Background. Orthopedic trauma patients can have significant pain management requirements. Patient satisfaction has been associated with pain control and narcotic use in previous studies. Due to the multifactorial nature of pain, various injury patterns, and differences in pain tolerances the relationship between patient factors and narcotic requirements are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to compare patient demographics for trauma patients requiring high doses of narcotics for pain control versus those with more minimal requirements. Methods. Our study sample included 300 consecutive trauma activations who presented to our emergency department during the 2015 calendar year. Opioids given to the patients during their hospital stay were converted to oral morphine equivalents using ratios available from the current literature. Patients were placed into two groups including those who were in the top 10% for average daily inpatient oral morphine equivalents and the other group was composed of the remaining patients. In addition to morphine equivalents, patient age, gender, injury severity score, length of stay, number of readmissions and urine toxicology results were also recorded. Injury severity score (ISS), morphine equivalents, and patient age were evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Between group comparisons for positive urine toxicology screen and gender were performed with Chi square and Fisher exact test. Pearson correlations were calculated between injury severity score, average daily oral morphine equivalents, and length of stay. P-value of 0.05 was used to represent significance. Statistical comparisons were made using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Results. Median average daily morphine equivalents in the 10% of patients receiving the highest doses was 86.30 and 12.95 for the bottom 90%. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The median ISS between the 2 groups was significant (p=0.018). There was no significant difference in age, readmission rate, and urine toxicology results. Patients in the top 10% were more likely to be male (p=0.003). Median length of stay for the top 10% group and bottom 90% group was 4 days and 2 days, respectively (p=0.005). No correlation between injury severity score and length of stay was found (p=0.475). A weak correlation of 0.115 was found between morphine equivalents and length of stay (p=0.047). Discussion. Our study shows male gender and ISS were correlated with higher oral morphine equivalents for the 10% of patients receiving the highest daily amounts when compared to the reaminder of the cohort. There was a significantly increased length of stay in the patients receiving higher narcotic doses. Whether this is due to ISS or increase in narcotics is unclear. However, positive correlation was not found between ISS and length of stay

Background. Narcotics are commonly prescribed for pain control of orthopedic trauma but injury pattern and severity, in addition to patient factors, result in varying dosing requirements. These factors, coupled with increasing pressure to reduce narcotic consumption, highlight the importance of narcotic stewardship and comprehension of patient factors leading to higher pain control demands. The purpose of this study is to understand whether or not narcotic consumption is greater in patients who present to the emergency department with positive drug screen (utox) for illicit substances. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of 300 consecutive trauma activations during the 2015 calendar year. Of the patient cohort, 226 patients received a utox screen which represents the cohort for this study. Utox screen included amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, ethanol, methadone, phencyclidine, and tetrahydrocannabinol. Opioids given hospital stay were converted to oral morphine equivalents using ratios available in the current literature. The average daily equivalent was calculated for their total hospital stay and recorded. Patient injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, length of stay, readmission rates were also recorded. Statistical comparisons were made using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Data distributions were examined with the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality between group comparisons were made with Mann Whitney U tests. Chi squared test was used to evaluate categorical data. Significance was set at p=0.05. Results. There were 108 (48%) positive utox tests of the 226 that received a utox test. There was no difference in gender distribution or age between the 2 groups. The calculated morphine equivalent consumption of the positive utox patient cohort was compared against the negative utox group. The median daily oral morphine equivalents in the positive utox group was 23.85 versus 12.05 for those with a negative utox screen. This was found to be statistically significant with a p value of 0.014. The average length of stay for the positive utox group was 3 days versus 2 days for the negative utox group. This also was statistically significant with a p value of 0.009. There was no statistical significance for ISS (5 in utox positive versus 5 in utox negative patients) nor was there any significance found in the rate of readmissions. Discussion. Our study shows that infividuals found to have positive utox screening for illicit drug use require more opioids for pain control and have longer hospital stays. These increased resource requirements exist despite no statistically significant difference in ISS. The high rate of positive findings and differences in patient clinical course support continued utox screening in trauma activation patients. When treating these patients, physicians should be aware of potential differences in pain management strategies and would likely benefit from multimodal pain control progam

INTRODUCTION. Preoperative optimization and protocols for joint replacement care pathways have led to decreased length of stay (LOS), decreased narcotic use and are increasingly important in delivering quality, cost savings and shifting appropriate cases to an outpatient setting. The intraoperative use of vasopressors is independently associated with increased length of stay, risk of adverse postoperative events including death and in total hip arthroplasty there is an increased risk for ICU admission. Our aim is to characterize the patient characteristics associated with vasopressor use specifically in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 748 patients undergoing inpatient primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution by two surgeons from 1/1/17 to 12/21/18. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors and intraoperative medication administration were compared with multivariate regression to identify patients who may require intraoperative vasopressors. RESULTS. Seven hundred-forty eight patients underwent total knee arthroplasty and 439 patients required intraoperative vasopressors while 307 did not require vasopressors. Significant predictors of vasopressor use were male sex (p=0.035), history of prior cerebrovascular event (p=0.041) and older age (p=0.048). NPO time, anesthesia provider level of training, operative time, and intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate were not significant predictors of vasopressor use intra-operatively during total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION. In this study, nearly fifty-nine percent of patients undergoing TKA received intraoperative vasopressor support. Male gender, history of stroke and older age were significantly associated with increased intraoperative vasopressor use. Surgical time and case order do not appear to be optimizable factors to minimize the use of vasopressors in TKA. Our results highlight variation in anesthesia practices and an opportunity to standardize vasopressor triggers and identify patients who may require vasopressor support during preoperative optimization and selection of their surgical setting

Background. Adequate pain management is mandatory for patients' early rehabilitation and improvement of outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conventional pain management, consisted of mainly opioids, has some adverse effects such as dizziness and nausea. Motor blockade occasionally resulted from epidural analgesics. A novel multimodal analgesic strategy with peripheral nerve block, peri-articular injection (PAI) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) were utilized for our patients receiving TKA. In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects in the group of multimodal analgesia (MA) or epidural analgesia alone. Methods. One hundred and eighteen patients undergoing TKA with spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients of TKA received either our protocol of multimodal analgesia or patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) alone. MA included ultrasound guided nerve block in femoral and obturator nerves before spinal anesthesia, and PAI mixed with NSAID, morphine, ropivacaine and epinephrine, as well as IVPCA after surgeries. The analgesic effect with numeric rating scale (NRS) and occurrence of adverse effects, including motor blockade, numbness, postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), and dizziness were recorded for all patients. Results. Thirty-one patients received MA, and eighty-seven patients received PCEA. No significant difference of NRS in MA and PCEA group within 24 hours after surgery either in rest (0.2 ± 1 compared with 0.22 ± 0.98; p = 0.930) or motion (0.40 ± 1.56 compared with 0.31± 1.23; p = 0.764). MA group sustained lesser motor blockade than PCEA (6.45% compared with 22.98%; p = 0.028) beyond 24 hours after surgery. The occurrence of numbness is lower in MA group (18.52%) compared with PCEA group(43.33%) (p=0.031). No statistic difference of PONV and dizziness is noted between two groups. However, there is a trend that lesser PONV and dizziness occurred in MA group than PCEA group. Conclusion. TKA patients receiving either MA or PCEA have adequate analgesic efficacy after surgeries. MA group has a lower incidence of motor blockade and PONV than PCEA. This multimodal analgesia proposed here has shown patients' safety and improved pain control after TKA, decreased narcotics use and their associated side effects. Besides, lesser motor blockade and adequate pain relief may encourage patient's early rehabilitation