Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 12 of 12
Results per page:

Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the border of the PN. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new direct line along the joint capsule. In 28 adult patients, the closest distances from each line to the PN in standard knee MRI images were significantly shorter than arthroscopic position MRI images (all p-values < 0.05). All danger areas assessed in the actual arthroscopic position MRIs were included within the danger areas as assessed by the standard knee MRIs. We found that the standard knee MRIs can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 7 - 7
4 Apr 2023
Bottomley J Al-Dadah O
Full Access

Meniscal tears are the most common injury in the knee, affecting 66/100,000 people/year. Surgical treatment includes arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Little is known regarding medium-term outcomes following these procedures in isolated meniscal tears. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate patients with meniscal tears, and those who have undergone meniscectomy and meniscal repair using validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), further exploring factors which affect surgical outcomes. This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery at South Tyneside Hospital since August 2013. 134 patients with isolated meniscal tears were invited to complete postal PROMs. A combination of patient notes and radiological imaging was used to collect information of interest including age, gender, knee-laterality, injured meniscus, tear pattern, procedure performed, complications, and associated injuries. A total of 115 patients (pre-operative patients with current meniscal tear (n=36), meniscectomy (n=63), meniscal repair (n=16)) were included in the analysis with 96% successful PROM completion. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repairs (mean 55-months follow-up) showed better outcomes than pre-operative patients with meniscal tears. Meniscal repairs demonstrated superior outcomes across all PROMs when compared to meniscectomy, with a greater mean overall KOOS score of 17.2 (p=0.009). Factors including higher pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade, pre-operative articular cartilage lesions and bilateral meniscectomies were shown to negatively influence outcomes. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repair maintain clinical benefit at mean 55-months follow-up, affirming their use for treatment of meniscal tears. When feasible, meniscal repair should be performed preferentially over meniscectomy in isolated meniscal tears. Identified predictive factors allow adequate treatment stratification in specific patient groups


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 37 - 37
1 Nov 2021
Peretti GM
Full Access

In the last decades, significant effort has been attempted to salvage the meniscus following injury. Basic science approaches to meniscus repair include procedures for both meniscus regeneration and meniscus healing. Regeneration of meniscal tissue focuses on filling a defect with reparative tissue, which resembles the native structure and function of the meniscus. Procedures for meniscus healing, on the other hand, aim to accomplish adhesion between the margins of a meniscal lesion, with no attempt to regenerate or replace meniscal tissue. Regeneration studies of tissue to fill a defect in the meniscus have shown interesting results, but complete restoration of the native meniscus has not yet been accomplished. Healing of a meniscal lesion has been investigated in different models although none has demonstrated reproducible healing. Therefore, different paths of investigation must be undertaken, and one of these may be the cell-therapy / tissue engineering approach. In a study from our group, we showed the capacity of chondrocyte-seeded cartilaginous scaffold to repair a bucket-handle lesion of the knee meniscus orthotopically in a large animal study. Following studies were done in order to test the potential of other scaffolds and different cell sources for the repair of the meniscal tissue. We have also evaluated the role of hypoxia in meniscal development in vitro as basis for future research in this field, as hypoxia could be be considered as a promoter for meniscal cells maturation, and opens considerably opportunities in the field of meniscus tissue engineering


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 1 | Pages 169 - 175
1 Jan 2010
Dutton AQ Choong PF Goh JC Lee EH Hui JHP

We hypothesised that meniscal tears treated with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) together with a conventional suturing technique would show improved healing compared with those treated by a conventional suturing technique alone. In a controlled laboratory study 28 adult pigs (56 knees) underwent meniscal procedures after the creation of a radial incision to represent a tear. Group 1 (n = 9) had a radial meniscal tear which was left untreated. In group 2 (n = 19) the incision was repaired with sutures and fibrin glue and in group 3, the experimental group (n = 28), treatment was by MSCs, suturing and fibrin glue.

At eight weeks, macroscopic examination of group 1 showed no healing in any specimens. In group 2 no healing was found in 12 specimens and incomplete healing in seven. The experimental group 3 had 21 specimens with complete healing, five with incomplete healing and two with no healing. Between the experimental group and each of the control groups this difference was significant (p < 0.001).

The histological and macroscopic findings showed that the repair of meniscal tears in the avascular zone was significantly improved with MSCs, but that the mechanical properties of the healed menisci remained reduced.


