Aims

Prior cost-effectiveness analyses on osseointegrated prosthesis for transfemoral unilateral amputees have analyzed outcomes in non-USA countries using generic quality of life instruments, which may not be appropriate when evaluating disease-specific quality of life. These prior analyses have also focused only on patients who had failed a socket-based prosthesis. The aim of the current study is to use a disease-specific quality of life instrument, which can more accurately reflect a patient’s quality of life with this condition in order to evaluate cost-effectiveness, examining both treatment-naïve and socket refractory patients.

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe implant and patient-reported outcome in patients with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) treated with a bone-anchored, transcutaneous prosthesis. Methods. In this cohort study, all patients with a unilateral TFA treated with the Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) implant system in Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, between January 1999 and December 2017 were included. The cohort comprised 111 patients (78 male (70%)), with a mean age 45 years (17 to 70). The main reason for amputation was trauma in 75 (68%) and tumours in 23 (21%). Patients answered the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) before treatment and at two, five, seven, ten, and 15 years’ follow-up. A prosthetic activity grade was assigned to each patient at each timepoint. All mechanical complications, defined as fracture, bending, or wear to any part of the implant system resulting in removal or change, were recorded. Results. The Q-TFA scores at two, five, seven, and ten years showed significantly more prosthetic use, better mobility, fewer problems, and an improved global situation, compared with baseline. The survival rate of the osseointegrated implant part (the fixture) was 89% and 72% after seven and 15 years, respectively. A total of 61 patients (55%) had mechanical complications (mean 3.3 (SD 5.76)), resulting in exchange of the percutaneous implant parts. There was a positive relationship between a higher activity grade and the number of mechanical complications. Conclusion. Compared with before treatment, the patient-reported outcome was significantly better and remained so over time. Although osseointegration and the ability to transfer loads over a 15-year period have been demonstrated, a large number of mechanical failures in the external implant parts were found. Since these were related to higher activity, restrictions in activity and improvements to the mechanical properties of the implant system are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):55–63

This study compares outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual lag screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Technical factors associated with mechanical failure were also identified. All adult patients (>18yrs) with a subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Included patients underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and technical predictors of failure. The study included 587 patients, 336 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 71% female). The IN group exhibited a higher prevalence of osteoporosis (p=0.002) and CKD□3 (p=0.007). There were no other baseline differences between groups. The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.51, p=0.020). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (p=0.040), back-out (p=0.040) and nail breakage (p=0.51) was only observed in the GN group. The risk of peri-implant fracture was similar between the groups (HR 1.10, p=0.84). Technical predictors of mechanical included varus >5° for cut-out (HR 15.61, p=0.016), TAD>25mm for back-out (HR 9.41, p=0.020) and shortening >1cm for peri-implant fracture (HR 6.50, p=<0.001). Dual lag screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the early postoperative mortality and morbidity in older patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, between those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and those who underwent hemiarthroplasty.

Aims

Patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are often multimorbid, thus unplanned readmissions following surgery are common. We therefore aimed to analyze 30-day and one-year readmission rates, reasons for, and factors associated with, readmission risk in a cohort of patients with surgically treated PFFs across Austria.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability.

Dual mobility significantly reduces the risk of prosthetic instability. This mechanical complication occurs when the prosthetic head moves out from the retentive polyethylene liner, such phenomenon called intra-prosthetic dislocation reports a ten-year incidence of 2% in the literature. We prospectively analysed all intra-prosthetic dislocations having occurred since 1985 in our department in order to investigate patient- and implant-related risk factors. 91 intra-prosthetic dislocations occurred with NOVAE (SERF) cups in 85 patients of mean age 50.7 years. Intra-prosthetic dislocation occurred after a mean period of 8.8 years. A PRO (SERF) stem was implanted in 56 cases and a PF (SERF) stem in 35. The stems were different from one another in their neck diameter and material: 13 mm titanium neck and 16 mm stainless steel neck respectively. When taking both prosthetic features into account, no significant difference could be established regarding the time between implantation and dislocation. Comparison between these two prosthetic features was performed by means of two continuous homogeneous series which included 240 patients implanted with PF stems and 382 patients with PRO stems. At a mean 15-year follow-up, the two series reported a non-statistically different intra-prosthetic dislocation rate of 4%. In both series, young age and large diameter cups were considered predisposing factors for intra-prosthetic dislocation. Therefore, unlike suggested by several authors, prosthetic neck material and diameter do not appear as the main predictors for intra-prosthetic dislocation which is highly promoted by patient-related features

