The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is considered as an important stabilizer of the knee joint. This ligament prevents anterolateral subluxation of the proximal tibia on the femur when the knee is flexed and internally rotated. Injury of the ALL was not investigated in patients with knee dislocation. The aim of the current research is to study the prevalence and characteristics of ALL injury in dislocated knees. A retrospective review of charts and radiological images was done for patients who underwent multiligamentous knee reconstruction surgery for knee dislocation in our institution from May 2008 to December 2016. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to describe the ALL injury. The association of ALL injury with other variables related to the injury and the patient's background features was examined. Forty-eight patients (49 knees) were included. The mean age of the patients was 32.3 ± 10.6 years. High energy trauma was the mechanism of dislocation in 28 (57.1%) knees. Thirty-one knees (63.3%) were classified as knee dislocation (KD) type IV. Forty-five (91.8%) knees had a complete ALL injury and three (6.1%) knees had incomplete ALL injury. Forty (81.6%) knees had a complete ALL injury at the proximal fibres of the ALL, while 23 (46.9%) knees had complete distal ALL injury. None of the 46 (93.9%) knees with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury had normal proximal ALL fibres (p = 0.012). Injury to the distal fibres of the ALL, as well as overall ALL injury, were not associated with any other variables (p >0.05). Moreover, all patients with associated tibial plateau fractures (9, 18.4%) had abnormality of the proximal fibres of the ALL (p = 0.033). High grade ALL injury is highly prevalent among dislocated knees. The outcomes of reconstructing the ALL in multiligamentous knee reconstruction surgery should be investigated in future studies

Hinged elbow orthoses (HEO) are often used to allow protected motion of the unstable elbow. However, biomechanical studies have not shown HEO to improve the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. This lack of effectiveness may be due to the straight hinge of current HEO designs which do not account for the native carrying angle of the elbow. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a custom-designed HEO with adjustable valgus angulation on stabilizing the LCL deficient elbow. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The adjustable HEO was secured to the arm and its effect with 0°, 10°, and 20° (BR00, BR10, BR20) of valgus angulation was investigated. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. We examined 5 elbow states, intact, LCLI, BR00, BR10, BR20. There were significant differences in varus and ER angulation between different elbow states with the forearm both pronated and supinated (P=0 for all). The LCLI state with or without the brace resulted in significant increases in varus angulation and ER of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the intact state (P 0.05). The difference between each of the brace angles and the LCLI state ranged from 1.1° to 2.4° for varus angulation and 0.5° to 1.6° for ER. Although there was a trend toward decreasing varus and external rotation angulation of the ulnohumeral articulation with the application of this adjustable HEO, none of the brace angles examined in this biomechanical investigation was able to fully restore the stability of the LCL deficient elbow. This lack of stabilizing effect may be due to the weight of the brace exerting unintentional varus and torsional forces on the unstable elbow. Previous investigations have shown that the varus arm position is highly unstable in the LCL deficient elbow. Our results demonstrate that application of an HEO with an adjustable carrying angle does not sufficiently stabilize the LCL deficient elbow in this highly unstable position and varus arm position should continue to be avoided in the rehabilitation programs of an LCL deficient elbow