Although remnant-preserved ACL reconstruction (ACLR) restores knee joint stability and dampens the problem of acute ACL rupture-induced knee pain, an increasing number of patients still develop post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after 10 to 15 years of ACLR. We previously found that remnant-preserved ACLR with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus repair may not prevent cartilage degeneration and weaken muscle strength, while the clinical features of PTOA are not clear. We hypothesized that remnant-preserved ACLR with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus tears is related to early cartilage damage, worse function recovery, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and delayed duration to return to sports. The aim is to evaluate the remnant-preserved ACLR with complicated meniscal injuries in predicting which patients are at higher risk of osteoarthritic changes, worse function and limited activities after ACLR for 12 months. Human ethical issue was approved by a committee from Xi'an Jiaotong University. 26 young and active patients (24 male, 2 female) with ACL injuries (Sherman type I and II) with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus within 2 months were included from January 2014 to March 2022. The average age of the ACLR+ meniscus repair was 26.77±1.52 (8 right, 5 left) and isolated ACLR control was 31.92±2.61 years old (7 left, 6 right). Remnant-preserved ACLR with a 5- to 6-strand hamstring tendon graft was operated on by the same sports medicine specialists. MRI CUBE-T. 2. scanning with 48 channels was conducted by a professional radiologist. The volume of the ACL graft was created through 3 dimensional MRI model (Mimics 19, Ann Arbor). Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS) was applied to score visible cartilage damage. IKDC 2000 score and VAS were assessed by two blinded researchers. Results were presented as mean± SEM of each group. The cross-sectional area and 3D volume of the ACL graft were greater in the remnant-preserved ACLR+meniscus group compared with isolated ACLR (p=0.01). It showed that ACLR+ meniscus group had early signs of joint damage and delayed meniscus healing regarding ACLOAS compared to control group (p=0.045). MRI CUBE-T. 2. prediction of radiographic cartilage degeneration was not obvious in both groups post remnant-preserved ACLR over 12 months (p>0.05). However, higher VAS scores, lower IKDC scores, and long-last joint swelling were reported in the ACLR+ meniscus repair group at the end of 12 months follow-up. Although remnant-preserved ACLR+ meniscus was able to maintain the restore the knee function, it showed delayed timing (>12 months) to return to play at the pre-injury stage, while no difference between the timing of returning to the normal daily routine of their ACLR knee compared to control (p=0.30). The cost of ACLR+ meniscus (average 10,520.76$) was higher than the control group (6,452.92$, p=0.018). Remnants-preserved ACLR with concomitant injured medial and lateral meniscus repair shows a higher risk of cartilage damage, greater cost, worse functional performance, and longer time for young male patients to return to sports after 12-month follow-up compared to isolated ACLR. Further evidence and long-term follow-up are needed to better understand the association between these results and the risk of development of PTOA in this patient cohort


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 82 - 82
17 Apr 2023
Kale S Deore S Singh S Gunjotikar A Agrawal P Ghodke R
Full Access

This study was proposed to evaluate the efficacy of fibrin clot augmentation in meniscal tear using inside-out meniscal repair. A total of 35 patients with meniscus tears were operated on with inside-out meniscus repair and fibrin clot augmentation. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with clinical criteria, Lysholm knee scoring system, and MRI. Out of the total 35 cases, 5 cases were lost to follow up. Clinical improvement was observed in 29 out of 30 patients (96.6%). The mean Lysholm score improved significantly from 67.63 ± 6.55 points preoperatively to 92.0 ± 2.9 points postoperatively (P < 0.05) in 2 years follow-up. Follow-up MRI in all patients revealed complete healing except in 1 case where the patient presented with recurrence of symptoms such as pain and locking which resolved with partial meniscectomy. Paraesthesia in the anterior part of the knee was observed in 2 cases. (6.6%). We conclude that fibrin clot augmentation is a good cost-effective modality of treatment for repairable meniscus tears to preserve the meniscus and decrease the point contact pressure on the condyles which may prevent the early occurrence of osteoarthritis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 16 - 16
1 May 2017
Furumatsu T Inoue H Miyazawa S Tanaka T Fujii M Ozaki T
Full Access

Background. Meniscus repair can restore the function of torn meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees. However, few reports investigate the relationship between concurrent meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction and postoperative meniscal position. This study aimed to evaluate the size of the medial meniscus in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and concomitant all-inside medial meniscus repair. Methods. This study received the approval of our Institutional Review Board. Twenty patients underwent ACL reconstruction and concurrent medial meniscus repair of a peripheral longitudinal tear using the FasT-Fix meniscal repair device. Medial tibial plateau length (MTPL) and width (MTPW) were determined by radiographic images. We evaluated the Lysholm score, anteroposterior instability (difference in KT-2000 arthrometer measurement), meniscal healing, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based medial meniscal length (MML) and width (MMW). The healing status of repaired medial meniscus was assessed by 2nd-look arthroscopy. Results. ACL reconstruction improved the Lysholm score and anteroposterior instability. All the patients showed complete healing of the repaired meniscus in 2nd-look arthroscopic evaluation. Significant increase of MML and MML percentage (100 × MML/MTPL) was observed after concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction. However, MMW and MMW percentage (100 × MMW/MTPW) were not affected. Conclusions. Concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction had satisfactory clinical results. Anteroposterior length of the medial meniscus increased after surgery. Our results suggest that medial meniscus repair associated with ACL reconstruction may affect the biomechanical function of the medial meniscus. Level of Evidence. Case-control study, Level IV. Disclosure. The authors have no conflicts of interest


