Aims. 1. To develop a decision aid - Decision Support Package (DSP) - that will provide low back pain (LBP) patients, and their treating physiotherapists with information on the treatment options available to the patients. 2. To develop a training package for physiotherapists on how to use the DSP. 3. To encourage and evaluate the informed shared decision making (ISDM) process between patients and physiotherapists during consultation. Method. We developed a DSP informed by existing research and collaboration with physiotherapists, patients and experts in the field of decision aids and LBP. We did six pieces of exploratory work: literature review; 2009 NICE LBP guidelines review; qualitative screening of transcripts of interviews of LBP patients; focus groups (patients); nominal group (physiotherapists), and Delphi study (experts). We collated these data to develop the DSP. We also developed a training package for physiotherapists. Results. We developed a LBP patient resource for use prior to their first consultation and a training package for physiotherapists. The DSP contained information on acupuncture, structured group exercise, manual therapy and cognitive behavioural approach. LBP patients would expect these treatment options to be offered to them at their initial consultation. The training package for physiotherapists was on DSP use and communication skills during consultation. Conclusion. We have developed an evidence and theory informed Decision Support Package and physiotherapists training. We are currently piloting its use in one NHS Trust prior to running a pilot RCT (N=150) to test is effect on improving patient satisfaction with LBP patients' treatment choices. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. National Institute for Health Research- Research for Patient Benefit (NIHR-RfPB). This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Previous studies revealed the close relation of anxiety and low back pain. Among people with chronic low back pain, anxiety is the most commonly reported mental disorder. Thus, in the literature, there are several studies considering the anxiety as a risk factor for chronic low back pain. The authors also documented a significant differences between sexes in anxiety and quality of life due to low back pain. US National Institute of Mental Health reports that the lifetime prevalence of an anxiety disorder is 60 % higher in women than in men and that the onset, severity, clinical course, and treatment response of anxiety disorders differ significantly in women. In addition, literature has showed that women may have a worse quality of life when they have low back pain. University students may undergo an undue amount of stress, with negative outcomes in terms of academic resuşts and personal, emotional or health, consequences. Moreover, stress can be experienced at different time periods, not only during university life, but also before, during the transition from undergraduate to professional level, and after, during the transition to the life work. After all these literature knowledge, we designed the study to compare the anxiety and quality of life levels of female and male specifically university students with low back pain aged between 18–26. In this study, 100 female and male university students with low back pain aged between 18–26 were included. The low back pain level were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the disability level due to the pain was measured by Revised Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to evaluate the anxiety level and also, Short Form 36 survey (SF-36) was used to understand the quality of life for subjects. These questionnaires were asked to participants on online platform via Google Forms between March 2020 and May 2020. SPSS Version 25.0 program was used for statistical analyses. The result of the study showed that there was a statistically significant difference between female and male students on anxiety levels (p<0.05). There were no statistically differences between female and male students on ODI and VAS (p>0.05). In female group, BAI and “Physical function” and “General Health” subgroups of SF-36 have negative correlations (p<0.05). When we correlated BAI and all subgroups of SF-36 in male group, the statistical results were showed that negative correlation with all subgroups (p<0.05) except “Energy and Fatigue” subgroup (p>0.05). We conclude that female university students with low back pain have higher anxiety levels than male students. Future studies can work on young students to cope with the psychological problems for well-being

In the last decades, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly investigated in intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and chronic low back pain (LBP) research. To date, several AI-based cutting-edge technologies, such as computer vision, computer-assisted diagnosis, decision support system and natural language processing have been utilized to optimize LBP prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. This talk will provide an outline on contemporary AI applications to IDD and LBP research, with a particular attention towards actual knowledge gaps and promising innovative tools

