The critical relationship between airborne microbiological contamination in an operating theatre and surgical site infection (SSI) is well known. The aim of this annotation is to explain the scientific basis of using settle plates to audit the quality of air, and to provide information about the practicalities of using them for the purposes of clinical audit. The microbiological quality of the air in most guidance is defined by volumetric sampling, but this method is difficult for surgical departments to use on a routine basis. Settle plate sampling, which mimics the mechanism of deposition of airborne microbes onto open wounds and sterile instruments, is a good alternative method of assessing the quality of the air. Current practice is not to sample the air in an operating theatre during surgery, but to rely on testing the engineering systems which deliver the clean air. This is, however, not good practice and microbiological testing should be carried out routinely during operations as part of clinical audit. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):887–891

Background. Open fracture wounds are well known to be associated with infection & prolonged healing. Activity in scientific research to improve wound healing has often provided variable results. This study was done to question the de facto nature of Normal Saline as best irrigant in management of such wounds and to find out a better irrigant, if so, that does exist with due consideration to the mechanism by which saline dressings act. Material and methods. 30 patients with Grade 3 open fracture wounds were assessed over a period of three months according to Ganga Hospital Injury severity Score and were divided equally in study and control groups after adequate matching. A standard dressing protocol consisting of debridement and external fixation within 6 hours, avoidance of any antiseptic or surfactant agent, high-volume low-pressure pulsatile lavage irrigation and saline soaked gamgee pad packings with concerned solutions changed twice daily was done in respective groups. Follow-up was done by colour of healing granulation tissue, pus culture and soft tissue biopsy at Day 1, 3,7,10 & 14. Results. 6 out of 15(40%) wounds in study group were observed to have reached pink healthy granulation with low exudate by Day 14 as compared to only 3 out of 15(20%) in control group. The time taken to traverse from each stage of healing granulation was also observed to be smaller with 3% NaCl as compared to 0.9% NaCl. Although once healthy granulation stage was reached, further dressing with 3% NaCl in study group was shown to have worsening of granulation in about 33% of cases with none such observed in control. Conclusion. 3% NaCl is a better irrigant than 0.9% NaCl for dressing of Open trauma wounds during initial stages of dressing. Their effectivity in maintaining advanced granulation is although questionable, probably owing to its desiccative action

Aims. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries. Methods. This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation. Results. Male sex, obesity, open wound, dislocations, late definitive surgical treatment, and lack of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as adverse predictors and incorporated to construct the STEHOP model. It displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.84). A high C-index value of 0.77 could still be reached in the internal validation. The calibration plot showed good agreement between nomogram prediction and observed outcomes. Conclusion. The newly developed STEHOP model is a valid and convenient instrument to predict HO formation after surgery for elbow trauma. It could assist clinicians in counselling patients regarding treatment expectations and therapeutic choices. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):963–971

Abstract. Aims. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of fungal knee periprosthetic joint infection following knee arthroplasty. The secondary aim was to evaluate risk factors for acquiring a fungal PJI. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with a confirmed fungal PJI of the knee in two tertiary centres. There were a total of 45 cases. Isolated fungal infections along with mixed bacterial and fungal infections were included. Mean follow up was 40 months (range 3–118). Results. The mean age at presentation was 69 years (range 46 to 87) and mean BMI was 31 kg/m2 (range 20 to 44). The median number of procedures that patients had on the affected limb from the index primary arthroplasty procedure was 6 (range 2–17). The median procedure number at which a fungal infection was identified was 5 (range 2–10). A history of prolonged antibiotic therapy (above 6 months total) was present in 37 patients (88%). During the study period 22 patients were infection free, 14 treated with lifelong suppression, 7 had above knee amputations and 6 had died. Overall infection cure rate was 49%. Conclusions. Patients with fungal PJI are generally poor hosts with multiple co-morbidities, long term exposure to antibiotics and high rates of open wounds and sinuses. The poor outcome associated with fungal PJI relative to bacterial PJI should be shared with patients in order to manage the expectations of this complex cohort