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 131 - 131
2 Jan 2024
McDermott G Domingos M Barkatali B Richardson S
Full Access

Meniscal injuries affect over 1.5 million people across Europe and the USA annually. Injury greatly reduces knee joint mobility and quality of life and frequently leads to the development of osteoarthritis. Tissue engineered strategies have emerged in response to a lack of viable treatments for meniscal pathologies. However, to date, constructs mimicking the structural and functional organisation of native tissue, whilst promoting deposition of new extracellular matrix, remains a bottleneck in meniscal repair. 3D bioprinting allows for deposition and patterning of biological materials with high spatial resolution. This project aims to develop a biomimetic 3D bioprinted meniscal substitute. Meniscal tissue was characterised to effectively inform the design of biomaterials for bioprinting constructs with appropriate structural and functional properties. Histology, gene expression and mass spectrometry were performed on native tissue to investigate tissue architecture, matrix components, cell populations and protein expression regionally across the meniscus. 3D laser scanning and magnetic resonance imaging were employed to acquire the external geometrical information prior to fabrication of a 3D printed meniscus. Bioink suitability was investigated through regional meniscal cell encapsulation in blended hydrogels, with the incorporation of growth factors and assessed for their suitability through rheology, scanning electron microscopy, histology and gene expression analysis. Meniscal tissue characterisation revealed regional variations in matrix compositions, cellular populations and protein expression. The process of imaging through to 3D printing highlighted the capability of producing a construct that accurately replicated meniscal geometries. Regional meniscal cell encapsulation into hydrogels revealed a recovery in cell phenotype, with the incorporation of growth factors into the bioink's stimulating cellular re-differentiation and improved zonal functionality. Meniscus biofabrication highlights the potential to print patient specific, customisable meniscal implants. Achieving zonally distinct variations in cell and matrix deposition highlights the ability to fabricate a highly complex tissue engineered construct. Acknowledgements: This work was undertaken as part of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)-funded CDT in Advanced Biomedical Materials


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 44 - 44
17 Apr 2023
Wang M Lu X Li G
Full Access

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) in the treatment of meniscal tears in the avascular region. Seventy-two twelve-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats with full-thickness longitudinal medial meniscal tears in the avascular region were divided into 3 groups: control group (G. con. ), treated with classic signal PEMF (G. classic. ), and high slew rate signal PEMF(G. HSR. ). The HSR signal has the same pulse and burst frequencies as the classic signal, but with a higher slew rate. Macroscopic observation and histological analysis of the meniscus and articular cartilage were performed to evaluate the meniscal healing and progressions of osteoarthritis. The synovium was harvested for histological and immunofluorescent analysis to assess the intra-articular inflammation. The meniscal healing, articular cartilage degeneration, and synovitis were quantitatively evaluated according to their respective scoring system. Dramatic degenerative changes of the meniscus and articular cartilage were noticed during gross observation and histological evaluation in the control group at 8 weeks. However, the menisci in the two treatment groups were restored to normal morphology with a smooth surface and shiny white color. Particularly, the HSR signal remarkably enhanced the fibrochondrogenesis and accelerated the remodeling process of the regenerated tissue. The meniscal healing scores of PEMF treatment groups were significantly higher than those in the control group at 8 weeks. Specifically, the HSR signal showed a significantly higher meniscal repair score than the classic signal at week 8 (P < .01). The degeneration score (G. con. versus G. classic. : P < .0001; Gcon versus G. HSR. : P < .0001) and synovitis score (G. con. versus Gclassic: P < .0001; G. con. versus G. HSR. : P = .0002) of the control groups were significantly higher than those in the two treatment groups. PEMF promoted the healing of meniscal tears in the avascular region and restored the injured meniscus to its structural integrity in a rat model. Compared to the classic signal, the HSR signal showed the increased capability to promote fibrocartilaginous tissue formation and modulate the inflammatory environment and therefore protected the knee joint from post-traumatic osteoarthritis development


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Dec 2022
Lombardo MDM Mangiavini L Peretti GM
Full Access

