Introduction. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) is assessed in the acutely injured knee to investigate for ligamentous injury and rotational laxity. Specifically, there is a growing recognition of the significance of anterior medial rotary laxity (AMRI) as a crucial element in assessing knee stability. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are often accompanied with medial collateral ligament (MCL) damage. It has been suggested that Deep MCL (dMCL) fibres are a primary restraint in rotational displacement. This research aims to quantify the difference in rotational laxity of patients with ACL and MCL injuries to deem if the Feagin-Thomas test can robustly capture metrics of AMRI. 2. Methods. AMRI was assessed using the Feagin-Thomas test in 7 isolated ACL (iACL) injured participants, 3 combined ACL and superficial fibre MCL (sMCL) injuries, 5 combined ACL and deep fibre MCL injuries, and 21 healthy controls. Displacement values were recorded using an optical motion capture (OMC) system and bespoke processing pipeline which map and model the knee's anterior displacement values relative to the medial compartment. Since absolute values (mm) of rotational laxity vary dependant on the person, values were recorded as a proportion of the rotational laxity obtained from the subject's contralateral leg. Values were compared between each patient group using an ANOVA test and Tukey's honesty significant difference post hoc test. 3. Results. The healthy control group had a median proportion of 0.97 (3SF), whilst the iACL was 1.12 (3SF), a 12% increase in rotational laxity in the injured leg. The sMCL group yielded a result of 1.64 (3SF), a 64% increase in rotational laxity in the injured leg; finally, dMCL resulted in a proportion of rotational laxity of 1.90 (3SF), a 90% increase in rotational laxity [table 1]. Whilst all groups showed differences in the increase of rotational laxity, dMCL was significantly different from the healthy control group (P value 0.0041). 4. Conclusion. ACL injuries with MCL involvement led to an increase in anterior medial rotary laxity and this is more evident in patients where deep MCL fibres are involved. The Feagin-Thomas test appears to be sensitive in detecting differences in AMRI and should be considered when performing comprehensive clinical knee examination. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. To evaluate career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL + medial collateral ligament (MCL) and ACL +posterolateral corner (PLC) surgeries in all elite athletes. Secondly, in a subgroup of male professional footballers to determine career length and competition level after ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC reconstructions and compare this to a cohort who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) alone. Methods. A consecutive cohort of elite athletes undergoing combined ACL+MCL surgery and combined ACL+PLC surgery between February 2001 and October 2019 were analysed. A subgroup of male footballers from this population was compared to a previously identified cohort of male, professional footballers having had primary ACL reconstruction without other ligament surgery. A minimum 2-years follow-up was required. Outcome measures were career length and competition level. Results. Ninety-eight elite athletes were included, 50 had ACL+PLC and 48 had ACL+MCL surgeries. The timeline for return to play (RTP)was significantly longer for ACL+PLC injuries (12.8 months) as compared to ACL+MCL injuries (11.1 months, p=.019). On average, career length after surgery of an athlete in the ACL+PLC group was 4.8 years and for the ACL+MCL group 4.2 years (n.s.). In the subgroup analysis of footballers, a significantly lower number of players with combined ACL+PLC surgery were able to RTP (88%, p=.003) compared to 100%for ACL+MCL surgery and 97% for isolated ACL reconstruction, as well as requiring almost 3 months longer RTP timeline (12.9±4.2 months= .002) when compared to isolated ACL (10.2 ± 3.9 months) and combined ACL+MCL groups (10.0+2.4 months). However, career length and competition level were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion. The addition of MCL surgery to ACL-R did not affect RTP time and rate in elite athletes, nor competition level in male professional footballers compared to ACL-R alone. Moreover, the career length after successful RTP following combined ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC surgeries were the same. However, professional footballers with combined ACL+PLC surgery return at a lower rate and require a longer RTP time when compared to the ones with isolated ACL-R or combined ACL+MCL surgery. For the factors assessed in this study additional MCL surgery to ACL-R alone did not alter outcome from that with ACL-R in professional soccer players

Aims

Dual plating of distal femoral fractures with medial and lateral implants has been performed to improve construct mechanics and alignment, in cases where isolated lateral plating would be insufficient. This may potentially compromise vascularity, paradoxically impairing healing. This study investigates effects of single versus dual plating on distal femoral vascularity.

Most fractures of the radial head are stable undisplaced or minimally displaced partial fractures without an associated fracture of the elbow or forearm or ligament injury, where stiffness following non-operative management is the primary concern. Displaced unstable fractures of the radial head are usually associated with other fractures or ligament injuries, and restoration of radiocapitellar contact by reconstruction or prosthetic replacement of the fractured head is necessary to prevent subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and forearm. In fractures with three or fewer fragments (two articular fragments and the neck) and little or no metaphyseal comminution, open reduction and internal fixation may give good results. However, fragmented unstable fractures of the radial head are prone to early failure of fixation and nonunion when fixed. Excision of the radial head is associated with good long-term results, but in patients with instability of the elbow or forearm, prosthetic replacement is preferred.

This review considers the characteristics of stable and unstable fractures of the radial head, as well as discussing the debatable aspects of management, in light of the current best evidence.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:151–9.