Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld. Methods. A multicentre observational study was undertaken: 1,553 acute and 1,556 chronic PJIs, diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Culture-negative PJIs were diagnosed according to the Muskuloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) definitions. The primary outcome was recurrent infection, and the secondary outcome was removal of the prosthetic components for any indication, both during a follow-up period of two years. Results. None of the acute PJIs and 70 of the chronic PJIs (4.7%) were culture-negative; a total of 36 culture-negative PJIs (51%) were treated with antibiotics, particularly those with histological signs of infection. After two years of follow-up, no recurrent infections occurred in patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. The requirement for removal of the components for any indication during follow-up was not significantly different in those who received antibiotics compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld (7.1% vs 2.9%; p = 0.431). Conclusion. When adequate methods of culture are used, the incidence of culture-negative PJIs is low. In patients with culture-negative PJI, antibiotic treatment can probably be withheld if there are no histological signs of infection. In all other patients, diagnostic efforts should be made to identify the causative microorganism by means of serology or molecular techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):183–188

Introduction

Infection rates following arthroplasty surgery are reported between 1–4%, with considerably higher rates in revision surgery. The associated costs of treating infected arthroplasty cases are over 4 times the cost of primary arthroplasties, with significantly worse functional and satisfaction outcomes. In addition, multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria are developing, so to reduce the infection rates and costs associated with arthroplasty surgery, new preventative methods are required. HINS-light is a novel blue light inactivation technology which kills bacteria through a photodynamic process, and is proven to have bactericidal activity against a wide range of species. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of HINS-light for the inactivation of bacteria isolated from infected arthoplasty cases.

Aim

Propionibacterium acnes is a skin commensal colonizing the deeper structures of the pilous bulb. It is responsible for 5–10% of lower limb prosthetic joint infections (PJI) but accounts for as many as 50% of shoulder arthroplasty infections. P. acnes PJIs characteristically feature limited systemic inflammation, limited polymorphonuclear infiltration and clinical signs compatible with aseptic loosening. All current microbiological definitions of PJI require two or more identical commensal isolates to be recovered from the same procedure to diagnose PJI to increase specificity and rule out contamination. Whereas the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of coagulase negative staphylococci are highly polymorphic and commonly allow the ready distinction of unrelated strains, P. acnes shows a highly stereotypical susceptibility profile and it is impossible to phenotypically assess the clonal relationship of isolates. In order to determine the clonal relationship of multiple P. acnes isolates recovered from arthroplasty revisions, we analyzed by multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) P. acnes isolates grown from PJI in a reference center for bone and joint infection.

Background. Data regarding the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-determined fluid film and joint aspiration prior to revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is limited. This study aimed to analyse (1) the value of US-determined fluid film, (2) characterisation of the pre- and intraoperative microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns and (3) the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative culture results. Methods. We analysed 366 US-examinations from 340 patients prior to revision THA. Selected cases were categorized into clearly infected, non-infected and inconclusive, according to the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 Criteria. If US-determined fluid film was <1mm, no aspiration was performed based on our institutional standard protocol. Patients were grouped into no-aspiration (144/366;[39.3%]), dry-tap (21/366;[5.7%]) and a successful-tap (201/366;[54.9%]). The microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns were determined and differences were compared between pre- and intraoperative results. Results. The absence of US-determined fluid film showed no correlation with the presence of hip PJI. Overall, 29.9% cases of the no-aspiration-group had a confirmed PJI. Discrepancies were found in 43.2% between successful taps and intraoperative cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms in preoperative synovial fluid were Staphylococcus epidermidis (20.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (20.9%) and Enterococcus faecalis (9.3%). The most prevalent microorganisms in intraoperative cultures were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes and other coagulase-negative Staphylococci (14.2%). Additional microorganisms were identified in 43.8% intraoperatively. Staphylococcus aureus was more often detected preoperatively (20.9% vs. 5.8%;P=0.003), and Cutibacterium acnes intraoperatively (2.3% vs. 14.4%;P=0.01). There were no differences between the antibiotic resistance patterns of pre- and intraoperative concordant microorganisms. Conclusion. Absence of US-determined fluid film cannot rule out the presence of hip PJI. US-guided joint aspirations is a well-established technique. However, the preoperative analysis of synovial fluid shows high discrepancies especially in Cutibacterium acnes and other rare gram-positive microorganisms compared to intraoperative cultures

