Dual plating of the medial and lateral distal femur has been proposed to reduce angular malunion and hardware failure secondary to delayed union or nonunion. This strategy improves the strength and alignment of the construct, but it may compromise the vascularity of the distal femur paradoxically impairing healing. This study investigates the effect of dual plating versus single plating on the perfusion of the distal femur. Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities were assigned to either isolated lateral plating or dual plating of a single limb. The contralateral lower extremity was used as a matched control. A distal femoral locking plate was applied to the lateral side of ten legs using a standard sub-vastus approach. Five femurs had an additional 3.5mm reconstruction plate applied to the medial aspect of the distal femur using a medial sub-vastus approach. The superficial femoral artery and the profunda femoris were cannulated at the level of the femoral head. Gadolinium MRI contrast solution (3:1 gadolinium to saline ration) was injected through the arterial cannula. High resolution fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo sequences were completed both with and without gadolinium contrast. Intra-osseous contributions were quantified within a standardized region of interest (ROI) using customized IDL 6.4 software (Exelis, Boulder, CO). Perfusion of the distal femur was assessed in six different zones. The signal intensity on MRI was then quantified in the distal femur and comparison was made between the experimental plated limb and the contralateral, control limb. Following completion of the MRI protocol, the specimens were injected with latex medium and the extra-osseous vasculature was dissected. Quantitative MRI revealed that application of the lateral distal femoral locking plate reduced the perfusion of the distal femur by 21.7%. Within the dual plating group there was a reduction in perfusion by 24%. There was no significant difference in the perfusion between the isolated lateral plate and the dual plating groups. There were no regional differences in perfusion between the epiphyseal, metaphyseal or meta-diaphyseal regions. Specimen dissection in both plating groups revealed complete destruction of any periosteal vessels that ran underneath either the medial or lateral plates. Multiple small vessels enter the posterior condyles off both superior medial and lateral geniculate arteries and were preserved in all specimens. Furthermore, there was retrograde flow to the distal most aspect of the condyles medially and laterally via the inferior geniculate arteries. The medial vascular pedicle was proximal to the medial plate in all the dual plated specimens and was not disrupted by the medial sub-vastus approach in any specimens. Fixation of the distal femur via a lateral sub-vastus approach and application of a lateral locking plate results in a 21% reduction in perfusion to the distal femur. The addition of a medial 3.5mm reconstruction plate does not significantly compromise the vascularity of the distal femur. The majority of the vascular insult secondary to open reduction, internal fixation of the distal femur occurs with application of the lateral locking plate

Peri-prosthetic fractures above a TKA are becoming increasingly more common, and typically occur at the junction of the anterior flange of the femoral component and the osteopenic metaphyseal distal femur. In the vast majority of cases, the TKA is well fixed and has been functioning well prior to fracture. For fractures above well-fixed components, internal fixation is preferred. Fixation options include retrograde nailing or lateral plating. Nails are typically considered in arthroplasties that allow intercondylar access (“open box PS” or CR implants) and have sufficient length of the distal fragment to allow multiple locking screws to be used. This situation is rare, as most distal fragments are quite short. If a nail is chosen, use of a long nail is preferred, since it allows the additional fixation and alignment that diaphyseal fill affords. Short nails should be discouraged since they can “toggle” in the meta-diaphysis and do not engage the diaphysis to improve coronal alignment. Plates can be used with any implant type and any length of distal fragment. The challenge with either fixation strategy is obtaining stable fixation of the distal fragment while maintaining length, alignment, and rotation. Fixation opportunities in the distal fragment can be limited due to obstacles caused by femoral component lugs, boxes, stems, cement mantles, and areas of stress shielding or osteolysis. Modern lateral locked plates can be inserted in a biologically friendly submuscular extra-periosteal fashion. The goal of fixation is to obtain as many long locked screws in the distal fragment as possible. High union rates have been reported with modern locked plating and nailing techniques, however, biplanar fluoroscopic vigilance is required to prevent malalignments, typically valgus, distraction, and distal fragment hyperextension. For certain fractures, distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a wise choice. The author reserves DFR for situations where internal fixation is likely to fail (severe distal osteolysis, severe osteopenia) or for cases where it has already failed (nonunion). Obviously, if the implant is loose, revision is indicated, and typically the distal bone loss is so severe that a distal femoral replacement is indicated. The author prefers cemented constructs and routinely adds antibiotics to the cement mixture. Careful attention to posterior dissection of the distal fragment is recommended to avoid neurovascular injury. Cementing the femoral component in the proper amount of external rotation is important to allow central patellar tracking. The available literature demonstrates excellent functional results with these reconstructions, however, complications are not uncommon. Infection and extensor mechanism complications are the most frequent complications and are best avoided. In summary, ORIF remains the treatment of choice for these fractures, however, for cases where ORIF is likely to fail, or has failed, DFR remains a predictable salvage option

