Hop tests are used to determine return to sports after ACL reconstruction. They mostly measure distance and symmetry but do not assess kinematics and kinetics. Recently, biomechanical evaluations have been incorporated into these functional jump tests for the better assessment of return to sport. We assessed the sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) of the knee, the deviation axis of rotation (DAOR), and the vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) normalized to body weight in nine healthy participants during the single leg (SLH) and crossover hop tests (COHT). Participants' leg lengths were measured. Jumping distances were marked in the test area as being 4/5 of the leg length. Four sensors were placed on the thighs, the legs and the feet. These body parts were handled as a single rigid body. Eight 480 Hz cameras were used to capture the movements of these rigid bodies. vGRF at landing were measured using a force plate (Bertec, Inc, USA). The ROM of the knee joint and the DAOR were obtained from kinematic data. Participants' joint kinematics metrics were similar in within-subjects statistical tests for SLH and COHT. We therefore asked whether the repeated vGRF normalized to body weight will be similar in both legs during these jumps. Joint kinematics metrics however were different in between subjects indicating the existence of a personalized jumping strategy. These hop tests can be recorded at the beginning of the training season for each individual, which can establish a comparative evaluation database for prospective lower extremity injury recovery and return to sport after ACL injury

Introduction and Objective. Despite the low incidence of pilon fractures among lower limb injuries, their high-impact nature presents difficulties in surgical management and recovery. Current literature includes a wide range of different management strategies, however there is no universal treatment algorithm. We aim to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open and closed pilon fractures, managed using a treatment algorithm that was applied consistently over the span of this study. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution, including 141 pilon fractures in 135 patients, from August 2014 to January 2021. AO/OTA classification was used to classify fractures. Among closed fractures, 12 had type 43A, 18 had type 43B, 61 had type 43C. Among open fractures, 11 had type 43A, 12 had type 43B, 27 had type 43C. Open fractures were further classified with Gustilo-Anderson (GA); type 1: n=8, type 2: n=10, type 3A: n=12, type 3B: n=20. Our treatment algorithm consisted of fine wire fixator (FWF) for severely comminuted closed fractures (AO/OTA type 43C3), or open fractures with severe soft tissue injury (GA type 3). Otherwise, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) was performed. When required, minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) was performed in combination with FWF to improve joint congruency. All open fractures, and closed fractures with severe soft tissue injury (skin contusion, fracture blister, severe oedema) were initially treated with temporary ankle-spanning external fixation. For all open fracture patients, surgical debridement, soft tissue cover with a free or pedicled flap were performed. For GA types 1 and 2, this was done with ORIF in the same operating session. Those with severe soft tissue injury (GA type 3) were treated with FWF four to six weeks after soft tissue management was completed. Primary outcome was AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score at 3, 6 and 12-months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include time to partial weight-bear (PWB) and full weight-bear (FWB), bone union time. All complications were recorded. Results. Mean AOFAS score 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment for open and closed fracture patients were 44.12 and 53.99 (p=0.007), 62.38 and 67.68 (p=0.203), 78.44 and 84.06 (p=0.256), respectively. 119 of the 141 fractures healed without further intervention (84.4%). Average time to bone union was 51.46 and 36.48 weeks for open and closed fractures, respectively (p=0.019). Union took longer in closed fracture patients treated with FWF than ORIF (p=0.025). On average, open and closed fracture patients took 12.29 and 10.76 weeks to PWB (p=0.361); 24.04 and 20.31 weeks to FWB (p=0.235), respectively. Common complications for open fractures were non-union (24%), post-traumatic arthritis (16%); for closed fractures they were post-traumatic arthritis (25%), superficial infection (22%). Open fracture was a risk factor for non-union (p=0.042; OR=2.558, 95% CI 1.016–6.441), bone defect (p=0.001; OR=5.973, 95% CI 1.986–17.967), and superficial infection (p<0.001; OR=4.167, 95% CI 1.978–8.781). Conclusions. The use of a two-staged approach involving temporary external fixation followed by definitive fixation, provides a stable milieu for soft tissue recovery. FWF combined with MIO, where required for severely comminuted closed fractures, and FWF for open fractures with severe soft tissue injury, are safe methods achieving low complication rates and good functional recovery

