Purpose. While changes in lower limb alignment and pelvic inclination after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using certain surgical approaches have been studied, the effect of preserving the joint capsule is still unclear. We retrospectively investigated changes in lower limb alignment, length and pelvic inclination before and after surgery, and the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients who underwent capsule preserving THA using the anterolateral-supine (ALS) approach. Methods. Between July 2016 and March 2018, 112 hips (non-capsule preservation group: 42 hips, and capsule preservation group: 70 hips) from patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA were included in this study. Patients who underwent spinal fusion and total knee arthroplasty on the same side as that of the THA were excluded. Using computed tomography, we measured lower limb elongation, external rotation of the knee, and femoral neck/stem anteversion before operation and three to five days after operation. We examined the pelvic inclination using vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity measured by X-ray of the anteroposterior pelvic region in the standing position before and six to 12 months after operation. All operations were performed using the ALS approach and taper wedge stem. Results. No dislocation was found in both groups. Lower limb elongation was 14.5±6.3 (mean±SD) mm in the non-capsule preservation group and 9.4±8.8 mm in the capsule preservation group. A significant reduction was found in the capsule preservation group (p<0.05). Changes in knee external rotation was 7.2±10.5 degrees in the non-capsule preservation group and 3.5±10.3 degrees in the capsule preservation group. A trend toward decreased knee external rotation in the capsule preservation group (p=0.07) was observed. There was no difference in femoral neck/stem anteversion and vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity between both groups. Discussion. Patients in the capsule preservation group tended to have reduced external rotation of lower limb, which might prevent postoperative anterior dislocation due to preservation of anterior structures. The capsule preservation group had significantly reduced lower limb elongation, suggesting that preservation of the hip joint capsule ligament contributes to joint stability. There was no significant difference in the pelvic inclination between both groups. Long-term changes will be assessed by regular follow up after operation

Introduction. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a commonly used surgical technique for treating moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment of the knee by shifting the center of force towards the lateral compartment. The amount of alignment correction to be performed is usually calculated prior to surgery and it's based on the patient's lower limb alignment using long-leg radiographs. While the procedure is generally effective at relieving symptoms, an accurate estimation of change in intraarticular contact pressures and contact surface area has not been developed. Using electromyography (EMG), Meyer et al. attempted to predict intraarticular contact pressures during gait patterns in a patient who had received a cruciate retaining force-measuring tibial prosthesis. Lundberg et al. used data from the Third Grand Challenge Competition to improve contact force predictions in total knee replacement. Mina et al. performed high tibial osteotomy on eight human cadaveric knees with osteochondral defects in the medial compartment. They determined that complete unloading of the medial compartment occurred at between 6° and 10° of valgus, and that contact pressure was similarly distributed between the medial and lateral compartments at alignments of 0° to 4° of valgus. In the current study, we hypothesised that it would be possible to predict the change in intra-articular pressures based on extra-articular data acquisition. Methods. Seven cadavers underwent an HTO procedure with sequential 5º valgus realignment of the leg up to 15º of correction. A previously developed stainless-steel device with integrated load cell was used to axially load the leg. Pressure-sensitive sensors were used to measure intra-articular contact pressures. Intraoperative changes in alignment were monitored in real time using computer navigation. An axial loading force was applied to the leg in the caudal-craneal direction and gradually ramped up from 0 to 550 N. Intra-articular contact pressure (kg) and contact area (mm2) data were collected. Generalised linear models were constructed to estimate the change in contact pressure based on extra-articular force and alignment data. Results. The application of an axial load results in axial angle changes and load distribution changes inside the knee joint. Preliminary analysis has shown that it is possible to predict lateral and medial compartment pressures using externally acquired data. For lateral compartment pressure estimation, the following equation had an R of 0.86: Lateral compartment pressure = −1.26*axial_force + 37.08*horizontal_force − 2.40*vertical_force − 271.66*axial_torque − 32.64*horizontal_torque + 18.98*vertical_torque − 24.97*varusvalgus_angle_change + 86.68*anterecurvature_angle_change − 17.33*axial_angle_change − 26.14. For medial compartment pressure estimation, the following equation had an R2 of 0.86: Medial compartment pressure = −2.95*axial_force −22.93*horizontal_force − 9.48*vertical_force − 34.53*axial_torque + 6.18*horizontal_torque − 127.00*vertical_torque − 110.10*varusvalgus_angle_change − 15.10*anterecurvature_angle_change + 55.00*axial_angle_change + 193.91. Discussion. The most important finding of this study was that intra-articular pressure changes in the knee could be accurately estimated given a set of extra-articular parameters. The results from this study could be helpful in developing more accurate lower limb realignment procedures. This work complements and expands on previous research by other groups aimed at predicting intra-articular pressures and identifying optimal alignment for unloading arthritic defects. A possible clinical application of these findings may involve the application of a predetermined axial force to the leg intra-operatively. Given the estimated output from the predictive equation, one could then perform the opening wedge until the desired estimated intra-articular pressure is achieved. With this method, an arthrotomy and placement of intra-articular pressure sensors would not be needed. This work is not without its limitations. This experiment was performed on cadaveric specimens. Therefore, we cannot directly predict what the pressures would be in a de-ambulating patient. However, these sort of experiments do help us understand the complex biomechanics of the knee in response to alterations in multi-planar alignment. Further in vivo research would be warranted to validate these results. Additionally, given our current experimental setup, only axial loading could be performed for testing. Further experiments involving dynamic motion of the lower limb under load would further help us understand the changes in pressure at difference flexion angles. Continued experiments would help us gather additional data to better understand the relationship between these variables and to construct a more accurate predictive model. In summary, we have established a framework for estimating the change in intra-articular contact pressures based on extra-articular, computer-navigated measurements. Quantifying the resulting changes in load distribution, alignment changes, torque generation and deflection will be essential for generating appropriate algorithms able to estimate joint alignment changes based on applied loads

