Ankle fractures are the fourth most common fracture requiring surgical management. The deltoid ligament is considered the primary stabilizer of the ankle against a valgus force. The management of the deltoid ligament in ankle fractures is currently a controversial topic no consensus exists regarding repair in the setting of ankle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the role and indications for deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures. A systematic database search was conducted with Medline, Pubmed and Embase for relevant studies discussing patients with ankle fractures involving deltoid ligament rupture and repair. The papers were screened independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the MINORs criteria. Data extraction included post-operative outcomes, pain, range of motion (ROM), function, medial clear space (MCS), syndesmotic malreduction and complication rates. Following title, abstract and full text screening, 10 eligible studies published between 1987 and 2017 remained for data extraction (n = 528). The studies include 325 Weber B and 203 Weber C type fractures. Malreduction rate in studies with deltoid ligament repair was 7.4% in comparison to those without repair at 33.3% (p < 0.05). Eleven (4%) of deltoid ligament repair patients returned for re-operation to have implants removed in comparison to eighty three (42%) of those without repair (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates (p < 0.05). The mean operating time of deltoid ligament repair groups was 20 minutes longer than non-repair groups(p < 0.05). Deltoid ligament repair offers significantly lower syndesmotic malreduction rates and reduced re-operation rates for hardware removal when performed instead of transsyndesmotic screw fixation. When compared to non-repair groups, there are no significant differences in pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates. Deltoid ligament repair should be considered for ankle fracture patients with syndesmotic injury, especially those with Weber C. Other alternative syndesmotic fixation methods such as suture button fixation should be explored. A large multi-patient randomized control trial is required to further examine the outcomes of ankle fracture patients with deltoid ligament repair

Background. Lateral ligament injuries of the ankle are common. They account for up to 50% of all sporting injuries. Recovery times vary, leading to time away from sport and training for the professional athlete. Predicting this time is important for the treating surgeon, the athlete and the rehabilitation team. This can be difficult as associated ankle injuries occurring at the time of the trauma may alter recovery and rehabilitation. Aim. To compare the time to return to training and sports of isolated lateral ligament injuries with more complex injuries of the ankle treated surgically and to evaluate if lateral ligament repair is safe and effective in the professional athlete. Study design: Case series; level of evidence 4. Methods. A consecutive series of professional sportsmen and women were treated operatively for radiologically and clinically confirmed grade III lateral ligament injury between 2005 and 2009. The patients were split into two groups; isolated lateral ligament injuries and those with other associated injuries. The end points studied were the time to return to training in weeks and the time to return to play in weeks. Results. There were 26 ankles in 26 patients. 16 were isolated injuries (Group A) and 10 had associated injuries (Group B). The associated injuries included, osteochondral defects (OCD) (3), deltoid ligament injury (5), syndesmotic injury (1) and deltoid ligament injury combined with an OCD (1). The mean time to return to training in group A was 61.3 days (range 55–110) and in group B was 99.5 days (63–152). The mean time to return to play in Group A was 78.2 days (range 63–127) and group B 116.7 days (82–178). The time to return to training and play was significantly shorter for the isolated lateral ligament injury group, (p=0.0003) and (p=0.0004) respectively. The only complications were two minor wound infections that responded to oral antibiotics. No patient returned for recurrent instability and all returned to their pre-injury level of play. Conclusion. Lateral ligament repair was a successful and safe procedure leading to return to pre-injury level of play for all the athletes. Time to return to training and play was significantly shorter if there were no associated injuries to the ankle. NO DISCLOSURES

