptic failures. Elixhauser comorbidity index and ICD-9 codes were used to obtain patients’ medical conditions and identify PJI. Multiple logistic-regression analyses were used to determine the associated variables with mortality. In-hospital mortality was compared to the followings: coronary-artery bypass graft, mastectomy, prostatectomy, appendectomy, kidney transplant, carotid surgery, cholecystectomy, and coronary interventional procedures. PJI was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio 2.04) of in-hospital mortality (0.77%) compared to aseptic revisions (0.38%). The in-hospital mortality of revision THAs done for PJI (1.38%, 95%CI, 1.12–1.64%) was comparable to or higher than interventional coronary procedure (1.22%, 95%CI, 1.20–1.24%), cholecystectomy (1.13%, 95%CI, 1.11–1.15%), kidney transplantation (0.70%, 95%CI, 0.61%–0.79%) and carotid surgery (0.89%, 95%CI, 0.86%–0.93%) (Figure 1). The following comorbidities were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality after TJA: liver disease, metastatic disease, fluid and electrolyte disorders, coagulopathy, weight loss and malnutrition, congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disorder, renal failure, and peripheral vascular disease. PJI is associated with a two-fold increase in mortality and have mortality rates comparable to kidney transplantation and carotid surgery. Considering the fact that patients with PJI often require multiple surgical procedures, the rate of actual in-hospital mortality for patients with PJI may be considerably higher. Surgeons should be cognizant of the potentially fatal outcome of PJI and must emphasize the importance of infection control to reduce the risk of mortality

Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis remains one of the most important strategies for preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Current guidelines recommend giving universal antibiotic prophylaxis to all total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients regardless of their medical conditions or immune status. The aims of this study were to determine if comorbidities influence the organism profile of PJIs and to investigate if the efficacy of the two most frequently used perioperative antibiotics (cefazolin or vancomycin) are affected by patient comorbidities. Using an institutional database, the influence of comorbidities on the organism profile of 1022 PJIs was evaluated. To investigate the influence of perioperative antibiotic monotherapy (cefazolin or vancomycin therapy) on PJI, 8575 primary TJAs were identified and analyzed based on their comorbidities. Patients with multiple perioperative antibiotics, prior septic arthritis, unavailable perioperative antibiotic information, or who underwent aseptic revision were excluded. PJI was determined from ICD-9 codes. While no comorbidities were associated with an increased rate of gram-positive or gram-negative infections, metastatic disease (odds ratio [OR] 7.54, p=0.006), rheumatologic disease (OR 1.63, p=0.046), and chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.46, p=0.030) demonstrated an increased risk of Staphylococcus aureus PJI. In addition, metastatic disease (OR 5.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–26.93, p=0.018), congestive heart failure (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.16–4.00, p=0.010), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.09–2.78, p=0.015), and diabetes (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.08–2.52, p=0.019) were associated with PJI from antibiotic resistant organisms. However, there was no difference in the rate of PJI between cefazolin and vancomycin monotherapy when stratified for the aforementioned comorbidities. The present study reveals that comorbidities do not significantly alter the organism profile of high-risk comorbidities and that comorbidities associated with immune deficits do not influence the rate of PJI between two different antibiotics. The results of this study thus support current guidelines, which provide a universal recommendation rather than a protocol that is tailored to a patient's preexisting comorbidities

Some DEFINITIONS are necessary: “STEMS” refers to “intramedullary stem extensions”, which may be of a variety of lengths and diameters, fixed with cement, porous coating or press fit alone and which may be modular or an inherent part of the prosthesis. The standard extension keel on the tibia does not qualify as a “stem (extension)”. COMPLEX implies multiple variables acting on the end result of the arthroplasty with the capability of inducing failure, as well as necessary variations to the standard surgical technique. A lesser degree of predictability is implied. More specifically, the elements usually found in an arthritic knee and used for the arthroplasty are missing, so that cases of COMPLEX primary TKA include: Soft tissue coverage-(not relevant here), Extensor mechanism deficiency-patellectomy, Severe deformity, Extra-articular deformity, Instability: Varus valgus, Instability: Plane of motion, Instability: Old PCL rupture, Dislocated patella, Stiffness, Medical conditions: Neuromuscular disorder, Ipsilateral arthroplasty, Prior incisions, Fixation hardware, Osteopenia, Ipsilateral hip arthrodesis, Ipsilateral below knee amputation, etc. Complexity includes MORE than large deformity, i.e., success with large deformity does NOT mean success with constrained implants regardless of indication. In addition, the degree of constraint must be specified to be meaningful. NECESSARY presumably this means: “necessary to ensure durable fixation in the face of poor bone quality or more mechanically constrained” and SUFFICIENT suggests that stems, by themselves or in some shape of form, by themselves “will ensure success (specifically here) of fixation”. If we can start with the second proposal, that STEMS are SUFFICIENT for success the answer is: “NO”, many more aspects of surgical technique and implant design are required. Even if all other aspects of the technique are exemplary, some types of stems or techniques are inadequate, e.g., completely uncemented, short stem extensions. The answer to the first proposal is: “YES, in many cases”. The problem will be to determine which cases. There are philosophical analogies to this question that we already know the answer to. ANALOGY: Is a life-raft necessary on a boat? Yes, you may not use it, but it is considered necessary. Is a life-raft “sufficient” on a boat? No, other problems may occur. Are seat belts necessary? Are child seats necessary? The AAOS already has a position on child restraints, an analogous situation, where a party who cannot control their situation (anesthetised patient/ child) functions in the care of a responsible party. The objection may be argued in terms of cost saving by NOT using increased fixation. A useful analogy, (that would of course require specific analysis), is that of patellar resurfacing: universal resurfacing is cost-effective when considering the expense of even a small number of secondary resurfacings. Of course a complex arthroplasty that requires a revision procedure is far more expensive than secondary patellar resurfacing and so universal use of the enhanced fixation in the face of increased constraint makes sense. The human cost of revision surgery tips the balance irrefutably. DANGER-We must avoid the glib conclusion, often based on poor quality data, that constrained implants do not need additional intramedullary fixation (with stem extensions). When “complexity” is involved, complex analysis is appropriate to select the best course

