In case of spine tumors, when en bloc vertebral column resection (VCR) is indicated and feasible, the segmental defect should be reconstructed in order to obtain an immediate stability and stimulate a solid fusion. The aim of this study is to share our experience on patients who underwent spinal tumor en bloc VCR and reconstruction consecutively. En bloc VCR and reconstruction was performed in 138 patients. Oncological and surgical staging were performed for all patients using Enneking and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini systems accordingly. Following en bloc VCR of one or more vertebral bodies, a 360° reconstruction was made by applying posterior instrumentation and anterior implant insertion. Modular carbon fiber implants were applied in 111 patients, titanium mesh cage implants in 21 patients and titanium expandable cages in 3 patients; very recently in 3 cases we started to use custom made titanium implants. The latter were prepared according to preoperative planning of en bloc VCR based on CT-scan of the patient, using three dimensional printer. The use of modular carbon fiber implant has not leaded to any mechanical complications in the short and long term follow-up. In addition, due to radiolucent nature of this implant and less artifact production on CT and MRI, tumor relapse may be diagnosed and addressed earlier in compare with other implants, which has a paramount importance in these group of patients. We did not observe any implant failure using titanium cages. However, tumor relapse identification may be delayed due to metal artifacts on imaging modalities. Custom- made implants are economically more affordable and may be a good alternative choice for modular carbon fiber implants. The biocompatibility of the titanium make it a good choice for reconstruction of the defect when combined with bone graft allograft or autograft. Custom made cages theoretically can reproduce patients own biomechanics but should be studied with longer follow-up

Used routinely in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery, the chondrocostal graft is also applied to hand surgery in traumatic or pathologic indications. The purpose of this overview was to analyze at long-term follow-up the radiological and histological evolution of this autograft, in hand and wrist surgery. We extrapolated this autograft technique to the elbow by using perichondrium. Since 1992, 148 patients have undergone chondrocostal autograft: 116 osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, 18 radioscaphoid arthritis, 6 articular malunions of the distal radius, 4 kienbock's disease, and 4 traumatic loss of cartilage of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. Perichondrium autografts were used in 3 patients with elbow osteoarthritis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in 19 patients with a mean follow-up of 68 months (4–159). Histological studies were performed on: i) perioperative chondrocostal grafts (n=3), ii) chondrocostal grafts explanted between 2 and 48 months after surgery (n=10), and iii) perioperative perichondrium grafts (n=2). Whatever the indication, the reconstruction by a chondrocostal/ostochondrocostal or perichondrium graft yielded satisfactory clinical results at long-term follow-up. The main question was the viability of the graft. -. For rib cartilage grafting: The radiological study indicated the non-wear of the graft and a certain degree of ossification. The MRI and histology confirmed a very small degree of osseous metaplasia and graft viability. The biopsies showed neo-vascularization of the cartilage that had undergone morphological, constitutional and architectural changes. Comparison of these structural modifications with perioperative chondrocostal graft histology is in progress. -. For perichondrium grafting: The first cases gave satisfactory clinical results but must be confirmed on a larger number of patients. Histological results highlighted a tissue composed of one fibrous layer and one cartilage-like layer, a common composition of supporting tissue. Despite the strong mechanical strain in the hand and wrist, chondrocostal graft is a biological arthroplasty that is trustworthy and secure over the long term, although it can cause infrequent complications inherent to this type of surgery. Despite the inevitable histological modification, the cartilage remains alive and is of satisfactory quality at long term follow-up and fulfills the requirements for interposition and reconstruction of an articular surface. The perichondrium graft constitutes a new arsenal to cure cartilage resurfacing. The importance of perichondrium for the survival of the grafted cartilage, as previously reported, as well as its role in resurfacing, is being investigated

The Columbus is a relatively new implant with no published medium or long term follow-up. Its extensive use within our department led to this study to review the five-year clinical outcomesof patients who had a navigated Columbus primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implanted between March 2005 and December 2006. Case notes, departmental and hospital databases and PACS were used to identify patients and collect routine five-year review data. Information Services Division was approached for all cases of re-admission and associated complications anywhere in Scotland. 219 (90 male, 116 left) patients were identified. Mean age was 69 years (48–89) and mean BMI 32.2 (SD 5.8). Of the 219 patients operated on, twenty-one had a complication; ten still had intermittent mild to moderate pain, three had wound problems, one had a washout, one had DVT/PE within ninety days and one was diagnosed with patellar clunk syndrome. The remaining five patients had revision TKA (revision rate 2.3%), four for infection and only one due to aseptic loosening (revision rate excluding infection 0.5%). 115 patients returned to clinic at five years. Of these 96.4% were satisfied with their operation. The mean Oxford knee score had reduced from 42.5 (SD 8.2) pre-operatively to 23.6 (SD 9.2). Mean fixed flexion was 1° (SD 2.8°, range 0° to 15°) with four patients having a fixed flexion of 6° or more. Mean maximum flexion was 100° (SD 10.2°, range 60° to 120°) with two patients having flexion less than 80°. X-ray analysis showed that fourteen patients had a radiolucent line. Nine of these were not present at one year, six being at the tibial component. These results are satisfactory. The revision rate is similar to that cited by the National Joint Registry report 2011 (2.5%). Furthermore, the revision rate excluding infection is very low