Introduction and Objective. Lower limb fractures are amongst the most common surgically managed orthopaedic injuries, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as the conventional method of treatment of the fibula. In recent years, dedicated intramedullary implants have emerged for fibula fixation in tandem with the move towards minimally invasive surgery in high-risk patients. This is the largest multicentre review to date with the aim of establishing the clinical outcomes following intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of the fibula and to identify the absolute indication for fibula IMN fixation. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study of adult patients in all UK hospitals, who underwent fibula nail fixation between 01/01/2018 and 31/10/2020 was performed. Primary outcome measures included time to union, infection rate, other post-operative complications associated with the fixation and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcome measure was to identify the indication for fibula nailing. Data tabulation was performed using Microsoft Excel and analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23 (SPSS Statistics). Results. 2 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) and 9 Trauma Units (TUs) were eligible for inclusion. 102 patients were included and 91% were classified as ankle fractures of 68% (n=69) were Weber B, 24% (n=24) Weber C and 8% (n=9) were either distal tibial fractures with an associated fibula fracture or pilon fractures. The mean age was 64 years of which 45 were male patients and 57 were female. The average BMI was 30.03kg/m. 2. and 44% of patients were ASA 3. 74% of patients had poor pre-op skin condition including swelling and open wounds. The calculated infection rate for fibula nail was 4.9% and metal-work complication rate was 4.9%. The average time to union was 13 weeks and length of inpatient stay was 15 days (SD +/− 12 days). Conclusions. MEFNO has demonstrated that fibula nail is an ideal implant in patients who have a physiologically higher risk of surgery, poor skin condition and a complex fracture pattern. The time to union, complication and infection risks are lower than that reported in literature for ankle ORIFs

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) classification of open fractures and economic costs. Methods. Resource use was measured during the six months that followed open fractures of the lower limb in 748 adults recruited as part of two large clinical trials within the UK Major Trauma Research Network. Resource inputs were valued using unit costs drawn from primary and secondary sources. Economic costs (GBP sterling, 2017 to 2018 prices), estimated from both a NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective, were related to the degree of complexity of the open fracture based on the OTS classification. Results. Adjusted mean total NHS and PSS costs were £13,785 following treatment of complex fractures and £3,550 following treatment of simple fractures, where the open fracture wound is closed at the end of the first wound debridement, generating a mean difference of £10,235 (95% confidence interval £8,074 to £12,396). Conclusion. Following previous work correlating clinical outcomes with the OTS classification of open fractures, this study suggests that the new OTS classification also correlates with economic costs estimated from alternative study perspectives. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):408–412

Aims. It has been generally accepted that open fractures require early skeletal stabilization and soft-tissue reconstruction. Traditionally, a standard gauze dressing was applied to open wounds. There has been a recent shift in this paradigm towards negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with open tibial fractures receiving standard dressing versus NPWT. Methods. This multicentre randomized controlled trial was approved by the ethical review board of a public sector tertiary care institute. Wounds were graded using Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, and patients with GA-II to III-C were included in the study. To be eligible, the patient had to present within 72 hours of the injury. The primary outcome of the study was patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life assessment using 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12), wound infection rates at six weeks and nonunion rates at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis and independent-samples t-test were applied for secondary outcomes. Analyses of primary and secondary outcomes were performed using SPSS v. 22.0.1 and p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. Results. A total of 486 patients were randomized between January 2016 and December 2018. Overall 206 (49.04%) patients underwent NPWT, while 214 (50.95%) patients were allocated to the standard dressing group. There was no statistically significant difference in DRI at 12 months between NPWT and standard dressing groups (mean difference 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08 to 1.1; p = 0.581). Regarding SF-12 scores at 12 months follow-up, there was no significant difference at any point from injury until 12 months (mean difference 1.4; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.9; p = 0.781). The 30-day deep infection rate was slightly higher in the standard gauze dressing group. The non-union odds were also comparable (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.45; p = 0.685). Conclusion. Our study concludes that NPWT therapy does not confer benefit over standard dressing technique for open fractures. The DRI, SF-12 scores, wound infection, and nonunion rates were analogous in both study groups. We suggest surgeons continue to use cheaper and more readily available standard dressings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):912–917