Aim. Culture-based conventional methods are still the gold standard to identify microorganisms in hip and knee PJIs diagnosis. However, such approach presents some limitations due to prior antimicrobial treatment or the presence of unusual and fastidious organisms. Molecular techniques, in particular specific real-time and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are available for diagnostic use in a suspected PJI. However, limited data is available on their sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a rapid and simple Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire® JI multiplex PCR panel when compared to traditional microbiological procedures. Method. Fifty-eight native synovial fluid samples were recovered from 49 patients (female n=26; male =23) who underwent one or multiple septic or aseptic revision arthroplasties of the hip (n=12) and knee (n=46). The JI panel methodology was used either on specimens freshly collected (n=6) or stored at −80°C in our Musculoskeletal Biobank (n=52). The JI panel performance was evaluated by comparison with culture reference methods. Patient's medical records were retrieved from our institutional arthroplasty registry as well as our prospectively maintained PJI infection database. Results. The JI panel identified additional microorganisms in 3/39 (7.7%) positive cases, and a different microorganism in 1/39 (2.6%) sample. Out of 9/58 (15.5%) culture negative samples, two (22%) were positively detected by the JI panel. In total 49/58 (84%) native synovial fluid specimens were positive by culture methods, versus 39/58 (81.2%) with the JI panel. Ten samples are currently under investigation for confirmatory results. Out of 39 positive detections with the JI panel, 35 (89.7%) were concordant with the identified microorganism (n=29 same species; n=6 same genus). The combined information from the JI panel results and clinical records revealed the existence of 6/58 (10.3%) PJIs’ cases which would have required a different antibiotic therapeutic approach. Conclusions. The work presented, provides additional value for the clinical use of the JI panel to the improvement of PJI management in terms of rapid and successful treatment decisions, patient outcome, and healthcare costs. This technique shows high sensitivity to detect PJIs specific microorganisms in both fresh as well frozen native synovial fluid samples, thus emphasizing its use for retrospective studies analysis

Aim. In severe cases of postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) multiple revision surgeries may be needed. Little is known if changes of the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern occur between revision surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with multiple revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Furthermore, changes of the microbiological spectrum, distribution of mono vs. polymicrobial infections, and changes of the antimicrobial resistance profile in persistent microorganisms were evaluated. Method. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center spine infection database was performed with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Between 01/2011 and 12/2018, 103 patients underwent 248 revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Overall, 20 patients (6 male/14 female) underwent 82 revisions for PSII (median 3; range 2–12). There were 55/82 (67.1%) procedures with a positive microbiological result. Microbiological analysis was performed on tissue and implant sonication fluid. Changes in microbial spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern between surgeries were evaluated using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact test. Results. In total, 74 microorganisms (83.3% gram-positive; 10.8% gram-negative) were identified. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.9%) and Cutibacterium acnes (18.9%). All S. epidermidis identified were methicillin-resistant (MRSE). Overall, there were 15/55 (27.3%) polymicrobial infections. The microbiological spectrum changed in 57.1% (20/35) between the revision stages over the entire PSII period. In 42.9% (15/35) the microorganism persisted between the revision surgeries stages. Overall, changes of the antibiotic resistance pattern were seen in 17.4% (8/46) of the detected microorganisms comparing index revision and all subsequent re-revisions. Moreover, higher resistance rates were found for moxifloxacin and for ciprofloxacin at first re-revision surgery compared with index PSII revision. Resistances against vancomycin increased from 4.5% (1/23) at index PSII revision to 7.7% (2/26) at first re-revision surgery. Conclusions. Changes of the microbiological spectrum and the resistance pattern can occur in patients with severe PSII who require multiple revision surgeries. It is important to consider these findings in the antimicrobial treatment of PSII. The microbiological analysis of intraoperative tissue samples should be performed at every revision procedure for PSI