Lower limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare it to alignment outcomes after medial UKA, making our understanding of this issue based on medial UKA studies. Unfortunately, since the geometry, mechanics, and ligamentous physiology are different between these two compartments, drawing conclusions for lateral UKAs based on medial UKA results may be imprecise and misleading. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk for limb alignment overcorrection and the ability to predict postoperative limb alignment between medial and lateral UKA. We evaluated the results of mechanical limb alignment in 241 patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent medial or lateral UKA; there were 229 medial UKAs and 37 lateral UKAs. Mechanical limb alignment was measured in standing long limb radiographs pre and post-operatively, intra-operatively it was measured using a computer assisted navigation system. Between the two cohorts, we compared the percentage of overcorrection and the difference between post-operative alignment and alignment measured by the navigation system. The percentage of overcorrection was significantly higher in the lateral UKA group (11%), when compared to the medial UKA group (4%), (p= 0.0001). In the medial UKA group, the mean difference between the intraoperative “virtual” alignment provided by the navigation system, and the post-operative, radiographically measured mechanical axis, was 1.33°(±1.2°). This was significantly lower than the mean 1.86° (±1.33°) difference in the lateral UKA group (p=0.019). Our data demonstrated an increased risk of mechanical limb alignment overcorrection and greater difficulty in predicting postoperative alignment using computer navigation, when performing lateral UKAs compared to medial UKAs

Lower limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare it to alignment outcomes after medial UKA, making our understanding of this issue based on medial UKA studies. Unfortunately, since the geometry, mechanics, and ligamentous physiology are different between these two compartments, drawing conclusions for lateral UKAs based on medial UKA results may be imprecise and misleading. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk for limb alignment overcorrection and the ability to predict postoperative limb alignment between medial and lateral UKA. We evaluated the results of mechanical limb alignment in 241 patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent medial or lateral UKA; there were 229 medial UKAs and 37 lateral UKAs. Mechanical limb alignment was measured in standing long limb radiographs pre and post-operatively, intra-operatively it was measured using a computer assisted navigation system. Between the two cohorts, we compared the percentage of overcorrection and the difference between post-operative alignment and alignment measured by the navigation system. The percentage of overcorrection was significantly higher in the lateral UKA group (11%), when compared to the medial UKA group (4%), (p= 0.0001). In the medial UKA group, the mean difference between the intraoperative “virtual” alignment provided by the navigation system, and the post-operative, radiographically measured mechanical axis, was 1.33°(±1.2°). This was significantly lower than the mean 1.86° (±1.33°) difference in the lateral UKA group (p=0.019). Our data demonstrated an increased risk of mechanical limb alignment overcorrection and greater difficulty in predicting postoperative alignment using computer navigation, when performing lateral UKAs compared to medial UKAs