Purposes of the study and background. Smaller studies indicate that yoga may be an effective treatment for chronic low back pain. We conducted a randomised trial to evaluate if yoga compared to usual care improves back function in patients with chronic or recurrent low back pain. Summary of the methods used and the results. Outcomes were assessed by postal questionnaires. The setting was 13 non-National Health Service premises. We recruited 313 adults with chronic or recurrent low back pain from primary care. 157 were randomised to usual care. 156 were randomised to a 12-class, gradually-progressing programme of yoga delivered by 12 teachers over three months. All received The Back Book. Primary outcome was back function (Roland Morris Disability Score) at three months. Secondary outcomes: back function at six and 12 months, back pain, pain self-efficacy and general health. Back function improved more in the yoga group: mean difference in changes from baseline at three (−2.17, 95% CI −3.31 to −1.03, p<0.001), six (−1.48, 95% CI −2.62 to −0.33, p=0.011) and 12 months (−1.57, −2.71 to −0.42, p=0.007). Improvement in pain self-efficacy at three and six months in the yoga group. No differences in general health and pain reduction. Two adverse events were reported by controls and 12 by the yoga group – 8 out of 12 reported pain which may have been due to yoga. 63 (40%) were not fully compliant with treatment and 23 (15%) did not attend any yoga classes. Conclusion. At all time points Yoga was more effective than usual care at improving back function. Conflicts of Interest. AT, AS and JDA are self-employed yoga practitioners and may benefit if there is a demand for the yoga programme. AT, AS, the funders and the University of York would share any royalties from the future sale of the yoga manuals and CD.” AT, AS AND JDA had no involvement in the collection of data and in the analysis of the trial. Source of funding. Arthritis Research UK

With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, remote working has been ubiquitously implemented to reduce disease transmission via minimization of in-person interactions. Low back pain (LBP) is the first cause of disability worldwide and is frequently reported by workers with sedentary occupations. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the role of remote working in a population of adults affected by LBP through an online questionnaire. We enrolled 136 teleworkers affected by LBP. A total of 101 responses were received and 93 suitable questionnaires were included in the final analysis. Demographic data, remote working features and tasks, and LBP burden were analysed. The psychological burden of remote working was evaluated with the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). LBP severity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). LBP-related disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The effect of LBP on working capacity was examined with the Occupational Role Questionnaire (ORQ). Independent risk factors related to LBP worsening were identified using a multivariate logistic regression model. LBP severity was significantly higher compared to previous in-person working (p<0.0001) as well as average weekly work hours (p<0.001). Furthermore, the risk of LBP deterioration was associated with being divorced (OR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.27-14.47; p=0.019) or living with others (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.81; p=0.021), higher ill-being (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; p=0.035) and depression scores (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.00-1.91; p=0.048), as well as having reported unchanged (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.65; p=0.006) or decreased job satisfaction (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.54; p=0.003) and increased stress levels (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.04-8.65; p=0.042). These findings highlight key factors to consider for improving remote workers’ physical and mental wellbeing and decrease their LBP burden

Introduction. Low back pain (LBP) is a worldwide leading cause of disability. This preclinical study evaluated the safety of a combined advanced therapy medicinal product developed during the European iPSpine project (#825925) consisting of mesendoderm progenitor cells (MEPC), derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells, in combination with a synthetic poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel (NPgel) in an ovine intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) model. Method. IDD was induced through nucleotomy in 4 adult sheep, 5 lumbar discs each (n=20). After 5 weeks, 3 alternating discs were treated with NPgel (n=6) or NPgel+MEPC (n=6). Before sacrifice, animals were subjected to: MRI of lumbar spines (disc height and Pfirmann grading); blood sampling (hematological, biochemical, metabolic and lymphocyte/monocytes immunological). After 3 months the sheep were sacrificed. The spines were processed for: macroscopic morphology (Thompson grading), microscopic morphology (Histological grading), and glycosaminoglycan content (GAG, DMMB Assay). Furthermore, at sacrifice biodistribution of human MEPC was assessed by Alu-sequences quantification (qPCR) from three tissue samples of heart, liver, spleen, brain, lungs, and kidneys, and PBMCs collected to assess activation of systemic immune cells. To each evaluation, appropriate statistical analysis was applied. Result. Flow cytometry showed no induction of systemic activation of T cells or monocytes. Alu quantification did not give detection of any cells in any organ. Disc height index was slightly increased in discs treated with NPgel+MEPC. Pfirmann's and Thompson's classification showed that treatment with NPgel or NPgel+MEPC gave no adverse reactions. Histological grading showed similar degeneration in vertebrae treated with NPgel+MEPC or with NPgel alone. The amount of GAG was significantly increased in the nucleus pulposus following treatment with NPgel+MEPC compared to NPgel alone, in which a decrease was observed compared to untreated discs in both nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus. Conclusion. This study showed the safety of both NPgel+MEPC and NPgel treatments