The role of anconeus in elbow stability has been a long-standing debate. Anatomical and electromyographic studies have suggested a potential role as a stabilizer. However, to our knowledge, no clinical or biomechanical studies have investigated its role in improving the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. Seven cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The anconeus tendon and its aponeurosis were sutured in a Krackow fashion and tensioned to 10N and 20N through a transosseous tunnel at its origin. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. During active motion, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in varus angulation (5.3°±2.9°, P=.0001 pronation, 3.5°±3.4°, P=.001 supination) and external rotation (ER) (8.6°±5.8°, P=.001 pronation, 7.1°±6.1°, P=.003 supination) of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the control state (varus angle −2.8°±3.4° pronation, −3.3°±3.2° supination, ER angle 2.1°±5.6° pronation, 1.6°±5.8° supination). Tensioning of the anconeus significantly decreased the varus angulation (−1.2°±4.5°, P=.006 for 10N in pronation, −3.9°±4°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, −4.3°±4°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −5.3°±4.2°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) and ER angle (2.6°±4.5°, P=.008 for 10N in pronation, 0.3°±5°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, 0.1°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −0.8°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) of the injured elbow. Comparing anconeus tensioning to the control state, there was no significant difference in varus-valgus angulation except with anconeus tensioning to 20N with the forearm in supination which resulted in less varus angulation (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.267 for 20N in pronation, P=.604 for 10N in supination, P=.030 for 20N in supination). Although there were statistically significant differences in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state (except with anconeus tensioning to 10N with the forearm in pronation which was not significantly different), anconeus tensioning resulted in decreased external rotation angle compared to the control state (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.020 for 20N in pronation, P=.033 for 10N in supination, P=.001 for 20N in supination). In the highly unstable varus elbow orientation, anconeus tensioning restores the in vitro stability of an LCL deficient elbow during simulated active motion with the forearm in both pronation and supination. Interestingly, there was a significant difference in varus-valgus angulation between 20N anconeus tensioning with the forearm supinated and the control state, with less varus angulation for the anconeus tensioning which suggests that loads less than 20N is sufficient to restore varus stability during active motion with the forearm supinated. Similarly, the significant difference observed in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state suggests that lesser degrees of anconeus tensioning would be sufficient to restore the posterolateral instability of an LCL deficient elbow. These results may have several clinical implications such as a potential role for anconeus strengthening in managing symptomatic lateral elbow instability

Previous biomechanical studies of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries and their surgical repair, reconstruction and rehabilitation have primarily relied on gravity effects with the arm in the varus position. The application of torsional moments to the forearm manually in the laboratory is not reproducible, hence studies to date likely do not represent forces encountered clinically. The aim of this investigation was to develop a new biomechanical testing model to quantify posterolateral stability of the elbow using an in vitro elbow motion simulator. Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. A threaded screw was then inserted on the dorsal aspect of the proximal ulna and a weight hanger was used to suspend 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight from the screw head to allow torsional moments to be applied to the ulna. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. Ulnohumeral rotation was recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare elbow states (intact, LCLI, and LCLI with 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight). During active motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of weights did not significantly increase the external rotation (ER) of the ulnohumeral articulation (10°±7°, P=.268 400g, 10.5°±7.1°, P=.156 600g, 11°±7.2°, P=.111 800g) compared to the LCLI state (8.4°±6.4°) with the forearm pronated. However, with the forearm supinated, the addition of 800g of weight significantly increased the ER (9.2°±5.9°, P=.038) compared to the LCLI state (5.9°±5.5°) and the addition of 400g and 600g of weights approached significance (8.2°±5.7°, P=.083 400g, 8.7°±5.9°, P=.054 600g). During passive motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.0001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of 600g and 800g but not 400g resulted in a significant increase in ER of the ulnohumeral articulation (9.3°±7.8°, P=.103 400g, 11.2°±6.2°, P=.004 600g, 12.7°±6.8°, P=.006 800g) compared to the LCLI state (3.7°±5.4°) with the forearm pronated. With the forearm supinated, the addition of 400g, 600g, and 800g significantly increased the ER (11.7°±6.7°, P=.031 400g, 13.5°±6.8°, P=.019 600g, 14.9°±6.9°, P=.024 800g) compared to the LCLI state (4.3°±6.6°). This investigation confirms a novel biomechanical testing model for studying PLRI. Moreover, it demonstrates that the application of even small amounts of torsional moment on the forearm with the arm in the varus position exacerbates the rotational instability seen with the LCL deficient elbow. The effect of torsional loading was significantly worse with the forearm supinated and during passive elbow motion. This new model allows for a more provocative testing of elbow stability after LCL repair or reconstruction. Furthermore, this model will allow for smaller sample sizes to be used while still demonstrating clinically significant differences. Future biomechanical studies evaluating LCL injuries and their repair and rehabilitation should consider using this testing protocol