Purpose. To evaluate the accuracy of the alignment of lower extremity in 661 cases of total knee replacement arthroplasty (TKA) using navigation system. Materials and method. From June 2006 to September 2008, 661 cases (431 patients) of TKA using navigation system were operated. To analyze the mechanical axis, the weight bearing full length lower extremity radiographs were taken preoperatively and 3 weeks after the operation. The results from a well- experienced surgeon (423 cases) were compared with those from a less-experienced surgeon (238 cases), and they both used the navigation. Results. The mean of mechanical axis was −13.3Ëš (range: −33.3Ëš∼10.6Ëš) preoperatively, but it was corrected as −2.0Ëš (range: −14.3Ëš∼7.5Ëš) after TKA using navigation. There was no significant difference between the mean, −1.8Ëš (range: −13.4Ëš∼6.8Ëš) by a well-experienced surgeon and the mean, −2.2Ëš (range: −14.3Ëš∼7.5Ëš) by a less-experienced one. Conclusion. According to the radiologic results, the navigation is beneficiary for the accuracy of mechanical axis in TKA. The navigation system helps a less-experienced surgeon increase the accuracy of lower extremity alignment

Introduction

The current standard for alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is neutral mechanical axis within 3° of varus or valgus deviation [1]. This configuration has been shown to reduce wear and optimally distribute load on the polyethylene insert [2]. Two key factors (patient-specific hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and surgical component alignment) influence load distribution, kinematics and soft-tissue strains across the tibiofemoral (TF) joint. Improvements in wear characteristics of TKA materials have facilitated a trend for restoring the anatomic joint line [3]. While anatomic component alignment may aid in restoring more natural kinematics, the influence on joint loads and soft-tissue strains should be evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of varus component alignment in combination with a variety of HKA limb alignments on joint kinematics, loads and soft-tissue strain.

Introduction

In prosthetic knee surgery, the axis of the lower limb is often determined only by static radiographic analysis. However, it is relevant to determine if this axis varies during walking, as this may alter the stresses on the implants. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative measurement of the mechanical femorotibial axis (mFTA) varies between static and dynamic analysis in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis.

Introduction

Limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare alignment outcomes between medial and lateral UKA. In this study, we retrospectively compare a single surgeon's alignment outcomes between medial and lateral UKA using a robotic-guided protocol.

The emergence of patient specific instrumentation has seen an expansion from simple radiographs to plan total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with modern systems using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Concerns have emerged regarding accuracy of these non-weight bearing modalities to assess true mechanical axis. The aim of our study was to compare coronal alignment on full length standing AP imaging generated by the EOS acquisition system with the CT coronal scout image. Eligible patients underwent unilateral or bilateral primary TKA for osteoarthritis under the care of investigating surgeon between 2017 and 2022, with both EOS X-Ray Imaging Acquisition System and CT scans performed preoperatively. Coronal mechanical alignment was measured on the supine coronal scout CT scan and the standing HKA EOS. Pre-operative lower limb coronal alignment was assessed on 96 knees prior to TKA on the supine coronal scout CT scan and the standing HKA EOS. There were 56 males (56%), and 44 right knees (44%). The mean age was 68 years (range 53-90). The mean coronal alignment was 4.7 degrees (SD 5.3) on CT scan and 4.6 degrees (SD 6.2) on EOS (p=0.70). There was a strong positive correlation of coronal alignment on CT scan and EOS (pearson. 0.927, p=0.001). The mean difference between EOS and CT scan was 0.9 degrees (SD 2.4). Less than 3 degrees variation between measures was observed in 87% of knees. On linear regression for every 1° varus increase in CT HKA alignment, the EOS HKA alignment increased by 0.93° in varus orientation. The model explained 86% of the variability. CT demonstrates excellent reliability for assessing coronal lower limb alignment compared to EOS in osteoarthritic knees. This supports the routine use of CT to plan TKA without further weight bearing imaging in routine cases