Background. Fear avoidance (FA) has been identified as a risk factor for poor prognosis and a target for intervention in patients with low back pain (LBP), but the mechanisms involved need clarification. Experimental studies would benefit from the use of carefully developed and controlled stimuli representing avoided movements in back pain, and matched stimuli of movements to provide a credible control stimuli. Existing stimuli depicting avoided movements in LBP are static, do not include a set of control stimuli, and do not control for possible systematic observer biases. Method and results. Two studies were carried out aiming to develop and test LBP patients' responses to videos of models depicting commonly avoided movements associated with back pain, and those associated with a control condition, wrist pain. Two samples of LBP patients rated how much pain and harm each movement would cause them. They also reported how often they avoided the movement. The findings from the first study (N = 99) indicate that using videos of commonly avoided movements in low back pain is viable, and that movements associated with wrist pain provide an acceptable control stimuli. Participants in the second study (N=85) consistently rated movements depicted by females as causing more harm, and more frequently avoided than the same movements depicted by males. Conclusion. The use of video stimuli could advance research into the processes associated with fear avoidance through experimental paradigms. However, although small, the model gender effects should be carefully considered. No Conflict of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Aims. A systematic review of the available literature comparing the outcomes of radiofrequency denervation to sham procedure in treating chronic low back pain caused by lumber zygapophysial joint pathology. Methods. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for English language articles from 2005 to July 2010. Articles were considered for review if they satisfied the inclusion criteria: Randomised Controlled Trials(RCT) comparing radiofrequency neurotomy(RFN) to a ‘placebo’ procedure in patients with chronic low back pain caused by facet joint osteoarthritis. Adult patients of both sexes above 17 years of age who complained of continuous low back pain for more than 6 months with focal tenderness over the facet joints. Outcome measures of interest are pain improvement, physical activity, analgesic use, quality of life variables, range of motion of the lumbar spine and hip movement. Critical appraisal of the selected studies was carried out using the CASP appraisal tool for RCT. Results. Two articles were identified. Both demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the pain (p<0.05) using a visual analogue scale in the RFN group compared to the sham procedure. Only one trial demonstrated a corresponding reduction in analgesic use. There was no consensus of improvement of quality of life factors in either study as compared to placebo. Conclusion. Radiofrequency denervation is better than sham procedure in treating pain caused by facet joint osteoarthritis with minimal adverse effects in the short term. A higher powered trial using a larger cohort and longer follow up is required to resolve some of the equivocal results. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None

Introduction and Objective. The coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, first identified in China in December 2019, halted daily living with mandatory lockdowns imposed in Israel in March 2020. This halt induced a sedentary lifestyle for most citizens as well as a decreased physical activity time. These are both common risk factors for the development of low back pain (LBP) which is considered a major global medical and economical challenge effecting almost 1 in 3 people and a leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. It is hypothesized that prevalence of minor LBP episodes during the first total lockdown should have increased compared to previous times. However, due to “Covid-19 fear” we expect a decrease in ED visits. We also speculate that rate of visits due to serious spinal illness (causing either immediate hospitalization or spinal surgery within 30-days of presentation) did not change. Materials and Methods. Retrospective study based on patients visiting the ED in Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center During the first pandemic stage in 2020 compared to parallel periods in 2018 and 2019 due to LBP. Results. During the first lockdown period on March 11th-April 21st, only 171 patients attended the ED due to non-traumatic LBP compared to more than 330 patients in the corresponding time during the years 2018 and 2019. This represents a statistically significant drop of 52.5% (p-value < 0.01) and 48.7% (p-value < 0.01) in LBP ED visits during the first pandemic lockdown of 2020 compared to 2019 and 2018, respectively. Additionally, there was no significant drop in immediate hospitalization or spine surgeries within 30 days following the ED visit (p-value >0.10 for all analysis types). Conclusions. “Covid-19 fear” was probably the main reason for patients with an LBP episode to stay at home during the Covid-19 massive outbreak. Since no significant change was shown in the more severe cases, it seems that the minor LBP patients were able to contain the episode outside hospital walls. This presents an opportunity for clinicians and policy decisions makers to learn and find ways to improve our care of back pain in the community and to reduce unnecessary burden on EDs and the healthcare system

