Introduction. Knee arthroscopy can be used for ligamentous repair, reconstruction and to reduce burden of infection. Understanding and feeling confident with knee arthroscopy is therefore a highly important skillset for the orthopaedic surgeon. However, with limited training or experience, furthered by reduced practical education due to COVID-19, this skill can be under-developed amongst trainee surgeons. Methods. At a single institution, ten junior doctors (FY1 to CT2), were recruited as a part of a five, two-hour session, training programme utilising the Simbionix® ARTHRO Mentor knee arthroscopy simulator, supplemented alongside educational guidance with a consultant orthopaedic knee surgeon. All students had minimal to no levels of prior arthroscopic experience. Exercises completed included maintaining steadiness, image centring and orientation, probe triangulation, arthroscopic knee examination, removal of loose bodies and meniscectomy. Pre and post experience questionnaires and quantitative repeat analysis on simulation exercises were undertaken to identify levels of improvement. Results. Comparing pre and post experience questionnaires significant improvements in levels of confidence were noted in the following domains: naming arthroscopic instruments, port positioning and insertion, recognising normal anatomy arthroscopically, holding and using arthroscopic instruments and assisting in a live theatre setting (p<0.05). Significant improvements were also noted in time taken to complete and distance covered in metres, of the simulated exercises on repeat performance (p<0.05). Conclusion. Overall, with only five sessions under senior guidance, using a simulator such as the ARTHRO Mentor, significant improvements in both levels of confidence and skill can be developed even among individuals with no prior experience

Introduction. To determine if elite athletes can return to professional sport after MCL or posterolateral (PLC) reconstruction using LARS ligaments. The secondary aims are to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LARS by reporting sport longevity, subsequent surgeries, and complications. Methods. A retrospective review of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions, utilising a LARS synthetic ligament, by 3 sports knee surgeons between 2013 and 2020 was undertaken. All elite athletes aged over 16 years and a minimum of 2 years post reconstruction were included. No LARS were used for ACL reconstructions, and they were excluded if a LARS ligament was used for a PCL reconstruction. Return to play (RTP) was defined as competing at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport. Results. Sixty-four (84.2%) MCL reconstructions and 12 (15.8%) PLC reconstructions were included. 52 (68.4%) underwent concomitant autograft cruciate(s) reconstruction including 6 (7.8%) bicruciate reconstructions. The mean age was 25.1 years (SD +/− 4.50). 35 (46.1%) were footballers and 35 (46.1%) were rugby players. Sixty-seven athletes (88.2%) returned to elite sport, 7 (9.2%) did not RTP and RTP status was unknown for 2 (2.6%) (Figure 1). 65 out of 67 (97.0%) RTP at the same/higher Tegner level. 56 (83.6%) and 20 (57.1%) were still playing at 2- and 5-years post-surgery Six (7.9%) players required further surgery due to irritation from the metal fixation implants. One had an inflammation adjacent to the synthetic material at the femoral end and the other cases involved the tibial staples. All six cases were able to RTP. One athlete, following bicruciate /MCL surgery had the LARS removed due to laxity. There was one MCL re-rupture, sustained while jumping, 4 years after returning to football. Conclusions. Utilising LARS in extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions allows 88.2% of athletes with a variety of knee ligament injuries to return to elite sport. The results compare well regarding RTP, complication, and revision rates with the published evidence for other types of MCL and PLC grafts. This, coupled with 57% of athletes still playing 5 years post-surgery suggests the LARS is safe and effective in these cases. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopaedic operation. The use of a four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis hamstring graft (STG) is a well established method of reconstruction to restore knee stability. Aim. To assess the ten year subjective knee function and activity level following STG anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods. 86 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction by two knee surgeons in the year 1999. 80 patients meet the inclusion criteria of STG reconstruction by a standard operative technique. Patient evaluation was by completion of a Lysholm Knee Score and Tegner Activity Level Scale at a minimum of ten years from reconstructive surgery. This was by initial postal questionnaire and subsequent telephone follow-up. Results. 80 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction with average age 30.9 years +/− 8.8 (15 to 58 years). There was a 77.5% (62 patients) response at ten years to the questionnaire. The mean Lysholm Knee Score at ten years was 78.4 +/− 12.8 (39 to 90). The mean activity level had decreased from 8.3 to 5.3 at ten years according to the Tegner Activity Scale. 11 patients required medial and lateral partial menisectomies at the time of original reconstruction. This group of patients had a Lysholm Knee Score of 67.6 +/− 19.1 and Tegner Activity Scale of 3.9 at ten years following reconstruction. 17 of the 80 patients (21.25%) required re-operation because of further knee symptoms, with 4 patients requiring revision of the anterior cruciate following re-rupture. Conclusion. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four-strand STG hamstring graft provides a reliable method of restoring knee function with a 5% revision rate for re-rupture at ten years. Combined partial medial and lateral menisectomy at the time of the initial reconstruction is a poor prognostic indicator for function at ten years