Background. Post-operative (postop) lower limb alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been reported to be an important factor for postop outcomes. Slight under-correction of limb alignment has been recommended to yield a better clinical outcomes than neutral alignment. It is useful if the postop limb alignment can be predicted during surgery, however, little is known about the surgical factors affecting the postop limb alignment in UKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the medial tibial joint line elevation on postop limb alignment in UKA. Methods. Seventy-four consecutive medial UKAs were enrolled in this study. All the patients received a conventional fixed bearing UKA. Pre-operative (preop) and postop limb alignment was examined using long leg radiograph and lower limb alignment changes were calculated. Femoral and tibial osteotomy thickness were measured during surgery. Medial tibial joint line change was defined as polyethylene thickness minus tibial osteotomy thickness and sawblade thickness (1.27mm). Positive values indicated a tibial joint line elevation. Medial femoral joint line change was defined as femoral distal component thickness (6.5mm) minus femoral distal osteotomy thickness and sawblade thickness. Positive values indicated a femoral joint line reduction. Medial joint distraction width was also calculated by tibial joint line elevation plus femoral joint line reduction. The correlation of lower limb alignment change with polyethylene insert thickness, the medial tibial joint line elevation, femoral joint line reduction, or joint distraction width were analyzed. Results. The mean preop hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was 7.1 ± 3.3° in varus and postop was 2.1 ± 3.0° in varus. The mean lower limb alignment change was 5.0 ± 2.6°. The mean polyethylene insert thickness was 8.5 ± 0.8mm, the tibial joint line elevation was 4.4 ± 1.3mm and the medial femoral joint line reduction was 0.0 ± 1.1mm, the joint distraction width was 4.5 ± 1.5mm. The polyethylene insert thickness, the medial tibial joint line elevation, and the joint distraction width were positively correlated with the lower limb alignment change (R=0.27; P<0.05, R=0.47; P<0.001, R=0.53; P<0.001, respectively) (Figure 1a,b,d). There was no correlation between the medial femoral joint line reduction and the lower limb alignment change (Figure 1c). Discussion. The postop limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is determined by the osteotomy angle of the femur and tibia. On the other hand, it has been reported that the postop alignment in UKA is not influenced by the osteotomy angle but by the insert thickness. Our results indicated that the medial tibial joint line elevation and the joint distraction width were more useful to predict lower limb alignment change than the insert thickness itself. Measuring the medial tibial osteotomy thickness during surgery will help surgeon to predict postop lower limb alignment in UKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Upright body posture is maintained with the alignment of the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities, and the muscle strength of the body trunk and lower extremities. Conversely, the posture is known to undergo changes with age, and muscle weakness of lower extremities and the restriction of knee extension in osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA) have been considered to be associated with loss of natural lumbar lordosis and abnormal posture. As total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is aimed to correct malalignment of lower extremities and limited range of motion of knee, particularly in extension, we hypothesized that TKA positively affects the preoperative abnormal posture. To clarify this, the variation in the alignment of the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities before and after TKA was evaluated in this study. Patients and methods. Patients suffering from primary knee OA who were scheduled to receive primary TKA were enrolled in this study. However, patients with arthritis secondary to another etiology, i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or previous surgical interventions to the knee, were excluded. Moreover, patients who suffered from hip and ankle OA, cranial nerve diseases, or severe spinal deformity were also excluded. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the horizontal distance between the posterosuperior aspect of the S1 endplate surface and a vertical plumb line drawn from the center of the C7 vertebral body, is an important index of sagittal balance of the trunk. Thus, patients were classified into two groups based on the preoperative SVA with preoperative standing lateral digital radiographs: normal (< 40mm) and abnormal (≥ 40mm) groups. The variations in the sagittal alignment of the spine, pelvis and lower extremities were evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. This study was approved by an institutional review board, and informed consent for participation was obtained from the patients. Results. Forty-nine knees in 49 patients were enrolled. Three different patterns of postural changes as well as hip and knee angles following TKA were observed. After TKA, the preoperatively normal SVA patients (26.5%) showed extension of the hip and knee joints and decrease of lumbar lordosis, while the SVA remained almost within the normal range. In the preoperatively abnormal SVA group, 13 patients (26.5%) showed extension of the knee joint while the SVA remained abnormal, however, 23 of the preoperatively abnormal SVA group patients (47.0%) showed improvement of SVA into the normal range with the extension of the hip and knee joints. Discussion. As the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities together affect body alignment, once limitation of knee extension due to severe knee OA is corrected and lower extremity alignment is improved with TKA, the lumbar lordosis may increase, and SVA could decrease. Recently, the relationship between the imbalance of the sagittal plane of the body and the risk of falls was described. From this, it could be said that TKA not only helped in recovering knee function and lower extremity alignment in severe knee OA, but also helped to improve posture and to protect from falls