Purpose: The choice of irrigating fluid and delivery pressure remains controversial. Identifying surgeons’ preferences in techniques and the rationale for their choices may aid in focusing educational activities to the orthopaedic community as well as planning future clinical trials. Our objective was to clarify current opinion with regard to the irrigation of open fracture wounds. Method: We mailed and delivered a cross-sectional survey using a sample-to-redundancy strategy to members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association and attendees of an international fracture course (AO, Davos, Switzerland) to examine surgeons’ preferences in the initial management of open fracture wounds. Results: Of the 1,764 surgeons who received the questionnaire, 984 (55.8%) responded. In the management of open wounds, most surgeons surveyed, 676 (70.5%), favoured normal saline alone, however 16.8% used Bacitracin. Many surgeons, 695 (71%) used low pressures when delivering the irrigating solution to the wound, however variation exists in what constituted high versus low pressure lavage. Surgeons supported the need for a clinical trial evaluating outcomes following both the use of different irrigating solutions as well as irrigating pressures [803 (84.8%) and 730 (77.6%) respectively]. Conclusion: The majority of surgeons favour both normal saline and low pressure lavage for the initial management of open fracture wounds

Aims. Deep surgical site infection (SSI) is common after lower limb fracture. We compared the diagnosis of deep SSI using alternative methods of data collection and examined the agreement of clinical photography and in-person clinical assessment by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria after lower limb fracture surgery. Methods. Data from two large, UK-based multicentre randomized controlled major trauma trials investigating SSI and wound healing after surgical repair of open lower limb fractures that could not be primarily closed (UK WOLLF), and surgical incisions for fractures that were primarily closed (UK WHiST), were examined. Trial interventions were standard wound care management and negative pressure wound therapy after initial surgical debridement. Wound outcomes were collected from 30 days to six weeks. We compared the level of agreement between wound photography and clinical assessment of CDC-defined SSI. We are also assessed the level of agreement between blinded independent assessors of the photographs. Results. Rates of CDC-defined deep SSI were 7.6% (35/460) after open fracture and 6.3% (95/1519) after closed incisional repair. Photographs were obtained for 77% and 73% of WOLLF and WHiST cohorts respectively (all participants n = 1,478). Agreement between photographic-SSI and CDC-SSI was fair for open fracture wounds (83%; k = 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.42)) and for closed incisional wounds (88%; k = 0.29 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.37)) although the rate of photographically detected deep SSIs was twice as high as CDC-SSI (12% vs 6%). Agreement between different assessors for photographic-SSI (WOLLF 88%, k = 0.63 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.72); WHiST 89%; k = 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69)); and wound healing was good (WOLLF 90%; k = 0.80 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.86); WHiST 87%; k = 0.57 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.64)). Conclusion. Although wound photography was feasible within the research context and inter-rater assessor agreement substantial, digital photographs used in isolation overestimated deep SSI rates, when compared to CDC criteria. Wound photography should not replace clinical assessment in pragmatic trials but may be useful for screening purposes where surgical infection outcomes are paramount. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1802–1808

To determine if immediate closure of open wounds is safe, we examined our results over a five year period. Of the two hundred and ninety-seven open fractures, two hundred and fifty-five (86 %) were closed immediately. Grade III open fractures accounted for 24.2% of cases. The superficial infection rate was 10.9%. The combined deep infection and osteomyelitis rate was 4.7%. Neither region of injury, Gustilo grade, velocity of trauma, nor time to primary closure had a significant influence on the incidence of infection. Primary closure may be a safe practice and could be accepted as a viable treatment plan in the care of most open fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if immediate primary closure of open fracture wounds is a safe practice without increased deep infections and delayed/ nonunions?. There was neither an increase in deep infection nor delayed union/non-union. Benefits include a decreased requirement for repeat debridements and soft tissue procedures, minimized surgical morbidity, hospital stay, and cost of treatment. Primary closure may be a safe practice in the care of most open fractures. The standard of care has been to leave traumatic wounds open after initial emergent surgical debridement. Due to orthopedic advancements and current resource limitations, treatment at our institution has evolved to immediate closure of all open wounds after adequate irrigation and debridement. Of the two hundred and ninety-seven open fractures, two hundred and fifty-five (86 %) were closed immediately after irrigation and debridement. Grades 3a, 3b and 3c open fractures accounted for 24.2% of cases. The superficial infection rate of primary closure was 10.9 %. All cases resolved with oral antibiotics. The combined deep infection and osteomyelitis rate was 4.7%. Neither region of injury, Gustilo grade, velocity of trauma, nor time to primary closure had a significant influence on the incidence of infection. The study reviewed all open fractures presenting to a Level One Trauma center over a five-year study period. Patients were followed until fracture union or complication resolution. Multiple variables were examined including patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture location, Gustilo classification, time to antibiotic administration, surgical debridement and wound closure, and method of wound closure. Outcome measurement included infection or union problems