Background. Alterations in the neural drive to trunk muscles have been implicated in low back pain (LBP). This is supported by evidence of reduced corticospinal excitability, delayed muscle activation, reduced endurance and enhanced fatigability of these muscles; whether these changes persist during pain free periods remain unclear. Neural drive (or voluntary activation-VA) can be measured using twitch interpolation and the aim of this study is to investigate if subjects with a history of LBP show reduced VA. Methods. Twenty five subjects participated (13 with a history of LBP, 12 controls). Back extensor torque was measured using a dynamometer and bilateral electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from erector spinae and rectus abdominis. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was applied while the subject, lying prone, performed graded voluntary back extensions. VA was calculated from the size of the twitches evoked by the TMS and EMG data were analysed for evidence of altered neural drive. Results. The LBP typical VAS pain scores were 3.39±1.76(SD), with worst pain being 5.92±2.29. There were no differences in the physical activity scores between the groups. EMG data revealed no differences in the evoked responses at varying levels of voluntary torque. VA was not significantly different between the LBP and control groups (LBP: 85.30±6.45% vs C: 80.14±11.40%). Discussion. These data show that in our cohort of subjects with a history of LBP, their ability to fully activate their back muscles maximally is not reduced. Whether subjects with current LBP exhibit reduced VA remains to be established. No conflicts of interest. Funded by Imperial College London. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Low back pain admission to orthopaedics, aged >55, routinely received a myeloma screen (protein electrophoresis and urinary Bence Jones proteins). Myeloma association guidelines outline the symptoms that should trigger investigation. Acute admissions for back pain alone do not form part of this. We aimed to establish the number of emergency back pain admissions, >55, in our unit over two years. We wished to identify all patients who had protein electrophoresis and/or urinary Bence Jones proteins taken, the number of positive results and diagnoses of myeloma. From our database all patients >55 admitted with back pain in 2009 and 2010 were identified. Using the electronic laboratory reporting system we recorded FBC/ESR/Electrophoresis/Urinary Bence-Jones Proteins. There were 7682 admissions from January 2009–December 2010. 87 were for back pain (1.4%). 55 patients were aged >55 years. Within this group – 22 had protein electrophoresis and 23 had Bence-Jones Proteins. All were negative. 36 patients had an ESR taken, 9 were elevated. None were subsequently found to have haematological malignancy. 53 patients had an FBC taken (5 were anaemic, 8 had leucocytosis and 3 had thrombocytopenia). 20 patients had a vertebral fracture (36.4%). There were no documented cases of myeloma. The Information & Statistics Division of NHS Scotland published figures that demonstrate in 2006–2010, in patients > 55, there were 716 new cases of myeloma in the West of Scotland. Extrapolating this to our unit, on average, we would expect 24 new cases / year in this age group from all presentations. Performing myeloma screens on all back pains does not fulfil recognised screening criteria. We propose myeloma screens are not performed routinely in patients >55 admitted with back pain. It would be reasonable to do so where there is evidence of bone marrow failure, or plasmocytoma on Xray, associated with non-mechanical back pain