Introduction. Intraoperative assessment of coronal alignment is important when performing corrective osteotomies around the knee and ankle, limb lengthening and trauma surgery. The Joint Angle Tool (JAT) provides surgeons with information about the anatomic and mechanical axes intraoperatively based on true anteroposterior radiographs. Aim: Presentation of the JAT, a low-cost goniometer for intraoperative assessment of the lower limb alignment. Materials and Methods. The JAT consists of pre-printed joint orientation angles of the anatomic and mechanical axis including normal variations on a plastic sheet. It is placed on the screen of the image intensifier after obtaining a true anterior-posterior image. The pre-printed joint orientation angles can intraoperatively assist the surgeons in achieving the pre-planned axis correction. Here, its feasibility is demonstrated in four cases. Results. Here, we present the intraoperative use of JAT in four cases:. 77 mm femoral bone transport due to non-union utilizing a bone transport nail,. distal femoral osteotomy correcting coronal and torsional malalignment using a retrograde intramedullary trauma nail,. proximal / high tibial open wedge osteotomy with an intramedullary implant correcting varus malalignment in a hypophosphatemic rickets patient, and. a supramalleolar, closing wedge osteotomy realigning the anatomic axis with a plate and screws. Conclusions. The JAT is a modified goniometer which allows intraoperative assessment of the mechanical and anatomic axis. JAT is applicable throughout the entire surgical procedure irrespective of the method of internal fixation and may provide additional reassurance of correct alignment. The JAT consists of a plastic sheet with printed joint orientation angles and their normal variation. JAT is freely available from . profeedback.dk/JAT/JAT.pdf. for use and modification according to Creative Commons license (CC BY-SA 4.0)

[Background]. Factors determining improvement of the long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty include accurate reproduction of lower limb alignment. To acquire appropriate lower limb alignment, tibial component rotation is an important element for outcomes. We usually determine the tibial component rotation using the anatomical rotaional landmark of the proximal tibia and range of motion technique. In addition we followed by confirmation of overall lower limb alignment referring to the distal tibial index. When the tibia have a rotational mismatch between its proximal and distal AP axis, a larger error of the distal tibial index than those of other rotational landmark is of concern. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of the distal tibial AP axis as a reference axis of tibial compornent rotation in the intraoperative setting. [Subjects and Methods]. The 86 patients (104 knees) with osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent primary TKA were evaluated with use of computerized tomography scans. A 3D images of the proximal tibial and ankle joint surfaces and foot were prepared, and the reference axis was set. In measurement, the images and reference axes were projected on the same plane. We measured the angle caluculated by the proximal and distal tibial AP axes (torsion angle) in preoperative 3D CT images. As a proximal tibial AP reference axis, AP-1 is a line connecting the medial margin of the tibial tubercle and Middle of the PCL attachment site and AP-2 is a line connecting the 1/3 medial site of the tibial tubercle and center of the PCL attachment site. As a distal tibial AP reference axis, D3 is a line connecting the anteroposterior middle point of the talus, D4 is a perpendicular line of transmalleoler axes, and D5 is the second metatarsal bone axis. [Results]. AP-2 was 9.9±1.1°externally rotated relative to AP-1. And D4 was externally rotated relative to D3 in all cases, and the mean external rotation was 11.6°. The mean torsion angle of the distal tibial AP axis relative to AP-1 were all positive and D3:3.7°, D4:15.3°, D5:0.1° respectively. D5 was internally rotated relative to D3 in 67 cases, externally rotated in 31, consistent in only 6, and the mean torsion angle was 3.5°internal rotation. The mean torsion angle of AP-2 axis were D3, 6.3°internal rotation; D4, 5.3°external rotation; and D5, 9.8°internal rotation respectively. [Discussion]. In our department, after determining the rotation using the proximal tibial AP axis and ROM method, the alignment is confirmed referring to the distal tibial AP axis. However, a torsion angle of 25° or greater was noted in some cases, while it was within 3° in about 35–40% of cases, showing that the distal tibial AP axis was inappropriate as a reference axis for some cases. To perform TKA, it is important to identify the difference (torsion angle) between the proximal and distal tibial AP axes to prevent errors in the intraoperative setting of rotation