Purpose. Unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic revision-total-knee-arthroplasties (rTKA) are common, and the clinical significance is not entirely clear. In contrast, in some presumably septic rTKA, an identification of an underlying pathogen was not possible, so called unexpected-negative-intraoperative-cultures (UNIC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate alpha defensin (AD) levels in these patient populations. Methods. In this retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained biobank, we evaluated synovial AD levels from 143 rTKAs. The 2018-Musculoskeletal Infection Society score (MSIS) was used to define our study groups. Overall, 20 rTKA with UPIC with a minimum of one positive intraoperative culture with MSIS 2-≥6 and 14 UNIC samples with MSIS≥6 were compared to 34 septic culture-positive samples (MSIS ≥6) and 75 aseptic culture-negative (MSIS 0–1) rTKAs. Moreover, we compared the performance of both AD-lateral-flow-assay (ADLF) and an enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (ELISA) to test the presence of AD in native and centrifuged synovial fluid. Concentration of AD determined by ELISA and ADLF methods, as well as microbiological, and histopathological results, serum and synovial parameters along with demographic factors were considered. Results. AD was detected in 31/34 (91.2%) samples from the infected-group and in 14/14 (100%) samples in the UNIC group. All UPIC samples showed a negative AD result. Positive AD samples were highly (p<0.001) associated with culture positive and infection related histopathological results. Moreover, we found significantly (p=0.001) more high-virulent microorganisms 19/34 (55.9%) in the infected-group compared to the UPIC-group (0/20). Samples from the infected group with high virulent microorganisms 17/19 (89.5%) showed a positive AD. The presence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (MRSE) led to increased AD (p=0.003) levels when compared to those determined in samples positive for methicillin susceptible S. epidermdis (MSSE). ELISA and ADLF tests were positive with centrifuged (8/8) and native (8/8) synovial fluid. Conclusion. AD showed a solid diagnostic performance in infected and non-infected revisions, and it provided an additional value in the diagnostic of UPIC and UNIC associated to rTKAs. AD levels produced by patients with PJIs caused by high-virulent microorganisms and MRSE are significantly higher compared to those in patients with PJIs caused by either low-virulent or antibiotic susceptible microorganisms. Centrifugation of synovial fluid had no influence in the outcome of ADLF quantification. Keywords: Alpha-defensin, UPIC, UNIC, revision-knee-arthroplasty

Aim. Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are serious infections requiring early optimized antimicrobial therapy. BJIs can be polymicrobial or caused by fastidious bacteria, and the patient may have received antibiotics prior to sampling, which may decrease the sensitivity of culture-based diagnosis. Furthermore, culture-based diagnosis can take up to 14 days. Molecular approaches can be useful to overcome these concerns. The BioFire® system performs syndromic multiplex PCR in 1 hour, with only a few minutes of sample preparation. The BioFire® Joint Infection (JI) panel (BF-JI), recently FDA-cleared, detects both Gram-positive (n=15) and Gram-negative bacteria (n=14), Candida, and eight antibiotic resistance genes directly from synovial fluids. The aim of this study was to evaluate its performance in acute JIs in real-life conditions. Method. BF-JI was performed on synovial fluid from patients with clinical suspicion of acute JI, either septic arthritis or periprosthetic JI, in 6 French centers. The results of BF-JI were compared with the results of culture of synovial fluid and other concomitantly collected osteoarticular samples obtained in routine testing in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Results. From July 2021 to May 2022, 319 patients (including 10 children < 5y and 136 periprosthetic infections) had been included in the study. The BF-JI test was invalid for one patient (not retested). Among the 318 remaining patients, overall concordance with comparative microbiology methods was 88% (280/318): 131 samples were negative with both BF-JI and culture, and 149 samples were positive with the same microorganisms using complementary techniques. In 33 cases (10.4%), BF-JI was negative while culture was positive: 18 microorganisms were not targeted by BF-JI (including Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=10, and Cutibacterium acnes, n=2); 15 microorganisms targeted by BF-JI were obtained in culture but not by the molecular test (false-negative 4.7%). In 20 cases, BF-JI was positive while culture was not: 12 patients had received antibiotics before sampling, and 7 cases involved fragile and fastidious bacteria (Kingella kingae, n=5; Neisseria gonorrhoeae, n=2). In 6 cases, both BF-JI and culture were positive, but no yielding the same bacteria (polymicrobial specimens). Conclusions. In acute JIs, the BF-JI panel shows a good concordance with culture for the microorganisms targeted by the panel. Therefore, this molecular tool may have a place in microbiological diagnosis of acute JIs in order to confirm JI faster than culture. Moreover, it allows easy detection of difficult-to-culture bacteria. Acknowledgements. study was supported by bioMérieux, who provided all reagents

