The ability to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) would enhance treatment decision making and facilitate economic analysis. QALYs are calculated using utilities, or health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) weights. An instrument designed for cervical myelopathy disease would increase the sensitivity and specificity of HRQoL assessments. The objective of this study is to develop a multi-attribute utility function for the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) Score. We recruited a sample of 760 adults from a market research panel. Using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE), participants rated 8 choice sets based on mJOA health states. A multi-attribute utility function was estimated using a mixed multinomial-logit regression model (MIXL). The sample was partitioned into a training set used for model fitting and validation set used for model evaluation. The regression model demonstrated good predictive performance on the validation set with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.80-0.82)). The regression model was used to develop a utility scoring rubric for the mJOA. Regression results revealed that participants did not regard all mJOA domains as equally important. The rank order of importance was (in decreasing order): lower extremity motor function, upper extremity motor function, sphincter function, upper extremity sensation. This study provides a simple technique for converting the mJOA score to utilities and quantify the importance of mJOA domains. The ability to evaluate QALYs for DCM will facilitate economic analysis and patient counseling. Clinicians should use these findings in order to offer treatments that maximize function in the attributes viewed most important by patients

Abstract. Introduction. There is paucity of evidence in predicting outcomes following cervical decompression in patients in octogenerians with cervical myelopathy. Our aim is to analyse the predictive value of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on clinical outcomes in this group. Methods. All patients age >80 years who underwent cervical decompression+/−stabilisation between January 2006-December 2021 at University Hospitals of Derby & Burton were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed using JASP. Results. Total 72 patients (n=32 male, n=28 female). Mean age 83.44 ± 3.21 years. 67 patients underwent posterior decompression+ stabilisation & 5 patients had posterior decompression alone. Mean CCI was 5; graded moderate in 32 (44%, CCI=<4) and severe in 40 (55.5%, CCI>4). Mean age and preoperative Nurick grade was similar between moderate and severe groups. Postoperative Nurick grade improved equally in both groups by 0.67 and 0.68 respectively (p=0.403). Mean LOS 16±16.12 days. 5 complications in the moderate group (21.8%) and 8 complications in severe group (21.6%); wound infection (n=7), other infection (n=2), electrolyte derangement (n=2), AKI (n=1), blood transfusion (n=1) and early death (n=3) (p=0.752). 1 early postoperative death <30 days occurred in the moderate group (4.3%) whereas 2 occurred in the severe group (5.3%) (p=0.984). No patients with moderate CCI required nursing home discharge whereas 7.9% of severe patients required this. Conclusion. Both groups benefitted from neurological improvement postoperatively, low 1 year mortality. No difference in hospital stay, complication rate and early mortality between both groups. More patients with severe CCI require nursing care after discharge than those with moderate CCI

Introduction:. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative condition that results in a non-traumatic, progressive and chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord. Surgery is indicated for patients with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive myelopathy. Literature shows that decompressive surgery halts progression of the condition. We undertook this study to see if there is a worthwhile improvement in function in patients who had spine decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Material and Method:. From a retrospective review of our medical records, a total of 61 patients had decompressive surgery for cervical myelopathy during the period between January 2008 and January 2014. 11 Patients were excluded because their cervical myelopathy was due to compression from tuberculosis or a tumour. 33 patients had incomplete records. We are reporting on the 17 patients who had complete records. From the patients' notes we recorded the detailed preoperative neurologic examination usually done for these patients in our clinic. This was compared to the neurological examination done at 6 months, 12 months and at more than 2 years follow-up. Where this examination was not adequate, patients were called in for the neurologic examination. Results:. 13 Patients had a Nurick grading of 3 and above pre-operatively and 16 had a Ranawat classification of IIIA and above preoperatively. Post-operatively 14 patients had a Nurick grading of 1 or 0 and 15 had a Ranawat classification of II or I. There was also improvement of the physical signs that are diagnostic of myelopathy. The results were subjected to statistical analysis, but this was not conclusive because of the small numbers. Conclusion:. Decompressive surgery in this small series does not only stop progression of the myelopathy, but also improves neurologic function

In multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions, extending the fusion across the cervico-thoracic junction at T1 or T2 (CTJ) has been associated with decreased rate of re-operation and pseudarthrosis but with longer surgical time and increased blood loss. The impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. The primary objective was to determine whether extending the fusion through the CTJ influenced PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare the number of patients reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the PROs and mJOA, operative time duration, intra-operative blood loss (IOBL), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, adverse events (AEs), re-operation within 12 months of the surgery, and patient satisfaction. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational cohort study of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients who underwent a posterior instrumented fusion of 4 levels of greater (between C2-T2) between January 2015 and October 2020 with 12 months follow-up were included. PROS (NDI, EQ5D, SF-12 PCS and MCS, NRS arm and neck pain) and mJOA were compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline differences. Patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical details were abstracted. Percentafe of patient reaching MCID for these outcomes was compared using chi-square test. Operative duration, IOBL, AEs, re-operation, discharge disposittion, LOS and satisfaction were compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables. A total of 206 patients were included in this study (105 patients not crossing the CTJ and 101 crossing the CTJ). Patients who underwent a construct extending through the CTJ were more likely to be female and had worse baseline EQ5D and NDI scores (p> 0.05). When adjusted for baseline difference, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the PROs and mJOA at 3 and 12 months. Surgical duration was longer (p 0.05). Satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups but significantly different at 12 months (80% versus 72%, p= 0.042 for the group not crossing the CTJ and the group crossing the CTJ, respectively). The percentage of patients reaching MCID for the NDI score was 55% in the non-crossing group versus 69% in the group extending through the CTJ (p= 0.06). Up to 12 months after the surgery, there was no statistically significant differences in PROs between posterior construct extended to or not extended to the upper thoracic spine. The adverse event profile did not differ significantly, but longer surgical time and blood loss were associated with construct extending across the CTJ

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established spinal operation for cervical disc degeneration disease with neurological compromise. The procedure involves an anterior approach to the cervical spine with discectomy to relieve the pressure on the impinged spinal cord to slow disease progression. The prosthetic cage replaces the disc and can be inserted stand-alone or with an anterior plate that provides additional stability. The literature demonstrates that the cage-alone (CA) is given preference over the cage-plate (CP) technique due to better clinical outcomes, reduced operation time and resultant morbidity. This retrospective case-controlled study compared CA versus CP fixation used in single and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for myelopathy in a tertiary centre in Wales. A retrospective clinico-radiological analysis was undertaken, following ACDF procedures over seven years in a single tertiary centre. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with cervical myelopathy who had at least six-month follow-up data. SPSS was used to identify any statistically significant difference between both groups. The data were analysed to evaluate the consistency of our findings in comparison to published literature. Eighty-six patients formed the study cohort; 28 [33%] underwent ACDF with CA and 58 [67%] with CP. The patient demographics were similar in both groups, and fusion was observed in all individuals. There was no statistical difference between the two constructs when assessing subsidence, clinical complication (dysphagia, dysphonia, infection), radiological parameters and reoperations. However, a more significant percentage [43% v 61%] of patients improved their cervical lordosis angle with CP treatment. Furthermore, the study yielded that surgery to upper cervical levels results in a higher incidence of dysphagia [65% v 35%]. Finally, bony growth across the cage was observed on X-ray in 12[43%] patients, a unique finding not mentioned in the literature previously. Our study demonstrates no overall difference between the two groups, and we recommend careful consideration of individual patient factors when deciding what construct to choose

Reduced cervical spine canal AP diameter is linked to the development of spinal cord injury and myelopathy. This is of particular interest to clinicians in New Zealand, given a unique socio-ethnic make-up and prevalent participation in collision sport. Our study builds upon previous unpublished evidence, by analysing normal cervical spine CT scans to explore morphological differences in the sub-axial cervical spine canal, between New Zealand European, Māori and Paciāca individuals. 670 sub-axial cervical vertebrae (C3-C7) were analysed radiographically using high resolution CT trauma scans, showing no acute pathology with respect to the cervical spine. All measurements were made uPlising mulP-planar reconstruction software to obtain slices parallel to the superior endplate at each vertebral level. Maximal canal diameter was measured in the AP and transverse planes. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). We included 250 Maori, 250 NZ European and 170 Paciāca vertebrae (455 male, 215 female). Statistically and clinically signiācant differences were found in sagittal canal diameter between all ethnicities, at all spinal levels. NZ European vertebrae demonstrated the largest AP diameter and Paciāca the smallest, at all levels. Transverse canal diameter showed no signiācant difference between ethnicities, however the raatio of AP:transverse diameter was signiācantly different at all spinal levels except C3. Subjective morphological differences in the shape of the vertebral canal were noted, with Māori and Paciāca patients tending towards a flatter, curved canal shape. A previous study of 166 patients (Coldham, G. et al. 2006) found cervical canal AP diameter to be narrower in Māori and Paciāca patients than in NZ Europeans. Our study, evaluating the normal population, conārms these differences are likely reflecPve of genuine variation between these ethniciPes. Future research is required to critically evaluate the morphologic differences noted during this study