Aims. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is undertaken in patients with a passively correctable varus deformity. Our hypothesis was that restoration of natural soft tissue tension would result in a comparable lower limb alignment with the contralateral normal lower limb after mobile-bearing medial UKA. Patients and Methods. In this retrospective study, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, position of the weight-bearing axis (WBA) and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) after mobile-bearing medial UKA was compared with the normal (clinically and radiologically) contralateral lower limb in 123 patients. Results. Postoperatively, HKA angle was restored to within ±3° of the contralateral lower limb in 87% of patients andWBA passed within ±1 Kennedy and White's tibial zone of the contralateral normal lower limb in 95% of patients. The difference in the mean KJLO between the two groups was not significant (p=0.05) and the KJLO was within ±3° of the contralateral normal lower limb in 96% of patients. Conclusion. Lower limb alignment & knee joint line obliquity after mobile-bearing medial UKA were comparable to the unaffected contralateral limb in most patients. Clinical Relevance. Comparison with the contralateral normal lower limb is a reliable method to evaluate and validate limb mechanical alignment after mobile-bearing medial UKA

INTRODUCTION. Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on component positioning, soft tissue balance and lower limb alignment, all of which can be difficult to achieve using manual instrumentation. A new robotic-guided technology has been shown to improve postoperative implant positioning and lower limb alignment in UKA but so far no studies have reported clinical results of robotic-assisted medial UKA. Goal of this study therefore was to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted medial UKA in a large cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. METHODS. This multicenter study with IRB approval examines the survivorship and satisfaction of this robotic-assisted procedure coupled with an anatomically designed UKA implant at a minimum of two-year follow-up. A total of 1007 patients (1135 knees) underwent robotic-assisted surgery for a medial UKA from six surgeons at separate institutions in the United States. All patients received a fixed-bearing metal backed onlay implant as the tibial component between March 2009 and December 2011 (Figure 1). Each patient was contacted at minimum two-year follow-up and asked a series of five questions to determine implant survivorship and patient satisfaction. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and worst-case scenario analysis was performed whereby all patients were considered as revision when they declined study participation. Revision rates were compared in younger and older patients (age cut-off 60 years) and in patients with different body mass index (body mass index cut-off 35 kg/m. 2. ). Two-sided chi-square tests were used to compare these groups. RESULTS. Data was collected for 797 patients (909 knees) with an average follow-up of 29.6 months (range: 22 – 52 months). At 2.5-years follow-up, eleven knees were reported as revised, which resulted in a survivorship of 98.8% (Figure 2). Thirty-five patients declined to participate in the study yielding a worst-case survivorship of 96.0%. Higher revision rates were seen in younger patients (2.60% versus 0.93%, p = 0.09) and in morbidly obese patients (3.36% versus 0.91%, p = 0.03). Of all patients without revision, 92% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function (Figure 3). CONCLUSION. In this multicenter study, robotic-assisted UKA was found to have high survivorship and satisfaction rate at short-term follow-up. Prospective comparison studies with longer follow-up are necessary in order to compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA and robotic-assisted UKA to total knee arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Objective. To explore whether good postoperative alignment could be obtained through simple individual valgus resection angle using common instruments in total knee arthroplasty with lateral bowing femur. Methods. Data of 46 TKAs with lateral bowing femur were collected prospectively, the center of the femoral intercondylar notch was the fixed drilling hole whether preoperative planning or intraoperative implementing. The intramedullary rod was put into the femur as deep as possible, until completely entrance or the distal point of the rod contact with the lateral cortical bone of the femur, which prevent the further entrance of the rod. Individual valgus resection angle ranging from 7°to 9°was performed according to preoperative planning, followed by meticulous assessment of matching between cutting surface and valgus resection angle. Postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle?medial tibial plate angle and position of lower extremity alignment passing through the tibial plate were measured. Results. The preoperative measurement valgus resection angle include 14 cases of 8°, 13 cases of 9°, 5 cases of 10°, 2 case of 11°. The postoperative mean medial tibial plate angle was 89.5°±0.5°, mean HKA angle was 179.3°±0.8°. 27(79.4%), 23(67.6%) and 16 (47.1%) cases had restoration of mechanical axis to ±3°, ±2°and ±1°of neutral respectively, and there were 7 (15.2%) outlier (±3°). Excluding 3 cases of actual performed 9°valgus resection angle while preoperative measurement larger than 9°, both components were aligned within 3° of neutral in 88.2% of the knees. 27 (79.4%) cases had lower extremity alignment passing through the middle third of tibial plate, 7 (20.6%) cases pass through the medial third of the tibial plate. Conclusions. Excellent postoperative alignment could be obtained through simple individual valgus resection angle using common instruments in total knee arthroplasty with lateral bowing femur