Aim. Treatment recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) include surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy or staged revision. In surgical related foot and ankle infections (SR-FAI), implant removal will lead to instability. Debridement is difficult because the implant is outside the joint. Recommendations regarding PJI treatment can therefore not be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Method. We searched PubMed for the etiology and treatment of SR-FAI, taken into account the time of occurrence, causative microorganisms and surgical treatment options. We integrated this knowledge into a treatment algorithm for SR-FAI. Results. Within the first 6 weeks after surgery, it is difficult to distinguish acute osteomyelitis from surgical site infection in which infection is limited to the soft tissue. The predominantly causative microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus. No debridement can be performed, because of the diffuse soft tissue inflammation and the absence of a joint space. If early SR- FAI is suspected without signs of systemic symptoms, fistula or abscess, empirical antibiotic treatment covering Staphylococcus aureus is recommended. If there is suspicion of ongoing SR-FAI after 2 weeks of empirical treatment, samples for culture after an antibiotic free window should be obtained to identify the causative microorganisms. If SR-FAI is confirmed, but there is no consolidation yet, targeted antibiotic treatment is given for 12 weeks without initial implant removal. In all other cases, debridement and samples for culture should be obtained after an antibiotic free window. Staged revision surgery will be performed if there is still a nonunion. Conclusions. Treatment algorithm regarding PJI cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Until now, no treatment guideline for SR-FAI is available. We have introduced a treatment algorithm for the treatment of SR-FAI. The guideline will be validated during the next 2 years

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence the microbiological spectrum and clinical outcome of hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) at a single center with minimum follow up of 2 years. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. Between 2011 and 2020 we performed presumably aseptic rTHA (n=939) and rTKA (n= 1,058). Clinical outcome, re-revision rates and causes as well as the microbiological spectrum were evaluated. Results. In total, 219/939 (23.3%) rTHA and 114/ 1,058 (10.8%) rTKA had a UPIC (p<0.001). Single positive intraoperative cultures were found in 173/219 (78.9%) in rTHA and 99/114 (86.8%) in rTKA, whereas 46/219 (21.0%) rTHA and 15/114 (13.2%) rTKA had positive results in ≥2 intraoperative cultures. A total of 390 microorganisms were found among the 333 cases. Staphylococcus epidermidis 30.9%, CoNS (21.9%), Cutibacterium acnes 21.1%, and Bacillus spp. 7.3% were the most common microorganisms. Overall, detected microorganisms showed high sensitivity to daptomycin (96.6%), vancomycin (97.3%) and linezolid (98.0%). After a minimum follow up of 2 years (rTHA 1,470 (735; 3,738) days; rTKA 1,474 (749; 4,055) days). During the 2-year follow-up, 8 patients died and 5 were lost to follow-up. There were 54/219 (24.7%) re-revision in rTHa and 20/114 (17.5%) in rTKA. Overall, there were 23 (10.5%) septic re-rTHA and 9 (7.9%) septic re-rTKA as well as 31 (14.2%) aseptic re-rTHA and 11 (9.6%) aseptic re-rTKA. Patients with previous septic revisions bevor UPIC procedure showed a significant higher risk for septic re-revision (p<0.05). Moreover, there were less septic re-revisions after single culture positive UPIC (rTHA: 16/173 (9.2%); rTKA 6/99 (6.1%)) compared to ≥2 positive intraoperative cultures UPIC (rTHA: 7/46 (15.2%); rTKA 3/15 (20.0%)). The most common reason for re-revision in the rTHA-group was aseptic loosening of the cup (34.2%) or of the stem (23.3%), dislocation (18.3%) and periprosthetic-fractures (7.8%). In the rTKA-group it was aseptic loosening (40.4%), instability (24.6%) and secondary patella resurfacing (7.9%). There was a higher septic re-revision rate in consecutive revisions than in planned revisions 17.3% vs. 8.5% in the rTHA-group and 14.3% vs. 7.5% in the rTKA-group, p<0.001. Conclusion. UPICs are common in rTJA. The rate was higher in hips which may partly explained by the easier pre op joint aspiration in the knee. UPIC may lead to an increase in subsequent re-revisions

