Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 38 - 38
1 Dec 2022
Tedesco G Evangelisti G Fusco E Ghermandi R Girolami M Pipola V Tedesco E Romoli S Fontanella M Brodano GB Gasbarrini A
Full Access

Neurological complications in oncological and degenerative spine surgery represent one of the most feared risks of these procedures. Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) mainly uses methods to detect changes in the patient's neurological status in a timely manner, thus allowing actions that can reverse neurological deficits before they become irreversible. The utopian goal of spinal surgery is the absence of neurological complications while the realistic goal is to optimize the responses to changes in neuromonitoring such that permanent deficits occur less frequently as possible. In 2014, an algorithm was proposed in response to changes in neuromonitoring for deformity corrections in spinal surgery. There are several studies that confirm the positive impact that a checklist has on care. The proposed checklist has been specifically designed for interventions on stable columns which is significantly different from oncological and degenerative surgery. The goal of this project is to provide a checklist for oncological and degenerative spine surgery to improve the quality of care and minimize the risk of neurological deficit through the optimization of clinical decision-making during periods of intraoperative stress or uncertainty. After a literature review on risk factors and recommendations for responding to IONM changes, 3 surveys were administered to 8 surgeons with experience in oncological and degenerative spine surgery from 5 hospitals in Italy. In addition, anesthesiologists, intraoperative neuro-monitoring teams, operating room nurses participated. The members participated in the optimization and final drafting of the checklist. The authors reassessed and modified the checklist during 3 meetings over 9 months, including a clinical validation period using a modified Delphi process. A checklist containing 28 items to be considered in responding to the changes of the IONM was created. The checklist was submitted for inclusion in the new recommendations of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SINC) for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The final checklist represents the consensus of a group of experienced spine surgeons. The checklist includes the most important and high-performance items to consider when responding to IONM changes in patients with an unstable spine. The implementation of this checklist has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient safety in the field of spinal surgery


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 220 - 220
1 Jul 2014
Blair-Pattison A Henke J Penny G Hu R Swamy G Anglin C
Full Access

Summary Statement. Incorrect pedicle screw placement can lead to neurological complications. Practice outside the operating room on realistic bone models, with force feedback, could improve safety. Pedicle forces in cadaveric specimens are reported, to support development of a training tool for residents. Introduction. Inserting screws into the vertebral pedicles is a challenging step in spinal fusion and scoliosis surgeries. Errors in placement can lead to neurological complications and poor mechanical fixation. The more experienced the surgeon, the better the accuracy of the screw placement. A physical training system would provide orthopaedic residents with the feel of performing pedicle cannulation before operating on a patient. The proposed system consists of realistic bone models mimicking the geometry and material properties of typical patients, coupled with a force feedback probe. The purpose of the present study was to determine the forces encountered during pedicle probing to aid in the development of this training system. Methods. We performed two separate investigations. In the first study, 15 participants (9 expert surgeons, 3 fellows, 3 residents) were asked to press a standard pedicle awl three times onto a mechanical scale, blinded to the force, demonstrating what force they would apply during safe pedicle cannulation and during unsafe cortical breach. In the second study, three experienced surgeons used a standard pedicle awl fitted with a one-degree of freedom load cell to probe selected thoracolumbar vertebrae of eight cadaveric specimens to measure the forces required during pedicle cannulation and deliberate breaching, in randomised order. A total of 42 pedicles were tested. Results. Both studies had wide variations in the results, but were in general agreement. Cannulation (safe) forces averaged approximately 90 N (20 lb) whereas breach (unsafe) forces averaged approximately 135–155 N (30–35 lb). The lowest average forces in the cadaveric study were for pedicle cannulation, averaging 86 N (range, 23–125 N), which was significantly lower (p<0.001) than for anterior breach (135 N; range, 80–195 N); medial breach (149 N; range, 98–186 N) and lateral breach (157 N; range, 114–228 N). There were no significant differences among the breach forces (p>0.1). Cannulation forces were on average 59% of the breach forces (range, 19–84%) or conversely, breach forces were 70% higher than cannulation forces. Discussion. To our knowledge, axial force data have not previously been reported for pedicle cannulation and breaching. A large range of forces was measured, as is experienced clinically. Additional testing is planned with a six-degree-of-freedom load cell to determine all of the forces and moments involved in cannulation and breaching throughout the thoracolumbar spine. These results will inform the development of a realistic bone model as well as a breach prediction algorithm for a physical training system for spine surgery. The opportunity to learn and practice outside of the operating room, including learning from deliberate mistakes, should increase the confidence and comprehension of residents performing the procedure, enhance patient safety, reduce surgical time, and allow faster progression of learning inside the operating room