PURPOSE. To evaluate the late radiographic and functional complications occurring after treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail. PATIENTS. This is a retrospective study which was conducted between October 2004 and October 2009. 55 patients with a reverse oblique trochanteric fracture were treated with the Gamma 3 nail. According to the AO classification, there were 36 type AIII-1, 8 AIII-2, 11 AIII-3 fractures. Closed reduction was achieved in all patients. The long gamma 3 nail was used in 34 fractures. The mean follow up was 18 months (range 9 to 32 months). The patients were evaluated clinically (Harris hip score) and radiographically. RESULTS. No intraoperative complications were recorded. During surgery, satisfactory reduction and acceptable nail insertion was assessed in all patients. No early postoperative technical failures were noticed. Complete union was achieved in 51 patients. The mean Harris hip score was 80.2. The results were excellent in 23 patients (41.8%), good in 19 (34.5%), fair in 9 (16.3%), and poor in 4 patients (7%). Late radiographic complications included secondary varus displacement due to cut-out of the proximal screw in three patients (5.4%), and calcification at the tip of the greater trochanter in nine patients (16%). Stress shielding as evidenced by the lack of cortical hypertrophy at the level of the tip of the implant were detected in 5 patients. Patients treated with a long gamma 3 nail achieved a statistically significant better result (p< 0.005). Three patients (5.5%) required a reconstructive procedure. CONCLUSION. Proximal femoral nailing provides stronger fixation of the proximal part in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures reducing mechanical complications. The implant choice, the accuracy of fracture reduction, and the correct placement of the nail are the key factors influencing the final outcome

Introduction. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures (AO 31A2) continue to be a challenge, as non-locking implants have shown a considerable rate of loss of reduction. Intramedullary fixation has been recommended, although screw cut-out has been identified as problematic. This study was performed to ascertain whether treatments with the established proximal femoral nail (PFN) and the newer PFNA with blade design (proximal femoral nail antirotation) have advantages over the use of the Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP, developed by Gotfried). Methods. Cohort study. Between March 2003 and March 2008, 134 patients with unstable fractures were treated with a PCCP, (n=44, 78.3 yrs, ASA 2.8), a PFN (n=50, 77.2 yrs, ASA 2.8), or a PFNA (n=40, 75.8 yrs, ASA 2.6). The patients (31 PCCP, 33 PFN, 30 PFNA) were then reexamined clinically and radiologically after approximately 21 months. Results. The PCCP was found to require less implantation time than the PFN and the PFNA (60 vs. 80 vs. 84 min, p<0.001) and less radiation exposition time (PCCP 139 vs. PFN 283 vs. PFNA 188 seconds, p<0.001). The rate of reoperations due to wound infections and hematomas amounted to 2% for the PCCP, 4% for the PFN, and 5% for the PFNA (p=0.799). Due to mechanical complications, 9% of patients implanted with a PCCP, 13% of those implanted with a PFN, and 5% of those implanted with a PFNA had to be reoperated (p=0.353). The cut-out rate was 2% after implantation of the PCCP, 4% after the PFN, and 5% after implantation of the PFNA (p=0.799). In one case, the shaft was fractured intraoperatively (PFNA). The tip-apex distance for the lower femoral neck screw (PCCP 22mm vs. PFN 30mm vs. PFNA 30mm, p<0.001), stress-related varisation of the collodiaphyseal (CCD) angle (4° for all implants), impaction (PCCP 5mm vs. PFN 5mm vs. PFNA 6mm, p=0.662) and femoral shortening (PCCP 3mm vs. PFN 3mm vs. PFNA 4mm, p=0.876) were not determinants of the postoperative function. On the basis of their scores according to Merle d'Aubigné and Harris, there was no variation in the results of the follow-up examinations. Conclusions. The use of the PCCP for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures presents a minimally invasive method of implantation, as well as a promising therapy option with regards to operation time, radiologic examination time, and rate of complications. Processes of impaction due to stress are seldom observed. No benefits could be established in an intramedullary treatment with the PFN or the PFNA; thus, it appears that the higher cost of these implants is avoidable

In a prospective, randomised study we have compared the pertrochanteric external fixator (PF) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) in 100 consecutive patients who were allocated randomly to the two methods of treatment. Details of the patients and the patterns of fracture were similar in both groups. Follow-up was for six months. Use of the PF was associated with significantly less blood loss, a shorter operating time, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospitalisation (p < 0.001), earlier mobilisation (p < 0.001) and a reduced rate of mechanical complications (p < 0.01). Superficial infection was significantly more common with the PF (p < 0.01), but without long-term adverse consequences. There were no differences in the healing of the fracture, mortality or final functional outcome. Our results indicate that the external fixator is an effective and safe device for treating pertrochanteric fractures and should be considered as a useful alternative to conventional fixation with the sliding hip screw

Aims

Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of treatment with an osseointegrated percutaneous (OI-) prosthesis and a socket-suspended (S-) prosthesis for patients with a transfemoral amputation.