Introduction. Civilian fractures have been extensively studied with in an attempt to develop classification systems, which guide optimal fracture management, predict outcome or facilitate communication. More recently, biomechanical analyses have been applied in order to suggest mechanism of injury after the traumatic insult, and predict injuries as a result of a mechanism of injury, with particular application to the field so forensics. However, little work has been carried out on military fractures, and the application of civilian fracture classification systems are fraught with error. Explosive injuries have been sub-divided into primary, secondary and tertiary effects. The aim of this study was to 1. determine which effects of the explosion are responsible for combat casualty extremity bone injury in 2 distinct environments; a) in the open and b) enclosed space (either in vehicle or in cover) 2. determine whether patterns of combat casualty bone injury differed between environments Invariably, this has implications for injury classification and the development of appropriate mitigation strategies. Method. All ED records, case notes, and radiographs of patients admitted to the British military hospital in Afghanistan were reviewed over a 6 month period Apr 08-Sept 08 to identify any fracture caused by an explosive mechanism. Paediatric cases were excluded from the analysis. All radiographs were independently reviewed by a Radiologist, a team of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons and a team of academic Biomechanists, in order to determine the fracture classification and predict the mechanism of injury. Early in the study it became clear that due to the complexity of some of the injuries it was inappropriate to consider bones separately and the term ‘Zone of Insult’ (ZoI) was developed to identify separate areas of injury. Results. 62 combat casualties with 115 ZoIs (mean 1.82 zones) were identified in this study. 34 casualties in the open sustained 56 ZoIs (mean 1.65); 28 casualties in the enclosed group sustained 59 ZoIs (mean 2.10). There was no statistical difference in the mean ZoIs per casualty in the open vs enclosed group (Student t-test, p=0.24). Open fractures were more prevalent in the open group compared to the enclosed group (48/59 vs 20/49, Chi-squared test p<0.001). Of the casualties in the open, 1 zone of injury was due to the primary effects of blast, 10 a combination of primary and secondary blast zones, 23 due to secondary effects and 24 from the tertiary effects of blast. In contrast, there were no primary or combined primary and secondary blast zones and only 2 secondary blast zones in the enclosed group. Tertiary blast effects predominated in the enclosed group, accounting for 96% of injury zones (57/59). Analysis of the pattern of injury revealed that there were a higher proportion of lower limb injuries in the Enclosed group (54/59) compared to the Open group (40/58, Chi-squared p<0.05). In the Open group the mechanism of lower limb injury was more evenly distributed amongst mixed primary and secondary blast effects (10), secondary (10) and tertiary (20). In the enclosed group, lower limb injuries were almost exclusively caused by tertiary blast effects (47/48). A similar pattern was also seen in the Upper limb with 4/5 in the enclosed group was injured by tertiary effects compared to 4/18 in the Open Group. In the open group fragmentation injury was the predominant cause of injury (13/18). Conclusions. This data clearly demonstrates two distinct injury groups based upon the casualties' environment. The enclosed environment afforded by buildings and vehicles appears to mitigate the primary and secondary effects of the explosion. However, tertiary blast effects were the predominant mechanism of injury, with severe axial loading to the lower extremity being a characteristic of the fractures seen. In contrast, secondary fragments from the explosion were more likely to result in fractures of casualties caught in the open. The development of future mitigation strategies must be focused on reducing all the different mechanisms of injury caused by an explosion. This will require a better understanding on the effects of bone in high strain environments. This method of forensic biomechanics involving clinicians and engineers, combined with accurate physical and numerical simulations can form the basis in reducing the injury burden to the combat soldier

During the cold snap in the West of Scotland 20 December 2009 to 10 January 2010 there was a cluster of uncommon lower limb injuries in children from sledging accidents. These cases are presented as a series. This retrospective descriptive study details acute orthopaedic admissions for the period of the cold snap. The case-notes for all admissions were reviewed for diagnosis, mechanism of injury. Five (ex 20 ie 1/4) trauma admissions involved sledging: (1) combined avulsion of anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments left knee (2) Lisfranc injury, (3) distal femoral fracture, (4) distal tibial plafond fracture, (5) pelvis, patella also forearm and facial fractures. These cases are analysed in more detail. Sledging injuries comprise a substantial portion of workload and morbidity. In children, there is a propensity for lower limb and higher energy trauma. Tertiary referrals and non-standard trauma equipment may be required

Knee injuries in cyclists are often thought to result from an imbalance of load during the cycling motion as a consequence of inappropriate bike set-up. Recently, it has been postulated that incorrect foot positioning may be a significant factor in lower limb injury and poor cycling performance. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of changing the foot position at the shoe-pedal interface on Vastus Medialis (VM) and Vastus Lateralis (VL) activity (mean and mean peak), knee angle and knee displacement. Maximum power tests were completed on a first visit, with data collection on a second visit recorded at 60% of the subjects maximum. Video footage and surface electromyography (SEMG) from VM and VL muscles was obtained. Data was recorded over 10 crank cycles in 3 experimental conditions; neutral, 10 degrees inversion and 10 degrees eversion using Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) wedges fitted between the cyclists shoe and the shoe cleat. Raw data (mean SEMG, mean peak SEMG) was obtained using Noraxon and SiliconCOACH measured knee angle and knee displacement. Data was analyzed using Friedmans test with appropriate post hoc tests. 12 male subjects (range 26-45, mean 35.9 years) completed the study. Mean and mean peak SEMG data showed no significant differences between the 3 experimental conditions for VM and VL. VM:VL ratios from raw mean SEMG data demonstrated a decrease in synchronicity in inversion and eversion compared to neutral. Pronators demonstrated most synchronicity in inversion and least synchronicity in eversion. There were statistically significant differences in knee angle and knee displacement between neutral, inversion and eversion (p<0.05). Inversion promoted smaller knee valgus angles and greater knee displacement from the bike. Eversion promoted larger knee valgus angles and a smaller displacement from the bike. By altering the foot position to either 10 degrees inversion or 10 degrees eversion, knee angle and knee displacement can be significantly influenced. Clinically, subjects who foot type is classified as pronating may benefit from some degree of forefoot inversion posting. Further research on subjects with knee pain needs to be undertaken