Bone loss secondary to primary or metastatic lesions of the proximal humerus remains a challenging surgical problem. Options include preservation of the joint with stabilisation using internal fixation or resection of the tumour with prosthetic replacement. Resection of the proximal humerus often includes the greater tuberosity and adjacent diaphysis, which may result in poor function secondary to loss of the rotator cuff and/or deltoid function. Preservation of the joint with internal fixation may reduce the time in hospital and peri-operative morbidity compared with joint replacement, and result in a better functional outcome. We included 32 patients with pathological fractures of the proximal humerus in this study. Functional and radiological assessments were performed. At a mean follow-up of 17.6 months (8 to 61) there was no radiological evidence of failure of fixation. The mean revised musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score was 94.6% (86% to 99%). There was recurrent tumour requiring further surgery in four patients (12.5%). Of the 22 patients who were employed prior to presentation all returned to work without restrictions. The use of a
Periarticular metastasis may be treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction. The extensive surgery required may not, however, be appropriate for all patients. Our aim was to establish if the outcome of
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of operative intervention for femoral metastases which were selected based on expected survival and to discuss appropriate surgical strategies. From 2002 to 2017, 148 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for femoral metastasis were included in this study. Prognostic risk assessments were performed according to the Katagiri and revised Katagiri scoring system. In general, the low-risk group underwent resection and reconstruction with endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), while the high-risk group underwent internal fixation (IF) and radiation therapy. For the intermediate-risk group, the operative choice depended on the patient’s condition, degree of bone destruction, and radio-sensitivity. Overall survival, local failure, walking ability, and systemic complications were evaluated.Aims
Methods
For paediatric and adolescent patients with growth potential, preservation of the physiological joint by transepiphyseal resection (TER) of the femur confers definite advantages over arthroplasty procedures. We hypothesized that the extent of the tumour and changes in its extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are essential factors in the selection of this procedure, and can be assessed with MRI. The oncological and functional outcomes of the procedure were reviewed to confirm its safety and efficacy. We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients (seven male and nine female, mean age 12.2 years (7 to 16)) with osteosarcoma of the knee who had been treated by TER. We evaluated the MRI scans before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for all patients to assess the extent of the disease and the response to treatment.Aims
Methods
Free vascularised fibular grafting has been used for the treatment
of large bony defects for more than 40 years. However, there is
little information about the risk factors for failure and whether
newer locking techniques of fixation improve the rates of union.
The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of union of free
fibular grafts fixed with locking and traditional techniques, and
to quantify the risk factors for nonunion and failure. A retrospective review involved 134 consecutive procedures over
a period of 20 years. Of these, 25 were excluded leaving 109 patients
in the study. There were 66 men and 43 women, with a mean age of
33 years (5 to 78). Most (62) were performed for oncological indications,
and the most common site (52) was the lower limb. Rate of union
was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for
nonunion were assessed using Cox regression. All patients were followed
up for at least one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this study were to analyse the long-term outcome
of vascularised fibular graft (VFG) reconstruction after tumour
resection and to evaluate the usefulness of the method. We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who had undergone resection
of a sarcoma and reconstruction using a VFG between 1988 and 2015.