Introduction. Various implant designs and bearing surfaces are used in TKR. The use of All Poly Tibia and poly moulded on Tibial metal base plate has been in practice since long. Recently due to the reports on wear and osteolysis in modular articulations, these components have generated significant interest. Aim. To report early medium term results in elderly (>70 years) patients. Method. Study of 130 cases done between 2005–2009. All cases were performed by the author. Inclusion Criteria:. Patients with physiological age > 70 years. Patients with low functional demand. Good bone quality. Exclusion Criteria: Inflammatory arthropathy. Osteoporosis and poor bone quality. High functional demand. All Poly Tibial component/ Moulded Metal back Tibia implantations were performed. A PS design was used in all cases fixed with CMW 1 gentamicin cement. Results. 12 cases were lost to follow up. 11 patients deceased due to medical conditions. This left us with 107 cases at the time of the last follow up. Mean age at index surgery was 72.5 years.(70–91 years). Preop KSS average was 42 (25–62). Post operative at the latest Follow up was 89 (68–97). Of 107 cases there were 4 revisions - two for deep sepsis and two for periprosthetic fractures. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening or osteolysis. All 103 cases are performing well functionally and clinically. 19 cases have a nonprogressive radiolucent line beneath the Tibial component. Discussion. Use of Monobloc Tibia is somewhat controversial. The first Total condylar Knee was an all poly design in early 70s. 1. The monobloc tibia eliminates backside wear. The overall thickness of polyethylene in this implant is 2 to 4mm thicker in allpoly tibia design. The metal base plate with compression moulded polyethylene dissipates stresses evenly in osteopaenic bones. The polywear and osteolysis are two most important factors for aseptic loosening. If Symptomatic, loosening warrants a revision surgery. Metal back fixed bearing implant has a disadvantage that it wears from both the surfaces. The highly polished trays are supposed to reduce the wear but it is too early for a statistically significant conclusion. Functionally low demand patients have lesser stresses as compared to their counterparts. The surgical technique for insertion of these implants is slightly demanding as compared to modular implants. The combination of perfect alignment and soft tissue balance creates an environment for a successful TKR. The choice of Monobloc Tibial component for functionally low demand age group patients reduce the chances of premature wear and osteolysis. In elderly patients the implant should outlive the patient. Here it is observed that at early medium term (5 to 9 yr.s) aseptic loosening and subsequent revision chances are low. The Monobloc Tibial component is cheaper as compared to its metal back counterpart. Conclusion. An excellent clinical result in our hands for this group of patients supports the continued use of this implant strongly

Background. Vitamin D deficiency may increase predisposition to a number of paediatric orthopaedic conditions and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is increasing in children in developed countries. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiology of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in children presenting to a regional paediatric orthopaedic service. We also examined the relationships between vitamin D status, social deprivation and ethnicity. Methods. Individuals, age < 18 years, presenting to the regional paediatric orthopaedic service at Southampton, UK from 2008 to 2010 were investigated. Deprivation index scores were calculated from indices of deprivation. Results. 187 children (97 male, 90 female, mean age 7.1 years) underwent serum 25-(OH) D level measurement. 82% were white British and 11% of Asian ethnicity. The calculation of the total depravation index for the whole cohort showed 34 (18%) of subjects were in quartile 1 (least deprived), 54 (29%) in quartile 2, 49 (26%) in quartile 3 and 50 (27%) in quartile 4 (Most deprived). 60 (32%) had vitamin D insufficiency with 25-(OH) levels < 50nmol/l and 15 (8%) had vitamin D deficiency. No relation ship was identified between vitamin D level and social depravation score. Conclusions. There is a need for awareness of the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the paediatric orthopaedic population presenting with bone pain and lower limb deformity before commencing ‘observation or orthopaedic surgical treatment’

Aims

The timing of when to remove a circular frame is crucial; early removal results in refracture or deformity, while late removal increases the patient morbidity and delay in return to work. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of a staged reloading protocol. We report the incidence of mechanical failure following both single-stage and two stage reloading protocols and analyze the associated risk factors.