Peri-prosthetic fractures above a TKA are becoming increasingly more common, and typically occur at the junction of the anterior flange of the femoral component and the osteopenic metaphyseal distal femur. In the vast majority of cases the TKA is well fixed and has been functioning well prior to fracture. For loose components, revision is typically indicated. Typically a megaprosthesis is required. Well-fixed components, internal fixation is preferred. Fixation options include retrograde nailing or lateral plating. Nails are typically considered in arthroplasties that allow intercondylar access (“open box PS” or CR implants) and have sufficient length of the distal fragment to allow multiple locking screws to be used. This situation is rare, as most distal fragments are quite short. If a nail is chosen, use of a long nail is preferred, since it allows the additional fixation and alignment that diaphyseal fill affords. Short nails should be discouraged since they can “toggle” in the meta-diaphysis and do not engage the diaphysis to improve coronal alignment. Plates can be used with any implant type and any length of distal fragment. The challenge with either fixation strategy is obtaining stable fixation of the distal fragment while maintaining length, alignment, and rotation. Fixation opportunities in the distal fragment can be limited due to obstacles caused by femoral component lugs, boxes, stems, cement mantles, and areas of stress shielding or osteolysis. Modern lateral locked plates can be inserted in a biologically friendly submuscular extra-periosteal fashion. More recent developments with polyaxial locked screws (that allow angulation prior to end-point locking) may offer even more versatility when distal fragment fixation is challenging. The goal of fixation is to obtain as many long locked screws in the distal fragment as possible. High union rates have been reported with modern locked plating techniques, however, biplanar fluoroscopic vigilance is required to prevent malalignments, typically valgus, distraction, and distal fragment hyperextension

Peri-prosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are becoming increasingly more common, and typically occur at the junction of the anterior flange of the femoral component and the osteopenic metaphyseal distal femur. In the vast majority of cases the TKA is well-fixed and has been functioning well prior to fracture. For loose components, revision is typically indicated. Typically a megaprosthesis is required. For well-fixed components, internal fixation is preferred. Fixation options include retrograde nailing or lateral plating. Nails are typically considered in arthroplasties that allow intercondylar access (“open box PS” or CR implants) and have sufficient length of the distal fragment to allow multiple locking screws to be used. This situation is rare, as most distal fragments are quite short. If a nail is chosen, use of a long nail is preferred, since it allows the additional fixation and alignment that diaphyseal fill affords. Short nails should be discouraged since they can “toggle” in the meta-diaphysis and do not engage the diaphysis to improve coronal alignment. Plates can be used with any implant type and any length of distal fragment. The challenge with either fixation strategy is obtaining stable fixation of the distal fragment while maintaining length, alignment, and rotation. Fixation opportunities in the distal fragment can be limited due to obstacles caused by femoral component lugs, boxes, stems, cement mantles, and areas of stress shielding or osteolysis. Modern lateral locked plates can be inserted in a biologically friendly submuscular extra-periosteal fashion. More recent developments with polyaxial locked screws (that allow angulation prior to end-point locking) may offer even more versatility when distal fragment fixation is challenging. The goal of fixation is to obtain as many long locked screws in the distal fragment as possible. High union rates have been reported with modern locked plating techniques, however, biplanar fluoroscopic vigilance is required to prevent malalignments, typically valgus, distraction, and distal fragment hyperextension

Periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are a significant complication of total hip arthroplasty. Plate osteosynthesis with or without onlay strut allograft has been the mainstay of treatment around well-fixed stems. Nonunions are a rare, challenging complication of this fixation method. The number of published treatment strategies for periprosthetic femoral nonunions are limited. In this series, we report the outcomes of a novel orthogonal plating surgical technique for addressing nonunions in the setting of Vancouver B1 and C-type periprosthetic fractures that previously failed open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). A retrospective chart review of all patients from 2010 to 2014 with Vancouver B1/C total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic femoral nonunions was performed. All patients were treated primarily with ORIF. Nonunion was defined as no radiographic signs of fracture healing nine months post-operatively, with or without hardware failure. Exclusion criteria included open fractures and periprosthetic infections. The technique utilised a mechanobiologic strategy of atraumatic exposure, resection of necrotic tissue, bone grafting with adjuvant recombinant growth factor and revision open reduction internal fixation. Initially, compression was achieved using an articulated tensioning device and application of an anterior plate. This was followed by locked lateral plating. Patients remained non-weight bearing for eight weeks. Six Vancouver B1/C periprosthetic femoral nonunions were treated. Five patients were female with an average age of 80.3 years (range 72–91). The fractures occurred at a mean of 5.8 years (range 1–10) from their initial arthroplasty procedure. No patients underwent further revision surgery; there were no wound dehiscence, hardware failures, infections, or surgical complications. All patients had a minimum of nine months follow up (mean 16.6, range 9–36). All fractures achieved osseous union, defined as solid bridging callus over at least two cortices and pain free, independent ambulation, at an average of 24.4 weeks (range 6.1–39.7 weeks). To our knowledge, this is the first case series describing 90–90 locked compression plating using modern implants for periprosthetic femoral nonunions. This is a rare but challenging complication of total hip arthroplasty and we present a novel solution with satisfactory preliminary outcomes. Orthogonal locked compression plating utilising an articulated tensioning device and autograft with adjuvant osteoinductive allograft should be considered in periprosthetic femur fractures around a well-fixed stem. Further biomechanical and clinical research is needed to improve our treatment strategies in this population

Practice variation may occur when there is no standardised approach to specific clinical problems and there is a lack of scientific evidence for alternative treatments. Practice variation suggests that a segment of the patient population may be managed sub-optimally, and indicates a need for further research in order to establish stronger evidence-based practice guidelines. We surveyed Australian orthopaedic surgeons to examine practice variation in common orthopaedic presentations. In February 2009, members of the Australian Orthopaedic Association were emailed an online survey, which collected information regarding experience level (number of years as a consultant), sub-specialty interests, state where the surgeon works, on- call participation, as well as five common (anecdotally controversial) orthopaedic trauma cases with a number of management options. Surgeons were asked to choose their one most likely management choice from the list provided, which was either surgical or non-surgical in nature. A reminder was sent two weeks later. Exploratory regression was modeled to examine the predictors of choosing surgical management for each case and overall. Of 760 surgeons, 358 (47%) provided responses. For undisplaced scaphoid fractures, respondents selected short-arm cast (53%), ORIF (22%), percutaneous screw (22%) and long-arm cast (3%). Less experienced (0 to 5 years) (p=0.006) and hand surgeons (p=0.008) were more likely to operate. For a displaced mid-shaft clavicle fracture, respondents selected non-operative (62%), plating (31%) and intramedullary fixation (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). For an undisplaced Weber B lateral malleolus fracture, respondents selected plaster cast or boot (59%), lateral plating (31%), posterior plating (9%) and no splinting (2%). For a displaced Colles fracture in an older patient, respondents selected plating (47%), Kirschner wires (28%), cast/splint (23%) and external fixation (1%). Less experienced (p<0.001) and hand surgeons (p=0.024) were more likely to operate. For a two-part neck of humerus fracture in an older patient, respondents selected non-operative (74%), locking plate (14%), and hemiarthroplasty (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). Accounting for all answers in multiple regression modeling, it was found that more experienced surgeons (>15 years) were 25% less likely to operate (p=0.001). Overall, there was no difference among sub-specialties, or whether a surgeon participated in an on-call roster. Considerable practice variation exists among orthopaedic surgeons in the approach to common orthopaedic problems. Surgeons who identify with a sub-specialty are more likely to manage conditions in their area of interest operatively, and more experienced surgeons are less likely to recommend surgical management