Abstract. Objectives. To determine the effects of self-management interventions (SMIs) including an exercise component (EC) on low back pain (LBP) and disability and to determine whether SMIs with tailored exercises (TEs) have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with general exercises (GEs). Methods. An electronic systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in 5 electronic databases. RCTs compared SMIs with an EC to control interventions. Data were extracted at 3 follow-up points (short-term, intermediate and long-term) and meta-analyses were performed. Reviewed RCTs were divided into subgroups based on whether the EC was tailored or generic. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed at the short-term follow-up to assess whether the SMIs with TEs have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with GEs. Results. 12 original RCTs were included in the review (six including SMIs with TEs) and were of moderate quality. The pooled results revealed the effect sizes (ESs) of −0.26,-0.32 and −0.21 for short, intermediate and long-term pain intensity, respectively and −0.26,-0.22 and −0.21 for short, intermediate, and long-term disability, respectively (negative value indicates a mean difference in favour of SMIs) indicating a moderate but significant reduction in pain and disability compared to controls. Subgroup meta-analysis at the short-term follow-up revealed that SMIs with TEs had ES of –0.19(p=0.004) for pain and –0.20(p=0.002) for disability compared to SMIs with GEs demonstrating positive but not significant improvement in pain (ES −0.48, p=0.09) and disability (ES −0.45, p=0.10). Conclusions. There is moderate quality evidence for SMIs with an EC to have moderate but significant positive effect on pain and disability in people with LBP. The subgroup analysis revealed that SMIs with exercises tailored to person's needs are superior in reducing pain and disability. These results indicate the importance of developing TE solutions supporting self-management to improve its effect on pain and disability in LBP patients. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background and purpose. The STarT Back trial demonstrated benefits from a stratified primary care model that targets low back pain (LBP) treatment according to patient prognosis (low-, medium-, or high-risk). The current IMPaCT Back study implemented this approach in everyday primary care to investigate; i) changes in GPs' and physiotherapists' attitudes, confidence and behaviours, ii) patients' clinical outcomes, and iii) cost-effectiveness. Method. This quality improvement study involved 5 GP practices (65 GPs and 34 physiotherapists) with before and after implementation cohorts of consecutive LBP consulters using an intention to treat analysis to compare patient data. Phase 1: Usual care data collection from clinicians and patients (pre-implementation). Phase 2: Introduction of prognostic screening and targeted treatment including a minimal GP intervention (low-risk group), systematic referral to physiotherapy (medium-risk group) and to psychologically informed physiotherapy (high-risk group). Phase 3: Post-implementation data collection from clinicians and patients. Results. 922 patients participated (368 in Phase 1 and 554 in Phase 3) with similar baseline characteristics (mean age 53 v 54 years, disability (RMDQ) 8.7 v 8.4). Significant differences in favour of targeted treatment were demonstrated in clinicians' attitudes and confidence, and RMDQ 6-month change scores (mean difference 0.7 [95% CI 0.1, 1.4]). Health care cost savings were also identified, in addition to an average of 3.5 fewer days off work during study follow-up. Conclusion. A stratified model of LBP management can be successfully introduced into real-life primary care, improving clinicians' attitudes and confidence and patient disability outcomes and reducing the economic burden of LBP. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. The Health Foundation. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part, it has been presented at international meetings in 2011, but not yet a national meeting