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 72 - 72
1 Jan 2017
Barbanti Brodano G Halme J Gasbarrini A Bandiera S Terzi S Ghermandi R Babbi L Boriani S
Full Access

The surgical treatment of spinal deformities and degenerative or oncological vertebral diseases is becoming more common. However, this kind of surgery is complex and associated to a high rate of early and late complications. We retrospectively collected all the major complications observed in the perioperative and post-operative period for surgeries performed at our Division of Spine Surgery in the 2010–2012 period,. 285 surgeries were registered in 2010, 324 in 2011 and 308 in 2012. All the complications observed during the procedure and the follow-up period were recorded and classified according to the type (mechanical complications, neurological complications, infection, hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, systemic complications, death related to the surgery). In 2010, on 285 surgeries 47 patients (16.5 %) had 69 complications (24.2%): 25.7% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 23% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 27% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 11% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis (infectious diseases). In 2011, on 324 surgeries 35 patients (10.8 %) had 54 complications (16.7%): 16.3% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 16.3% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 20% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 28.6% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. In 2012, on 308 surgeries, 25 patients (8.1 %) had 36 complications (11.7%): 14.4% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 7.2% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 16.7% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 20% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. On 917 spinal surgeries performed from January 2010 to December 2012, 159 complications (17.3%) were recorded, with a prevalence of mechanical complications and infections. We are also prospectively collecting complications related to 2013–2015, in order to have a larger amount of data and try to detect potential risk factors to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process for complex spinal surgery


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 308 - 308
1 Jul 2014
Pezeshki P Akens M Woo J Whyne C Yee A
Full Access

Summary. A novel bipolar cooled radiofrequency ablation probe, optimised for bone metastases applications, is shown in two preclinical models to offer a safe and minimally invasive treatment option that can ablate large tissue volumes and preserve the regenerative ability of bone. Introduction. Use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating of skeletal metastases has been rising, yet its impact on bone tissue is poorly understood. 2–11 RF treatment induces frictional heating and effectively necrotises tissue in a local and minimally invasive manner.1 Bipolar cooled RF (BCRF) is a significant improvement to conventional RF whereby larger regions can be safely treated, protecting sensitive neighbouring tissues from thermal effects. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel bipolar RFA probe to create large contained lesions within healthy pig vertebrae and its determine its effects on bone and tumour cells in a rabbit long bone tumour model. Methods. Following a pre-treatment MRI, a BCRF probe was placed transpedicularly into targeted lumbar vertebrae of six Yorkshire pigs. Energy was delivered for 15min at a set temperature of 65°C (n=2 per animal) with a sham control performed at a non-contiguous level (n=1 per animal). Post-treatment neurologic evaluation, MRI and histology were used to characterise the region of effect. Twelve New Zealand White Rabbits received a 200 µl injection of VX2 tumour cells into one femur. On day 14, half of the tumour-bearing and contralateral healthy femora were RF-treated (n=6 per group). RF-treated femora were compared to tumour-bearing and healthy sham groups (n=6 per group) through pre (day 14) and post treatment (day 28) MRI and histology (H&E (for general evaluation), AE1/AE3 (for VX2 tumour cell evaluation), TRAP (for osteoclast evaluation) and TUNEL (for osteocyte evaluation)). Results. In treated porcine spines there were no neurological complications. MR imaging confirmed a 2cm oval shaped ablative zone. External thermocouple measurements indicated output values in the physiological temperature range suggesting treatment was safely confined within targeted vertebrae. Histological results correlated well with the ablation regions determined using MRI sequences in both models. In rabbit femora, large zones of RF ablation (average volume 12.9±5.5 cm3) extended beyond the femur cortex (corresponding to the probe design for human use) into the surrounding soft tissue. The RFA-treated tumour-involved specimens demonstrated a significant reduction in tumour volume compared to sham femora, however a small number of viable tumour cells remained within the ablation volume. Newly formed trabecular structures were also seen in all treated femora. TRAP staining demonstrated a significant reduction in osteoclast number post-RFA in both the tumour-involved and healthy groups. TUNEL staining revealed areas of patchy cortical osteocyte necrosis within the ablation zone. Discussion/Conclusions. The large histologic region of effect created by RFA was consistent with MRI findings in both models. Treatment was contained in the porcine vertebrae without collateral damage to neighbouring sensitive structures. In the femora, while osteoclasts were found to be very susceptible to RFA, a small number of tumour cells and osteocytes in the treated regions remained viable. As the treatment zone did not encompass the full extent of the intramedullary lesions, it is possible that the sporadic VX2 cell viability may be explained by local tumour cell migration. Limited destruction of healthy osteocytes by RFA may be desirable in restoring bone health