We have conducted a case-control study over a period of ten years comparing both deep infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and colonised cases with a control group. Risk factors associated with deep infection were vascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, admission to a high-dependency or an intensive-care unit and open wounds. Those for colonisation were institutional care, vascular diseases and dementia. Older age was a risk factor for any MRSA infection. The length of hospital stay was dramatically increased by deep infection. These risk factors are useful in identifying higher-risk patients who may be more susceptible to MRSA infection. A strategy of early identification and isolation may help to control its spread in trauma units

Aim. Fracture-related infection (FRI) is an important complication following surgical fracture management. Key to successful treatment is an accurate diagnosis. To this end, microbiological identification remains the gold standard. Although a structured approach towards sampling specimens for microbiology seems logical, there is no consensus on a culture protocol for FRI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a structured microbiology sampling protocol for fracture-related infections compared to ad-hoc culture sampling. Method. We conducted a pre-/post-implementation cohort study that compared the effects of implementation of a structured FRI sampling protocol. The protocol included strict criteria for sampling and interpretation of tissue cultures for microbiology. All intraoperative samples from suspected or confirmed FRI were compared for culture results. Adherence to the protocol was described for the post-implementation cohort. Results. In total 101 patients were included, 49 pre-implementation and 52 post-implementation. From these patients 175 intraoperative culture sets were obtained, 96 and 79 pre- and post-implementation respectively. Cultures from the pre-implementation cohort showed significantly more antibiotic use during culture sampling (P = 0.002). The post-implementation cohort showed a tendency more positive culture sets (69% vs. 63%, P = 0.353), with a significant difference in open wounds (86% vs. 67%, P = 0.034). In all post-implementation culture sets causative pathogens were cultured more than once per set, in contrast to pre-implementation (P <0.001). Despite stricter tissue sampling and culture interpretation criteria, the number of polymicrobial infections was similar in both cohorts, approximately 29% of all culture sets and 44% of all positive culture sets. Significantly more polymicrobial cultures were found in early infections in the post-implementation cohort (P = 0.048). This indicates a better yield in the new protocol. Conclusions. A standardised protocol for intraoperative sampling for bacterial identification in FRI is superior than an ad-hoc approach. This was the combined effect of no antibiotics around sampling, more tissue samples with the ‘no touch-technique, increased awareness for both surgeon and microbiologist and stricter criteria for diagnosis. It resulted in more microbiologically confirmed infections and more certainty when identifying causative pathogens