Aim. The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic and microbiological variables of acute ankle infections posterior to ankle osteosynthesis and to determine the different characteristics of patients withE. cloacae infection. Method. A multicenter retrospective observational study (4 national hospitals) of acute post osteosynthesis infections of ankle fracture operated between 2015 and 2018 was implemented. The demographic and microbiological variables relating to the surgical intervention and the antibiotic treatment performed were collected. A descriptive assessment of all the variables and a univariate comparison between patients with E. cloacae infection and patients with alternative microorganism infections were performed. The SPSS v25 program for Windows was the choice for statistical analysis. Results. 71 Patients with an average age of 57 years were included, the majority being males (55%). 31% of patients were diabetic, 27% had vascular pathology, and 18.3% had a BMI greater than 35. Trimalleolar fracture was the most common in our study being 52%. 26.8% were open fractures. The microorganisms isolated were: 25% S. aureus, 22.5% E. cloacae and 22.5% polymicrobial. Accounting for polymicrobial infections, the presence of E. cloacae rises to 32%. In the univariate analysis, only significant differences were found in age (patients with E. cloacae infection were older) and the use of VAC therapy. Conclusions. In our series, higher percentages of E. cloacae infection were observed than those described in the literature. There are statistically significant differences in the variables of age and need for VAC therapy. The high incidence of E. cloacae infections suggests the vital importance of adapting antibiotic prophylaxis, ensuring the coverage of this microorganism

Aim. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of unexpected intraoperative cultures on the outcome of total presumed aseptic knee and hip revision surgery. Method. Data regarding patients prospectively recruited in our center, who had undergone elective complete hip and knee revision surgery from January 2003 to July 2017 with a preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening was retrospectively reviewed. Partial revisions and patients with follow up below 60 months were excluded from the study. The protocol of revision included at least 3 intraoperative cultures. Failure was defined as the need for re-revision due to any-cause at 5 years and/or the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy. Results. A total of 608 cases were initially included in the study, 53 patients were excluded. 123 hip and 432 knee revision surgeries were included. 420 cases (75.7%) had all cultures negative, 114 (20.5%) a single positive culture or two of different microorganisms and 21 (3.8%) had at least 2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. Early failure was found in 4.8% (1/21) of the patients with missed low grade infection. The presence of positive cultures during total exchange was not associated with a higher failure rate than in those with negative cultures (44 of 420, 10.5%). In contrast, patients revised before 24 months had a significant higher rate of re-revision, 18% (15/83) vs. 8.4%. Conclusions. Total hip and knee revisions with unexpected positive cultures were not significantly associated with a higher re-revision risk at 5 years of follow-up. Representing an overall good prognosis. However, revision surgeries performed within the first 24 months have a higher rate of failure

Aim. Prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Method. Synovial fluid samples were prospectively collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to culture-based methods as reference standard. Results. A total of 45 samples were analyzed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100%, 95% CI 73 – 100) and positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 79 – 100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 83% (95% CI 36 – 99) and 88% (95% CI 47 – 99) respectively for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis (n=12), 77% (95% CI: 46 – 94) and 63% (95% CI: 26 – 90) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI (n=14), and 27% (95% CI 7 – 61) and 27% (95% CI: 7 – 61) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI (n=19). Conclusions. The results of this pilot study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of low-grade microorganisms in the panel

