Aims. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is undertaken in patients with a passively correctable varus deformity. Our hypothesis was that restoration of natural soft tissue tension would result in a comparable lower limb alignment with the contralateral normal lower limb after mobile-bearing medial UKA. Patients and Methods. In this retrospective study, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, position of the weight-bearing axis (WBA) and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) after mobile-bearing medial UKA was compared with the normal (clinically and radiologically) contralateral lower limb in 123 patients. Results. Postoperatively, HKA angle was restored to within ±3° of the contralateral lower limb in 87% of patients andWBA passed within ±1 Kennedy and White's tibial zone of the contralateral normal lower limb in 95% of patients. The difference in the mean KJLO between the two groups was not significant (p=0.05) and the KJLO was within ±3° of the contralateral normal lower limb in 96% of patients. Conclusion. Lower limb alignment & knee joint line obliquity after mobile-bearing medial UKA were comparable to the unaffected contralateral limb in most patients. Clinical Relevance. Comparison with the contralateral normal lower limb is a reliable method to evaluate and validate limb mechanical alignment after mobile-bearing medial UKA

Purpose. We aimed to investigate whether the anterior superior iliac spine could provide consistent rotational landmark of the tibial component during mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using computed tomography (CT). Methods. During sagittal tibial resection, we utilized the ASIS as a rotational landmark. In 47 knees that underwent postoperative CT scans after medial UKA, the tibial component position was assessed by drawing a line tangential to the lateral wall of the tibial component. Rotation of the tibial component was measured using two reference lines: a line perpendicular to the posterior cortical rim of the tibia (angle α) and Akagi's line (angle β). Instant bearing position and posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement were also evaluated. External rotation of the tibial component relative to each reference line and external rotation of the bearing relative to the lateral wall of the tibial component were considered positive values. Results. The mean angle α and β were 8.0 ± 6.1° (range, −4.0 – 24.3) and 8.7 ± 4.8° (range, 1.9 – 25.2), respectively. The mean instant bearing position was 4.3 ± 28.6° (range, −52.9 – 179.7). One bearing showed complete 180° rotation at 2 weeks postoperatively. Fourteen knees (29.8%) showed posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement of the tibial resection margin. Conclusions. Due to the wide variation in, and inherent difficulty in identification of, the ASIS during the operation, it is not recommended for guidance of sagittal tibial resection during mobile-bearing medial UKA. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Aims. The aims of this retrospective study were to determine the incidence of extra-articular deformities (EADs), and determine their effect on postoperative alignment in knees undergoing mobile-bearing, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Patients and Methods. Limb mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal bowing of the femoral shaft and proximal tibia vara or medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing, full-length hip-to-ankle radiographs of 162 patients who underwent 200 mobile-bearing, medial UKAs. Results. Incidence of EAD was 7.5% for coronal femoral bowing of >5°, 67% for proximal tibia vara of >3° (MPTA<87°) and 24.5% for proximal tibia vara of >6° (MPTA<84°). Mean postoperative HKA angle achieved in knees with femoral bowing ≤5° was significantly greater when compared to knees with femoral bowing >5° (p=0.04); in knees with proximal tibia vara ≤3° was significantly greater when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >3° (p=0.0001) and when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >6° (p=0.0001). Conclusion. Extra-articular deformities are frequently seen in patients undergoing mobile-bearing medial UKAs, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°. Presence of an EAD significantly affects postoperative mechanical limb alignment achieved when compared to limbs without EAD and may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively. Clinical Relevance. Since the presence of an EAD, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°, may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively and may affect long-term clinical and implant survival outcomes, UKR in such knees should be performed with caution

Enhanced appreciation of normal knee kinematics and the inability to replicate these in the replaced total knee has led to increased enthusiasm for partial knee arthroplasty by some. These arthroplasties more closely replicate normal kinematics since they inherently preserve the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Indications for medial UKA are: anteromedial osteoarthritis with an intact ACL, posterior cruciate ligament, and medial collateral ligament (MCL), full thickness cartilage loss, and correctable deformity demonstrated radiographically with valgus stress view; full thickness cartilage laterally with no central ulcer; <15 degrees of flexion contracture, < 15 degrees varus and > 90 degrees flexion. The state of the patellofemoral joint, chondrocalcinosis, obesity, age and activity level are NOT contraindications to medial mobile-bearing UKA. The only certain contraindications are the presence of inflammatory arthritis or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Advantages of medial UKA are that it preserves undamaged structures, it is a minimally invasive technique with low incidence of perioperative morbidity, preservation of the cruciate mechanism results in more “normal” kinematics versus TKA, it normalises contact forces and pressures in the patellofemoral joint, and it provides better range of motion than TKA. Furthermore, medial UKA results in better function than TKA in gait studies, with demanding activities, such as climbing stairs, having a better “feel”. Pain relief with medial UKA is equivalent or better than TKA, and morbidity and mortality are decreased compared with TKA, as well as venous thromboembolism. Recommended preoperative imaging studies consist of plain radiographs with the following views obtained: standing AP, PA flexed, lateral, Merchant or axial, and valgus stress. There are several surgical perils associated with performing medial UKA. First, in regard to patient selection, avoid medial UKA in patients with residual hyaline cartilage – the joint must be bone on bone. Second, perform a conservative tibial resection with respect to depth to prevent tibial collapse as well as excessive overload of weakened bone, and avoid excessive posterior slope. Perform the tibial resection coplanar with tibial spine/ACL insertion to maximise tibial coverage. Avoid overcorrection of deformity. Do not perform a medial release. Balance flexion/extension gaps meticulously. For mobile-bearing designs, remove all impinging osteophytes. Over 55 published studies report results with mobile-bearing medial UKA, with survival ranging 63.2–100% at mean follow-up ranging from 1 to 17.2 years