The best algorithm, measurements, and criteria for screening children with Down syndrome for upper cervical instability are controversial. Many authors have recommended obtaining flexion and extension views. We noted that patients who require surgical stabilization due to myelopathy or cord compression typically have grossly abnormal radiographic measurements on the neutral upright lateral cervical spine radiograph (NUL). This study was designed to determine whether a full series of cervical spine images including flexion/extension lateral radiographs (FEL) was important to avoid missing upper cervical instability. This is a retrospective evaluation of cervical spine images obtained between 2006 and 2012 for the purposes of “screening” children with Down syndrome for evidence of instability. The atlanto-dental interval, space available for cord, and basion axial interval were measured on all films. The Weisel-Rothman measurement was made in the FEL series. Clinical outcome of those with abnormal measurements were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of NUL and FEL x-rays for identifying clinically significant cervical spine instability were calculated. Two-hundred and forty cervical spine series in 213 patients with Down syndrome between the ages of four months and 25 years were reviewed. One hundred and seventy-two children had a NUL view, and 88 of these patients also had FEL views. Only one of 88 patients was found to have an abnormal ADI (≥6mm), SAC (≤14mm), or BAI (>12mm) on an FEL series that did not have an abnormal measurement on the NUL. This patient had no evidence of cord compression or myelopathy. Obtaining a single NUL x-ray is an efficient method for radiographic screening of cervical spine instability. Further evaluation may be required if abnormal measurements are identified on the NUL x-ray. We also propose new “normal” values for the common radiographic measurements used in assessing risk of cervical spine instability in patients with Down syndrome

Aims. The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic. Methods. A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software. Results. Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020. Recommendations. We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future:. 24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic. Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases. Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating. Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries. Conclusion. This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281–286

Background:. Spinal deformity surgery carries the risk of loss of neurological function which may be permanent. Although the overall the incidence is low it is much higher in complex congenital deformities or those with pre-existing myelopathy. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring allows this risk to be reduced by providing feedback to the surgeon while the corrective manoeuvres are performed. Although ideally a trained technician with multimodal monitoring is recommended, it is often not an option in a resource limited environment and surgeon operated technology is used. Aim:. to evaluate the use of surgeon operated trans-cranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) in spinal deformity surgery. Methods:. A retrospective review was conducted on a single surgeon series of 108 consecutive cases utilising the NIM system (Medtronic). Percutaneous needles were employed in the scalp, both hands and feet to allow the upper limbs to act as controls. Forty-nine patients were 13 years old or less, 47 were 14–18, and 12 adults. The cohort consisted of 54 AIS, 27 neuromuscular scoliosis, 14 congenital, 2 old TB and 11 miscellaneous. The vast majority were posterior based procedures. Results:. In 4 cases initial traces could not be obtained. One was a severe myelopathy and further efforts to monitor were abandoned. In one case the anaesthetist had broken protocol and once converted to TIVA the traces improved. Two others were poor initially but improved as the case progressed. In 8 cases intra-operative traces were lost. One was thought to be due to hypothermia and the patient woke intact. Two were unrelated to surgical intervention and recovered spontaneously with patients waking intact. Four cases deteriorated during the corrective manoeuvre (one delayed) and recovered with reduction of correction. One case required removal of instrumentation after repeated loss each time rods were inserted and awoke with a weak leg but recovered and was re-operated two weeks later. Conclusion:. Surgeon operated tcMEP's allows feedback in terms of safety of deformity correction with a 100% negative predictive value and an 8% incidence of signal loss during correction allowing immediate remedial action