Background. Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduce significant anatomic modifications and secondary ligament imbalances. A restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol was proposed to minimize these issues and improve TKA clinical results. Method. rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated on 1000 knee CT-Scans from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA is defined by the following criteria: Independent tibial and femoral cuts within ± 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis and; a resulting HKA within ±3° of neutral. Medial-lateral (ΔML) and flexion-extension (ΔFE) gap differences were calculated and compared with measured resection MA results. Results. Extension space ML imbalances ≥3mm occurred in 33% of TKA with MA technique versus 8% with rKA, and ≥5mm were present in up to 11% of MA knees versus 1% rKA (p<0.001). Using the MA technique, for the flexion space, higher ML imbalance rates were created by both MA techniques (using TEA or 3°PC) versus rKA (p<0.001). When all the differences between ΔML and ΔFE are considered together: using MA with TEA there were 41% of the knees with <3mm imbalances throughout; using PC this was 55% and using rKA it was 92% (p<0.001). Conclusion. Significantly less ML or FE gap imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. Using rKA may help the surgeon to preserve native knee ligament balance during TKA and avoid residual instability, whilst keeping the lower limb alignment within a safe range

Introduction. Standard image-free navigation systems have proven to improve the accuracy of components placement and reduce the proportion of outliers for lower limb mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, their disadvantages include a longer duration of surgery and pin-tract related complications. More recently, pinless navigation has been developed to address these shortcomings. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a new pinless navigation system (Zimmer® iAssist™ Knee) in TKA. Methods. Power analysis was performed. To detect a significant difference in the proportion of outliers for lower limb mechanical axis at a power of 0.80, a sample size of 50 patients would be required. Between May 2013 and April 2014, 50 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee were divided into two surgical technique arms: 1) iAssist™; 2) conventional TKA. One Adult Reconstruction surgeon performed all the surgeries. The patients were prospectively followed up and postoperative long leg radiographs were taken at one month post-surgery. Two reviewers blinded to the surgical method performed the measurements on radiographic films. Five radiographic measurements were measured: 1) Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA); 2) Coronal Femoral-Component Angle (CFA); 3) Coronal Tibia-Component Angle (CTA); 4) Sagittal Femoral-Component Angle (SFA); and 5) Sagittal Tibia-Component Angle (STA), The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups for quantitative variables while the Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Results. There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender and side of operated knee (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in the duration of surgery, postoperative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence. The median HKA, CFA, CTA, SFA and STA were comparable between both groups [Fig. 1]. Similarly, there was no difference in the proportion of outliers for lower limb alignment (HKA) and components placement (CFA, CTA, SFA and STA) [Fig. 2]. Conclusion. This study does not show any statistical difference in the use of iAssist™ to reduce the proportion of outliers for lower limb alignment and component placement in TKA patients. However this is possibly contributed by the fact that all the surgeries were performed by a single experienced Adult Reconstruction surgeon instead of orthopaedic surgeons in general, thereby reducing the incidence of outliers with conventional technique. In keeping with other studies on pinless navigational systems, this study also found no significant difference in postoperative drop of haemoglobin levels with the use of iAssist™, however this study also found no significant difference in operative time when using iAssist™