Their mean follow-up was 98 months (5 to 317). Reconstruction was
with an osteochondral graft (n = 13), intercalary graft (n = 12),
inlay graft (n = 4), or resection arthrodesis (n = 20). We analysed
the oncological and functional outcome, and the rate of bony union
and complications.Aims
Patients and Methods
In 1999, we developed a technique for biological
reconstruction after excision of a bone tumour, which involved using
autografts of the bone containing the tumour treated with liquid
nitrogen. We have previously reported the use of this technique
in 28 patients at a mean follow up of 27 months (10 to 54). In this study, we included 72 patients who underwent reconstruction
using this technique. A total of 33 patients died and three were
lost to follow-up, at a mean of 23 months (2 to 56) post-operatively,
leaving 36 patients available for a assessment at a mean of 101
months 16 to 163) post-operatively. The methods of reconstruction included
an osteo-articular graft in 16, an intercalary in 13 and, a composite
graft with prosthesis in seven. Post-operative function was excellent in 26 patients (72.2%),
good in seven (19.4%), and fair in three (8.3%) according to the
functional evaluation system of Enneking. No recurrent tumour occurred
within the grafts. The autografts survived in 29 patients (80.6%),
and the rates of survival at five and ten years were 86.1% and 80.6
%, respectively. Seven of 16 osteo-articular grafts (44%) failed
because of fracture or infection, but all the composite and intercalary
grafts survived. The long-term outcomes of frozen autografting, particularly using
composite and intercalary grafts, are satisfactory and thus represent
a good method of treatment for patients with a sarcoma of bone or
soft tissue. Cite this article:
Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone
disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for
more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision
to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant
and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall
survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence
of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and
is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society
(BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents
‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed
to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again
champion the cause of patients with MBD. A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being
made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines.Objectives
Methods
We evaluated the results of fibular centralisation as a stand alone technique to reconstruct defects that occurred after resection of tumours involving the tibial diaphysis and distal metaphysis. Between January 2003 and December 2006, 15 patients underwent excision of tumours of the tibial diaphysis or distal metaphysis and reconstruction by fibular centralisation. Their mean age was 17 years (7 to 40). Two patients were excluded; one died from the complications of chemotherapy and a second needed a below-knee amputation for a recurrent giant-cell tumour. A total of 13 patients were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 29 months (16 to 48). Only 16 of 26 host graft junctions united primarily. Ten junctions in ten patients needed one or more further procedure before union was achieved. At final follow-up 12 of the 13 patients had fully united grafts; 11 walked without aids. The mean time to union at the junctions that united was 12 months (3 to 36). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 24.7 (16 to 30). Fibular centralisation is a durable reconstruction for defects of the tibial diaphysis and distal metaphysis with an acceptable functional outcome. Stable osteosynthesis is the key to successful union. Additional bone grafting is recommended for patients who need postoperative radiotherapy.
We retrospectively reviewed 101 consecutive patients
with 114 femoral tumours treated by massive bone allograft at our
institution between 1986 and 2005. There were 49 females and 52
males with a mean age of 20 years (4 to 74). At a median follow-up
of 9.3 years (2 to 19.8), 36 reconstructions (31.5%) had failed.
The allograft itself failed in 27 reconstructions (24%). Mechanical complications such as delayed union, fracture and
failure of fixation were studied. The most adverse factor on the
outcome was the use of intramedullary nails, followed by post-operative
chemotherapy, resection length >
17 cm and age >
18 years at the
time of intervention. The simultaneous use of a vascularised fibular
graft to protect the allograft from mechanical complications improved
the outcome, but the use of intramedullary cementing was not as
successful. In order to improve the strength of the reconstruction and to
advance the biology of host–graft integration, we suggest avoiding
the use of intramedullary nails and titanium plates, but instead
using stainless steel plates, as these gave better results. The
use of a supplementary vascularised fibular graft should be strongly
considered in adult patients with resection >
17 cm and in those
who require post-operative chemotherapy.
We used a knee-sparing distal femoral endoprosthesis in young patients with malignant bone tumours of the distal femur in whom it was possible to resect the tumour and to preserve the distal femoral condyles. The proximal shaft of the endoprosthesis had a coated hydroxyapatite collar, while the distal end had hydroxyapatite-coated extracortical plates to secure it to the small residual femoral condylar fragment. We reviewed the preliminary results of this endoprosthesis in eight patients with primary bone tumours of the distal femur. Their mean age at surgery was 17.years (14 to 21). The mean follow-up was 24 months (20 to 31). At final follow-up the mean flexion at the knee was 102° (20° to 120°) and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 80% (57% to 96.7%). There was excellent osteointegration at the prosthesis-proximal bone interface with formation of new bone around the hydroxyapatite collar. The prosthesis allowed preservation of the knee and achieved a good functional result. Formation of new bone and remodelling at the interface make the implant more secure. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term structural integrity of the prosthesis.
Massive endoprostheses using a cemented intramedullary stem are widely used to allow early resumption of activity after surgery for tumours. The survival of the prosthesis varies with the anatomical site, the type of prosthesis and the mode of fixation. Revision surgery is required in many cases because of aseptic loosening. Insertion of a second cemented endoprosthesis may be difficult because of the poor quality of the remaining bone, and loosening recurs quickly. We describe a series of 14 patients with triplate fixation in difficult revision or joint-sparing tumour surgery with a minimum follow-up of four years. The triplate design incorporated well within a remodelled cortex to achieve osseomechanical integration with all patients regaining their original level of function within five months. Our preliminary results suggest that this technique may provide an easy, biomechanically friendly alternative to insertion of a further device with an intramedullary stem, which has a shorter lifespan in revision or joint-sparing tumour surgery. A short segment of bone remaining after resection of a tumour will not accept an intramedullary stem, but may be soundly fixed using this method.