The spiral blade modification of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was designed for superior biomechanical fixation in the osteoporotic femoral head. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes and in particular the incidence of loss of fixation.

In a series of 197 consecutive patients over the age of 50 years treated with DHS-blades (blades) and 242 patients treated with conventional DHS (screw) for AO/OTA 31.A1 or A2 intertrochanteric fractures were identified from a prospectively compiled database in a level 1 trauma centre. Using propensity score matching, two groups comprising 177 matched patients were compiled and radiological and clinical outcomes compared. In each group there were 66 males and 111 females. Mean age was 83.6 (54 to 100) for the conventional DHS group and 83.8 (52 to 101) for the blade group.

Loss of fixation occurred in two blades and 13 DHSs. None of the blades had observable migration while nine DHSs had gross migration within the femoral head before the fracture healed. There were two versus four implant cut-outs respectively and one side plate pull-out in the DHS group. There was no significant difference in mortality and eventual walking ability between the groups. Multiple logistic regression suggested that poor reduction (odds ratio (OR) 11.49, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.45 to 90.9, p = 0.021) and fixation by DHS (OR 15.85, 95%CI 2.50 to 100.3, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of loss of fixation.

The spiral blade design may decrease the risk of implant migration in the femoral head but does not reduce the incidence of cut-out and reoperation. Reduction of the fracture is of paramount importance since poor reduction was an independent predictor for loss of fixation regardless of the implant being used.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:398–404.

Patients with transfemoral amputation (TFA) often experience problems related to the use of socket-suspended prostheses. The clinical development of osseointegrated percutaneous prostheses for patients with a TFA started in 1990, based on the long-term successful results of osseointegrated dental implants.

Between1999 and 2007, 51 patients with 55 TFAs were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, single-centre non-randomised study and followed for two years. The indication for amputation was trauma in 33 patients (65%) and tumour in 12 (24%). A two-stage surgical procedure was used to introduce a percutaneous implant to which an external amputation prosthesis was attached. The assessment of outcome included the use of two self-report questionnaires, the Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) and the Short-Form (SF)-36.

The cumulative survival at two years’ follow-up was 92%. The Q-TFA showed improved prosthetic use, mobility, global situation and fewer problems (all p < 0.001). The physical function SF-36 scores were also improved (p < 0.001). Superficial infection was the most frequent complication, occurring 41 times in 28 patients (rate of infection 54.9%). Most were treated effectively with oral antibiotics. The implant was removed in four patients because of loosening (three aseptic, one infection).

Osseointegrated percutaneous implants constitute a novel form of treatment for patients with TFA. The high cumulative survival rate at two years (92%) combined with enhanced prosthetic use and mobility, fewer problems and improved quality of life, supports the ‘revolutionary change’ that patients with TFA have reported following treatment with osseointegrated percutaneous prostheses.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:106–13.

Limited access surgery is thought to reduce post-operative morbidity and provide faster recovery of function. The percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) is a recently introduced device for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with minimal exposure. It has several potential mechanical advantages over the conventional compression hip screw (CHS). Our aim in this prospective, randomised, controlled study was to compare the outcome of patients operated on using these two devices.

We randomised 104 patients with intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31.A1–A2) to surgical treatment with either the PCCP or CHS and followed them for one year postoperatively.

The mean operating blood loss was 161.0 ml (8 to 450) in the PCCP group and 374.0 ml (11 to 980) in the CHS group (Student’s t-test, p < 0.0001). The pain score and ability to bear weight were significantly better in the PCCP group at six weeks post-operatively. Analysis of the radiographs in a proportion of the patients revealed a reduced amount of medial displacement in the PCCP group (two patients, 4%) compared with the CHS group (10 patients, 18.9%); Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.02.

The PCCP device was associated with reduced intra-operative blood loss, less postoperative pain and a reduced incidence of collapse of the fracture.