Objective. Posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) is indicated in the management of severe rigid spine deformities. It is a complex surgical procedure and is only performed in a few spine centres due to the technical expertise required and associated risk. The purpose of this study is to review the indications, surgical challenges and outcomes of patients undergoing PVCR. Methods. 12 patients with severe spinal deformities who underwent PVCR were retrospectively reviewed after a follow-up of 2 years. Surgery was performed with the aid of motor evoked spinal cord monitoring and cellsaver when available. The average surgical duration was 310 minutes (100–490). The average blood loss was 1491 ml (0–3500). The indication for PVCR was gross deformity and myelopathy which was due to congenital spinal deformities and one case of old tuberculosis. Clinical records and the radiographic parameters were reviewed. Results. Kyphosis of an average of 72 degrees was corrected to 28 degrees. The associated scoliosis was corrected from an average of 49.2 to 21.2 degrees. Ten patients improved neurologically to ASIA D and E. One patient deteriorated markedly, required revision with no initial improvement but reached ASIA E at 6 months after surgery. Four patients had associated syringomyelia. All were re-scanned at 1 year. The three with small syrinx's demonstrated no progression on MRI and the large syrinx resolved completely. In addition to the neurological deterioration, complications included 1 right lower lobe pneumonia. Conclusion. PVCR is an effective option to correct complex rigid kyphoscoliosis. In addition it allows excellent circumferential decompression of the cord and neurological recovery. When the congenital scoliosis is associated with syringomyelia with no other cause evident, it may allow resolution of the syrinx. Key words: Posterior vertebral column resection, severe spinal deformities, myelopathy, syringomyelia. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. MRI signal changes are commonly found with myelopathy. The clinical significance of these signal changes in myelopathic patients remains debated. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the data to determine the effect of MRI signal change on pre-operative and post-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and on recovery rate following surgery. Methods. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify all published studies that provided data on the presence of MRI signal change as well as JOA scores in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Data was tabulated and JOA scores were normalised to the 17-point scale. T-tests were performed to determine if there were significant differences between pre-operative and post-operative JOA scores in patients with or without MRI signal change. The recovery rate was calculated for all patients undergoing surgery. T-tests were performed to determine if significant differences occurred in recovery rate in patients with or without MRI signal change. Results. 16 studies were used for the meta-analysis. Total sample included 886 patients: 659 with signal change, and 227 without signal change. The pre-operative and post-operative JOA scores and the recovery rates were significantly better in patients without MRI signal changes (p< 0.05). The mean pre-operative JOA scores were 10.63 and 11.37 for patients with and without MRI signal changes, respectively. The mean post-operative JOA scores were 13.37 and 14.19 for patients with and without MRI signal changes, respectively. The mean recovery rates were 43.87% and 49.31% for patients with and without MRI signal change, respectively. Conclusion. Meta-analysis revealed statistically better pre-operative and post-operative JOA scores and recovery rates following surgery in myelopathic patients without signal change. While the data were statistically significant, the clinical significance of the differences might be less due to the relatively small differences in actual values

Aims

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the biggest communicable causes of mortality worldwide. While incidence in the UK has continued to fall since 2011, Bradford retains one of the highest TB rates in the UK. This study aims to examine the local disease burden of musculoskeletal (MSK) TB, by analyzing common presenting factors within the famously diverse population of Bradford.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy and myelopathy has the complication of the development of adjacent segment degeneration. Furthermore, reoperations may be required to treat complications of fusion, such as non-union, graft collapse, or expulsion. Cervical disc arthroplasty lays claim to preserving cervical motion and reducing the risks of adjacent segment disease in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. We performed a prospective study in order to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty for single or two level disc disease with associated radiculopathy. Our study included a total of 26 patients. Each patient had cervical radiculopathy from nerve root compression due to degenerative disc disease at one or two levels. Diagnosis was made preoperatively on clinical examination and by means of MRI scanning. Each patient also had preoperative flexion and extension cervical spine x-rays in order to assess pre-operative range of neck movement. The outcomes of surgery were assessed prospectively. Range of motion at final follow-up was measured by flexion and extension view x-rays of the cervical spine. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of VAS scores for pain, SF12 for mental and physical health and the neck disability index (NDI). All complications were recorded. 14 of the patients had a follow-up for two years and the remaining 12 patients had a follow-up for one year. A Discovery disc arthoplasty by Scient'X was the implant used in all patients. A standard anterior cervical approach was used to achieve decompression and for the implantation of the prosthesis. On follow-up all patients had either maintenance or an improvement in the range of movement. There was no evidence of progression of degeneration in the segments adjacent to the arthroplasty prosthesis. Improvements in SF12, VAS, and NDI scores were seen from preoperative levels in 25 of the 26 patients. Complications included one patient with a horse voice post-operatively and one patient with minimal improvement of radicular symptoms. Post-operative MRI scanning demonstrated adequate decompression with this procedure and showed no evidence of progression of adjacent segment disease. There were no cases of implant subsidence or dislocations. We have found cervical disc arthroplasty to produce good clinical outcomes when used for single or two level cervical radiculopathy whilst maintaining neck motion with an acceptable complication rate. A longer follow-up is needed to further assess the risk of development of adjacent segment disease but we did not discover the development of adjacent segment disease in our study with a follow-up of upto 2 years

Aims

COVID-19 has changed the practice of orthopaedics across the globe. The medical workforce has dealt with this outbreak with varying strategies and adaptations, which are relevant to its field and to the region. As one of the ‘hotspots’ in the UK , the surgical branch of trauma and orthopaedics need strategies to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19.