Knee dislocation is a rare injury in high energy trauma, but it is even rarer in low energy injuries. We present, to our knowledge, the only case in the world literature of knee dislocation following a cricketing injury. The patient was a 46 year old recreational fast bowler who, whilst bowling, slipped on the pitch on the follow through. He sustained an anteromedial knee dislocation which was reduced under intravenous sedation. He also sustained a neuropraxia of the common peroneal nerve with grade 2 weakness of ankle and toe dorsiflexion. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmed a complete rupture of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and postero-lateral corner (PLC). Patient underwent surgical reconstruction and repair of his PLC along with repair of LCL with combination of anchor sutures and metal staple within 72 hours of the injury. He was treated in a cast brace. The ACL insufficiency was treated conservatively. Patient made an uneventful recovery and follow up at 3 months revealed a full range of knee movements with asymptomatic ACL laxity

Introduction. There is little information available to surgeons regarding how the lateral soft-tissue structures prevent instability in knees implanted with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to quantify the lateral soft-tissue contributions to stability following cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. Methods. Nine cadaveric knees with CR TKA implants (PFC Sigma; DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction) were tested in a robotic system (Fig. 1) at full extension, 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion angles. ±90 N anterior-posterior force, ±8 Nm varus-valgus and ±5 Nm internal-external torque were applied at each flexion angle. The anterolateral structures (ALS, including the iliotibial band, anterolateral ligament and anterolateral capsule), the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), the popliteus tendon complex (Pop T) and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were then sequentially transected. After each transection the kinematics obtained from the original loads were replayed, and the decrease in force / moment equated to the relative contributions of each soft-tissue to stabilising the applied loads. Results. In the CR TKA knee, the LCL was found to be the primary restraint to varus laxity (Fig. 2, an average 56% across all flexion angles), and was significant in internal-external rotational stability (28% and 26% respectively) and anterior drawer (16%). The ALS restrained 25% of internal rotation (Fig. 3), whilst the PCL was significant in posterior drawer only at 60° and 90° flexion. The Pop T was not found to be significant in any tests. Conclusion. This study has for the first time delineated the relative contributions of lateral structures to stability in the implanted knee. It was confirmed that the LCL is the major lateral structure in CR TKA stability throughout the arc of flexion. In the event of LCL deficiency, stability of the knee may only be restored by either changing to a more constrained implant or performing a reconstruction of the ligament. Furthermore, care should be taken when releasing the LCL to correct a valgus deformity as it may result in a combined rotational laxity pattern that cannot be overcome by the other passive lateral structures or the PCL. For figures, please contact authors directly

Lubricin is a proteoglycan that is a boundary lubricant in synovial joints and both a surface and collagen inter-fascicular lubricant in ligaments. The purpose of this study was to characterise the mRNA levels for lubricin in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) in aging and surgically-induced menopausal rabbits. We hypothesised that lubricin mRNA levels would be increased in ligaments from aging and menopausal rabbits compared with ligaments from normal rabbits. All four knee ligaments (ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL) were isolated from normal (1-year-old rabbits, n=8), aging (3-year-old rabbits, n=6), and menopausal (1-year-old rabbits fourteen weeks after surgical ovariohysterectomy, n=8) female New Zealand White rabbits. RT-qPCR was used to evaluate the mRNA levels for lubricin normalised to the housekeeping gene 18S. After removing outliers, data for normal, aging, and menopausal rabbits for each knee ligament (ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL) were compared using ANOVA with linear contrasts or Kruskal-Wallis test with Conover post-hoc analysis. For ACLs, the mRNA levels for lubricin were increased in menopausal and aging rabbits compared with normal rabbits (p<0.056). For PCLs, trends for increased lubricin mRNA levels were found when comparing menopausal and aging rabbits with normal rabbits (p<0.092). For MCLs, the mRNA levels for lubricin were increased in menopausal and aging rabbits compared with normal rabbits (p<0.050). For LCLs, no differences in lubricin mRNA levels were detected comparing the three groups. For all four knee ligaments (ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL), no differences in lubricin mRNA levels were detected comparing the ligaments from menopausal rabbits with those from aging rabbits. Lubricin plays a role in collagen fascicle lubrication in ligaments (1,2). Increased lubricin gene expression was associated with mechanical changes (including decreased modulus and increased failure strain) in the aging rabbit MCL (3). Detection of similar molecular changes in the ACL, and possibly the PCL, may indicate that their mechanical properties may also change as a result of increased lubricin gene expression, thereby potentially pre-disposing these ligaments to damage accumulation. Compared to aging ligaments, aging tendons exhibited decreased lubricin gene and protein expression, and increased stiffness (4). Although opposite changes than aging ligaments, these findings support the relationship between lubricin and modulus/stiffness. The similarities between ligaments in the aging and menopausal groups may suggest that surgically-induced menopause results in a form of accelerated aging in the rabbit ACL, MCL and possibly PCL