Peri-prosthetic fractures above a TKA are becoming increasingly more common, and typically occur at the junction of the anterior flange of the femoral component and the osteopenic metaphyseal distal femur. In the vast majority of cases the TKA is well fixed and has been functioning well prior to fracture. For loose components, revision is typically indicated. Often, distal femoral mega prostheses are required to deal with metaphyseal bone loss. Good results have been reported in small series, however, complications, including infection remain concerning, and these implants are incredibly expensive. Although performing a mega prosthesis in the setting of a well fixed TKA is not unreasonable due to immediate full weight bearing, in my opinion, prosthetic replacement should be limited to cases of failed ORIF (rare), or in cases where fixation is likely to fail (i.e., severe osteolysis distally). For the majority of fractures above well fixed components, internal fixation is preferred for the main reason that the overwhelming majority of these fractures will heal. Fixation options include retrograde nailing or lateral locked plating. Nails are typically considered in arthroplasties that allow intercondylar access (“open box PS” or CR implants) and have sufficient length of the distal fragment to allow multiple locking screws to be used. This situation is rare, as most distal fragments are quite short. If a nail is chosen, use of a long nail is preferred, since it allows the additional fixation and alignment that diaphyseal fill affords. Short nails should be discouraged since they can “toggle” in the meta-diaphysis and do not engage the diaphysis to improve coronal alignment. Plates can be used with any implant type and any length of distal fragment. The challenge with either fixation strategy is obtaining stable fixation of the distal fragment while maintaining length, alignment, and rotation. Fixation opportunities in the distal fragment can be limited due to obstacles caused by femoral component lugs, boxes, stems, cement mantles, and areas of stress shielding or osteolysis. Modern lateral locked plates can be inserted in a biologically friendly submuscular extra-periosteal fashion. More recent developments with polyaxial locked screws (that allow angulation prior to end-point locking) may offer even more versatility when distal fragment fixation is challenging. The goal of fixation is to obtain as many long locked screws in the distal fragment as possible. High union rates have been reported with modern locked plating techniques, however, biplanar fluoroscopic vigilance is required to prevent malalignments, typically valgus, distraction, and distal fragment hyperextension

Peri-prosthetic fractures above a TKA are becoming increasingly more common, and typically occur at the junction of the anterior flange of the femoral component and the osteopenic metaphyseal distal femur. In the vast majority of cases the TKA is well-fixed and has been functioning well prior to fracture. For loose components, revision is typically indicated. Often, distal femoral mega prostheses are required to deal with metaphyseal bone loss. Good results have been reported in small series, however, complications, including infection remain concerning, and these implants are incredibly expensive. Although performing a mega prosthesis in the setting of a well-fixed TKA is not unreasonable due to immediate full weight bearing, in my opinion, prosthetic replacement should be limited to cases of failed ORIF (rare), or in cases where fixation is likely to fail (i.e., severe osteolysis distally). For the majority of fractures above well-fixed components, internal fixation is preferred for the main reason that the overwhelming majority of these fractures will heal. Fixation options include retrograde nailing or lateral locked plating. Nails are typically considered in arthroplasties that allow intercondylar access (“open box PS” or CR implants) and have sufficient length of the distal fragment to allow multiple locking screws to be used. This situation is rare, as most distal fragments are quite short. If a nail is chosen, use of a long nail is preferred, since it allows the additional fixation and alignment that diaphyseal fill affords. Short nails should be discouraged since they can “toggle” in the meta-diaphysis and do not engage the diaphysis to improve coronal alignment. Plates can be used with any implant type and any length of distal fragment. The challenge with either fixation strategy is obtaining stable fixation of the distal fragment while maintaining length, alignment, and rotation. Fixation opportunities in the distal fragment can be limited due to obstacles caused by femoral component lugs, boxes, stems, cement mantles, and areas of stress shielding or osteolysis. Modern lateral locked plates can be inserted in a biologically friendly submuscular extra-periosteal fashion. More recent developments with polyaxial locked screws (that allow angulation prior to end-point locking) may offer even more versatility when distal fragment fixation is challenging. The goal of fixation is to obtain as many long locked screws in the distal fragment as possible. High union rates have been reported with modern locked plating techniques, however, biplanar fluoroscopic vigilance is required to prevent malalignments, typically valgus, distraction, and distal fragment hyperextension

Aims

Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS), is a method to achieve the intra-operative correction of long bone deformities using a hexapod external fixator before definitive internal fixation with minimally invasive stabilisation techniques.

The aims of this study were to determine the reliability of this method in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing femoral deformity correction, with a minimum six-month follow-up, to assess the complications and to define the ideal group of patients for whom this treatment is appropriate.