Aim. The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) focuses on obtaining fracture healing and eradicating infection to prevent osteomyelitis. Treatment guidelines include removal, exchange, or retention of the implants used according to the stability of the fracture and the time from the infection. Infection of a fracture in the process of healing with a stable fixation may be treated with implant retention, debridement, and antibiotics. Nonetheless, the retention of an intramedullary nail is a potential risk factor for failure, and it is recommended to exchange or remove the nail. This surgical approach implies additional life-threatening risks in elderly fragile hip fracture patients. Our study aimed to analyze the results of implant retention for the treatment of infected nails in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods. Our retrospective analysis included patients 65 years of age or older with an acute fracture-related infection treated with implant retention from 2012 to 2020 in 6 Spanish hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients that required open reduction during the initial fracture surgery were excluded. Variables included in our analysis were patient demographics, type of fracture, date of FRI diagnosis, causative microorganism, and outcome. Treatment success was defined as fracture healing with infection eradication without the need for further hospitalization. Results. A total of 48 patients were identified. Eight patients with open reduction were excluded and 11 did not complete a 1-year follow-up. Out of the 29 remaining patients, the mean age was 81.5 years, with a 21:9, female to male ratio. FRI was diagnosed between 10 and 48 days after initial surgery (mean 26 days). Treatment success was achieved in 24 patients (82.7%). Failure was objectivated in polymicrobial infections or infections caused by microorganisms resistant to antibiofilm antibiotics. Seven patients required more than one debridement with a success rate of 57%. Twelve patients had an infection diagnosed after 21 days from the initial surgery and implant retention was successful in all of them. Conclusion. Our results suggest implant retention is a valid therapeutic approach for fracture-related infection in elderly hip fracture patients treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nailing

Aim. Analysis of microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns as well as the clinical outcome of patients who underwent a Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in the early phase following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Method. Of 312 patients treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty between January 2011 and December 2019, 16 (5.1%) patients (9 knee, 7 hip) underwent a DAIR procedure within 6 months following second stage. We retrospectively analyzed the microbiological results as well as changes in the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns between stages of two-stage exchange arthroplasties and DAIR procedures. Patient's re-revision rates after a minimum follow-up of 12 months following DAIR procedure were evaluated. Moreover, differences between knee and hip and between infected primary total joint replacement (TJRs) and infected revision TJRs as well as patient's host factors and microbiological results regarding the outcome of DAIR were analyzed. Results. In 7/16 (43.8%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture positive, in 5/16 (31.2%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture negative and in 4/16 (25%) patients the first stage procedure was culture positive, and the second stage procedure was culture negative. Moreover, 6 (37.5%) out of 16 DAIR procedures showed a positive microbiological result. In 5/7 (71.4%) patients with culture positive second stage procedure a different microorganism compared to first stage procedure was detected. In 6/6 (100%) patients with culture positive DAIR procedure, the isolated microorganisms were not detected during first or second stage procedure. An additional re-revision surgery was necessary in 4/16 (25%) patients after a median time of 31 months (range, 12 to 138 months) at a mean follow up of 63.1 ± 32 months following DAIR procedure. Highest re-revision rates were found in patients with culture positive second stage procedures (3/7 [42.9%]) and patients with culture positive DAIR procedures (2/6 [33.3%]). Conclusions. DAIR procedure seems to be a useful early treatment option following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty. The re-revision rates were independent of different combinations of culture positive and culture negative first and second stage procedures. The high number of changes in the microbiological spectrum needs to be considered in the treatment of PJI

Aim. Acute post-surgical infection is one of the most serious complications after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion with an incidence of 0.7%-12%. Acute infection can lead to an increase in morbidity, mortality, and economic costs for the healthcare system. The main objective of our study was to determine the variables associated with a higher risk of acute infection after thoracolumbar instrumentation in our center. Methods. We conducted an observational case-control study including instrumented fusions of the thoracolumbar spine performed between 2015 and 2021 at our institution. We included patients with thoracolumbar fusions after a fracture or for the treatment of degenerative pathology. We analyzed demographic variables related to the surgical procedure, the causative microorganism of infection, the outcome of infection treatment, and complications. We performed a descriptive analysis of all variables and a univariate comparison of cases and controls. The dichotomous variables were compared using the Fisher test, while the quantitative variables were compared using the Student's T-test. A p-value of <0.05 is taken into account to consider the statistical significance. SPSS v25 Windows program was used for statistical analyses. Results. 455 patients were included, 53% were male with a mean age of 60 years. 35% of patients had a BMI (Body Mass Index) >30, 21.1% were classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) >3, 15.8% were diabetic, and 2.6% were under chronic corticosteroid treatment. In 34.1% of the fusions, the procedure lasted more than 3 hours. We identified 26 post-surgical acute infections (5.7%). Patients with an infection had a higher prevalence of diabetes (14.7% vs 34.6% p=0.012), chronic corticosteroid treatment (2.1% vs 11.5% p=0.026), and a higher percentage of surgeries with duration > 3 hours (32.4% vs. 61.1%, p=0.019). A trend towards significance was also observed in patients classified as ASA >3 (20.3% vs. 34.6%, p=0.088), and BMI >30 (33.8% vs. 53.8%, p=0.054). No significant differences were observed in the rest of the variables studied. The most frequent causative microorganism was S.epidermidis (38%), followed by S.aureus (34%) and polymicrobial infections (34%). Conclusions. There is a significant increase in infection in diabetic patients, patients with chronic corticosteroid treatment, and in surgeries lasting > 3 hours