Passive knee stability is provided by the soft tissue envelope which resists abnormal motion. There is a consensus amongst orthopedic surgeons that a good outcome in TKA requires equal tension in the medial and the lateral compartment of the knee joint, as well as equal tension in the flexion and extension gap. The purpose of this study was to quantify the ligament laxity in the normal non-arthritic knee before and after standard posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA). We hypothesized that the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) will show minimal changes in length when measured directly by extensometers in the native human knee during varus/valgus laxity testing. We also hypothesized that due to differences in material properties and surface geometry, native laxity is difficult to be completely reconstructed using contemporary types of PS-TKA. Methods:. A total of 6 specimens were used to perform this in vitro cadaver test using extensometers to provide numerical values for laxity and varus-valgus tilting in the frontal plane. See Fig. 1 The test set-up. Findings:. This study enabled a very precise measurement of varus and valgus laxity as compared with the clinical assessment which is a subjective measure. The strains in both ligaments in the replaced knee were different from those in the native knee. Both ligaments were stretched in extension, in flexion the MCL tends to relax and the LCL remains tight. Fig. 2 Initial and maximal strain values in the MCL during valgus and varus laxity testing in different flexion angles. a: intact knee, b: replaced knee. and Fig. 3 Initial and maximal strain values in the LCL during valgus and varus laxity testing indifferent flexion angles. a: intact knee, b: replaced knee. Interpretation:. As material properties and surface geometry of the replaced knee add stiffness to the joint, we recommend when using a this type of PS-TKA to avoid overstuffing the joint in order to obtain varus/valgus laxity close to the native joint

Introduction. A prospective study was done using Kirschner (K) wires to internally fix capitellum fractures and its results were analysed. Materials/Methods. Since 1989, unstable displaced 17 capitellum fractures were anatomically reduced and internally fixed by inserting K wires in coronal plane from the capitellum into trochlea. The lateral end of wires were bent in form of a staple behind the fracture plane and anchored into the lateral humeral condyle with pre-drilled holes. Additional screws were used in 2 cases to stabilise the lateral pillar comminution. The capitellum was exposed with a limited modified lateral elbow approach between anconeus and extensor carpi ulnaris. The capsule was reflected anteriorly to expose the capitellum and trochlea. The deeper dissection was limited anterior to lateral collateral ligament (LCL) keeping it intact. The capitellum fragment was reposition under the radial head and anatomically reduced by full flexion of elbow and then internally fixed. Total 17 patients (7 males and 10 females) with average ages 34.8 years(14 to 75) had fractures, Type I: (Hans Steinthal #) 12, Type II: (Kocher Lorez #) 1, and Type III: (Broberg and Morrey #) 4. Post-operatively the patients were not given any immobilisation and were mobilised immediately. Results. Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically. Average followup was 31.7 (18–35) months. Capitellum fractures healed in all the patients. Mayo elbow score was excellent in 12, good in 4, and fair in 1 patient. Average elbow ROM was 5 to 132 degrees, pronation 84.5 (79–90) degrees and supination 88 (85–91) degrees. Complications seen were wire pain in 4 patients, loosening of wires in 2 which required early removal. We did not see any infection, non-union or avascular necrosis in the time scale we studied. Conclusions. We found a simple manoeuvre of hyper-flexion of elbow reduced the capitellum anatomically, and K wires stapling technique to be very easy and stable. A limited exposure of capitellum helped to restore immediate stable elbow with good function