Current treatment modalities for chronic non-healing leg ulcers are time consuming, expensive, and only moderately successful. The use of sub-atmospheric pressure dressings, available commercially as the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device, has been shown to be an effective way to accelerate healing of various wounds. There is patented computer-controlled system technology available that is established V.A.C.(KCI Concepts, San Antonio, Texas) treatment. Reducing costs associated with wound treatments is therefore becoming an increasingly important issue in health care. This study included 45 patients with open wounds of the lower extremity with exposed tendon, bone, hardware or with osteomyelitis. Fifteen wounds were the result of trauma. Thirty wounds were non-traumatic (twenty dehisced or infected orthopedic surgical wounds, five pressure sores and five miscellaneous wounds). We use the vacuum therapy as a tool to bridge the period between debridement and definite surgical closure in full-thickness wounds. Treatment efficacy was assessed by semi-quantitative scoring of the wound conditions (signs of rubor, calor, exudate and fibrinous slough) and by wound surface area measurements. In our technique, the system consist of a sterilized simple foam sponge, a vacuum drain, two blood infusion kit and a negative pressure aquarium air pump, one liter salin bottle, an steril drape. It’s mean applying time ten minutes and mean cost at the first time 36 dollars consecutive seances 11 dollars (the aquarium air pump 15 dollars – an electrical engineer change it positive to negative air pressure mode). Forty-five patients who needed open wound management before surgical closure were included in this study. Healing was characterized by development of a clean granulating wound bed (“ready for surgical therapy”) and reduction of wound surface area. To quantify bacterial load, cultures were collected. The total quantitative bacterial load was generally stable. However, nonfermentative gram negative bacilli showed a significant decrease in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds, whereas Staphylococcus aureus showed a significant increase in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds. Succesfull wound closure was obtained 43 of 45 patients. 41 wounds were closed with split-thicknees skin graft. The median time to complete healing was 31 days (27.5 to 34.5) and wound bed preparation was 7 days (5.8 to 8.2) in the non-computerized V.A.C. therapy, similar with the computerized therapy 29 (25.5 to 32.5–7 days 5.7 to 8.3) This study shows a positive effect of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on wound healing, expressed as a significant reduction of wound surface. The costs of computerized wound care were higher than our techique of V.A.C. and similar clinical results at the end

1. In the first 1600 of the series of peripheral nerve injuries treated during the years 1940-45 at the Peripheral Nerve Injuries Unit, Oxford, 52 per cent. were due to penetrating wounds, and 6 per cent. of these involved the brachial plexus. 2. A specific method of grouping and grading recovery is described: Group I—lesions of the roots and trunk of C.5, 6; Group II—lesions of the posterior cord; Group III—lesions of C.8, T.1, and the medial cord. 3. The recovery of cases in Group I was good, in Group II fair, and in Group III poor. 4. The brachial plexus was explored on twenty-two occasions. Only in four instances was there interruption of continuity—which is in striking contrast with the frequency in more distal degenerative nerve lesions in open wounds. 5. There is no evidence to suggest that neurolysis influenced motor or sensory recovery, but on one occasion it relieved persistent pain in the limb. In general the correlation between operative findings and prognosis was not precise. 6. With one exception, no recovery of consequence took place in the small muscles of the hand after a lesion in continuity, although galvanic stimulation to all paralysed muscles had been given regularly. 7. There is evidence to suggest that innervation of the biceps may not always be limited to C.5 and 6 and that in a proportion of cases C.7 may make a substantial contribution. 8. In five cases (12 per cent.) Horner's syndrome was present; the causation is discussed. 9. In every case of damage to a main vessel there was a marked tendency to joint stiffness, particularly in the hand, but on one occasion only was there evidence of ischaemic changes in the muscles and nerves. 10. The good spontaneous recovery which occurred in Groups I and II; the poor recovery in Group III even in cases where there was an apparently favourable lesion in continuity; the rarity with which division of nerves was found at operation; and the discouraging results of repair in three cases; make it necessary to conclude that routine exploration of open wounds of the brachial plexus is neither profitable nor justifiable

Introduction Management of bedsores in traumatic paraplegia has been a challenge since time immemorial. Conventional serial debridement and dressings require prolong hospitalization, imply posible complications and are an economic burden. Modalities like hyperbaricoxygen, electrical stimulation, altered cultured keratinocytes are cumbersome, expensive, and not readily available. Negative pressure to promote wound healing is under evolution. This study evaluates the effect of negative pressure in bedsore management. Methods The Negative Pressure Device (NPD) included sterilized foam, a low power continuous suction apparatus (Romovac) and a transparent polyurethane adhesive dressing. NPD was exclusively a bedside procedure. The perforated end of a drainage tube was placed on the wound surface and other end exited 10 cms away from wound margin, connected to Romovac. Sterilized foam was trimmed to size and geometry of wound as cover. Opsite closed the wound with an airtight seal. The bellow of Romovac was charged to attain negative pressure. Recharging was done after five to six hours. The wound inspected and dressings changed every five to seven days. Results NPD converted an open wound into a close controlled wound. By drawing away fluid from the wound it prevented collection of secretions and decreased purulence. Negative pressure increased vascularity, enhanced granulation tissue and rapidly reduced the size and depth of wound. Airtight sealing prevented soiling and odor enabling universal acceptance. In controlled based study, NPD: Reduced the frequency of dressing from once daily to once in five to seven days (cost effective). Reduced bacterial contamination and substantially increased granulation tissue. Serial microbial assessment of wound revealed efficacy in controlling bacterial growth and achieving a sterile culture within 10 days. Prooved itself to be an efficient and painless method of serial debridement. Reduced wound size and depth to one third of the original within three weeks. Was well tolerated by patients. The drawbacks of NPD were: Failure in low sacral bedsores close to the natal cleft. Difficulty in getting an airtight seal using Opsite. The tendency of the sterile foam to disintegrate, making the secretions viscous and clogging the drain. Tendency to increase bleeding, during changes of dressings, from the exuberant granulation tissue which formed. Conclusions NPD is a bedside procedure, easy to apply, with minimal side effects. It reduces the frequency of dressings and duration of hospitalization. By converting an open wound into a close-controlled wound it decreases purulence, hastens recovery and prevents soiling and the characteristic odor. The NPD apparatus suggested is innovative, cost-effective