Aim. Failed consolidation (nonunion) after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a major complication, which can lead to additional revision arthrodesis with increased risk of morbidity. Multiple factors can contribute to developing a nonunion, including a low-grade infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of unsuspected low-grade infection in revision arthrodesis for nonunions after foot and ankle arthrodesis. We also analyzed the outcome of unsuspected low-grade infections. Method. We conducted a retrospective study in The Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands. All patients who underwent revision arthrodesis for assumed aseptic nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis between January 2020 and July 2021 were included. Patients were excluded if <5 tissue samples were obtained during revision arthrodesis or if they were treated for infection after the index arthrodesis. For the included patients, at least 5 tissue samples for culture were taken during the revision arthrodesis. The causative microorganisms, antibiotic susceptibility and treatment were assessed. An unsuspected infection was defined as ≥2 positive cultures with phenotypical identical microorganisms. Success was defined as union on imaging during clinical follow-up, without signs of persistent infection after finishing the antibiotic treatment. Results. In total 91 revision arthrodesis due to nonunion were performed. The mean duration between index and revision arthrodesis was 571 days. In 14 patients, an unexpected infection was diagnosed. The most frequent causative bacteria identified were Cutibacterium acnes (n=10) and Staphylococcus spps. (n=5). One infection was caused by a Gram-negative bacilli (Acinetobacter spps.). Two infections were polymicrobial. Of the 14 infections, 12 were treated with antibiotics for 12 weeks, 1 for 6 weeks and 1 was not treated. After one-year follow-up, the success rate was 86% and in one patient re-surgery was performed for a non-infectious reason. Conclusions. In 18% of the revisions for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis, an unexpected low- grade infection was the cause of the nonunion. Nonunion occurring after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a severe complication, leading to additional revision arthrodesis. Low-grade infection should be considered as possible explanation of the nonunion, despite the lack of local inflammatory signs. As 18% of the nonunions were unexpectedly caused by low-grade infection, we strongly recommend obtaining at least 5 tissue samples for culture during revision arthrodesis. The outcome of unexpected infection as cause of nonunion is good, when treated with targeted antibiotics for 12 weeks

Aim. The gold standard treatment for late acute hematogenous (LAH) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is surgical debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). However, this strategy is still controversial in the case of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as some studies report a higher failure rate. The aim of the present study is to report the functional outcomes and cure rate of LAH PJI following TKA treated by means of DAIR at a long-term follow-up. Method. A consecutive prospective cohort consisting of 2,498 TKA procedures was followed for a minimum of 10 years (implanted between 2005 and 2009). The diagnosis of PJI and classification into LAH was done in accordance with the Zimmerli criteria (NEJM 2004). The primary outcome was the failure rate, defined as death before the end of antibiotic treatment, a further surgical intervention for treatment of infection was needed and life-long antibiotic treatment or chronic infection. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Surgical management, antibiotic treatment, the source of infection (primary focus) and the microorganisms isolated were also assessed. Results. Among the 2,498 TKA procedures, 10 patients were diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI during the study period (0.4%). All those 10 patients were operated by means of DAIR, which of course included the polyethylene exchange. They were performed by a knee surgeon and/or PJI surgeon. The failure rate was 0% at the 8.5 years (SD, 2.4) follow-up mark. The elapsed time between primary total knee replacement surgery and the DAIR intervention was 4.7 years (SD, 3.6). DAIR was performed at 2.75 days (SD 1.8) of the onset of symptoms. The most common infecting organism was S. aureus (30%) and E. coli (30%). There were 2 infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci and 2 culture-negative PJI. All culture-positive PJI microorganisms were susceptible to anti-biofilm antibiotics. The source of infection was identified in only 3 cases. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 11.4 weeks (SD 1.9). The postoperative clinical outcomes were excellent, with a mean KSS of 84.1 points (SD, 14.6). Conclusions. Although the literature suggests that TKA DAIR for acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection is associated with high rates of failure, the results presented here suggest a high cure rate with good functional outcomes. Some explanations for this disparity in results may be the correct diagnosis of LHA, not misdiagnosing acute chronic PJI, and a thorough debridement by surgeons specialized in PJI