There are basically 4 ways advocated to determine the proper femoral component rotation during TKA: (1) The Trans-epicondylar Axis, (2) Perpendicular to the “Whiteside Line,” (3) Three to five degrees of external rotation off the posterior condyles, and (4) Rotation of the component to a point where there is a balanced symmetric flexion gap. This last method is the most logical and functionally, the most appropriate. Of interest is the fact that the other 3 methods often yield flexion gap symmetry, but the surgeon should not be wed to any one of these individual methods at the expense of an unbalanced knee in flexion. In correcting a varus knee, the knee is balanced first in extension by the appropriate medial release and then balanced in flexion by the appropriate rotation of the femoral component. In correcting a valgus knee, the knee can be balanced first in flexion by the femoral component rotation since balancing in extension almost never involves release of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) but rather release of the lateral retinaculum. If a rare LCL release is anticipated for extension balancing, then it would be performed prior to determining the femoral rotation since the release may open up the lateral flexion gap to a point where even more femoral component rotation is needed to close down that lateral gap. It is important to know and accept the fact that some knees will require internal rotation of the femoral component to yield flexion gap symmetry. The classic example of this is a knee that has previously undergone a valgus tibial osteotomy that has led to a valgus tibial joint line. In such a case, if any of the first 3 methods described above is utilised for femoral component rotation, it will lead to a knee that is very unbalanced in flexion being much tighter laterally than medially. A LCL release to open the lateral gap will be needed, increasing the complexity of the case. My experience has shown that intentional internal rotation of the femoral component when required is well-tolerated and rarely causes problems with patellar tracking. It is also of interest to note that mathematical calculations reveal that internally rotating a femoral component as much as 4 degrees will displace the trochlear groove no more that 2–3 mm (depending on the FC size), an amount easily compensated for by undersizing the patellar component and shifting it medially those few mm. There are basically 3 ways to determine the proper tibial component rotation during TKA: (1) Anatomically cap the tibial cut surface with an asymmetric tibial component, (2) Align the tibial rotation relative to a fixed anatomic tibial landmark (most surgeons use this method and align relative to the medial aspect of the tibial tubercle), (3) Rotate the tibial component to a point where there is rotational congruency in extension between the femoral and tibial articulating surfaces. This third method must be used with fixed bearing arthroplasties (especially with conforming articulations) to avoid rotational incongruency between the components during weight-bearing that can create abnormal and deleterious torsional forces on posterior stabilised posts, insert tray interfaces and bone-cement interfaces. Rotating platform articulations can tolerate rotational mismatch unless it is to a point where the polyethylene insert rotates excessively and causes symptomatic soft tissue impingement

Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee remain a challenging orthopaedic problem. Studies evaluating PCL and PLC reconstruction have failed to demonstrate a strong correlation between the degree of knee laxity as measured by uniplanar testing and subjective outcome or patient satisfaction. The effect that changing the magnitude of posterior tibial slope has on multiplanar, rotational stability of the PCL-deficient knee has yet to be determined. We aimed to evaluate the effect that changes in posterior tibial slope would have on static and dynamic stability of the PCL-PLC deficient knee. Ten knees were used for this study. Navigated posterior drawer and standardised reverse mechanised pivot shift maneuvers were performed in the intact knee and after sectioning the PCL, the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), the popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and the popliteus muscle tendon (POP). Navigated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was performed to obtain the desired change in tibial plateau slope (+5® or −5® from native slope). We then repeated the posterior drawer and the reverse mechanised pivot shift test for each of the two altered slope conditions. Mean posterior tibial translation during the posterior drawer in the intact knee was 1.4 mm (SD = 0.48 mm). In the PCL-PLC deficient knee, posterior tibial translation increased to 18 mm (SD = 5.7 mm) (P < 0.001). Increasing the amount of posterior tibial slope by 5® reduced posterior tibial translation to 12 mm (SD = 4.7 mm) (P < 0.01). Decreasing the amount of posterior slope by 5® compared to the native knee, increased posterior tibial translation to 21 mm (SD = 6.8 mm) (P < 0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between the magnitude of tibial plateau slope and the magnitude of the reverse pivot shift (R2 = 0.71; P < 0.0001). Mean posterior tibial translation during the reverse mechanised pivot shift test in the intact knee was 7.8 mm (SD = 2.8 mm). In the PCL-PLC deficient knee, posterior tibial translation increased to 26 mm (SD = 5.6 mm) (P < 0.001). Increasing the amount of posterior tibial slope by 5® reduced posterior tibial translation to 21 mm (SD = 6.7 mm) (P < 0.01). Decreasing the amount of posterior slope by 5® compared to the native knee, increased posterior tibial translation to 34 mm (SD = 8.2 mm) (P < 0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between the magnitude of tibial plateau slope and the magnitude of the reverse pivot shift (R2 = 0.72; P < 0.0001). Decreasing the magnitude of posterior slope of the tibial plateau resulted in an increase in the magnitude of posterior tibial translation during the posterior drawer and the reverse mechanised pivot shift test in the PCL-PLC deficient knee. Conversely, increasing the slope of the tibial plateau reduced the amount of posterior tibial translation during the posterior drawer and the reverse mechanised pivot shift test. However, the effect of the increase in slope was not sufficient to reduce posterior tibial translation to levels similar to those of the intact knee

