The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiographical mid-term follow-up results of a second generation metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients younger than 50 years. Twenty eight patients (35 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty with second generation metal-on-metal bearings for osteonecrosis of the femoral head at a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in this study. There were 5 women (6 hips) and 23 men (29 hips) who had a mean age of 40 years (range, 23 to 49 years) and a mean follow-up of 7 years. We used a Fitmore (Zimmer) cup and a 28mm Metasul femoral head in all cases. A CLS (Protek AG/Zimmer) femoral stem was used in 30 hips and a Cone prosthesis¯ (Protek AG) was used in 5 hips. Functional results were measured by Harris hip (HHS) and WOMAC scores. Radiographic evaluations were used to assess loosening and osteolysis according to Gruen and Delee and Charnley criteria.Introduction
Methods
Ponseti method has become the most common and validated initial non-operative and/or minimally invasive treatment modality of idiopathic clubfoot regardless of the severity of the deformity worldwide. Despite hundreds of publications in the literature favoring Ponseti method, the data about secondary procedures performed in the follow-up period of clubfoot and their incidence remains sparse and given as small details in the articles. The objective of this study was to analyse our incidence of secondary procedures performed in the
Background. Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). Methods. The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component. Results. In the isolated acetabular revision group the median Harris Hip Score was 74 at a mean of 4.5 years post-revision. In the both components revision group the median Harris hip score was 85 at a mean of 4 years. There was no significant difference in function between the groups. Kaplan-Meier survivor ship analysis after revision showed an average survival of 91% at 10 years. There was a significant difference between survival of isolated acetabular revision (75%) and both component revision (96%). Conclusions. Revision total hip replacement subsequent to failure of hip resurfacing has good outcome and good
Summary Statement. To evaluate carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK as alternative biomaterial for total disc arthroplasty a closed loop between biotribology (in vitro), application of sterile particle suspensions in the epidural space of rabbits and biological response in vivo was established. Introduction. To prevent adjacent level degeneration in the cervical spine, total disc arthroplasty (TDA-C) remains an interesting surgical procedure for degenerative disc disease. Short- or