Summary. Anabolic and catabolic signalling processes within IVDs display overlapping pathways, however some pathways were identified as selective to catabolic signalling and inhibition of one of these pathways inhibited some of the catabolic factors induced by IL-1 although NFkB inhibition also affected anabolic expression. Degeneration of intervertebral discs (IVDs) is implicated in 40% of low back pain cases. In the normal disc the balance between anabolic and catabolic processes are carefully balanced. During degeneration this balance is lost in favour of catabolic processes which lead to degradation of the IVD, infiltration of blood vessels and nerves and release of cytokines which sensitise nerves to pain. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) is known to be important in the pathogenesis of IVD degeneration, here we investigated the intracellular signalling pathways activated by IL-1 and those activated by an anabolic factor (CDMP-1) to investigate differential pathways. Human nucleus pulposus cells (NP) removed during discetomy for nerve root pain were stimulated with IL-1 or CDMP-1 for 30 minutes. Site-specific phosphorylation of 46 signalling molecules were identified using R&D proteome array. The activation of ERK1/2, p38, c-jun, and IkB were confirmed using cell based ELISAs, in addition pNFκB localisation in stimulated cells was determined using immunohistochemisty. Pre-treatment with inhibitors to p38, and NFkB for 30 minutes, followed by stimulation with IL-1 (10ng/mL) or CDMP-1 (10ng/mL) for 24 hours was investigated to determine effects on anabolic and catabolic factors. In addition localisation of phosphorylated c-jun, p38 and NFkB were investigated within paraffin embedded sections of human IVD to investigate the presence of active pathways in vivo. Twenty intracellular signalling pathways were activated following CDMP-1 treatment and 8 signalling pathways activated by IL-1. Of note key classical IL-1 signalling pathways p38 MAPK, ERK 1/2 and JNK were activated by IL-1, however of these ERK 1/2 particularly was also activated by CDMP-1, whilst p38 and c-jun were only activated by IL-1. IL-1 induced activation of NFkB signalling to a greater extent than CDMP-1, these results were confirmed by the ‘in cell ELISAs’. IVD tissue samples displayed immunopositive staining for phosphorylated c-jun, NFkB and p38. Inhibition of p38 signalling inhibited IL-1 induced MMP 13 expression, but had little effect on the induction of IL-8. However inhibitors of NFkB signalling pathway failed to inhibit the induction of MMP 13 but abrogated the induced IL-6 and IL-8 expression. IL-1 induced a complete aberration of aggrecan expression by NP cells in alginate culture, this effect was partly inhibited by p38 MAPK inhibitor but was completely restored by inhibiting NFkB signalling. However the aggrecan expressed in CDMP-1 treated cells was decreased by inhibiting NFkB but not p38. Here, we have shown that anabolic and catabolic signalling processes within IVDs show a number of overlapping pathways, however a number of differential pathways were identified and inhibition of p38 MAPK and NFkB pathways inhibited a number of catabolic processes investigated which were induced by IL-1. Thus inhibition of signalling pathways could be a novel mechanism of inhibiting catabolic processes which could hold promise to inhibit degeneration at early stages of disease but also create the correct tissue niche to promote regeneration of the disc

Background. Although the aetiology of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is unknown, it is suggested that several subgroups among CLBP-patients might be identified who are likely to benefit from different interventions. The results of these interventions might be improved by matching interventions to patient characteristics. Purpose. The purpose of this longitudinal study is to determine which subgroup of CLBP-patients benefits most from the short, intensive pain management program of RealHealth_NL. Methods. A prospective cohort of 524 selected consecutive CLBP-patients was followed. Potential predictive indicators included demographic characteristics, functional disability, experienced pain and cognitive behavioural factors as measured at pre-treatment assessment. The outcome is defined as one year improvement in functional disability. A successful outcome is a value as seen in healthy populations. The two-week residential program is in line with recommendations in international guidelines, based on cognitive behavioural principles and delivered in collaboration with orthopedic spine surgeons. Results. Multivariate logistic regression revealed pre-treatment being employed (OR 3.609 [95%CI 1.795–7.256]), and functional disability (OR 0.943 [95%CI 0.921–0.965]) as significant predictive factors of a successful outcome in functional disability at one year follow-up. Conclusion. The results imply that CLBP-patients, who are employed, and less disabled at pre-treatment assessment, who participated in the RealHealth_NL program, are consistently associated with one year follow-up improvement of functional disability toward normal values. A small set of indicators is more easily identified and addressed and CLBP-patients who are more likely to benefit from the program could be given a higher entry priority. Conflict of Interest: J O'Dowd owns shares in RealHealth_NL; Research Development & Education independent research organisation; Sint Maartenskliniek health care provider and referral organisation. Source of funding: None. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Study purpose and background. There is growing concern that current outcome measures of back pain trials do not comprehensively capture what is important to patients. Some researchers believe we need to incorporate patients in the development of ‘next-generation’ outcomes. As a preliminary step to patient-interviews, we aimed to articulate ‘important change’ from the patients' perspective, as represented in reports of qualitative investigations inadvertently or directly exploring this. Summary of methods used and results. We adopted a multi-strand search of electronic databases, and citation and reference tracking. Two researchers identified qualitative investigations relating to low back pain. Data were abstracted and synthesised using meta-ethnographic processes. Provisional results, based on 41 studies, indicate few studies have directly addressed this issue, but that data regarding experience and expectations may be useful. Whilst results suggest that practically, patients are concerned with (re-)engagement in meaningful activities, the more experientially focused literature suggests that patients want to be believed and have validated their experiences and identity as someone ‘doing battle’ with pain. Patients seek not only diagnoses, treatment and cure, but simultaneously reassurance of the absence of pathology. In the absence of tenable diagnoses, some feel they must not adopt a ‘sick role’. Some struggle, but manage to meet others' expectations; thereby undermining the credibility of their pain/disability claims. Others withdraw, fearful of disapprobation and unable or unwilling to accommodate social demands. Patients generally seek to regain their pre-pain healthy, and emotionally robust state. Conclusion. Measurement of treatment effect must move beyond individual function to encompass the multidimensional impact of pain on identity and social participation. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. Arthritis Research UK

