Initial treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury remains as controversial in 2023 as it was in the early 19th century, when Sir Astley Cooper and Sir Charles Bell debated the merits or otherwise of surgery to relieve cord compression. There has been a lack of high-class evidence for early surgery, despite which expeditious intervention has become the surgical norm. This evidence deficit has been progressively addressed in the last decade and more modern statistical methods have been used to clarify some of the issues, which is demonstrated by the results of the SCI-POEM trial. However, there has never been a properly conducted trial of surgery versus active conservative care. As a result, it is still not known whether early surgery or active physiological management of the unstable injured spinal cord offers the better chance for recovery. Surgeons who care for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries in the acute setting should be aware of the arguments on all sides of the debate, a summary of which this annotation presents. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic factors for postoperative neurological recovery and survival in patients with complete paralysis due to neoplastic epidural spinal cord compression. The medical records of 135 patients with complete paralysis due to neoplastic cord compression were retrospectively reviewed. Potential factors including the timing of surgery, muscular tone, and tumour characteristics were analyzed in relation to neurological recovery using logistical regression analysis. The association between neurological recovery and survival was analyzed using a Cox model. A nomogram was formulated to predict recovery.Aims
Patients and Methods
Despite advances in treating acute spinal cord injury (SCI), measures to mitigate permanent neurological deficits in affected patients are limited. Augmentation of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) to promote blood flow and oxygen delivery to the injured cord is one of the only currently available treatment options to potentially improve
Lumbar fusion remains the gold standard for the treatment of discogenic back pain. Total disc replacement has fallen out of favor in many institutions. Other motion preservation alternatives, such as nucleus replacement, have had limited success and none are commercially available at this time. Two prospective, nonrandomized multicenter studies of lumbar disc nucleus replacement using the PerQdisc 2.0 nucleus replacement device in patients with lumbar discogenic back pain. Early clinical results are presented. A total of 16 patients from 4 international sites (Germany, Paraguay, Canada and Belgium) were enrolled in the trial between May 2019 and February 2021. Data collection points include baseline and postoperatively at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcome measures were obtained from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12V2, Analgesic Score (AS), and radiographic assessments. Prospectively gathered data on patient reported
Aims. The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved
Introduction. Evidence suggests that intra-operative spinal cord monitoring is sensitive and specific for detecting potential neurological injury. However, little is known about surgeons' responses to trace changes and the resultant
National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines on Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression recommend urgent consideration of patients with spinal metastases and imaging evidence of structural spinal failure with spinal instability for surgery to stabilise the spine and prevent Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. We aimed to compare
Objective-Study Design: Recognizing the value of intraoperative SEP monitoring in scoliosis and other spinal surgery, we applied prospectively continuous SEP recording during reconstructive procedures in 82 patients who sustained 20 cervical, 8 thoracic, 6 thoraco-lumbar, and 48 lumbar vertebral fractures or fractures-dislocations to investigate its efficacy in spinal trauma. Material: Seventy-one patients underwent single anterior or posterior operations, and 11 combined anterior-posterior procedures. Forty patients had incomplete injuries, and 42 had no preoperative neurological deficit. SEP trace amplitude at insertion of electrode was considered as the baseline value, and was compared to the lowest intraoperative signal amplitude and the amplitude at completion of operation. Results: Fifty-nine patients had a depression in wave amplitude of more than 25% during surgery; in 25 patients the trace fell by more than 50%, and in 7 cases a more than 75% diminution was recorded. A loss of 50% in SEP signal amplitude showed 67% sensitivity, and 71% specificity in predicting
To assess whether the timing of surgery is an important factor in
The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months.Aims
Methods
Introduction. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring allows for assessment of the spinal cord and susceptible structures during complex spinal surgery. It is well validated for the detection of potential neurological injury but little is known of surgeon's responses to an abnormal trace and its effect on
We analysed the influence of the timing of surgery (<
48 hours, group 1, 21 patients vs >
48 hours, group 2, 14 patients) on the
Tumours of the sacrum are difficult to manage. The sacrum provides the structural connection between the torso and lower half of the body and is subject to both axial and rotational forces. Thus, tumours or their treatment can compromise the stability of the spinopelvic junction. Additionally, nerves responsible for lower limb motor groups as well as bowel, bladder, and sexual function traverse or abut the sacrum. Preservation or sacrifice of these nerves in the treatment of sacral tumours has profound implications on the function and quality of life of the patient. This annotation will discuss current treatment protocols for sacral tumours. Cite this article:
Aim: To determine whether timing of intervention affects
Traumatic central cord syndrome (CCS) typically follows a hyperextension injury and results in motor impairment affecting the upper limbs more than the lower, with occasional sensory impairment and urinary retention. Current evidence on mortality and long-term outcomes is limited. The primary aim of this study was to assess the five-year mortality of CCS, and to determine any difference in mortality between management groups or age. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a traumatic CCS between January 2012 and December 2017 in Wales were identified. Patient demographics and data about injury, management, and outcome were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess mortality and between-group differences.Aims
Methods
Objective: To study the long term operative and non-operative outcome in patients with diastematomyelia (DM). Design: A prospectively acquired database of all spinal patients seen jointly by the senior authors (JKW, JLF), was searched for patients with DM. Their notes and the database were then reviewed. Subjects: Thirty-six patients were identified; twenty-one (58%) had associated scoliosis. There were 60 associated abnormalities in the 36 patients, most common being ten (27%) with leg length inequality. Twelve patients (33%) had no radiological bony abnormality. Twenty-four (66%) had neurosurgery, eleven (31%) untethering of filum alone and eleven (31%) with removal of a spur and closure of the DM as well. Nineteen (53%) underwent some sort of neuraxial shortening scoliosis correction/surgery. Twenty-eight (78%) were deemed to have a normal/independent