Over the last two decades, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions have gained popularity, while the use of extraarticular reconstructions has decreased. However, the biomechanical rationale behind the lateral extraarticular sling has not been adequately studied. By understanding its effect on knee stability, it may be possible to identify specific situations in which lateral extraarticular tenodesis may be advantageous. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the ability of a lateral extraarticular sling to restore native kinematics to the ACL deficient knee, with and without combined intraarticular anatomic ACL reconstruction. Additionally, we aimed to characterise the isometry of four possible femoral tunnel positions for the lateral extraarticular sling. Eight fresh frozen hip-to-toe cadavers were used in this study. Navigated Lachman and mechanised pivot shift examinations were performed on ACL itact and deficient knees. Three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: Single bundle anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction, Lateral extraarticular sling, Combined intraarticular ACL reconstruction and lateral extraarticular sling. After all stability tests were completed, we quantified the isometry of four possible femoral tunnel positions for the lateral extraarticular sling using the Surgetics navigation system. A single tibial tunnel position was identified and digitised over Gerdy's tubercle. Four possible graft positions were identified on the lateral femoral condyle: the top of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL); the top of the septum; the ideal tunnel position, as defined by the navigation system's own algorithm; and the actual tunnel position used during testing, described in the literature as the intersection of the linear projections of the LCL and the septum over the lateral femoral condyle. For each of the four tunnel positions, the knee was cycled from 0 to 90® of flexion and fiber length was recorded at 30® intervals, therefore quantiying the magnitude of anisometry for each tunnel position. Stability testing: Sectioning of the ACL resulted in an increase in Lachman (15mm, p = 0.01) and mechanised pivot shift examination (6.75mm, p = 0.04) in all specimens compared with the intact knee. Anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction restored the Lachman (6.7mm, p = 3.76) and pivot shift (−3.5mm, p = 0.85) to the intact state. With lateral extraarticular sling alone, there was a trend towards increased anterior translation with the Lachman test (9.2mm, p = 0.50). This reconstruction restored the pivot shift to the intact state. (1.25mm, p = 0.73). Combined intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction restored the Lachman (6.2mm, p = 2.11) and pivot shift (−3.75mm, p = 0.41) to the intact state. There was no significant difference between intraarticular alone and combined intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction. (p = 1.88). Isometry: The ideal tunnel position calculated by the navigation system was identified over the lateral femoral condyle, beneath the mid-portion of the LCL. The anisometry for the ideal tunnel position was significantly lower (5.9mm; SD = 1.8mm; P<0.05) than the anisometry of the actual graft position (14.9mm; SD = 4mm), the top of the LCL (13.9mm; SD = 4.3mm) and the top of the septum (12mm; SD = 2.4mm). In the isolated acute ACL deficient knee, the addition of a lateral extraarticular sling to anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction provides little biomechanical advantage and is not routinely recommended. Isolated lateral extraarticular sling does control the pivot shift, and may be an option in the revision setting or in the lower demand patient with functional instability. Additionally, the location of the femoral tunnel traditionally used results in a significantly more anisometric graft than the navigation's system mathematical ideal location. However, the location of this ideal tunnel placement lies beneath mid-portion of the fibers of the LCL, which would not be clinically feasible