The renewed interest in the clinically proven low wear of the metal-on-metal bearing combined with the capacity of inserting a thin walled cementless acetabular component has fostered the reintroduction of hip resurfacing. As in other forms of conservative hip surgery, i.e. pelvic osteotomies and impingement surgery, patient selection will help minimize complications and the need for early reoperation. Patient Selection and Hip Resurfacing. Although hip resurfacing was initially plagued with high failure rates, the introduction of metal on metal bearings as well as hybrid fixation has shown excellent survivorships of 97 to 99% at 4 to 5 years follow-up. However, it is important to critically look at the initial published results. In all of these series there was some form of patient selection. For example, in the Daniel and associates publications, only patients with osteoarthritis with an age less than 55 were included with 79% of patients being male. Treacy and associates stated that: “the operation was offered to men under the age of 65 years and women under the age of 60 years, with normal bone stock judged by plain radiographs and an expectation that they would return to an active lifestyle, including some sports”. However in the materials and methods, although the mean age is 52 years, the range is from 17 to 76 years including some patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as osteonecrosis. Obviously, some form of patient selection is needed; but how one integrates them is where the Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index (SARI) is useful. With a maximum score of 6, points are assigned accordingly: femoral head cyst >1cm: 2 points; patient weight <82kg: 2 points; previous hip surgery: 1 point; UCLA Activity level >6: 1 point. A SARI score >3 represented a 4 fold increase risk in early failure or adverse radiological changes and with a survivorship of 89% at four years. The SARI index also proved to be relevant in assessing the outcome of the all cemented McMinn resurfacing implant (Corin¯, Circentester, England) at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. Hips which had failed or with evidence of radiographic failure on the femoral side had a significantly higher SARI score than the remaining hips, 3.9 versus 1.9. Finally, one must consider the underlying diagnosis when evaluating a patient for hip resurfacing. In cases of dysplasia, acetabular deficiencies combined with the inability of inserting screws through the acetabular component may make initial implant stability unpredictable. This deformity in combination with a significant leg length discrepancy or valgus femoral neck could compromise the functional results of surface arthroplasty, and in those situations a stem type total hip replacement may provide a superior functional outcome. In respect to other diagnoses (osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis), initial analyses have not demonstrated any particular diagnostic group at greater risk of earlier failure. The only reservation we have is in patients with compromised renal function since metal ions generated from the metal-on-metal bearing are excreted through the urine and the lack of clearance of these ions may lead to excessive levels in the blood. Surgical Technique. Because resurfacing has not been within the training curriculum of orthopaedic surgeons for the last 2 decades, there will most likely be a learning curve in the integration of this implant within clinical practice. This data was confirmed for hip resurfacing when looking at the Canadian Academic Experience where in the first 50 cases of five arthroplasty surgeons only a 3.2% failure rate was noted of which 1.6% were due to neck fracture. Femoral neck fracture can occur because of significant varus positioning as well as osteonecrosis of the femoral head due to either disruption of the blood supply or over cement penetration. Finally, abnormal wear patterns leading to severe soft tissue reactions are being increasingly recognized and are related to either impingement or vertically placed acetabular components. Although impingement has long been recognized after total hip arthroplasty to limit range of motion and in extreme cases to hip instability, the risk after hip resurfacing may be greater since the femoral head-neck unit is preserved. Beaulé and associates have reported that 56% of hips treated by hip resurfacing have an abnormal offset ratio pre-operatively, with the two main diagnostic groups presenting deficient head-neck offset being osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis both of which have been associated with femoroacetabular impingement in the pre arthritic state. Conclusion. Although patients with a high activity level are likely to put their hip arthroplasties at risk for earlier failure, limiting a patient's activity because of fear of revision with a stem type hip arthroplasty has been shown to negatively impact the quality of life at long term follow-up. Thus hip resurfacing arthroplasty plays a significant role in the treatment of hip arthritis by permitting a return to full activities or what the patient perceives as his/her full capacities to do so, permitting them to enjoy a better quality of life without fearing a major hip revision