Background. Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management. Methods. Data from 3 semi-structured interviews with physiotherapy service managers and advanced spinal physiotherapy practitioner and a focus group (5 physiotherapists) in two NHS Health Boards, South Wales, UK, was thematically analysed. Results. Five themes emerged. CS knowledge: Clinicians and managers know different CSs and agree with its usefulness. Clinicians have specific CSs knowledge, managers viewed classification related to referral pathways and prognosis. Current CS use: Clinicians classify using their experience and clinical reasoning skills shifting between multiple CSs. Managers are confident that staff provide evidence-based service though believe classification is not always practiced across services. CS advantages/disadvantages: Effectively targeting the right patients for right treatments using evidence-based practice is advantageous. Prevalence of “guru led” CSs developed for research and of limited clinical use is disadvantageous. Barriers: Patients' treatment expectations, threat to clinical autonomy, lack of sufficiently complex CSs, lack of resources to up-skill clinicians and overall CSs fit into complex referral pathways. Enablers: CSs sufficiently complex & placed within clinical reasoning process, mentoring for inexperienced staff, positive engagement with all stakeholders and patients. Conclusion. Clinicians and managers are aware of CSs and agree with its usefulness to guide LBP management. Clinicians classify LBP though there is no formalized CS process in place. Whilst clinicians view classification as the relationship between patients and physiotherapy managers have a broader, whole service view. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Wales School of Primary Care Research, Cardiff, UK. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting

Statement of Purposes. Functional Restoration (FR) and spinal fusion are both used as treatment for patients with chronic low back pain however opinions are divided over their long term efficacy. This study examines the 18 month to 8 year outcomes of stand-alone lumbar fusion (STALIF) at L5/S1 and FR in similar groups of patients. Methods. A prospective audit was undertaken using data routinely collected from the practice of the senior author. Pain (VAS), disability (ODI) and patients' subjective appraisals were used as comparable outcome measures. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results. STALIF patients had sustained significant improvements in their VAS and ODI scores at study end, compared to the pre-operative assessments. FR patients demonstrated significant improvements in their VAS scores and measurable functionality on discharge from the programme, but these deteriorated by the one-month follow-up. At study end there was a significant deterioration in the outcomes compared to discharge. Patient perceived success was 85% in the STALIF patients and 58% in the FR. 24% of FR patients subsequently required surgery. Conclusions. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain and disability/functionality scores during the period of the study however improvements in the FR groups occurred only during the active phase and significantly reduced by study end. The low patient satisfaction rating for the FR group and the need for 25% to subsequently undergo surgery indicates that further robust investigation to clarify “real” sustainability and rule out short-term benefits that arise from psychological cushioning or simply a training effect is required. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented at a national meeting

Purpose and background

Effective reassurance is an essential element of treatment for conditions that do not require further investigations, referrals and on-going monitoring. However, research defining what reassurance should consist of and how to deliver it is scarce. The aim of this review was to identify consultation-related processes that improved patients' outcomes, in order to build an evidence-based model of effective reassurance in primary care.

Background

Farming is regarded as a high-risk work sector for LBP.