The Achilles tendon is the most commonly ruptured tendon in the body and yet its management remains controversial due to potential surgical complications. We believe that primary repair using LARS ligament augmentation, combined with early mobilisation will significantly reduce all these potential problems and lead to improved functional outcomes. Nine patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures underwent primary repair using augmentation with a Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) ligament. Day one postoperatively each patient was started on active range of motion exercises. Clinical parameters, isokinetic strength and outcome measurements (The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was utilised to assess pain and function, Tegner score to evaluate activity) were evaluated at an average follow-up of 17 months. Complications, if any, were also recorded. There were no re-ruptures and all patients returned to normal work (average time 9.2 weeks) and all but one returned to their previous level of recreational sporting activity (average time 20.8 weeks). The postoperative performance testing showed positive results with the mean decrease in calf circumference of affected leg was 1.0 cm (range, −0.5 to 2.0), and every patient was able to perform at least one heel-raise with the mean heel raise difference being −3.8 repetitions (range, −1 to −10 reps) when compared to the other leg. In terms of functional outcomes, all patients reported very good results. The mean AOFAS score postoperatively was 83.4% (range, 74% to 100%) and the mean LEFS score was 82.5% (range, 45 to 100%). The mean preoperative Tegner score was 4.75 (range, 2 to 8) and the postoperative score was 3.75 (range, 2 to 7). The results of our preliminary clinical series indicate that LARS ligament repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures provides a reliable and effective technique for repair. It eliminates the need for graft harvesting, it decreases postoperative complications, but most importantly, patients have improved functional outcomes

Aim

To correlate the surgical and MRI findings in acute lateral patellar dislocation and to determine the accuracy of MRI in identifying location of MFPL injury.

Abstract. Objectives. The study aims to determine whether an arthroscopic ligament reconstruction is necessary to relieve clinical ankle instability symptoms in patients with an MRI scan showing medial or lateral ligament tear. Methods. This was a single centre retrospective case series study of 25 patients with ankle instability and ligament tear on MRI scan who had undergone arthroscopic procedures from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were followed up for an average period of 3 years postoperatively to check for any recurrence of symptoms. Results. Of the 25 patients, 23 had ATFL tear on MRI scan, and 2 had deltoid ligament tear. Examination under anaesthesia was stable in 13 patients and unstable in 12 patients. The majority of the patients (76%) had a simple arthroscopic ankle debridement and no ligament repair. Six patients needed Brostrom repair. Conclusions. Our study has shown that in patients with MRI proven ligament tear and clinical instability, a ligament reconstruction was unnecessary in most patients. The instability symptoms of patients were relieved by simple ankle arthroscopic debridement

INTRODUCTION. Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an alternative treatment to avoid fusion related adverse events, specifically adjacent segment disease. New generation of elastomeric non-articulating devices have been developed to more effectively replicate the shock absorption and flexural stiffness of native disc. This study reports 5 years clinical and radiographic outcomes, range of motion and position of the center of rotation after a viscoelastic TDR. Material and methods. This prospective observational cohort study included 61 consecutive patients with monosegmental TDR. We selected patients with intermediate functional activity according to Baecke score. Hybrid constructs had been excluded. Only cases with complete clinical and radiological follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months were included. Mean age at the time of surgery was 42.8 +7.7 years-old (27–60) and mean BMI was 24.2 kg/m² +3.4 (18–33). TDR level was L5-S1 in 39 cases and L4-L5 in 22 cases. The clinical evaluation was based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Short Form-36 (SF36) including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and General Health Questionnaire GHQ28. The radiological outcomes were range of motion and position of the center of rotation at the index and the adjacent levels and the adjacent disc height changes. Results. There was a significant improvement in VAS (3.3±2.5 versus 6.6±1.7, p<0.001), in ODI (20±17.9 versus 51.2±14.6, p<0.001), GHQ28 (52.6±15.5 versus 64.2±15.6, p<0.001), SF 36 PCS (58.8±4.8 versus 32.4±3.4, p<0.001) and SF 36 MCS(60.7±6 versus 42.3±3.4, p<0.001). Additional surgeries were performed in 5 cases. 3 additional procedures were initially planified in the surgical program: one adjacent L3-L5 ligamentoplasty above a L5S1 TDR and two L5S1 TDR cases had additional laminectomies. Fusion at the index level was secondary performed in 2 L4L5 TDR cases but the secondary posterior fusion did not bring improvement. In the 56 remaining patients none experienced facet joint pain. One patient with sacroiliac pain needed local injections. Radiological outcomes were studied on 56 cases (exclusion of 5 cases with additional surgeries). The mean location centers of the index level and adjacent discs were comparable to those previously published in asymptomatic patients. According to the definition of Ziegler, all of our cases remained grade 0 for disc height (within 25% of normal). Discussion. The silent block design of LP-ESP provides an interesting specificity. It could be the key factor that makes the difference regarding facets problems and instability reported with other implants experimentally or clinically. Unfortunately no other comparative TDR series are available yet in the literature. Conclusion. This series reports significant improvement in mid-term follow up after TDR which is consistent with previously published studies but with a lower rate of revision surgery and no adjacent level disease pathologies. The radiographic assessment of the patients demonstrated the quality of functional reconstruction of the lumbar spine after LP ESP viscoelastic disc replacement