Menisci are crucial structures for knee homeostasis: they provide increase of congruence between the articular surfaces of the distal femur and tibial plateau, bear loading, shock absorption, lubrication, and proprioception. After a meniscal lesion, the golden rule, now, is to save as much meniscus as possible: only the meniscus tissue which is identified as unrepairable should be excised and meniscal sutures find more and more indications. Several different methods have been proposed to improve meniscal healing. They include very basic techniques, such as needling, abrasion, trephination and gluing, or more complex methods, such as synovial flaps, meniscal wrapping, or the application of fibrin clots. Basic research of meniscal substitutes has also become very active in the last decades. The features needed for a meniscal scaffold are: promotion of cell migration, it should be biomimetic and biocompatible, it should resist forces applied and transmitted by the knee, it should slowly biodegrade and should be easy to handle and implant. Several materials have been tested, that can be divided into synthetic and biological. The first have the advantage to be manufactured with the desired shapes and sizes and with precise porosity dimension and biomechanical characteristics. To date, the most common polymers are polylactic acid (PGA); poly-(L)-lactic acid (PLLA); poly- (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA); polyurethane (PU); polyester carbon and polycaprolactone (PCL). The possible complications, more common in synthetic than natural polymers are poor cell adhesion and the possibility of developing a foreign body reaction or aseptic inflammation, leading to alter the joint architecture and consequently to worsen the functional outcomes. The biological materials that have been used over time are the periosteal tissue, the perichondrium, the small intestine submucosa (SIS), acellular porcine meniscal tissue, bacterial cellulose. Although these have a very high biocompatibility, some components are not suitable for tissue engineering as their conformation and mechanical properties cannot be modified. Collagen or proteoglycans are excellent candidates for meniscal engineering, as they maintain a high biocompatibility, they allow for the modification of the porosity texture and size and the adaptation to the patient meniscus shape. On the other hand, they have poor biomechanical characteristics and a more rapid degradation rate, compared to others, which could interfere with the complete replacement by the host tissue. An interesting alternative is represented by hydrogel scaffolds. Their semi-liquid nature allows for the generation of scaffolds with very precise geometries obtained from diagnostic images (i.e. MRI). Promising results have been reported with alginate and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Furthermore, hydrogel scaffolds can be enriched with growth factors, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC). In recent years, several researchers have developed meniscal scaffolds combining different biomaterials, to optimize the mechanical and biological characteristics of each polymer. For example, biological polymers such as chitosan, collagen and gelatin allow for excellent cellular interactions, on the contrary synthetic polymers guarantee better biomechanical properties and greater reliability in the degradation time. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a very interesting method for meniscus repair because it allows for a patient-specific customization of the scaffolds. The optimal scaffold should be characterized by many biophysical and biochemical properties as well as bioactivity to ensure an ECM-like microenvironment for cell survival and differentiation and restoration of the anatomical and mechanical properties of the native meniscus. The new technological advances in recent years, such as 3D bioprinting and mesenchymal stem cells management will probably lead to an acceleration in the design, development, and validation of new and effective meniscal substitutes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 71 - 71
1 Apr 2017
Barnouin L Ruiz N Robert H
Full Access

Background. The objective was to evaluate the benefit that could be obtained in terms of pain and efficacy with processed segmental allografts on 20 patients in meniscal repair treatment. Methods. Segmental meniscal allografts were extracted from tibial plateaux during total knee arthroplasties on lateralised osteoarthritis and selected on macroscopic integrity criteria. They underwent decellularisation and deproteinisation processes to obtain a sterile collagenous matrix with glycosaminoglycans removal. Under arthroscopy, the grafts (50mm length) were fixed at the posterior horn and at the meniscosynovial wall. The main evaluation criterion was the IKDC subjective knee score evolution. Secondary criteria were the meniscus morphology (Magnetic Resonance Imaging after 12 months) and the recellularisation (biopsy after 1 year). Material. In this Phase II monocentric, prospective and open-label clinical trial, a total of 10 male patients (mean age: 39 years [24–50]) were enrolled. They were symptomatic (IKDC score < 70), did not suffer from osteoarthritis (Kellgreen-Lawrence score < Grade 2) and presented a meniscal tissue defect on the posterior and/or medium segment, respecting the posterior horn. Exclusion criteria were lax knees, significant frontal deviations, pre-osteoarthritis and obese patients. Results. One patient dropped out. The mean IKDC score increased from 45 points [23 to 70] at the inclusion to 70 points [49 to 90] after 1 year. The MRI and biopsies results are currently being analysed. The first biopsies studied show that the allograft is cellularised with fibroblasts and chondrocytes. Conclusions. The functional results are encouraging, at least equivalent to the ones obtained for massive grafts. Indications for segmental allografts are difficult to prescribe early and the surgical technique is challenging; these two facts contribute to good outcome. The early clinical results are positive, while awaiting the morphological and histological outcomes in a few months. Level of evidence. III


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 1 | Pages 10 - 14
1 Feb 2020
Ibrahim M Reito A Pidgaiska O