Hip fracture in the elderly is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Significant intra-operative blood loss and the subsequent need for transfusion significantly contribute to patient morbidity. Making a surgical incision with diathermy reduces wound related blood loss, by coagulating small vessels as tissue is incised, however no study to date has looked at the use of diathermy in making surgical incisions around the hip. In addition, the increasing prevalence of blood borne infections makes the exclusion of sharps from the operative field an attractive option. The aim of this study was to compare diathermy incision with traditional wound opening using a scalpel to incise all layers. 50 patient undergoing hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur were recruited prospectively. Patients on warfarin were excluded from the study while those on aspirin were not. After informed consent was obtained patients were randomized to scalpel or diathermy incision by coin toss. In the diathermy group the dermis was incised with the scalpel and all further layers with the diathermy, while in both groups diathermy as used for haemostasis. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics at induction and for 24 hours post-op. Wounds were closed in a standard fashion using absorbable sutures for closing fascia and fat layers and surgical staples for skin. Intra-operative parameters measured included: 1) Time to open wound – defined as time taken to open wound from skin incision to complete opening of the fascia lata and achieve haemostasis. 2) Wound length and depth. 3) Wound related blood loss – swabs used while creating and closing the wound were weighed separately. 4) Total operative blood loss. Post-operatively all wound related complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the un-paired Student t-test parametric data. Both groups were similar in relation to age, sex and pre-operative aspirin use. Intra-operatively neither wound sizes nor time taken to create the wound were statistically significantly different. In the scalpel group wound related blood loss represented over 30% of the total operative blood loss as compared with only 18.5% in the diathermy group. Post-operatively there were no wound infections or dehiscences in either group, however 4 patients in the scalpel group developed significant wound ooze that responded to conservative treatment. There were no significant wound problems in the diathermy incision group. This prospective study has shown that the use of diathermy incision for hip hemiarthroplasty significantly reduces wound related blood loss and the incidence of post-operative wound ooze. We conclude that the routine use of diathermy to make incisions around the hip is effective in reducing wound related bleeding without adverse effects on wound healing or infection rate

Purpose: The optimal choice of irrigating solution or irrigating pressure in the initial management of open fracture wounds remains controversial. FLOW compared the effect of castile soap versus normal saline, and low versus high pressure pulsatile lavage on one year re-operation rates in patients with open fracture wounds. Method: We conducted a multicenter, blinded, two-by-two factorial, pilot randomized trial of 111 patients with open fracture wounds receiving either castile soap solution or normal saline and either high or low pressure pulsatile lavage. The primary outcome, reoperation within one year, included infections, wound healing problems, and nonunions. Secondary outcomes included all operative and non-operative infections, wound healing problems, nonunion and functional outcomes. We followed the intention to treat principle. Results: Eighty-nine patients (80.2%) completed the 12-month follow-up. As anticipated in this small-sample-size pilot study, results were compatible with substantial benefit and substantial harm: the hazard ratio (HR) for reoperation with castile soap was 0.77, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.69, p=0.52; with low pressure lavage, the hazard ratio for the risk of reoperation was 0.56, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.27, p=0.17. Secondary outcomes showed a significant relative risk reduction for nonunion of 63% in favour of castile soap (p=0.036), and a trend for a relative risk reduction for nonunion of 44% in favour of low pressure lavage (p=0.22). Conclusion: The FLOW pilot study suggests the possibility of an important reduction in reoperation rates for both castile soap and low pressure pulsatile lavage. Our findings provide compelling rationale for continued investigation in a pivotal FLOW trial of 2280 patients