Purpose. The coronoid and collateral ligaments are key elbow stabilizers. When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. A coronoid prosthesis has been designed with an extended tip in an effort to augment elbow stability in the setting of residual collateral ligament insufficiency. The purpose of this biomechanical study, therefore, was to compare an anatomic coronoid replacement with an extended tip implant both with and without ligament insufficiency. Method. Two coronoid prostheses were designed and developed based on CT-derived images adjusted for cartilage thickness: an anatomical implant and an extended-tip implant. Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with an intact coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomical prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired. Results. Laxity increased following a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired (p<0.01) and sectioned collateral ligaments (p<0.01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the intact coronoid, the anatomic implant or the extended implant (p=0.88). Ligament sectioning with an intact coronoid produced severe joint instability, resulting in an average laxity (standard error) of 42.94.4 (p<0.01). With ligament sectioning, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared to the intact coronoid (p=0.72), whereas the extended implant reduced laxity by 20.56.3 (p=0.05). Conclusion. A coronoid prosthesis with an extended coronoid tip improves elbow stability relative to an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency. This may prove useful in patients with comminuted coronoid fractures with concomitant ligament injuries, allowing for maintenance of elbow stability during ligament healing or reconstruction. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs and to determine patient outcomes

Purpose. The coronoid process is an integral component for elbow stability. In the setting of a comminuted coronoid fracture, where repair is not possible, a prosthetic device may be beneficial in restoring elbow stability. The hypothesis of this in-vitro biomechanical study was that an anatomic coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid deficient elbow. Method. A metal coronoid prosthesis was designed and developed based on CT-derived images adjusted for cartilage thickness. The kinematics and stability of eight fresh-frozen male cadaveric arms (mean age 77.4 years, range 69–92 years) were quantified in the intact state; after collateral ligament sectioning and repair (control state); after a simulated 40% transverse coronoid fracture; and after implantation of a coronoid prosthesis. Elbow flexion was simulated passively with the arm oriented in the varus position and the forearm in pronation. Varus-valgus angulation (VV) and internal-external rotation (IE) of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified with an electromagnetic tracking system (Flock of Birds, Ascension Technologies, Burlington, VT, static accuracy: 1.8mm position, 0.5 orientation). Results. No significant difference was found between the intact elbow and the native coronoid control state with collateral ligament repair (mean standard deviation) (VV=0.13.1, p=0.9; IE=0.82.59, p=0.4). A significant decrease in stability was observed following the 40% coronoid fracture (VV=5.73.4, p<0.01; IE=10.93.35, p<0.001). Following coronoid hemi-arthroplasty, no significant difference in stability was found between the coronoid prosthesis and the control state (VV=0.22.7, p=1.0; IE=1.33.0, p=0.8). Conclusion. An anatomic coronoid prosthesis restores the stability of the coronoid deficient elbow similar to the intact state. Further studies are needed to determine the optimum fixation method of this device and to determine the range of sizes which would be required for the successful commercialization of this device for patient use. Clinical trials will be required to confirm the favourable findings of this in-vitro investigation