Infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can cause significant morbidity to the patient and be associated with significant costs and burdens to the healthcare system. Wound complications often initiate the cascade that can eventually lead to deep infection and implant failure. Galat et al. reported that wound complications following TKA requiring surgical treatment were associated with 2-year cumulative risks of major reoperation and deep infection of 5.3% and 6.0%, respectively. Consequently, developing a systematic approach to the management of wound problems following TKA can potentially minimise subsequent complications. Unlike the hip, the vascular supply to the soft tissue envelope to the knee is less robust and more sensitive to the trauma of surgery. Therefore, proper soft tissue handling and wound closure at the time of surgery can minimise potential wound drainage and breakdown postoperatively. Kim et al. showed, using a meta-analysis of the literature, that primary skin closure with staples demonstrated lower wound complications, decreased closure times, and lower resource utilization compared to sutures. However, a running subcuticular closure enables the most robust skin perfusion following TKA. Finally, the use of hydrofiber surgical dressings following surgery was associated with increased patient comfort and satisfaction and reduced the incidence of superficial surgical site infection. A wound complication following TKA needs to be managed systematically and aggressively. A determination of whether the extent of the involvement is superficial or deep is critical. Antibiotics should not be started without first excluding the possibility of a deep infection. Weiss and Krackow recommended return to the operating room for wound drainage persisting beyond 7 days. While incisional negative pressure wound therapy can occasionally salvage the “at risk” draining wound following TKA, its utilization should be limited only to the time immediately following surgery and should not delay formal surgical debridement, if indicated. Finally, early wound flap coverage and co-management of wound complications with plastic surgery is associated with increased rates of prosthesis retention and limb salvage

Infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can cause significant morbidity to the patient and be associated with significant costs and burdens to the health care system. Wound complications often initiate the cascade that can eventually lead to deep infection and implant failure. Galat et al. reported that wound complications following TKA requiring surgical treatment were associated with a 2-year cumulative risk of major reoperation and deep infection of 5.3% and 6.0%, respectively. Consequently, developing a systematic approach to the management of wound problems following TKA can potentially minimise subsequent complications. Unlike the hip, the vascular supply to the soft tissue envelope to the knee is less robust and more sensitive to the trauma of surgery. Therefore, proper soft tissue handling and wound closure at the time of surgery can minimise potential wound drainage and breakdown post-operatively. Kim et al. showed, using a meta-analysis of the literature, that primary skin closure with staples demonstrated lower wound complications, decreased closure times, and lower resource utilization compared to sutures. However, a running subcuticular closure enables the most robust skin perfusion following TKA. Finally, the use of hydrofiber surgical dressings following surgery was associated with increased patient comfort and satisfaction and reduced the incidence of superficial surgical site infection. A wound complication following TKA needs to be managed systematically and aggressively. A determination of whether the extent of the involvement is superficial or deep is critical. Antibiotics should not be started without first excluding the possibility of a deep infection. Weiss and Krackow recommended return to the operating room for wound drainage persisting beyond 7 days. While incisional negative pressure wound therapy can occasionally salvage the “at risk” draining wound following TKA, its utilization should be limited only to the time immediately following surgery and should not delay formal surgical debridement, if indicated. Finally, early wound flap coverage and co-management of wound complications with plastics surgery is associated with increased rates of prosthesis retention and limb salvage

Introduction. The optimal bearing for hip arthroplasty is still a matter of debate. in younger and more active patients ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearings are frequently chosen over metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings to reduce wear and increase biocompatibility. However, the fracture risk of ceramic heads is higher than that of metal heads. This can cause serious issue, as ceramic fractures pose a serious complication often necessitating major revision surgery – a complication more frequently seen in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. To date, there are no long-term data (> 20 years of follow-up) reporting fracture rates of the ceramic femoral heads in CoP bearings. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of 348 cementless THAs treated with 2nd generation Biolox® Al2O3 Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP) bearings, which had been consecutively implanted between January 1985 and December 1989. At implantation the mean patient age was 57 years. The cohort was subsequently followed for a minimum of 20 years. At the final follow-up 111 patients had died, and 5 were lost to follow-up (Fig. 1). A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of ceramic head fractures over the long-term. Results. (Figs. 2, 3):. After 22-years the cumulative incidence of ceramic head fracture was estimated at 0.3% (95%-CI, 0–2.4%; 38 hips at risk). No impending failures could be noted on radiographic analysis at final follow-up. Discussion. The fracture rate of second-generation ceramic heads using a CoP articulation remains very low into the third decade after cementless THA; ceramic heads appear to be a safe alternative to metal femoral heads. Summary. This study evaluates the long-term (20–25 year) survivorship of cement on polyethylene bearings in uncemented THA

The extraordinary majesty of THR, as it burst onto the scene 60 years ago, both dazzled and blinded. It dazzled patients and surgeons alike and simultaneously obstructed a clear eyed assessment of the human costs. It behooves current practitioners, who have benefited mightily by our progress, to pause and reflect thoughtfully on that progress. Look no further than the fact that the treatment of a benign disease left one patient out of every 50 dead. Dead from a pulmonary embolus and that over 25% of the patients threw pulmonary emboli. What were the big six major disadvantages: 1) Fatal pulmonary emboli; 2) Prosthetic joint infection; 3) Failure of fixation; 4) Dislocation; 5) Periprosthetic osteolysis; 6) Prolonged hospitalization. Start with the observation that THR in the modern era began with Charnley's experiment with Teflon articulations. Of the nearly 300 such operations done, nearly 300 failed. Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was better- much better. But still it produced wear and periprosthetic osteolysis, afflicting an estimated 1 million patients. Periprosthetic osteolysis became the most common reason for failure, the most common reason for reoperation, the most common reason for fracture, and the most common reason for extremely difficult re-operations requiring major grafting. Reoperation rates in certain series were 20 to 30% from loosening and 20 to 40% from osteolysis. Dislocation catapulted the unsuspecting patient to the floor at a rate of one out of 20 patients and the initial rate of prosthetic joint infection was 10%. Most patients were hospitalised in the new neighborhood of 2.5 weeks, at huge expense. Massive progress has been made but forget not that this striking progress was not obsessively linear. Recall the recent, extraordinary and continuing massive failure of metal-on-metal total hip replacements, despite 40 prior years of experience, predicting that metal-on-metal total joints should be ‘just fine’. Over the past six decades every one of the six major disadvantages listed above has been reduced by an order of magnitude. The challenge to you is to continue that progress