The optimal choice of irrigating solution or irrigating pressure in the initial management of open fracture wounds remains controversial. FLOW compared the effect of castile soap versus normal saline, and low versus high pressure pulsatile lavage on one year re-operation rates in patients with open fracture wounds. We conducted a multicentre, blinded, two-by-two factorial, pilot randomised trial of 111 patients with open fracture wounds receiving either castile soap solution or normal saline and either high or low pressure pulsatile lavage. The primary outcome, re-operation within one year, included infections, wound healing problems, and nonunions. Secondary outcomes included all operative and non-operative infections, wound healing problems, nonunion and functional outcomes. We followed the intention to treat principle. Eighty-nine patients (80.2%) completed the 12-month follow-up. As anticipated in this small-sample-size pilot study, results were compatible with substantial benefit and substantial harm. The hazard ratio (HR) for re-operation with castile soap was 0.77 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.35 to 1.69, p=0.52). With low pressure lavage, the hazard ratio for the risk of re-operation was 0.56, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.27, p=0.17. Secondary outcomes showed a significant relative risk reduction for nonunion of 63% in favour of castile soap (p=0.036), and a trend for a relative risk reduction for nonunion of 44% in favour of low pressure lavage (p=0.22). Functional outcome scores showed no significant differences at any time point between groups. The FLOW pilot randomised controlled trial demonstrated the possibility that the use of low pressure may decrease the re-operation rate for infection, wound healing problems, or nonunion. Our findings provide compelling rationale for continued investigation in a pivotal FLOW trial of 2280 patients

Aim. Antibiotic prophylaxis is critical for the prevention of fracture related infection (FRI) in trauma patients, particularly those with open wounds. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics prior to arrival at the hospital (e.g. by paramedics) may reduce intraoperative bacterial load and has been recommended; however scientific evidence for pre-hospital administration is scarce. Methods. The contaminated rabbit humeral osteotomy model of Arens was modified to resemble the sequence of events in open fractures. In an initial surgery representing the “accident”, a 2mm mid-diaphyseal hole was created in the humerus and the wound was contaminated with a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain (mean 1.6×106 Colony Forming Units, CFU). The animals were allowed recover for 4 hours mimicking the period from trauma to debridement. At this time, a second procedure was performed in order to debride and irrigate the wound, and to fix a complete osteotomy that was made through the initial defect. Three test groups were included (n=8 rabbits per group): 1) no antibiotic therapy; 2) standard “in-hospital” antibiotic prophylaxis (24 hours therapy starting 30 minutes before surgery); 3) “pre-hospital” antibiotics (single dose 15 minutes after the “accident”). The antibiotic used was cefuroxime and was administered in a weight-adjusted dosage. Results. In the absence of any antibiotic administration (group 1), high bacterial counts were identified at fixation (1.89×106 CFU) and at euthanasia (day 7, 7.70×107 CFU) in all rabbits. When 24 hours of antibiotics were administered commencing “in hospital” (group 2), the bacterial load during fixation surgery was slightly reduced (CFU 9.88×105) and 50% of animals were infected at euthanasia. When one single shot of antibiotics was administered in the “pre-hospital” setting (group 3), the bacterial load during fixation surgery was significantly lower than for both groups 1 and 2(CFU 2.34×103) yet all animals were infected at euthanasia. Conclusions. Early pre-hospital administration of antibiotics significantly reduced the bacterial load in the operative field at the time of debridement compared to regular prophylaxis. However, continuation of systemic antibiotics is necessary in order to prevent infection in this model

Aims

To identify variables independently associated with same-day discharge (SDD) of patients following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and to develop machine learning algorithms to predict suitable candidates for outpatient rTKA.