INTRODUCTION. To obtain appropriate joint gap and soft tissue balance, and to correct the lower limb alignment are important factor to achieve success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A variety of computer-assisted navigation systems have been developed to implant the component accurately during TKA. Although, the effects of the navigation system on the joint gap and soft tissue balance are unclear. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of accelerometer-based portable navigation system on the intraoperative joint gap and soft tissue balance. METHODS. Between March 2014 and March 2015, 36 consecutive primary TKAs were performed using a mobile-bearing posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (Vanguard RP; Biomet) for varus osteoarthritis. Of the 36 knees, 26 knees using the accelerometer-based portable computer navigation system (KneeAlign2; OrthAlign) (N group), and 10 knees using conventional alignment guide (femur side; intramedullary rod, tibia side; extramedullary guide) (C group). The intraoperative joint gap and soft tissue balance were measured using tensor device throughout a full range of motion (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 120°and full flexion) at 120N of distraction force. The postoperative component coronal alignment was measured with standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs. RESULTS. The mean joint gaps at each flexion angle were maintained constant in N group, and there was a tendency of the joint gap at midflexion ranges to increase in C group. The joint gaps at 30°and 45°of flexion angle in C group were significantly larger than that of in N group. The mean soft tissue balance at 0°of flexion was significantly varus in N group than that of in C group. Postoperatively, in N group, the mean femoral component alignment was valgus 0.1°± 1.3°(range, varus 2°- valgus 3°), the mean tibial component alignment was valgus 1.1°± 1.7°(range, varus 1°- valgus 3°) to the coronal mechanical axis. In C group, the mean femoral component alignment was varus 2.3°± 1.9°(range, varus 6°- valgus 1°), the mean tibial component alignment was valgus 2.0°± 1.3°(range, 0°- valgus 5°) to the coronal mechanical axis. There was statistically significant difference in femoral component alignment, there was no statistically significant difference in tibial component alignment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. The present study demonstrated that navigation-assisted TKA was prevented the joint gaps from increasing at 30°and 45°of flexion. However, it was difficult to achieve soft tissue balance at extension. In conventional TKA, the femoral component alignment was usually varus. In contrast, accelerometer-based portable navigation system is superior to implant the femoral component accurately. However, there were several cases that femoral component alignment is valgus because of a variation in the accuracy of this navigation system. Surgeons should be aware of difficulty to accomplish all of appropriate joint gap and soft tissue balance, and lower limb alignment in navigation-assisted TKA

Introduction. Coronal misalignment of the lower limbs is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. In cases of severe genu varus or valgus, evaluating this alignment can assist in choosing specific surgical strategies. Furthermore, restoring satisfactory alignment after total knee replacement promotes longevity of the implant and better functional results. Knee coronal alignment is typically evaluated with the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. It is generally measured on standing AP long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, patient positioning influences the accuracy of this 2D measurement. A new 3D method to measure coronal lower limb alignment using low-dose EOS images has recently been developed and validated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this technique when determining knee coronal alignment in a referral population, and more specifically to evaluate how the HKA angle measured with this 3D method differs from conventional 2D methods. Materials and methods. 70 patients (140 lower extremities) were studied for 2D and 3D lower limb alignment measurements. Each patient received AP monoplane and biplane acquisition of their entire lower extremities on the EOS system according the classical protocols for LLR. For each patient, the HKA angle was measured on this AP X-ray with a 2D viewer. The biplane acquisition was used to perform stereoradiographic 3D modeling. Valgus angulation was considered positive, varus angulation negative. Student's T-test was used to determine if there was a bias in the HKA angle measurement between these two methods and to assess the effect of flexion/hyperextension, femoral rotation and tibial rotation on the 2D measurements. One operator did measurements 2 times. Results. The average total dose for both acquisitions was 0.75mGy (± 0.11mGy). The 2D and 3D measurements are reported in table 1. Intraoperator reliability was >0,99 for all measurements. In the whole series, 2D–3D HKA differences were >2° in 34% of cases, >3° in 22% of cases, >5° in 9% of cases and >10° in 3% of cases >10°. We compared 2D and 3D measurements according to the degree of flessum/recurvatum (> or <5° and > or <10°). The results are reported in table 2. The statistical analysis of parameters influencing 2D/3D measurements is reported in table 3. Discussion and conclusion. The HKA angle is typically assessed from 2D long-leg radiographs. However, several studies highlighted that 2D assessment of this angle may be affected by patient's positioning. Radtke showed that lower limb rotation during imaging significantly affected measurements of coronal plane knee alignment. Brouwer showed that axial rotation had an even greater effect on the apparent limb alignment on AP radiographs when the knee was flexed. This last finding is particularly relevant as many lower extremities present some amount of flexion or hyperextension, especially in aging subjects. This low dose biplanar EOS acquisitions provide a more accurate evaluation of coronal alignment compared to 2D, eliminating bias due to wrong knee positioning. This study points out the interest of EOS in outliers patients and opens new perspectives for preoperative planning and postoperative control of deformity correction or knee joint replacement