Aim. Bone and Joint Infections (BJIs) present with non-specific symptoms and can be caused by a wide variety of bacteria and fungi, including many anaerobes and microorganisms that can be challenging to culture or identify by traditional microbiological methods. Clinicians currently rely primarily on culture to identify the pathogen(s) responsible for infection. The BioFire. ®. FilmArray. ®. Bone and Joint Infection (BJI) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) was designed to detect 15 gram-positive (seven anaerobes), 14 gram-negative bacteria (one anaerobe), two yeast, and eight antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes from synovial fluid specimens in an hour. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of an Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire BJI Panel (BBJIP) compared to conventional used as reference methods. Method. In a monocentric study, leftover synovial fluid specimens were collected in a single institution including 4 hospitals and tested using conventional bacterial culture (Standard of Care (SoC)) according to routine procedures following French national recommendations. Specimen has been placed in a refrigerator (4°C) as soon as possible after collection and stored for less than or equal to 7 days before enrollment. Performance of the IUO version of the BBJIP was determined by comparison to SoC for species identification. Results. To date, 201 specimens have been collected and tested using BBJIP. A total of 39 pathogens were obtained in culture. Compared to SoC culture, the overall PPA was 89.7% (35 TP, 4 FN (SA, 1; Strepto Spp, 2; P. micra, 1) and the overall NPA was 99.7% with 16 FP for a total of 5374 bacterial targets screened. Two complementary molecular tests using home-made PCR are underway to definitively conclude about the FN et FP for BBJIP observed in the preset study. Conclusions. The BioFire BJI Panel appears as a promising, sensitive, specific, and robust test for rapid detection of 31 microorganisms (including anaerobes) and eight AMR genes in synovial fluid specimens. The number of pathogens and resistance markers included in the BioFire BJI Panel, together with a reduced time-to-result and increased diagnostic yield compared to culture, is expected to aid in the management of BJIs

Aim. Little is known about microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns as well as the clinical outcome in patients who undergo a repeat first stage procedure as part of a 2-stage revision arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Methods. Between 2011 and 2019, a total of 327 2-stage revision arthroplasties were performed on 312 patients with PJI of the knee and hip at our institution. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients, who underwent a repeat first stage procedure regarding re-revision rate, host factors, culture negative and positive stages, monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections as well as microbiological spectrum and antimicrobial resistance patterns. Results. Overall, 52/312 (16.7%) patients (27 knee/25 hip) underwent a repeat first stage procedure. There were 35/52 (67.3%) culture positive first, 17/52 (32.7%) culture positive repeat first and 12/52 (23.1%) culture positive second stage procedures. In 13/52 (25%) patients a re-revision surgery was necessary at a median follow-up of 46.8 months (range, 12.2 to 93.3 months). High re-revision rates (10/12 [83.3%]) were found in patients with culture positive second stage and low re-revision rates (3/40 [7.5%]; p<0.01) were found in patients with culture negative second stage. The microbiological spectrum changed in 9/11 (81.8%) patients between culture positive first and repeat first stage, in 3/4 (75%) patients between culture positive repeat first and second stage and in 5/6 (83.3%) between culture positive second stage and subsequent re-revision surgery. Moreover, the antimicrobial resistance pattern changed in 6/9 (66.7%) of persistent microorganisms. Conclusion. Microbiological results during first, repeat first and second stage procedures significantly impacted the re-revision rates and changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns between stages are common. However, if eradication of the microorganism at second stage can be accomplished, low re-revision rates can be achieved, even in patients who require a repeat first stage procedure