Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_30 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Aug 2013
Joseph J Dearing J
Full Access

We present a simple seated dial test that can be used by a single examiner in the acute or chronic situation to diagnose posterolateral corner knee injury. In the acute setting a traditional prone dial test can be cumbersome and painful for patients. Therefore a supine technique can be utilised, however this requires an assistant in order to hold the knees together with the tibia in a reduced position. We therefore utilise a seated technique in which the patient sits with their knees flexed over the edge of the examination couch. The patient is then able to hold their knees together, negating the need for an assistant. The sensitivity of a dial test is improved if the knee is reduced and so with this technique the tibia will be held in the anatomical position by the examination couch. The patients' feet are grasped with both medial malleoli together and then an external rotation moment is exerted at 30 and 90 degrees of flexion measuring the thigh-foot angle or visualising the tibial tuberosities. A positive test being 10 degrees or more of increased external rotation in the affected knee. This test is similar to the Spin test however it relies on the tactile sensation of posterolateral tibial rotation. This can be difficult to elicit in the acute situation due to haemarthrosis. Simultaneous side-to-side comparison is also not possible. A further disadvantage of the Spin test is that it can only be performed at 90 degrees of flexion and so only applies in combined PCL and posterolateral corner repair. In conclusion we believe that this modification of the standard dial test is a simple to perform accurate method for assessing posterolateral corner knee injury in the acute and chronic setting


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_30 | Pages 39 - 39
1 Aug 2013
Baird E Macdonald D Gilmour A Kumar C
Full Access

We aimed to review the outcome of Agility total ankle replacements carried out in our institution between 2002 and 2006. Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological review pre-operatively, then at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and annually until 10 years post op. Clinical review included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score, satisfaction and pain scores. Case notes were reviewed to determine intra and post-operative complications. 30 arthroplasties were performed in 30 consecutive patients. Pre-operative diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis(16), primary osteoarthritis(12) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis(2). After a mean follow up of 6.2 years (1.4–10.1), 4 patients had died, and 22 out of the remaining 24 were available for follow-up. Intra operative complications included lateral malleoli fracture(3) and superficial peroneal nerve injury(2). Post operative complications included 1 early death, but this was not related to the surgical procedure. Two patients developed deep infections of the prosthesis. One underwent removal of the implant; the other is on long term oral antibiotic therapy. One patient had delayed union of the syndesmosis and six patients had non-union. On clinical assessment, patients' AOFAS scores improved from mean 40.4 pre-op to 83.5 post-op (p<0.001). Radiological assessment of the tibial component revealed 25 (93%) patients had lucency in at least one zone in the AP radiograph. We found a relatively high level of re-surgery and complications following Agility total ankle replacement. A 7% revision rate is much higher than would be tolerated in knee or hip arthroplasty, but compares favourably to other studies of TAR. Despite radiological features which suggest loosening, the high rate of re-surgery and complications; patients are generally satisfied with the procedure, reporting lower levels of pain and improved function. Overall we feel that the Agility ankle is an acceptable alternative to ankle arthrodesis, however patients need to be warned of the risk of re-surgery


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 8 | Pages 514 - 521
1 Aug 2017
Mannering N Young T Spelman T Choong PF

Objectives

Whilst gait speed is variable between healthy and injured adults, the extent to which speed alone alters the 3D in vivo knee kinematics has not been fully described. The purpose of this prospective study was to understand better the spatiotemporal and 3D knee kinematic changes induced by slow compared with normal self-selected walking speeds within young healthy adults.

Methods

A total of 26 men and 25 women (18 to 35 years old) participated in this study. Participants walked on a treadmill with the KneeKG system at a slow imposed speed (2 km/hr) for three trials, then at a self-selected comfortable walking speed for another three trials. Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were conducted using Stata/IC 14 to compare kinematics of slow versus self-selected walking speed.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 4 | Pages 520 - 526
1 Apr 2008
Yau WP Leung A Liu KG Yan CH Wong LS Chiu KY

We have investigated the errors in the identification of the transepicondylar axis and the anteroposterior axis between a minimally-invasive and a conventional approach in four fresh-frozen cadaver knees. The errors in aligning the femoral prosthesis were compared with the reference transepicondylar axis as established by CT.

The error in the identification of the transepicondylar axis was significantly higher in the minimal approach (4.5° of internal rotation, sd 4) than in the conventional approach (3° of internal rotation, sd 4; p < 0.001). The errors in identifying the anteroposterior axis in the two approaches were 0° (sd 5) and 1.8° (sd 5) of internal rotation, respectively (p < 0.001).